Conn. school shooting
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Conn. school shooting
This has to be the worst school shooting yet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
2nd worst to one that happened in 1927 (although that was a bombing).
Horrifying.
I had a call scheduled an hour ago with a woman who lives 5 miles from there, she was bawling when she picked up the phone.
Doesn't Ucant live in Connecticut? What about anyone else?
Horrifying.
I had a call scheduled an hour ago with a woman who lives 5 miles from there, she was bawling when she picked up the phone.
Doesn't Ucant live in Connecticut? What about anyone else?
Back from the dead
he's a killer of threads
without the use of PEDs
...ain't a doctor, they said.
he's a killer of threads
without the use of PEDs
...ain't a doctor, they said.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
why the fukk can't these fukking whack jobs just take themselves out?
sure is a good thing that schools are "gun free zones".
sure is a good thing that schools are "gun free zones".
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Conn. school shooting
Fucking juicer. Slap an asterisk on that one.Dr. Bob wrote:2nd worst to one that happened in 1927 (although that was a bombing).
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Re: Conn. school shooting
If only the grade-schoolers were allowed to arm themselves.smackaholic wrote:
sure is a good thing that schools are "gun free zones".
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
Not to make this political, but, WGAF?White House spokesman Jay Carney said Homeland Security adviser John Brennan informed President Obama of the shooting at 10:30 a.m. "The president is receiving regular updates as more information becomes available," Carney said.
26 people aren't going to go home tonight. This has fukk all to do with the president. of course he will certainly do what he can to get some political mileage from it and once again make the claim that we can prevent this sort of shit by magically making all the guns go away.
There is one thing that could prevent this and that is giving people a chance to defend themselves.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
Ucunt went to UConn, but lives in the Boston area. Me and Todd are the only Cters here to my knowledge and todd hasn't been heard from in awhile, and we all know he was a little screwy, so I figure this must be him.Dr. Bob wrote:2nd worst to one that happened in 1927 (although that was a bombing).
Horrifying.
I had a call scheduled an hour ago with a woman who lives 5 miles from there, she was bawling when she picked up the phone.
Doesn't Ucant live in Connecticut? What about anyone else?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Conn. school shooting
smackaholic wrote:Not to make this political, but, WGAF?White House spokesman Jay Carney said Homeland Security adviser John Brennan informed President Obama of the shooting at 10:30 a.m. "The president is receiving regular updates as more information becomes available," Carney said.
26 people aren't going to go home tonight. This has fukk all to do with the president. of course he will certainly do what he can to get some political mileage from it and once again make the claim that we can prevent this sort of shit by magically making all the guns go away.
There is one thing that could prevent this and that is giving people a chance to defend themselves.
SG's Son wrote:If only the grade-schoolers were allowed to arm themselves.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
I was thinking more along the line of teachers. Not saying it should be mandatory, but, it should be encouraged. If a teacher thinks they are up to it, they should be given training and be allowed to pack. "Gun free zones" are nothing more than targets for whack job cowards.Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:Not to make this political, but, WGAF?White House spokesman Jay Carney said Homeland Security adviser John Brennan informed President Obama of the shooting at 10:30 a.m. "The president is receiving regular updates as more information becomes available," Carney said.
26 people aren't going to go home tonight. This has fukk all to do with the president. of course he will certainly do what he can to get some political mileage from it and once again make the claim that we can prevent this sort of shit by magically making all the guns go away.
There is one thing that could prevent this and that is giving people a chance to defend themselves.SG's Son wrote:If only the grade-schoolers were allowed to arm themselves.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Conn. school shooting
It certainly appears that way. Schools, theaters, malls etc. Some whacko in China stabbed 22 kids in a school there on Wednesday.smackaholic wrote: "Gun free zones" are nothing more than targets for whack job cowards.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Conn. school shooting
I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
Once the the facts make their way out, I'm sure it was fairly easy for this scumbag to walk into the school with very little scrutiny.
Once the the facts make their way out, I'm sure it was fairly easy for this scumbag to walk into the school with very little scrutiny.
Re: Conn. school shooting
Like it would have made any difference in this case.jiminphilly wrote:I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
Once the the facts make their way out, I'm sure it was fairly easy for this scumbag to walk into the school with very little scrutiny.
