How many of you will actually vote?

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12716
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by mvscal »

Mikey wrote:a bitter vindictive fuck
Obama's 'revenge' remark reverberates on presidential campaign trail

“No, no, no. Don't boo. Vote,” Obama told a crowd in Springfield, Ohio. “Voting is the best revenge.”
There ya go.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12716
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by mvscal »

Mace wrote:Obama is using Romney's own words in his ads like "repealing Roe v Wade"
Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade" and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."

TIA
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mace »

mvscal wrote:
Mace wrote:Obama is using Romney's own words in his ads like "repealing Roe v Wade"
Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade" and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."

TIA
The quote is in one of the many ads and came out of his mouth. It may have been taken out of context but it's what he said.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12716
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by mvscal »

I asked for a link to Romney's speech expressing a desire to "repeal Roe v Wade" and an explanation of how he would make that happen not what Obluegums said about it in his campaign ad.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Goober McTuber »

Here you go, you bitter little fuckpuppet.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&safe=stric ... 69&bih=882
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7308
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Smackie Chan »

mvscal wrote:Why don't you go ahead and link me up to Romney wanting to "repeal Roe v Wade"
Repeal isn't the correct verb, but...




and then explain how SCOTUS opinions are "repealed."
I can only do so much.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mace »

mvscal wrote:I asked for a link to Romney's speech expressing a desire to "repeal Roe v Wade" and an explanation of how he would make that happen not what Obluegums said about it in his campaign ad.
I would venture to say that he would appoint conservative judges to the SC that would "overturn" Roe v Wade. Happy now?
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Cuda »

KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?

Seriously?
definitly much better to have an out & out thief representing your state than a nut job, right? :lol: :lol: :lol:
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31439
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mikey »

Cuda wrote:
KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?

Seriously?
definitly much better to have an out & out thief representing your state than a nut job, right? :lol: :lol: :lol:
ELMINATED


Hint: I speeled it wrong on purpose.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Derron »

Mace wrote:
The quote is in one of the many ads and came out of his mouth. It may have been taken out of context but it's what he said.
And we all know that is what in those ads has to be the gospel truth, and that presenting something out of context would never happen. Kind of like what happens here at T1B.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Truman »

KC Scott wrote:Vote for st. louis whack job akin?

Seriously?

He was denounced and asked to pull out of the race by Romney, Bond and the Ghost of Ronnie himself

Another Teabag nutcase the anti-choice crowd thinks can over turn the law and will of the people
Then those folks would be confused, Scott. There isn’t a prayer (sorry, figure of speech) of Roe v. Wade being overturned anytime soon. What your “Tea-bag nutcase” CAN do, however, is help overturn Obamacare and restore the Will of the People.

As I explained before, Scott, it’s more a vote against Claire.

You and I do not agree on the Affordable Care Act. You think it’s a good idea to legally compel people pay for health care insurance. I don’t believe that it is Constitutional to do so, despite Judge Robert’s opinion. No blood, no foul. We agree to disagree.

During the Town Hall Summer of ’09, Claire McCaskill arrogantly and condescendingly scolded Missourians for voicing their overwhelming displeasure with her support of Obamacare and her lock-step liberal voting record. On December 23rd of that year, she voted for the law’s passage.

And in November 2010, state-wide Democrats paid for her vote. For many, she’s not done paying yet.

I can almost forgive McCaskill using her private plane almost 90 times at tax-payer expense; her failure to pay $287,000 in property taxes over four years on the same “damn plane”; even the curious redirection of $20M in stimulus funds to her husband’s real estate company.

But I cannot forgive Claire’s vote for Obamacare. Tardd Akin’s words, while merely reprehensible at best, don’t hurt. Claire McCaskill’s vote does.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by War Wagon »

^^^ exactly.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12716
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by mvscal »

Mace wrote:
mvscal wrote:I asked for a link to Romney's speech expressing a desire to "repeal Roe v Wade" and an explanation of how he would make that happen not what Obluegums said about it in his campaign ad.
I would venture to say that he would appoint conservative judges to the SC that would "overturn" Roe v Wade. Happy now?
Oh, OK. I would venture to say that you're full of shit. Abortion has been legal for 39 years. During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge. Anyone voting for a candidate based on his position on abortion is a moron.

