Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations?!

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 9701
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations?!

Post by Diego in Seattle »

“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4959
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations

Post by Carson »

Anybody that thinks a refinery ever shuts completely off during "offline" is a stupid fool.

The fact is: production was slowed. Did you slow down your consumption, asswipe?
JPGettysburg wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31662
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations

Post by Mikey »

That system, McCullough said in an interview, lends itself to a market concentration that allows producers to subtly coordinate their prices.
Subtly?
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31662
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations

Post by Mikey »

The main reason gas prices are so high is that fuel, like crude, is a world market and prices for gasoline, diesel, etc. are higher in other countries. So, the refiners (i.e. the oil companies in this vertically integrated industry) ship "our" gas out of the country to boost their profits. Supply and demand, free market and stuff.

Of course building a pipeline from Canada to Texas so the Canadians could more easily sell their oil on the world market would solve all of that.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12899
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations

Post by mvscal »

88 wrote:He has spent most of his adult life testifying as a supposed expert on behalf of litigants in suits against energy companies.

Could he be right? Maybe. Could he be full of shit? Even he says that is possible in his report.

You decide.
I'm going to go with 'full of shit.'
That conclusion is reached from state environmental documents showing nitrogen-oxide emissions had returned to normal at the refinery a full week before it was reported to have come back on line.
Oh...OK.

:meds:
"It certainly does not prove collusion among the principal suppliers, since specific data by refineries is difficult to procure," McCullough's report said. "However, the data does suggest the need for an investigation on a refinery-by-refinery level."
Oh an investigation, you say? Yes, of course, and on a "refinery-by-refinery" basis no less. Well, considering that there are about 150 refineries in the US, that ought to keep the checks coming for a awhile.

Can't say that I'm really suprised to see another academic grant whore milking the taxpayers for yet another useless "investigation."
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Moving Sale

Re: Corporate Regulations....Who Needs Corporate Regulations

Post by Moving Sale »

Seeing as our resident black cock whore thinks he is full of shit, it's a pretty good bet his thesis is spot on.
Post Reply