So who thought Baylor/OU
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Atrocious play calling by both teams.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Papa Willie wrote:
A little of that, but both defenses showed the fuck up tonight. Nice to see some of that - certainly in this conference.
FTFY
Although OU has been the exception... they just have no offense.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
IT'S A SLUGFEST!
It amazes me that a blueblood program like OU can't find a QB with competent passing skills.
It amazes me that a blueblood program like OU can't find a QB with competent passing skills.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
I like Baylor's defense. They fly around out there...but pretty undisciplined.
- campinfool
- 2009 PET Champion
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 2:39 am
- Location: TEXAS
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Baptists are gonna rape OU in the second half and then shun them tomorrow as sinners for partaking in the sex act.
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
...Or dancin'. Don't fergit dancin', Scotty.
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
my GOD
i'm usually one to defend Stoops and Co to friends and coworkers....
i'm done with that bullshit...
Blake Bell is pathetic.
Our D was playing lights out , but because of our O being so inept, they're getting tired and sloppy and Baylor took advantage.
Huepel is NOT the answer.
i'm usually one to defend Stoops and Co to friends and coworkers....
i'm done with that bullshit...
Blake Bell is pathetic.
Our D was playing lights out , but because of our O being so inept, they're getting tired and sloppy and Baylor took advantage.
Huepel is NOT the answer.
![Image](http://www.theoneboard.com/orci/sig/md.jpg)
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
31-5
Where you at, SEC honks?
Still think Bammer would hang? Barner? aTm? Y'all suck. Baylor would eat your souls....
Where you at, SEC honks?
Still think Bammer would hang? Barner? aTm? Y'all suck. Baylor would eat your souls....
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Gayness? Sammy regards Baylor beneath contempt. I don't have a dog in this hunt other than to point out that our league ain't all that, Willie. Baylor's good; has been good all season; and would give every team in our conference a run for its money. S'all I've been tryin' to say. But some folks can't seem to see the obvious through their crimson and white shaded glasses...Papa Willie wrote:Truman wrote:31-5
Where you at, SEC honks?
Still think Bammer would hang? Barner? aTm? Y'all suck. Baylor would eat your souls....
Where's all the gayness coming from, buddy? I'm sitting here saying they look like one of the better teams in the country. OU's offense looks pretty shitty, and they certainly don't look like a top 10 team, but god damn dude!
Evidently the B12BSH'ering hasn't left your soul just quite yet...
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Who's Auburn beaten? They lost to the only good team they've played.Papa Willie wrote:SS is a reasonable guy. Something tells me (if he watched the game tonight) that he'll say he was wrong. It's true, though - Baylor hasn't played anybody until tonight. The Big12 is down this year. Again - Baylor looks pretty fucking good to me. Just sayin'...Truman wrote:Gayness? Sammy regards Baylor beneath contempt. I don't have a dog in this hunt other than to point out that our league ain't all that, Willie. Baylor's good; has been good all season; and would give every team in our conference a run for its money. S'all I've been tryin' to say. But some folks can't seem to see the obvious through their crimson and white shaded glasses...Papa Willie wrote: Where's all the gayness coming from, buddy? I'm sitting here saying they look like one of the better teams in the country. OU's offense looks pretty shitty, and they certainly don't look like a top 10 team, but god damn dude!
Evidently the B12BSH'ering hasn't left your soul just quite yet...
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
I dunno, Willie, where did you say you thought Auburn would beat Missouri?Papa Willie wrote:Again - where did I say I thought Auburn would beat Missouri?Truman wrote: Who's Auburn beaten? They lost to the only good team they've played.
My point, Willie, is that the SEC isn't the end-all/be-all that many of you SEC folks seem to think it is. There ARE other teams in this country that play a pretty good brand of ball.
Ain't mad at you Willie. Sam's arrogance and condescension got my Irish up tonight.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Baylor should be no lower than #3.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
I hate to keep banging on Ohio St because it's not really their fault, but the closest they've come to playing ranked teams is Wisconsin & Northwestern - wins of 7 & 10 points respectively....Sudden Sam wrote: Tru, all I'd ever said about Baylor was that they hadn't played anyone.
