Sick People

[Van]

They probably cheated on their taxes.

[LTS TRN 2]

Van, perhaps most nauseating about your simplistic fox hole of denial is your use of "her" when referring to the Zionist race-state experiment. Denoting gender to a nation is the clearest sign of propagandic bullshit coming your way. Are you a fan of Norman Podhoretz? How about Gerald Posner? All you do is dig yourself deeper when you increasingly rely on simple formulas and even more simplistic--and twisted--logic of ends justifying (and necessitating) means. By such logic the Lavon Affair was necessary and proper--and the Zionazi government agreed, giving the surviving agents medals! So..are you really so utterly fucked up as to be the outright Israel Firster you so robustly if clumsily declare? Really? No wonder you don't know shit about music.

[Van]

Sorry, Nick, but standard literary tradition is to refer to a nation (or a car, or a guitar, or a boat, or...) in the feminine sense. Don't like it? Convinced that it's indicative of some deeper nefarious intent?

Oh well. That's what psycho morons do, so knock yourself out.

[LTS TRN 2]

Actually it's a casual form of usage and is indeed a clear indication that the speaker is about to propagandize something. Just like you. As usual your observation is simplistic and uninformed. Many nations use "fatherland" and others use "motherland." Now..which do you suppose the apartheid bunker state is? I'll give you a hint...it's the same as the other National Socialist hyper-military race-state from Germany a few decades ago. And what's with your cowardly feint away from dealing with the Lavon Affair--both as an actual incident, and as an indicator of just how your "ends necessitate means" is really dangerous quackery? Are you just tired and lazy, or a nervous fraud all the way down?

[Van]

No nation refers to itself in the male sense, as in "I will fight to keep him free." Nope, not even those nations that use "fatherland" to describe their country. They still use the female gender any time the possessive is required and any time they're not going to the specific nickname.

In any case, my use of accepted convention is indicative of absolutely nothing other than an awareness and respect for literary norms.

[LTS TRN 2]

Van, your tedious niggling is annoying at best. I can understand why you would want to divert from actually facing the facts of your weak logic and simplistic conclusions which are themselves indefensible. And by that I mean that you can't--or certainly won't try--to defend any of the many duplicitous and murderous "necessary' actions by the Zionazis during their brief 65-year existence. None. When pressed, you slither into some rote chant like "Israel had to founded, and it had to be founded there" or "she must defend herself no matter what" similar twaddle. Yours is a lazy and shameful excuse for a brain. And just think, the base of support for the fake state is mush brained Christers and whatever the fuck you are.

[Van]

You should just be glad Israel has limited her responses to the small things of which you accuse her. She really should have taken the usual steps to solve the problem once and for all.

As always, it's not my fault that you're too much of a twisted-hatred-of-Jews-filled-freak to understand how the basic rules of the world have worked for thousands of years.

[LTS TRN 2]

Oh, the Lavon Affair, where they were about to bomb Americans and Brits to start a false flag machination was a "small thing"?

And Pollard stealing tremendous amounts of top secret nuclear codes and selling it all to the Russians? We should be happy "she" kept it so small?

And really, Van, what the fuck do you mean "solve the problem"? You know that's exactly what was discussed at the Wannsee conference of 1942, right? Except this time the Zionazis are desperate to...well, do what?

Think about it before you fold into your simplistic reflex response. What is the optimal outcome for the most ardent Zionist? Perhaps the entire land of Palestine as Israel proper--the whole West Bank, all of Jerusalem--without that pesky mosque--and the Gaza properly cleared and rendered into the world's largest desalinization plant? The Golan Heights as well, and a absolutely secure border all around? Is that the ultimate dream? Well, it's quite obviously impossible. And not just for the practical reasons of basic demography (another area of your acute denial) and the catastrophic results of any sort of IDF Attila attack on the region, but for obvious moral reasons--and this is a complete black hole in your head space. And if it can't be achieved, and if the only path forward is in fact increased violence, hatred,
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/world ... wanted=all
false fire wars and carnage, well...why continue it at all?

Think...after WWII in Poland, there were a lot more non-Jewish Poles killed by the Nazis, and a lot more non-Jewish Poles rendered homeless refugees. Same with Germany, Russia, the Baltics, etc. So...why should victims who happened to be Jewish get some license to move to the heart of the Arab world and establish a hyper-military race-state experiment in the first place? It was the Zionist groups who prevented Jewish refugees from coming to the U.S. and Britain, etc. Why don't you see that this entire event has been a dreadful and really criminal endeavor? The results speak for themselves.