Notre Dame to ACC
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Green Bay's population is five million? Sacramento has six million people?
It's all bullshit. Most any serious fan thinks of his team as 'we.' It doesn't matter whether it's a pro or college team. It's his team.
It's all bullshit. Most any serious fan thinks of his team as 'we.' It doesn't matter whether it's a pro or college team. It's his team.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
I said 10 times, not 100 times.
10 times 50-60,000 = 500-600,000.
10 times 50-60,000 = 500-600,000.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Never realized the Washington Nationals issued undergraduate degrees.Van wrote:Screwball never played for the Nats
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
:doh:Terry in Crapchester wrote:I said 10 times, not 100 times.
10 times 50-60,000 = 500-600,000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda60/cda605068f7df7767d20836747954deb21b306e9" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
When it comes to rooting for sports teams, what does that have to do with anything? Some fourteen-year-old kid from Austin can't consider the Texas Longhorns his team and refer to them as 'we' with his buddies simply because he never received a degree from the University of Texas? His father who has followed them since he was a child and who bleeds Burnt Orange can't either?Screw_Michigan wrote:Never realized the Washington Nationals issued undergraduate degrees.Van wrote:Screwball never played for the Nats
Nonsense. If you've supported something all your life, whether it's a sports team, a political party or a set of religious beliefs, you're perfectly within any non self-important douchebag—this is where you need to take a good look in the mirror—rights to refer to that entity as 'we.'
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
not to mention most of us watch our teams with friends who are also fans. "we" is the obvious pronoun in a collective setting.PSUFAN wrote: I agree. I think fans that back programs year after year have every reason to use "we". The programs definitely benefit from this emotional attachment in many ways. Emotional attachments are what make sports (especially college sports) compelling.
the only people who have a serious problem with "we" are insecure douchebags who predate hipsters in their obsession with pointless exclusivity or think they've honed in on some niggling linguistic point about who actually constitutes "we." the only use of "we" that raises my eyebrows is the hitherto could-give-a-fuck fan who suddenly starts asking about "our" next game only after the team's in line for a championship or something.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Racist.M Club wrote:niggling
And before you go off on me, realize that I'm kidding.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
I think it's sort of hilarious that both M Club and I used the exact same word, 'douchebag,' to describe Screwball and his self-serving nonsense of a 'take.'
Let's look at this a little more closely. Who are the three main proponents of Screwball's argument? Why, they're none other than Toejam, AP, and Screwball. I believe Jon also used to ring that same bell.
Nice intellectual company you're keeping there, Screwy. Once again, you embarrass Mgo.
Let's look at this a little more closely. Who are the three main proponents of Screwball's argument? Why, they're none other than Toejam, AP, and Screwball. I believe Jon also used to ring that same bell.
Nice intellectual company you're keeping there, Screwy. Once again, you embarrass Mgo.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
to be fair to screwy, he doesn't launch attacks from any sense of principle.Van wrote:I think it's sort of hilarious that both M Club and I used the exact same word, 'douchebag,' to describe Screwball and his self-serving nonsense of a 'take.'
Let's look at this a little more closely. Who are the three main proponents of Screwball's argument? Why, they're none other than Toejam, AP, and Screwball. I believe Jon also used to ring that same bell.
Nice intellectual company you're keeping there, Screwy. Once again, you embarrass Mgo.
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
True, unless you consider "Bitch, move your fat ass! I saw that empty dryer first!" a shining principle.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
I don't remember NOJ ever doing that, but if he did, he was all over the map, of sorts, on this particular topic. Long before he accidentally outed himself as Iowa State grad, I remember him complaining that Iowa State fans went to the "you didn't go there" card when addressing IowaFan (in hindsight, it seems clear he was talking about himself, but we didn't know it at the time). So at least on that point, it seems NOJ was the anti-Screwy, even if Screwy's use of this card is reserved strictly for ND subway alums.Van wrote:Let's look at this a little more closely. Who are the three main proponents of Screwball's argument? Why, they're none other than Toejam, AP, and Screwball. I believe Jon also used to ring that same bell.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Nah, I recall Jon going to the "you can't use 'we' unless you're a grad'' card too. Come to think of it, you know who else is wont to make a big deal over whether a person actually graduated from their team's school?
Shrubber.
So, that makes Toejam, AP, Shrubber, Screwball, and possibly Jon. Basically the Mount Rushmore of Board Piñatas. The only one missing is bradhusker.
Truly, brilliant minds think alike.
Shrubber.
So, that makes Toejam, AP, Shrubber, Screwball, and possibly Jon. Basically the Mount Rushmore of Board Piñatas. The only one missing is bradhusker.
Truly, brilliant minds think alike.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Shrub was the one who first made a big deal about me using "we" and "us" for ND in this thread.Van wrote:Come to think of it, you know who else is wont to make a big deal over whether a person actually graduated from their team's school?
Shrubber.
And I graduated from ND.
Maybe those painkillers are affecting his memory.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Notice that he never returned to the thread following your mention of dude's very own sig?
He probably forgot how to log back in.
He probably forgot how to log back in.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: Notre Dame to ACC
Going back to this point . . .
If that weren't the case, Syracuse and Rutgers -- neither exactly a football power -- wouldn't have gotten considerably more run than Kansas for Big Ten expansion. The Big Ten saw the opportunity to get the BTN into first-tier status in the NYC cable market, and that was all she wrote. Even so, of course, Syracuse and Rutgers could never be anything more than a spare part, not the brass ring itself. The Big Ten needed to get either ND or Texas onboard to do the large-scale expansion necessary to do that, and when they didn't accomplish that, having backed themselves into a corner on expansion, they had to settle for Nebraska, the best football program available.
I think there were more schools mentioned as potential candidates for Big Ten expansion than there were existing members of the Big Ten at the time, and Kansas never got anything more than a passing reference. Truth be told, it isn't even as much about football competitiveness as it is aboutKing Crimson wrote:Kansas is one of the top hoops programs in the nation, a member school in AAU....would the Big Ten (alleged criterion)...EVER have taken KU over Nebraska (which lost it's AAU status)?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e36e4/e36e4b51966300c101558040ac62e02c5f586a8d" alt="BODE :bode:"
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.