Think again, idiot, or better yet try thinking for yourself if you're able.KC Scott wrote:a nonpartisan think tank run
Either that or $86 billion in spending cuts. In any event, there is no such thing as "lower income taxpayers." The entire study is one gigantic strawman. Here's a link to Romney's plan. Note that there is no mention whatsoever of "revenue neutrality."Here's a summary of the report:
neutrality mathematically necessitates a shift in the tax burden of at least $86 billion away from high-income taxpayers onto lower- and middle-income taxpayers.
http://www.mittromney.com/issues/tax
His plan is to cut taxes and spending.To repair the nation’s tax code, marginal rates must be brought down to stimulate entrepreneurship, job creation, and investment, while still raising the revenue needed to fund a smaller, smarter, simpler government.