"Oh, I'm here to visit/kill my mom," this lunatic could have said. School shootings almost always have some sort of personal connection.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
Wrong, and a cheap attempt at equivocation. The bullshit on the issue of gun control is not from both sides at all. The proposals for gun control over the years have generally been sensible and fair. No one has suggested revoking the 2nd amendment. for example, and no one has called for a complete ban on basic weapons of self defense and hunting. No, the sheer torrent of fetid bullshit has come steadily and hysterically from the NRA lock-step right-wing militia types--like 1-malt (nee Mall Cop) who offer the most ludicrous fake arguments imaginable. Look at the Blame It On Washington thread right below where I destroy his tedious and absurdly weak attempt to defend the right of Americans to have whatever weapons they like. Keep it real, or as real as you can.Jsc810 wrote:
And look for bullshit to flow from all sides of the gun control debate.
Before God was, I am
Re: Conn. school shooting
Again, right in the wheelhouse for the onset of schizophrenia. I'd like to know what meds he was on.Sudden Sam wrote:The shooter was 24, killed his mother and all those kids.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
Correct. It's all on you and your ilk. Guns aren't even the issue here.LTS TRN 2 wrote:The bullshit on the issue of gun control is not from both sides at all.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Conn. school shooting
Sad sad day.
This is the reason I carry and will continue to carry.
This is the reason I carry and will continue to carry.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Conn. school shooting
Until the facts come out, who knows? But based on how the guy was dressed (hearing fatigues and body armor) and the fact that it's hard to conceal a .22 caliber rifle, I'll go out on a limb and say that no one thought he was there to fix the shitter.mvscal wrote:Like it would have made any difference in this case.jiminphilly wrote:I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
Once the the facts make their way out, I'm sure it was fairly easy for this scumbag to walk into the school with very little scrutiny.
"Oh, I'm here to visit/kill my mom," this lunatic could have said. School shootings almost always have some sort of personal connection.
Re: Conn. school shooting
So sad, words cannot describe it. I'm bummed out enough finding out an old friend had passed away this morning. Damn.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Re: Conn. school shooting
Really? The issue is exactly how a mentally disturbed individual could get four or five guns with huge maxi-clips and body armor so easily. And this has been the issue all along. Or what?mvscal wrote:Correct. It's all on you and your ilk. Guns aren't even the issue here.LTS TRN 2 wrote:The bullshit on the issue of gun control is not from both sides at all.
Before God was, I am
Re: Conn. school shooting
Really. Guns aren't the problem. Psychos are the problem.LTS TRN 2 wrote:Really?mvscal wrote:Correct. It's all on you and your ilk. Guns aren't even the issue here.LTS TRN 2 wrote:The bullshit on the issue of gun control is not from both sides at all.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
None of which will mean squat if a shooter simply wishes to break through a window, enter the premises, and begin blasting away. Video monitoring in the office? Yeah? So? Exactly what is Margie 'dere gonna do when confronted with the image of an armed-to-the-teeth Derron gone full-on fruitloop? Smack him with a ruler?KC Scott wrote:That's the way it is for my kids schools here. All doors are locked - access control & video monitoring in the officesjiminphilly wrote:I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
The PD tactical teams practice active shooter scenarios at an abandoned school in Indep
No, she'll call 911. By the time the police get there the damage will have been done.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Conn. school shooting
Emptying her magazine center mass as he comes bursting through the window seems like a pretty good idea to me.Van wrote:Exactly what is Margie 'dere gonna do when confronted with the image of an armed-to-the-teeth Derron gone full-on fruitloop? Smack him with a ruler?
What the fuck is with your fetish for helplessness?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
Oh, okay. Your sweet old grandmother sitting in some monitoring office halfway across campus is going to drop her Sudoku game and go Rambo on some armed intruder, and she's going to get there in time to prevent Derron from going Derron?mvscal wrote:Empty her magazine center mass as he comes bursting through the window seems like a pretty good idea to me.Van wrote:Exactly what is Margie 'dere gonna do when confronted with the image of an armed-to-the-teeth Derron gone full-on fruitloop? Smack him with a ruler?
Been watching a lot of old westerns on late-night TV, have you?
Paint me a realistic picture of how this very scenario couldn't have happened to your child, 'cause, you know, you and he are such take-charge badasses and all.What the fuck is with your fetish for helplessness?
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
All the access control in the world won't fix this. Kids and teachers come and go to schools every day. A nut job can simply show up at this time. We can't man every school with dedicated security officers. We can allow teachers that are able and willing to, have the means to defend themselves and their students.KC Scott wrote:That's the way it is for my kids schools here. All doors are locked - access control & video monitoring in the officesjiminphilly wrote:I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
The PD tactical teams practice active shooter scenarios at an abandoned school in Independence.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Conn. school shooting
No, the clear issue is how to prevent psychos from getting guns. Okay? And this means some serious procedures and restrictions on buying guns. And of course it means the same seriously increased restrictions on buying assault rifles and maxi-clips, armor piecing bullets, etc. We notice you don't have an argument to defend your hissing vehemence. Your attempt to roll out the congressional powers was appallingly stupid and was rolled up like taco. What the fuck are you, 1-malt? I mean besides a seething little out of shape creep?