And, they play nobody the rest of the way.
At least the SEC teams have to play at least one good team in a typical season.
Three horse race - 'Bama - FSU - Baylor.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Hope all three finish unbeaten, along with tOSU, Fresno and Northern Ill.The Seer wrote:Three horse race - 'Bama - FSU - Baylor.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
No. I just want to see Bammer have to play one of them in a BCS bowl. And lose.Sudden Sam wrote:You'd wanna see Fresno-Northern Illinois in the title game, wouldn't you?Goober McTuber wrote:Hope all three finish unbeaten, along with tOSU, Fresno and Northern Ill.The Seer wrote:Three horse race - 'Bama - FSU - Baylor.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
ass sex at Baylor. never sounds good.
i said OU was a 8-9 win team from the beginning. Sooners struggled with Kansas.
i would not pick Baylor over anyone in a BCS game.
kind of an art briles fan in principle....but OU is not a huge quality win. i was kinda surprised Sooners beat Tech at home. and then Tech gets assed in lub tex by OK State.
i said OU was a 8-9 win team from the beginning. Sooners struggled with Kansas.
i would not pick Baylor over anyone in a BCS game.
kind of an art briles fan in principle....but OU is not a huge quality win. i was kinda surprised Sooners beat Tech at home. and then Tech gets assed in lub tex by OK State.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
Why not? Lot of undeserving teams shy on football skills but high on glamor get to BCS games. Baylor would match up well vs anyone not named Bama or FSU.King Crimson wrote:i would not pick Baylor over anyone in a BCS game.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
with a month to prepare? Big XII may be the shit conference everyone from Mizzou CU Nebraska and ATM have been talking.....MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Why not? Lot of undeserving teams shy on football skills but high on glamor get to BCS games. Baylor would match up well vs anyone not named Bama or FSU.King Crimson wrote:i would not pick Baylor over anyone in a BCS game.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
But the difference between Baylor and your run of the mill video game spread team, is they appear to be able to play some defense. Rare combo these days. I would take them over most of the slapdicks ranked 5 through 15thish. Except maybe Stanford.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:But the difference between Baylor and your run of the mill video game spread team, is they appear to be able to play some defense. Rare combo these days. I would take them over most of the slapdicks ranked 5 through 15thish. Except maybe Stanford.
BU may be the best team on planet earth this year but both Oklahoma and Texas have lost the BCS game (and won loser BCS games) with better D's than Baylor and pinball O.
and BU is not the best team on planet earth this year.
until someone beats Bama. it's Bama.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
Re: So who thought Baylor/OU
o
Shit conference? Not from this Mizzou honk. The XII is down - hell, everybody appears to be this year - but that doesn't mean Baylor is. Yeah, an old-man-football-style ballclub may give them their comeuppance in the BCS, but that doesn't take away from the best season the Bears have ever had.
Baylor looks almost mortal on the road. Should the good Oklahoma State decide to show up at Boone Pickens (as opposed to the indifferent or the uninspired Oklahoma State), I 'd expect the Pokes to put up a pretty good fight to end the Bears unbeaten streak. Survive that, and Baylor finishes 12-0.
:?King Crimson wrote:with a month to prepare? Big XII may be the shit conference everyone from Mizzou CU Nebraska and ATM have been talking.....MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Why not? Lot of undeserving teams shy on football skills but high on glamor get to BCS games. Baylor would match up well vs anyone not named Bama or FSU.King Crimson wrote:i would not pick Baylor over anyone in a BCS game.
Shit conference? Not from this Mizzou honk. The XII is down - hell, everybody appears to be this year - but that doesn't mean Baylor is. Yeah, an old-man-football-style ballclub may give them their comeuppance in the BCS, but that doesn't take away from the best season the Bears have ever had.
Baylor looks almost mortal on the road. Should the good Oklahoma State decide to show up at Boone Pickens (as opposed to the indifferent or the uninspired Oklahoma State), I 'd expect the Pokes to put up a pretty good fight to end the Bears unbeaten streak. Survive that, and Baylor finishes 12-0.