More trouble for USC?

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6327
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

More trouble for USC?

Post by The Seer »

http://www.dailynews.com/breakingnews/c ... s-athletes

Already on probation...this one could leave marks....
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4956
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Carson »

Don't people understand?

Any contact from glorious U$C is a gift not to be foresaken.

Players should be paying them...
JPGettysburg wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Van »

This one is merely a rehashing of something the NCAA already investigated and dropped a couple of years ago. Haden is bending over backwards to cooperate with them, so I highly doubt anything will come of it. Besides, what are they going to do, vacate USC's glorious Emerald Bowl win for which McKnight was suspended anyway?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

There's also this: http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/ncf/stor ... painkiller

Oh, and there's that little bit about Laney Kitten not allowing opponents to do Friday walk-throughs at the Mausoleum.

Guess Van wants to focus on ND stories to distract attention.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Van »

The Armstead deal is also nothing, and I'm sure you know that.

Otherwise, USC is ranked #1 in the country. I don't really need to distract attention from them.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
M2
GOAT
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by M2 »

schmick wrote: USC owns the stadium now

I think I may have mentioned this before....


.... you're a fucking idiot.
Image
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by PSUFAN »

Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up? :lol:
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up? :lol:
If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31621
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Mikey »

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up? :lol:
If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.

He probably wouldn't qualify academically at Alabama.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

Van wrote:The Armstead deal is also nothing, and I'm sure you know that.
The lawyer in me thinks that a lawsuit might be stronger against the manufacturer of the painkiller and/or the federal government, due to failure to warn. But I don't know all the facts about the case.

The merits of the lawsuit notwithstanding, though, this can't exactly be good publicity for USC when it comes to recruiting. Ordinarily, a heart attack within the next 4-5 years is probably damn near the last thing on the mind of a 17-18 year old kid. The Armstead case puts it front and center, however.

And while it could have happened just about anywhere, it DID happen at USC. So there is that.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Van »

It's just a frivolous lawsuit from a kid going for a cash grab when his dreams of an NFL career didn't pan out. It's a nonstory that won't affect recruiting at all. We're talking about USC here. They have the #1 ranked 2013 class.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13489
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Left Seater »

Since when were schools allowed to sign football player early? signing day is still a season away. look no further than Kal at how many kids change their mind.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Van »

USC isn't Cal.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: More trouble for USC?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

schmick wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
PSUFAN wrote:Is there any substance to this, or not? Maybe we get Silas to come home? Should a rich booster get the lear jet warmed up? :lol:
If you apply the Schmick rule, USC never should have been allowed to get him in the first place. I guess his remaining options were Pitt and Temple.
Dude wasnt from Pennsylvania
At that point, he was attending school in Pennsylvania. If you want to look at his home state, then his only option was UConn.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Post Reply