More trouble for USC?
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
More trouble for USC?
http://www.dailynews.com/breakingnews/c ... s-athletes
Already on probation...this one could leave marks....
Already on probation...this one could leave marks....
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
Re: More trouble for USC?
Don't people understand?
Any contact from glorious U$C is a gift not to be foresaken.
Players should be paying them...
Any contact from glorious U$C is a gift not to be foresaken.
Players should be paying them...
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Re: More trouble for USC?
This one is merely a rehashing of something the NCAA already investigated and dropped a couple of years ago. Haden is bending over backwards to cooperate with them, so I highly doubt anything will come of it. Besides, what are they going to do, vacate USC's glorious Emerald Bowl win for which McKnight was suspended anyway?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: More trouble for USC?
There's also this: http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/stor ... painkiller
Oh, and there's that little bit about Laney Kitten not allowing opponents to do Friday walk-throughs at the Mausoleum.
Guess Van wants to focus on ND stories to distract attention.
Oh, and there's that little bit about Laney Kitten not allowing opponents to do Friday walk-throughs at the Mausoleum.
Guess Van wants to focus on ND stories to distract attention.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: More trouble for USC?
The Armstead deal is also nothing, and I'm sure you know that.
Otherwise, USC is ranked #1 in the country. I don't really need to distract attention from them.
Otherwise, USC is ranked #1 in the country. I don't really need to distract attention from them.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: More trouble for USC?
schmick wrote: USC owns the stadium now
I think I may have mentioned this before....
.... you're a fucking idiot.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae8e/5ae8eb6cab235996fe2d761b50a36c636ef68657" alt="Image"
Re: More trouble for USC?
Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: More trouble for USC?
If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up?
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: More trouble for USC?
Terry in Crapchester wrote:If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up?
He probably wouldn't qualify academically at Alabama.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: More trouble for USC?
The lawyer in me thinks that a lawsuit might be stronger against the manufacturer of the painkiller and/or the federal government, due to failure to warn. But I don't know all the facts about the case.Van wrote:The Armstead deal is also nothing, and I'm sure you know that.
The merits of the lawsuit notwithstanding, though, this can't exactly be good publicity for USC when it comes to recruiting. Ordinarily, a heart attack within the next 4-5 years is probably damn near the last thing on the mind of a 17-18 year old kid. The Armstead case puts it front and center, however.
And while it could have happened just about anywhere, it DID happen at USC. So there is that.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: More trouble for USC?
It's just a frivolous lawsuit from a kid going for a cash grab when his dreams of an NFL career didn't pan out. It's a nonstory that won't affect recruiting at all. We're talking about USC here. They have the #1 ranked 2013 class.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13489
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: More trouble for USC?
Since when were schools allowed to sign football player early? signing day is still a season away. look no further than Kal at how many kids change their mind.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: More trouble for USC?
USC isn't Cal.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: More trouble for USC?
At that point, he was attending school in Pennsylvania. If you want to look at his home state, then his only option was UConn.schmick wrote:Dude wasnt from PennsylvaniaTerry in Crapchester wrote:If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up?
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.