Before God was, I am
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21091
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
This time of year it is very easy to arm yourself to the teeth with no one having a clue. You would be amazed at the armory that can be concealed by a puffy coat.jiminphilly wrote:Until the facts come out, who knows? But based on how the guy was dressed (hearing fatigues and body armor) and the fact that it's hard to conceal a .22 caliber rifle, I'll go out on a limb and say that no one thought he was there to fix the shitter.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
Yup, in the hands of the non-batshit crazy folk.Screw_Michigan wrote:More guns is the answer.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Conn. school shooting
mvscal wrote:
Really. Guns aren't the problem. Psychos are the problem.
and all psychos carry guns.
Starting to ring a bell yet idiot ???
Or let me rephrase it... "all gun owners are psychos".
If you feel the need to carry heat on your person... you've got some serious mental issues.
Re: Conn. school shooting
And you propose to identify them well in advance, how?smackaholic wrote:Yup, in the hands of the non-batshit crazy folk.Screw_Michigan wrote:More guns is the answer.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
Re: Conn. school shooting
WRONG.LTS TRN 2 wrote:No, the clear issue is how to prevent psychos from getting guns. Okay?
The clear issue is psychos and what to do with them. Their access to guns is, in and of itself, irrelevant. If they can't be trusted with guns then they can't be trusted with matches either. Arsonists kill hundreds year in and year out (far, far more than school shooters) yet we never hear a peep about "match control." And why should we? It would be fucking stupid. Every bit as fucking stupid as gun control.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Conn. school shooting
Left Seater wrote:Sad sad day.
This is the reason I carry and will continue to carry.
I hate that something like this forces the responsible gun owners to "stick to their guns" even more. You guys obviously aren't the problem. It's lunatics that can get their hands on weapons that leads to stuff like this. One of the reasons we lose certain rights is because some take things way too far when they're given too much leash. Even if you kept everyone from having guns...the wrong people are going to get their hands on them somehow or bad people will find other ways to harm people.
This is a sickening event...my thoughts are with the victims' families.
Re: Conn. school shooting
That is the policy implemented at Sandy Hook Elementary at the beginning of this school year.jiminphilly wrote:I got an email from my kids' school this afternoon announcing an immediate change to the visitor policy. The doors will now be locked and visual and verbal identification must happen before you can enter the school followed by a normal sign-in process etc..
Once the the facts make their way out, I'm sure it was fairly easy for this scumbag to walk into the school with very little scrutiny.
- FLW Buckeye
- 2014 T1B FBBL Champ
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 am
Re: Conn. school shooting
How in the fuck can you gimps, regardless of how you feel about gun control, look at this in such a fucked up way?
Since the criminals will always have guns regardless, how about a law enforcement presence in the school. Many middle and high schools have this already. With the ability to secure all exits once school is in session, a combination of LE and cameras would prevent another tragedy.
With two grandsons in K and 2nd grade, this shit hits close to home. My sympathies to the victims and their families.
Since the criminals will always have guns regardless, how about a law enforcement presence in the school. Many middle and high schools have this already. With the ability to secure all exits once school is in session, a combination of LE and cameras would prevent another tragedy.
With two grandsons in K and 2nd grade, this shit hits close to home. My sympathies to the victims and their families.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
I don't think a single armed guard will do it. For one, it's expensive. Also, if you have one person who is the designated protector, he can be taken out by a nutjob with some planning ability. Having multiple unknown armed people is a better idea, IMO.FLW Buckeye wrote:How in the fuck can you gimps, regardless of how you feel about gun control, look at this in such a fucked up way?
Since the criminals will always have guns regardless, how about a law enforcement presence in the school. Many middle and high schools have this already. With the ability to secure all exits once school is in session, a combination of LE and cameras would prevent another tragedy.
With two grandsons in K and 2nd grade, this shit hits close to home. My sympathies to the victims and their families.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- FLW Buckeye
- 2014 T1B FBBL Champ
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 am
Re: Conn. school shooting
Yep, let's build bunkers around the teacher's desk. Don't forget to sandbag the walls to keep the nuts from assaulting through a window.
On this evening's local news (KY3 Springfield MO), they talked of how there are 55 schools in the city, which tie up 21 officers from the SPD. Most small to large cities have a police presence in some of the schools already. The problem will be with the rural districts.
It won't be cheap, but it needs to be done. Once it's in place, then debate about guns til the sun goes down.
On this evening's local news (KY3 Springfield MO), they talked of how there are 55 schools in the city, which tie up 21 officers from the SPD. Most small to large cities have a police presence in some of the schools already. The problem will be with the rural districts.
