this season under next year's rules?
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Re: this season under next year's rules?
agree 4 teams is an improvement.
i would bet Stanford right now.
8 teams is better, 9 the best with Cal as an alltime qualifier.
maybe 10 with Oregon....since they pretty much invented winning football games.
i would bet Stanford right now.
8 teams is better, 9 the best with Cal as an alltime qualifier.
maybe 10 with Oregon....since they pretty much invented winning football games.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13479
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: this season under next year's rules?
it doesn't matter how many teams you let in, there will still be controversy over the last few spots.
Does a two loss team really belong in the discussion for a national title? Not in my opinion.
You really want to help the situation, don't have any polls that are used to select participants that conduct a poll prior to the Saturday following Oct 15.
Does a two loss team really belong in the discussion for a national title? Not in my opinion.
You really want to help the situation, don't have any polls that are used to select participants that conduct a poll prior to the Saturday following Oct 15.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: this season under next year's rules?
I love the smell of unfiltered sarcasm on Sunday mornings....King Crimson wrote:agree 4 teams is an improvement.
i would bet Stanford right now.
8 teams is better, 9 the best with Cal as an alltime qualifier.
maybe 10 with Oregon....since they pretty much invented winning football games.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
Re: this season under next year's rules?
I'm obviously down with the no polls until like the 8th week of the season, and typically 2 loss teams wouldn't get in...but, an undefeated season means little with scheduling like say Ohio St's this season.Left Seater wrote:it doesn't matter how many teams you let in, there will still be controversy over the last few spots.
Does a two loss team really belong in the discussion for a national title? Not in my opinion.
Don't know how you reward competitive scheduling without increasing that team's risk.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
- MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
- Baby Bitch
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:29 am
- Location: Tempe, AZ
Re: this season under next year's rules?
Jesus, I was starting to think I was the only one.Left Seater wrote:it doesn't matter how many teams you let in, there will still be controversy over the last few spots.
Does a two loss team really belong in the discussion for a national title? Not in my opinion.
You really want to help the situation, don't have any polls that are used to select participants that conduct a poll prior to the Saturday following Oct 15.
Sure, you could make a case for any of those teams filling the 3rd & 4th slots. You could also make a compelling argument against all of them. The only team that has a 100% clear-cut case for playing for an MNC this year is Florida State. Anybody else that gets a shot should just feel fortunate to be there.
I'm still not sure that preseason and early-season polls are as big of a scourge as they're made out to be, though. As sports fans, we have a natural proclivity to predict and rank. Trying to do away with such polls seems like an exercise in futility. And just because the polls aren't published until mid-October doesn't mean the voters won't still have preconceived notions about teams and conferences. They're still going to have a preseason poll in their head and adjust it accordingly in the early weeks, regardless of whether we can see it or not.
"Keys, woman!"
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13479
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: this season under next year's rules?
These guys want to be the one to say they picked the National Champ in August. If they don't show us their ballot until we are part way thru the conf schedule they don't have to keep propping up a dog they had at the top of their list. Georgia and Florida are two excellent examples from this season.MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:
I'm still not sure that preseason and early-season polls are as big of a scourge as they're made out to be, though. As sports fans, we have a natural proclivity to predict and rank. Trying to do away with such polls seems like an exercise in futility. And just because the polls aren't published until mid-October doesn't mean the voters won't still have preconceived notions about teams and conferences. They're still going to have a preseason poll in their head and adjust it accordingly in the early weeks, regardless of whether we can see it or not.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: this season under next year's rules?
There really is a God.Sudden Sam wrote:BCS show: Alabama would be favored over FSU, Auburn, MSU and anyone else.
So, hell yeah, Alabama would be in a 4 team playoff right now.
Needs to be an 8 team playoff...trash the 4 team thing now.
How the fuck did this season go so wrong? FSU-Tide for months. Done deal. And now...not only is Alabama out...but AUBURN?! How the hell did this happen?! How the hell could things go this wrong?!?!
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: this season under next year's rules?
Sudden Sam = Morgan Freeman?
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: this season under next year's rules?
1 Florida St. vs 4 Michigan St.
2 Auburn vs 3 Alabama
Woulda been epic.
2 Auburn vs 3 Alabama
Woulda been epic.