As to what kind of SC justices Romney would appoint, I would suggest taking a look at his track record in Massachewshits.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Truman »

Mikey wrote:
Truman wrote:
Mikey wrote:My my we are a bitter vindictive fuck, aren't we?
I dunno. Are we?

Excoriate Akin, but forgive Claire. Gotcha.

So Tardd Akin's words have a far greater impact on our country than Claire McCaskill's vote? Ponderous.

I think you're right, Mikey: We ARE bitter vindictive fucks.
All I did was ask if you were voting for Akin.

Seems you got a llliiittttttllllle bit defensive about it.
Why would that be?
Was it my tone of voice that set you off?
Well, you got a well-reasoned explanation for my vote in an earlier post, which for some reason compelled you to drag me down to your level in your reply. Heck, I thought agreeing with you might make you feel a little better about yourself. Apparently not.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Truman »

Mikey wrote:Tru would prolly vote for Jerry Sandusky if he was running against McCaskill.
Fail. Sandusky can't run in Missouri. Tell me you knew...
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31439
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mikey »

Truman wrote:

Well, you got a well-reasoned explanation for my vote in an earlier post, which for some reason compelled you to drag me down to your level in your reply. Heck, I thought agreeing with you might make you feel a little better about yourself. Apparently not.
I guess you did agree with me. It must be my bitter vindictive side coming out.

Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mace »

mvscal wrote:Oh, OK. I would venture to say that you're full of shit. Abortion has been legal for 39 years. During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge. Anyone voting for a candidate based on his position on abortion is a moron.

As to what kind of SC justices Romney would appoint, I would suggest taking a look at his track record in Massachewshits.
He said overturning Roe v Wade would be his preference, and that's not taken out of context. I would agree that anyone who votes for Obama based on that single issue is a moron, but there are plenty of those around.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Truman »

Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
This.

Image

Here's to bitter vindictive (old) fucks like us, Mikey!
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31439
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mikey »

Truman wrote:
Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
This.

Image

Here's to bitter vindictive (old) fucks like us, Mikey!
Amen to that.

We'll be hoisting a few tonight at the Mikey shack no matter what the results are.
User avatar
Truman
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3665
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 3:12 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Truman »

Mikey wrote:
Truman wrote:
Mikey wrote:Funny this year how it seems like so many are reduced to voting against somebody instead of for somebody else.
This.

Image

Here's to bitter vindictive (old) fucks like us, Mikey!
Amen to that.

We'll be hoisting a few tonight at the Mikey shack no matter what the results are.
Sounds like a plan! Gotta feeling the sun is scheduled to rise somewhere tomorrow, and Tax Day will still be April 15th, regardless...
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31439
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mikey »

88 wrote:I am leaving to go vote right now. The polling place is conveniently located in a building directly behind my office. I will let you know how long it takes, and if there are any attempts to disenfranchise me and Mrs. 88 in this heavily Democratic district (formerly represented by Dennis Kucinich). Wish me luck.
Good luck. I hope you make it back OK. Don't forget your equipment.

Image
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12716
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by mvscal »

Mace wrote:He said overturning Roe v Wade would be his preference, and that's not taken out of context.
Yeah, well...personal preference isn't the basis for public policy and I'm sure Reagan, Poppy and Chimpy felt the same way.
I would agree that anyone who votes for Obama based on that single issue is a moron, but there are plenty of those around.
It goes both ways. Anyone voting for Romney based on that single issue is also a moron and you're right, there is certainly no shortage of morons.

It's a red meat distraction for both sides of the issue and it doesn't make a single iota of difference who you vote for based on abortion only.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
kcdave
crusader
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:52 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by kcdave »

KC Scott wrote:it doesn't matter if he recanted Wags - it's how he thinks and how most of the Anti-Chice crowd thinks

All Republicans should just STFU on any issue related to womens health / contraception etc. - it's what is going to cost us the election
More intelligent statement than I have heard from anyone voting red in quite a long time. How about you run for office next election.
User avatar
War Wagon
2010 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 21127
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
Location: Tiger country

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by War Wagon »

except that it's not what you "think" or believe that mean a damn thing... it's actions that define a person.

