Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:18 am

Washington is going nuts over the Evertune?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:00 am

I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:16 am

Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

I wouldn't fret about that.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:19 am

I like the tone of this one. Maybe Mikey can pull some strings and keep it going.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:26 am

For some reason, this thread resonates with me.

I saw the title...and couldn't let is slide.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:12 am

Maple isn't just syrup, you know. Remember that, the next time you're in a barre. It's a helluva pick-up line.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:15 am

Martyred wrote:For some reason, this thread resonates with me.

I saw the title...and couldn't let is slide.

Don't stick your neck out, it might get cutaway.

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:15 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
I wouldn't fret about that.

Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:37 pm

Smackie Chan wrote:
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Then why hammer on about things?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:50 pm

Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Then why hammer on about things?

Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:09 pm

Smackie Chan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
I wouldn't fret about that.
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

If we're going to succeed here we'll need to Marshall our resources.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:55 pm

Mikey wrote:If we're going to succeed here we'll need to Marshall our resources.

g0ddamn you, fat hippy man, I was gonna use that one. :x

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:57 pm

Fellas, hold up. We need one clear speaker here. All I'm hearing is distortion. We need a strong pitch to strike a solid chord.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:05 pm

wah, wah.

That is all I am hearing from you cry babies. Grow up, for crissakes.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:10 pm

So, an E-flat, a G-flat, and a B-flat walk into a bar.
And the bartender says,
"I'm sorry, we don't serve minors and I don't want to get in treble."

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:17 pm

Smackie Chan wrote:
Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.

Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...

...harm on nics.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:27 pm

Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.
Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...

...harm on nics.

Wasn't sure where you were going with that one, so I'm glad to see we managed to avoid another silly Fender bender.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:37 pm

So just how long can we string this thread out?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:51 pm

If this discussion goes on much longer I may have to unplug my computer's power chord.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:35 pm

Mikey wrote:If this discussion goes on much longer I may have to unplug my computer's power chord.

No you won't Mikey, that's a barre-faced lie. We just need someone to modulate this thread, to keep a nice interval between posts.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:53 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:
Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.
Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...

...harm on nics.
Masterful.

I'd clap tons, but I'm reading and turning the page.

With lines like that, I will place myself at your beck and call.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:03 pm

Dude, get off my (eric) Johnson. Swear to god, you people behave like a bunch of gibbons.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:11 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:I'd clap tons, but I'm reading and turning the page.

What Sam, are a segar of cheap attention?

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:17 pm

Papa Willie wrote:Trots this motherfucker.

Done.

Interesting that this band has a song called "Wolfman". Hmm...

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:32 pm

Van wrote:Dude, get off my (eric) Johnson. Swear to god, you people behave like a bunch of gibbons.

you go van!!!!!

tell 'em like it is.

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:42 pm

shutyomouth's deep-fried trots are like an adagio scirocco of flatulent feedback.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:11 pm

Whoever started this thread needs to die in an auto-erotic Steve Vai concert accident.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:17 pm

BSmack wrote:Whoever started this thread needs to die in an auto-erotic Steve Vai concert accident.

The folks over at department of redundancy department aren't gonna like that one.

Go Coogs' · Post by **Go Coogs'** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:57 am

All I know is 'Spray doesn't know diddly about what Washington wants.

Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread, smoke a dime bag and follow it up with a nice thick cut of Angus. Trust me, you'll feel like a young squire or prince.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:29 am

Go Coogs' wrote:Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:50 am

Van wrote:
Go Coogs' wrote:Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread

Thanks for the pictorial reference. Not like people not named smackaholic couldn't figure out what he was doing with that series.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:56 am

It was just the picture, is all. I saw that one recently and his expression cracked me up. This seemed like a good place for it.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:58 am

^^^^^^ the second page.

T1B

Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.