It won't be cheap, but it needs to be done. Once it's in place, then debate about guns til the sun goes down.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Conn. school shooting
So what's your solution?mvscal wrote:The clear issue is psychos and what to do with them.
Of course it would be fucking stupid, because you can produce fire without a match. Kinda tough to pull off a massacre without a gun, unless you're an expert bomb-maker, and not too many dickslap 22 year olds living in their parents' basement have the knowledge, skill or resources for that.Their access to guns is, in and of itself, irrelevant. If they can't be trusted with guns then they can't be trusted with matches either. Arsonists kill hundreds year in and year out (far, far more than school shooters) yet we never hear a peep about "match control." And why should we? It would be fucking stupid. Every bit as fucking stupid as gun control.
It isn't feasible to restrict every possible inanimate thing that can kill someone, but doing so for objects specifically made to shoot and kill at a high volume would seem like a fair line.
Telling teaches they can start packing heat is fine and dandy, but just because they could doesn't mean they would. Gun owners tend to fit a certain demographic, and I'm going to take a wild guess and say that liberal educators and 60 year old women don't represent a large chunk of that statistic.
Even if Mrs. Crabapple had her piece on her, it is difficult to say what would transpire. There are a lot of variables that come into play, even if all the badasses think they've got it all mapped out in their head. There is a good chance when faced with that situation, fear takes over and you're running for cover. There's also a good chance you're not wearing a bullet proof vest and the psycho is, so even if you do decide to play Rambo, you'll need a clean head shot to take him out. How close will you be able to get to do that, and how good of a shot are you? Are you spending all your Saturday afternoons at the gun range? Even if you are, you can't simulate this situation. So, you're a soiled mess and letting bullets fly...who's to say you don't take out a couplefew innocent peeps running frantically this way and that way? And oh hey, SWAT shows up, and maybe they mistake you (or someone else wielding a firearm) for the shooter. Of course, you probably never got that far to begin with, because you're dead instead of smartly getting the fuck out of there.
So put armed guards in every school, and best case scenario, that deters the psycho to go somewhere else to carry out his plan. And at the end of the day, 20-some people are still dead.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
Let's say you are batshit crazy wannabe mass murderer. Would you rather have a target with one easily identified defender or possibly dozens of unknown defenders?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Conn. school shooting
Many teachers won't want the gig, but, some will. I suspect a fair number of the custodial staff would. As for the perp having a flak jacket on, maybe he will, maybe he won't. no matter, you shoot him in the chest a few times and he ain't gonna like it much and it will put a bit of a kink in his killing for a short spell, anyway.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:So what's your solution?mvscal wrote:The clear issue is psychos and what to do with them.
Of course it would be fucking stupid, because you can produce fire without a match. Kinda tough to pull off a massacre without a gun, unless you're an expert bomb-maker, and not too many dickslap 22 year olds living in their parents' basement have the knowledge, skill or resources for that.Their access to guns is, in and of itself, irrelevant. If they can't be trusted with guns then they can't be trusted with matches either. Arsonists kill hundreds year in and year out (far, far more than school shooters) yet we never hear a peep about "match control." And why should we? It would be fucking stupid. Every bit as fucking stupid as gun control.
It isn't feasible to restrict every possible inanimate thing that can kill someone, but doing so for objects specifically made to shoot and kill at a high volume would seem like a fair line.
Telling teaches they can start packing heat is fine and dandy, but just because they could doesn't mean they would. Gun owners tend to fit a certain demographic, and I'm going to take a wild guess and say that liberal educators and 60 year old women don't represent a large chunk of that statistic.
Even if Mrs. Crabapple had her piece on her, it is difficult to say what would transpire. There are a lot of variables that come into play, even if all the badasses think they've got it all mapped out in their head. There is a good chance when faced with that situation, fear takes over and you're running for cover. There's also a good chance you're not wearing a bullet proof vest and the psycho is, so even if you do decide to play Rambo, you'll need a clean head shot to take him out. How close will you be able to get to do that, and how good of a shot are you? Are you spending all your Saturday afternoons at the gun range? Even if you are, you can't simulate this situation. So, you're a soiled mess and letting bullets fly...who's to say you don't take out a couplefew innocent peeps running frantically this way and that way? And oh hey, SWAT shows up, and maybe they mistake you (or someone else wielding a firearm) for the shooter. Of course, you probably never got that far to begin with, because you're dead instead of smartly getting the fuck out of there.
So put armed guards in every school, and best case scenario, that deters the psycho to go somewhere else to carry out his plan. And at the end of the day, 20-some people are still dead.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.