But I wouldn't expect a blithering idiot like you to understand that.
User avatar
M2
GOAT
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by M2 »

KC Scott wrote:I don't understand the GOP strategists not seeing what the electorate wants -

The GOP Message: Smaller Govt. -that means less Govt. intervention in peoples lives and individual choices. Yet their platform wants to dictate to 50% of the population that they have no choice in matters involving their own health and bodies

Image

Kansas Citians are like diapers... they both need to be changed often, and for the same reasons.
Image
User avatar
M2
GOAT
Posts: 5429
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:57 pm
Location: "Baghdad by the Bay"

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by M2 »

KC Scott wrote:
And you will see, unfortunetly, that they will define a Socialist regime for 4 more years



Image

I love Socialism...
Image
Moving Sale

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Moving Sale »

mvscal wrote: During that timeframe, the White House has been controlled by pro-life Presidents for 20 years and yet Roe v Wade is still on the books without even a whiff of a challenge.
Roe was 7-2 you vapid Racist black cock stroking fuck chair.
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

KC Scott wrote:Not sure who reads the NY Post, but at least he got a little support up there in Liberal NE

Image
Rupert Murdoch owns the NY Post. Tell me you knew.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
User avatar
kcdave
crusader
Posts: 1759
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:52 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by kcdave »

One quick question. If Romney was all that and a bag of chips, why the hell didn't he even win his home state, or any where in New England for that matter?
Seems to me if a guy can't win his home state, he shouldn't have even won the nomination from his party.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mace »

Paul Ryan didn't help him in Wisconsin either.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Goober McTuber »

Mace wrote:Paul Ryan didn't help him in Wisconsin either.
Wisconsin remains blue. Walker won the recall because there were a lot of people that didn't necessarily support him, but still felt the recall was wrong. The Baldwin win was probably a bit more surprising than Obama's, but proves that the state leans Democrat.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7308
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Smackie Chan »

KC Scott wrote:
kcdave wrote:One quick question. If Romney was all that and a bag of chips, why the hell didn't he even win his home state, or any where in New England for that matter?
Seems to me if a guy can't win his home state, he shouldn't have even won the nomination from his party.
He won Utah
I know this may be hard to believe, but Utah is not the home state of every Mormon. Mitt's a Michigander. Not that it matters, since he lost it, too. And Utah may still be the most red state there is, so any (R) on the ballot would've won it.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Smackie Chan wrote:Mitt's a Michigander.
How long do you have to grow up/live somewhere to be considered a "-gander?" By that logic, that means Mgo is a Florida-gander.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31439
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mikey »

If you go to a party store to get pop, you're probably a Michigander.
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7308
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Smackie Chan »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Mitt's a Michigander.
How long do you have to grow up/live somewhere to be considered a "-gander?" By that logic, that means Mgo is a Florida-gander.
Not sure about the rules of duration. To be considered a gander, you must be a male goose. Not sure about Mgo's history - he may be a Floridian for all I know.

As for Mittens, he was born in Detroit, raised in Bloomfield Hills, and lived in MI until after he graduated from high school. Whatever the criterion is to be considered a Michigander, I'd say he meets it. He's definitely not a Utahn simply by virtue of being a Mormon and that his mom was born there. I suppose he could be considered a Masshole since he was Governor and still maintains a residence there. Even though I've lived in VA for a few years, I consider myself a Californian since I was born & raised there. Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by R-Jack »

Smackie Chan wrote: Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?

It depends on what team is doing better.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21094
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Smackie Chan wrote:Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
I consider myself a native Michigander, but now since I reside in God's Country, I am a Washingtonian.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7308
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Smackie Chan »

Screw_Michigan wrote:I reside in God's Country
Which god? Ares?
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Mace »

Smackie Chan wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:I reside in God's Country
Which god? Ares?
Is that the God of Jizz Mopping?
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: How many of you will actually vote?

Post by Goober McTuber »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Do you consider yourself a Michigander or a Washingtonian?
I consider myself a native Michigander, but now since I reside in God's Country, I am a Washingtonian.
You reside in this country’s a-hole which makes you just another shitstain.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Post Reply