Oh? You were there in Iraq? Saddam showed you around, did he?
No I used my brain to figure it out and I was right wasn't I? And you were wrong even though you have been to Iraq. I guess peeling potatoes didn't learn you anything about his WMDs did it you stupid jug eared Mexican?
Willie,
Wtf are you babbling about? I don't care who else got it wrong.
Moving Sale wrote:
No I used my brain to figure it out
A lie.
Everybody here knows I was bashing bush on Iraq from day one so your backpedaling is just a bunch of smoke. There was no reason to invade Iraq at the time and the last decade had proven that point quite clearly. Would you like to try again you stupid jug eared Mexican?
Moving Sale wrote:
No I used my brain to figure it out
A lie.
Everybody here knows I was bashing bush on Iraq from day one...
That isn't even the point.
The point is that you are lying when you claim to have known that Saddam had no chemical weapons after 12 years of noncompliance with weapons inspections.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
You might have been dumb enough to fall for the old WMDs on a flat bed story but I wasn't. And I posted as much before the invasion and you know it. Now if I could figure it out, which I did, then it is no stretch to say bush also knew and then lied but if you want to go with he (and by extent on you) is dumber than dirt then that's fine too.
Moving Sale wrote:You might have been dumb enough to fall for the old WMDs on a flat bed story but I wasn't. And I posted as much before the invasion and you know it. Now if I could figure it out, which I did, then it is no stretch to say bush also knew and then lied but if you want to go with he (and by extent on you) is dumber than dirt then that's fine too.
How did you "figure it out", when all evidence and bi-partisan opinion was to the contrary?
More to the point, how come you aren't the combined director of the NSA, CIA, FBI and Joint Chiefs of Staff?
Why don't you run for POTUS? You'd certainly get at least one vote.
War Wagon wrote:
How did you "figure it out", when all evidence and bi-partisan opinion was to the contrary?
Objection. Assumes facts not in evidence. It is not true that all the evidence and bi-partisan opinion was pro WMDs.
That's it. Heap lie upon lie asshat.
You did no such thing because I don't care who said he had wmds. They were all wrong. The whole thing was a farce. The WMD flatbed, curveball, yellowcake. The whole thing. So tell me again how Kerry and Clinton were both lying. It changes nothing.
mvscal wrote:Obviously racism is the only reason for not being down with his program, right?
obviously with you it is.....you're unable to post anything referring to obama without some racist overtone/undertone.....
oplatelips
obongo
owhatever
some of your criticisms have validity, but the minute you employ your racist rants your credibility is kicked in the nuts......
look, we get that you don't like black people and you have the right to hate whoever you want....but your criticism of obama is obviously fueled by that hatred....that's pretty fucking sad, because there is plenty of stuff to criticize obama for without bringing race into the discussion....
Papa Willie wrote:
Let's see how long it takes the little midget niggger to figure that out.
all the quotes you cited were developed by Dems from the same trumped up "evidence" Bush used to invade Iraq.....why would you expect anybody to come to a different conclusion when the evidence was slanted to begin with.....
Papa Willie wrote:
Let's see how long it takes the little midget niggger to figure that out.
all the quotes you cited were developed by Dems from the same trumped up "evidence" Bush used to invade Iraq.....why would you expect anybody to come to a different conclusion when the evidence was slanted to begin with.....
Bush wasn't President in 1998, you fucking idiot.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
mvscal wrote:Oh, really? So if he was white I would think he's just great? Is that what you're trying to say?
You are the stupidest fuck on the planet. Two people just told you the same fucking thing and you still don't get it. It's not about his skin TO US we know YOU can't get past it because you are a racist pos. How's the weather loser?
Moving Sale wrote:Pose superciliously inane questions much?
It is entirely germane to the topic. You and feelsdix claim that I am unable to get past my dislike of niqqers in general. If that were true, it would necessarily mean that I would not have any respect for a black individual who has views I would ordinarily agree with.
Since you don't like hypothetical examples, we'll use Clarence Thomas. IMO, Thomas is the most reliable constitutional conservative on the court which means I believe him to be the best SC justice on the bench.
