Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:Why have we been skipping over the Ducks' problems?

"We" haven't. There's absolute;ly nothing new on this front since the charges came up over 2 years ago. I guess the NCAA has been too busy with PSU and Miami to be bothered with little ol' Oregon.
We all knew their meteoric rise
Winningest PAC team of the 90's, and off the top of my head, I believe only one losing season (just barely) in 20 years, multiple conference championships dating back 18 years... I don't think "meteoric" means what you think it means.

but now that they've been nailed, we ignore it?
Because the NCAA is ignoring it. As Duckfan, it's been frustrating -- "justice" has been delayed to ridiculousness. Been waiting 2 years to hear any more about it, and it's not happening.

The University of Oregon football program that Kelly left behind in January agreed that it committed major NCAA violations, according to Monday reports from Eugene-based newspaper The Oregonian and Portland-based TV station KATU.
Not important, but The Oregonian (aka Snoregonian) is Portland-based. The Register-Guard is the Eugene paper, which has the most U of O coverage.

Writing on the wall seems to point to less-than-debilitating sanctions. Even with "repeat offender" status(got whacked in 2004 for recruiting), the people commenting (ex-NCAA officials and whatnot) don't think there will be a bowl ban (they're learning their lessons about their cash-cows (sup USC, OSU)). "Betting line" is trending towards a 2-3 schollie a year penalty. Maybe losing a member of the recruiting staff.

As far as being "dirty" -- Lyles got ~$25K... the average amount a Bama player gets per game.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:Oregon's not been a regular visitor to the top ten in any polls until recently.

Hi.

Sin, Dude In Front

Image


Oregon, other than last year and the year they lost to Auburn, has been no threat to anyone outside of their conference.
Your thoughts, AngryMike?



Anymore memory lapses you'd like to share?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Sudden Sam wrote:Bama's clean, my friend.
Rrrrright.

Sin,

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr- ... ncaaf.html
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:Dins, how many top tens has Oregon been in at season's end over the last... say 20 years?

Uhm...

How about...

Same number as Bama.

7 out of the last 13.

Which is more than Bama over last 13 years.


Getting old playing havoc with your memory?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Python
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Python »

Dinsdale wrote:Same number as Bama.

7 out of the last 13.

Which is more than Bama over last 13 years.
How many national titles do you guys have? It doesn't even have to be recent. You can go back as far as you'd like.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Python wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:Same number as Bama.

7 out of the last 13.

Which is more than Bama over last 13 years.
How many national titles do you guys have? It doesn't even have to be recent. You can go back as far as you'd like.

This relates to "meteoric rise" how, exactly?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote: A rare foray into top ten territory over the prior 20 year span
7 of the last 13 years is "rare"?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

You mean in the last 20 years, a few years after some dude started pumping hundreds of millions into the facilities?

Weird how thaty works.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:

Oregon has been respectable, but not NC caliber...'til they cheated.

Like Bama then?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Terry in Crapchester
2012 March Madness Champ
Posts: 8995
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: Back in the 'burbs

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Terry in Crapchester »

Sudden Sam wrote:Oregon has been respectable, but not NC caliber...'til they cheated.

:grin:

At least they're not Cal.
All-time, they have a worse winning % than Cal. Surprised me too.

In fact, if one were to rank the current Pac-12 members in that category, it would look like:

1. USC .701
2. Washington .611
3. Arizona State .605
4. Utah .592
5. Colorado .591
6. UCLA .584
7. Stanford .574
8. Arizona .571
9. Cal .561
10. Oregon .557
11. Washington State .492
12. Oregon State .483

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/mi ... a_wins.php
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Python
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Python »

Severe SEC bias.

Anyway, back to my question. So that's, what, 2 or 3 National Champoinships for Oregon then?
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Dinsdale »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:

Oregon has been respectable, but not NC caliber...'til they cheated.
Like Bama then?
How so?

You're really going to go there?

Which team vacated wins in the last 10 years... Bama, or Oregon?


Now you're just being a dumbass, wearing the Crimson-colored goggles.


In fact, only USC can rival Bama's record for being dirty in the post-SMU era... dumbass. Bama just got off probation... AGAIN.

Not to be rude... but act like a dumbass, and you get called a dumbass.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Python
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:04 pm

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Python »

So we're talking one championship?
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6317
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by The Seer »

Python wrote:So we're talking one championship?

So in context with this thread - "meteoric rise" discussion....per you, a team can only have "risen" if it wins a MNC?

Final poll rankings 2-20 are totally meaningless?
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13489
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Wait...Oregon is dirty?

Post by Left Seater »

Does cooperation with the NCAA and self inflicted penalties not matter in your world?

Oregon self imposed penalties, something USC never did. That should go a long way in determining how severe the NCAA punishment is. Hell, many at SC still think they didn't break any rules.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Post Reply