data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations?!
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9701
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations?!
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations
Anybody that thinks a refinery ever shuts completely off during "offline" is a stupid fool.
The fact is: production was slowed. Did you slow down your consumption, asswipe?
The fact is: production was slowed. Did you slow down your consumption, asswipe?
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations
Subtly?That system, McCullough said in an interview, lends itself to a market concentration that allows producers to subtly coordinate their prices.
Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations
The main reason gas prices are so high is that fuel, like crude, is a world market and prices for gasoline, diesel, etc. are higher in other countries. So, the refiners (i.e. the oil companies in this vertically integrated industry) ship "our" gas out of the country to boost their profits. Supply and demand, free market and stuff.
Of course building a pipeline from Canada to Texas so the Canadians could more easily sell their oil on the world market would solve all of that.
Of course building a pipeline from Canada to Texas so the Canadians could more easily sell their oil on the world market would solve all of that.
Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations
I'm going to go with 'full of shit.'88 wrote:He has spent most of his adult life testifying as a supposed expert on behalf of litigants in suits against energy companies.
Could he be right? Maybe. Could he be full of shit? Even he says that is possible in his report.
You decide.
Oh...OK.That conclusion is reached from state environmental documents showing nitrogen-oxide emissions had returned to normal at the refinery a full week before it was reported to have come back on line.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
Oh an investigation, you say? Yes, of course, and on a "refinery-by-refinery" basis no less. Well, considering that there are about 150 refineries in the US, that ought to keep the checks coming for a awhile."It certainly does not prove collusion among the principal suppliers, since specific data by refineries is difficult to procure," McCullough's report said. "However, the data does suggest the need for an investigation on a refinery-by-refinery level."
Can't say that I'm really suprised to see another academic grant whore milking the taxpayers for yet another useless "investigation."
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations
Seeing as our resident black cock whore thinks he is full of shit, it's a pretty good bet his thesis is spot on.