That view would be impossible if I were "unable to look past someone's skin color."
You think 57 and windy is a nice day?
It's not windy and, yes, it is quite nice.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
mvscal wrote:Oh, really? So if he was white I would think he's just great? Is that what you're trying to say?
no, you'd still have the same disdain for him but you wouldn't be using terms like oplatelips or obongo....those are entirely race driven and don't try to deny they're not......
mvscal wrote:
Bush wasn't President in 1998, you fucking idiot.
but he was in 2001 when they presented the "evidence" to congress to justify invading Iraq....
invading iraq after 9-11 would be the equivalent of the US attacking South Korea after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor....
mvscal wrote:Oh, really? So if he was white I would think he's just great? Is that what you're trying to say?
no, you'd still have the same disdain for him but you wouldn't be using terms like oplatelips or obongo....those are entirely race driven and don't try to deny they're not......
Yes, I would use other terms of disparagement.
invading iraq after 9-11 would be the equivalent of the US attacking South Korea after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor....
We invaded Afghanistan after 9-11, dumbfuck. We didn't invade Iraq until two years later and it had nothing whatsoever to do with 9-11, you fucking idiot.
The purpose was to prevent another such attack.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Riiiight. Because AQ is the only source of terrorism on the planet and Saddam had no axe to grind with us. He was a nice, quiet boy who played well with others and never ever gassed anyone before.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
mvscal wrote:Riiiight. Because AQ is the only source of terrorism on the planet and Saddam had no axe to grind with us. He was a nice, quiet boy who played well with others and never ever gassed anyone before.
He didn't have WMDs and you are a yellow racist loser.
We hiked Bishop's peak today. Which local mountain did you hike you vapid jug eared Mexican?
A fact that was only ascertained by the application of military force. You knew nothing and neither did anybody else except for Saddam and a few of his inner circle.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
That is a flat out lie and you know it you stupid flyover fuck. Just because you are too stupid to figure it out didn't everyone one was. Plenty of people were calling bullshit on Bush and his "intelligence." You are a racist and also a jug eared Mexican who hates both his heritage and his DNA. Have a shitty day in Ofailure Nebraska asshat.
I said he didn't have them and he didn't. You can call that whatever you want and of course you were wrong AGAIN so you will pull any bullshit you can to try and save face. Yellowcake? I called bs and I was right. Mobil lab? Ditto. Curveball? Al tubes. Ditto ditto. Anybody with a brain KNEW he was bluffing. There were others who knew what I knew and lied to further political/$. Anything else you stupid jug eared Mexican?
"Saddam did not surrender unconditionally" --mvscal
True, Saddam Hussein himself did not sign it seeing as he made himself unavailable to signing the unconditional surrender, but his military chiefs signed it in his stead in pursuit of a cessation of hostilities. According to international law, the surrender then became a formal and lawful document. From that point forward, until the United States formally ended the conditions of the surrender, Iraq was obligated to abide by the terms set forth under the agreement.
Looks like our Purple Lipped Fucktard in Chief is at it again:
EXCLUSIVE: Obama's 'Incredible Mistake' over Phantom Kosovo Referendum
U.S. President Barack Obama has caused confusion after claiming yesterday that Kosovo held a UN-assisted referendum for self-determination – misleading people over the true origins of the country. The U.S. President used the example to hit out against Russia's annexation of Crimea, but experts have noted that no such referendum took place, and implied that Obama's "incredible mistake" should elicit a retraction or correction from the White House.
The error came in a speech delivered at the Palais des Beaux-Arts in Brussels, and has been remarked upon to Breitbart London by regional experts from both the United Kingdom and indeed from Kosovo. One source said the faux-pas was "the very last thing Kosovo and Serbia need" as the two seek to strengthen relations.
Obama said in his speech yesterday: "...Kosovo only left Serbia after a referendum was organised not outside the boundaries of international law, but in careful cooperation with the United Nations and with Kosovo’s neighbours. None of that even came close to happening in Crimea."
But none of it came close to happening in Kosovo either