Mikey wrote:a bitter vindictive fuck
There ya go.Obama's 'revenge' remark reverberates on presidential campaign trail
“No, no, no. Don't boo. Vote,” Obama told a crowd in Springfield, Ohio. “Voting is the best revenge.”
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Mikey wrote:a bitter vindictive fuck
There ya go.Obama's 'revenge' remark reverberates on presidential campaign trail
“No, no, no. Don't boo. Vote,” Obama told a crowd in Springfield, Ohio. “Voting is the best revenge.”
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade" and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."Mace wrote:Obama is using Romney's own words in his ads like "repealing Roe v Wade"
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
The quote is in one of the many ads and came out of his mouth. It may have been taken out of context but it's what he said.mvscal wrote:Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade" and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."Mace wrote:Obama is using Romney's own words in his ads like "repealing Roe v Wade"
TIA
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Repeal isn't the correct verb, but...mvscal wrote:Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade"
I can only do so much.and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."
I would venture to say that he would appoint conservative judges to the SC that would "overturn" Roe v Wade. Happy now?mvscal wrote:I asked for a link to Romney's speech expressing a desire to "repeal Roe v Wade" and an explanation of how he would make that happen not what Obluegums said about it in his campaign ad.
definitly much better to have an out & out thief representing your state than a nut job, right?KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?
Seriously?
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
ELMINATEDCuda wrote:definitly much better to have an out & out thief representing your state than a nut job, right?KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?
Seriously?
And we all know that is what in those ads has to be the gospel truth, and that presenting something out of context would never happen. Kind of like what happens here at T1B.Mace wrote:
The quote is in one of the many ads and came out of his mouth. It may have been taken out of context but it's what he said.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Then those folks would be confused, Scott. There isn’t a prayer (sorry, figure of speech) of Roe v. Wade being overturned anytime soon. What your “Tea-bag nutcase” CAN do, however, is help overturn Obamacare and restore the Will of the People.KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?
Seriously?
He was denounced and asked to pull out of the race by Romney, Bond and the Ghost of Ronnie himself
Another Teabag nutcase the anti-choice crowd thinks can over turn the law and will of the people
Oh, OK. I would venture to say that you're full of shit. Abortion has been legal for 39 years. During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge. Anyone voting for a candidate based on his position on abortion is a moron.Mace wrote:I would venture to say that he would appoint conservative judges to the SC that would "overturn" Roe v Wade. Happy now?mvscal wrote:I asked for a link to Romney's speech expressing a desire to "repeal Roe v Wade" and an explanation of how he would make that happen not what Obluegums said about it in his campaign ad.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Well, you got a well-reasoned explanation for my vote in an earlier post, which for some reason compelled you to drag me down to your level in your reply. Heck, I thought agreeing with you might make you feel a little better about yourself. Apparently not.Mikey wrote:All I did was ask if you were voting for Akin.Truman wrote:I dunno. Are we?Mikey wrote:My my we are a bitter vindictive fuck, aren't we?
Excoriate Akin, but forgive Claire. Gotcha.
So Tardd Akin's words have a far greater impact on our country than Claire McCaskill's vote? Ponderous.
I think you're right, Mikey: We ARE bitter vindictive fucks.
Seems you got a llliiittttttllllle bit defensive about it.
Why would that be?
Was it my tone of voice that set you off?
Fail. Sandusky can't run in Missouri. Tell me you knew...Mikey wrote:Tru would prolly vote for Jerry Sandusky if he was running against McCaskill.
I guess you did agree with me. It must be my bitter vindictive side coming out.Truman wrote:
Well, you got a well-reasoned explanation for my vote in an earlier post, which for some reason compelled you to drag me down to your level in your reply. Heck, I thought agreeing with you might make you feel a little better about yourself. Apparently not.
He said overturning Roe v Wade would be his preference, and that's not taken out of context. I would agree that anyone who votes for Obama based on that single issue is a moron, but there are plenty of those around.mvscal wrote:Oh, OK. I would venture to say that you're full of shit. Abortion has been legal for 39 years. During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge. Anyone voting for a candidate based on his position on abortion is a moron.
