Beat Off

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:50 pm

Yes, it was obnoxious. Apologies.

Go Coogs' · Post by **Go Coogs'** » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:56 pm

Y'all are old.

lovebuzz · Post by **lovebuzz** » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:59 pm

Dee Snutz wrote:Yes, it was obnoxious. Apologies.

i thought i was hallucinating. glad i'm not.
ps: your takes are spot on.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:09 pm

Btw, Mgo, as for that Grammy, I have just as many of them as Led Zeppelin does.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:39 pm

Go Coogs' wrote:Y'all are old.

We're all getting old, Coogs'...getting old waiting for your radio show return...

:o

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:29 pm

Dee Snutz wrote:Btw, Mgo, as for that Grammy, I have just as many of them as Led Zeppelin does.

How in the fukk does LZ not have a grammy? Did rock bands even get grammies in the 70s?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:14 pm

smackaholic wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:Btw, Mgo, as for that Grammy, I have just as many of them as Led Zeppelin does.
How in the fukk does LZ not have a grammy? Did rock bands even get grammies in the 70s?

No. And the cool ones didn't show show up to accept them if they won one. Pink Floyd has one Grammy. It's a lifetime achievement Grammy. Which is pretty much a "Sorry, we fucked up" award.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:22 am

Papa Willie wrote:I'd look at it this way.

Say it's 1973, and you've got Moon, Bonham & Carl Palmer.

I think that Moon could do okay with the Zep stuff, though he'd actually have to calm down a bit. I think Bonham could play the Who easier than Moon could the Zep. Palmer could play both the Who & LZ - maybe with not as much power or energy.

Neither Moon nor Bonham would have a chance in fucking hell of playing ELP. Maybe a couple of others at that time could - somebody like Bill Bruford or Billy Cobham, but Moon or Bonham couldn't hang with something as sophisticated as Yes, ELP or the MO.

You got way to much stock invested in drummers. Nobody cares about drummers or musicians. If a singer isn't involved, nobody cares.

lovebuzz · Post by **lovebuzz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:30 am

Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:32 am

Okay, Dee Snutz is pretty much an idiot.

'Spray, with the inclusion of Palmer you're definitely moving the goalposts. Now you're including Prog Rock players, so why not toss in fusion and jazz types too and make it a whole new ballgame?

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:39 am

lovebuzz, responding to the appropriately named Dee Snutz, wrote:ps: your takes are spot on.

Wanna just go ahead and take your Mulligan?

ML@Coyote · Post by **ML@Coyote** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:41 am

Dee Snutz wrote:Nobody cares about drummers or musicians. If a singer isn't involved, nobody cares.

That may be true today, but it wasn't the case in the 70s. If I remember correctly, many liked LZ despite Plant's singing. We didn't listen to Hendrix primarily to hear his voice. Any group of choirboy's could have sung for Yes. There was a lot of great music in the 70s, not just great singers. And people cared about the music.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:52 am

It's not true today either, at least not among those types who actually enjoy and appreciate real music.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:25 am

lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.

Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:33 am

Van wrote:Okay, Dee Snutz is pretty much an idiot.

'Spray, with the inclusion of Palmer you're definitely moving the goalposts. Now you're including Prog Rock players, so why not toss in fusion and jazz types too and make it a whole new ballgame?

Actually, you're an idiot. Nobody gives a fuck about Carl Palmer or any drummer that ever lived. I can now pick up an Alesis SR-16 that will replace any drummer. For $100.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:39 am

Dee Snutz wrote:
Van wrote:Okay, Dee Snutz is pretty much an idiot.
Actually, you're an idiot.

How's the weather in KC?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:42 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:
Van wrote:Okay, Dee Snutz is pretty much an idiot.
Actually, you're an idiot.

How's the weather in KC?

What, you don't have a smartphone?

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:16 am

Dee Snutz wrote:
lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.
Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.

Who gives a shit? Why not just ask her to identify her favorite H.R. Pufnstuf character, or her favorite McNugget?

Christ, what are you, a thirteen-year-old girl?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:29 am

Van wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:
lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.
Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.
Who gives a shit? Why not just ask her to identify her favorite H.R. Pufnstuf character, or her favorite McNugget?

Christ, what are you, a thirteen-year-old girl?

What, thirteen yr old girls are irrelevant to you?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:32 am

Van wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:
lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.
Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.
Who gives a shit? Why not just ask her to identify her favorite H.R. Pufnstuf character, or her favorite McNugget?

Christ, what are you, a thirteen-year-old girl?

What, thirteen yr old girls are irrelevant to you? You're more sophisticated?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:45 am

The only reason a dude ever picked up a guitar, was to fuck chicks. Nobody gives a shit about the drummer. He's the guy chicks fuck when they miss the singer, then the guitarist, the other guitarist, the keyboardist, and then the bassist. If you're some fag arguing about who's the better drummer, you're obviously a fucking loser.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:47 am

Dee Snutz wrote:What, thirteen yr old girls are irrelevant to you?

Rack the Diego in Seattle troll.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:55 am

Loser 1: Bonham's Better
Loser 2: Fuck you! Moon rules
Pussy: Buh bye

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:05 am

I think people are confused, because you were in here waxing the finer points of musicianship, and now you're basically saying Pitbull and Lady Gaga are all that matter.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:08 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I think people are confused, because you were in here waxing the finer points of musicianship, and now you're basically saying Pitbull and Lady Gaga are all that matter.

To what educational program do we owe a debt of gratitude for your reading comprehension skills?

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:10 am

Wait a second. What the fuck is going on here? Did we seriously just go from bradhusker to something even worse?

Has T1B finally delved too deep, until at the last we've stumbled upon the darkest utter abyss of interwebs punishment, the heretofore undiscovered Tenth Circle of Hell?

You fucking assholes.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:16 am

Dee Snutz wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I think people are confused, because you were in here waxing the finer points of musicianship, and now you're basically saying Pitbull and Lady Gaga are all that matter.
To what educational program do we owe a debt of gratitude for your reading comprehension skills?

My reading comprehension skills observed you attempting to legitimize top 40 radio. Care to take a crack at the sort of god-awful outfits that populate top 40 radio?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:25 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I think people are confused, because you were in here waxing the finer points of musicianship, and now you're basically saying Pitbull and Lady Gaga are all that matter.
To what educational program do we owe a debt of gratitude for your reading comprehension skills?
My reading comprehension skills observed you attempting to legitimize top 40 radio. Care to take a crack at the sort of god-awful outfits that populate top 40 radio?

Your reading comprehension skills have left you looking like a moron. But please expound upon your argument that I've endeavored to legitimize top 40 radio.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:30 am

Btw, Lady Gaga is legitimately talented. I don't know who this Pitbull is that you speak of.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:35 am

This isn't going well for Deesnuts, not that I ever expected it would.

Please, keep trying.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:36 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:Btw, Lady Gaga is legitimately talented. I don't know who this Pitbull is that you speak of.
Have you got some of her pussy in your baking soda?

Wha?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:38 am

War Wagon wrote:This isn't going well for Deesnuts, not that I ever expected it would.

Please, keep trying.

Yes, it was going well for the douchebag that was claiming that Keith Moon/John Bonham rules.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:44 am

Dee Snutz wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:My reading comprehension skills observed you attempting to legitimize top 40 radio. Care to take a crack at the sort of god-awful outfits that populate top 40 radio?
Your reading comprehension skills have left you looking like a moron. But please expound upon your argument that I've endeavored to legitimize top 40 radio.

Umm, just a few posts up we were witness to this exchange...

Numb Nutz wrote:
lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.
Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.

You can't truly be this addled, not right out of the gate.

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:47 am

Van wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:My reading comprehension skills observed you attempting to legitimize top 40 radio. Care to take a crack at the sort of god-awful outfits that populate top 40 radio?
Your reading comprehension skills have left you looking like a moron. But please expound upon your argument that I've endeavored to legitimize top 40 radio.
Umm, just a few posts up we were witness to this exchange...

Numb Nutz wrote:
lovebuzz wrote:Nobody cares about musicians ?! What are you smoking ?!

ps: I've decided to start taking screen shots of all your posts, Dee... for reference and stuff.
Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.
You can't truly be this addled, not right out of the gate.

So you have the last top 40 instrumental?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:52 am

Papa Willie wrote:
Dee Snutz wrote:Nobody should confuse being an artist w a musician. As someone stated earlier, music is a high degree of math. Not completely, but innate understanding of meter is a fundamental component of music. I can put a metronome against two drummers and prove conclusively one drummer's superiority to another. Beyond that, it's all subjective. And every musician has the same 12 notes to work with. Someone else pointed out, John Lennon is not regarded as a stellar guitarist. But Lennon also once said "I'm an artist. And if you give me a Tuba and I'll bring you something out of it". Art is impossibly subjective. If you were to base your opinion on general consensus, Mariah Carey is the greatest recording artist of all time.
You sort of contradicted yourself there at points. AND - this is where your personality hit an awkward speed bump. AND - this is where you decided to troll.

#44. That's the number.

Wtf? What does any of this nonsense mean?

Dee Snutz · Post by **Dee Snutz** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:31 am

Papa Willie wrote:The onus of Boris Becker's "Children of the Colorado Spleen" is clearly upon you now.

Too bad your real talent was being an internet loser. How great would it have been if you were a real musician?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:46 am

Don't hate too much. Vannie in New Mexico here has the same problem.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:14 am

Then there's Screwball's favorite band, and hey, look, they even sort of have singing...

Gotta love a pre-op tranny who emotes through his broken vagina while rhapsodizing over chicks from The District with really gnarly balls.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 6:02 am

Yep, MGMT and Air France, the Daily Double of Estrogen-Rich Suck.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:04 pm

Dee Snutz wrote:Name the last top 40 hit that didn't involve a singer.

The answer is: Axel F (The Frog Song) by Crazy Frog, which reached #21 in 2005

Prior to that:

E by Drunkenmunky #25 in 2003
Sandstorm by Darude #28 in 2001
Auld Lang Syne (The Millennium Mix) by Kenny G #10 in 1999 (the last instrumental top-10)

Last instrumental top-5:

Theme From Mission: Impossible by Adam Clayton & Larry Mullen #5 in 1996

Last instrumental #1:

Miami Vice Theme by Jan Hammer, #1 in 1985