As to what kind of SC justices Romney would appoint, I would suggest taking a look at his track record in Massachewshits.
This.Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
Amen to that.Truman wrote:This.Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
Here's to bitter vindictive (old) fucks like us, Mikey!
Sounds like a plan! Gotta feeling the sun is scheduled to rise somewhere tomorrow, and Tax Day will still be April 15th, regardless...Mikey wrote:Amen to that.Truman wrote:This.Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
Here's to bitter vindictive (old) fucks like us, Mikey!
We'll be hoisting a few tonight at the Mikey shack no matter what the results are.
Good luck. I hope you make it back OK. Don't forget your equipment.88 wrote:I am leaving to go vote right now. The polling place is conveniently located in a building directly behind my office. I will let you know how long it takes, and if there are any attempts to disenfranchise me and Mrs. 88 in this heavily Democratic district (formerly represented by Dennis Kucinich). Wish me luck.
Yeah, well...personal preference isn't the basis for public policy and I'm sure Reagan, Poppy and Chimpy felt the same way.Mace wrote:He said overturning Roe v Wade would be his preference, and that's not taken out of context.
It goes both ways. Anyone voting for Romney based on that single issue is also a moron and you're right, there is certainly no shortage of morons.I would agree that anyone who votes for Obama based on that single issue is a moron, but there are plenty of those around.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
More intelligent statement than I have heard from anyone voting red in quite a long time. How about you run for office next election.KC Scott wrote:it doesn't matter if he recanted Wags - it's how he thinks and how most of the Anti-Chice crowd thinks
All Republicans should just STFU on any issue related to womens health / contraception etc. - it's what is going to cost us the election
KC Scott wrote:I don't understand the GOP strategists not seeing what the electorate wants -
The GOP Message: Smaller Govt. -that means less Govt. intervention in peoples lives and individual choices. Yet their platform wants to dictate to 50% of the population that they have no choice in matters involving their own health and bodies
KC Scott wrote:
And you will see, unfortunetly, that they will define a Socialist regime for 4 more years
Roe was 7-2 you vapid Racist black cock stroking fuck chair.mvscal wrote: During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge.
Rupert Murdoch owns the NY Post. Tell me you knew.KC Scott wrote:Not sure who reads the NY Post, but at least he got a little support up there in Liberal NE
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Wisconsin remains blue. Walker won the recall because there were a lot of people that didn't necessarily support him, but still felt the recall was wrong. The Baldwin win was probably a bit more surprising than Obama's, but proves that the state leans Democrat.Mace wrote:Paul Ryan didn't help him in Wisconsin either.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
I know this may be hard to believe, but Utah is not the home state of every Mormon. Mitt's a Michigander. Not that it matters, since he lost it, too. And Utah may still be the most red state there is, so any (R) on the ballot would've won it.KC Scott wrote:He won Utahkcdave wrote:One quick question. If Romney was all that and a bag of chips, why the hell didn't he even win his home state, or any where in New England for that matter?
Seems to me if a guy can't win his home state, he shouldn't have even won the nomination from his party.
How long do you have to grow up/live somewhere to be considered a "-gander?" By that logic, that means Mgo is a Florida-gander.Smackie Chan wrote:Mitt's a Michigander.
Not sure about the rules of duration. To be considered a gander, you must be a male goose. Not sure about Mgo's history - he may be a Floridian for all I know.Screw_Michigan wrote:How long do you have to grow up/live somewhere to be considered a "-gander?" By that logic, that means Mgo is a Florida-gander.Smackie Chan wrote:Mitt's a Michigander.
Smackie Chan wrote: Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
I consider myself a native Michigander, but now since I reside in God's Country, I am a Washingtonian.Smackie Chan wrote:Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
Which god? Ares?Screw_Michigan wrote:I reside in God's Country
Is that the God of Jizz Mopping?Smackie Chan wrote:Which god? Ares?Screw_Michigan wrote:I reside in God's Country
You reside in this country’s a-hole which makes you just another shitstain.Screw_Michigan wrote:I consider myself a native Michigander, but now since I reside in God's Country, I am a Washingtonian.Smackie Chan wrote:Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim