mvscal wrote:
Mitigation for the loss of habitat the solar project would entail.
the solar project you keep referring to is DOA and has been since last year....want to take another swing?
No need. In 1993 the BLM decided that that was sensitive habitat for the desert tortoise, restricted the size of his herd to 150 head and jacked up the grazing fees.
define "jacked up"
and while your at it, provide me a trendline analysis relating increases in grazing permit fees to the price of beef....
I can help you out with that a little by pulling his last
authorized grazing permit and we can take a look at the escalation in grazing permit fees over the last 20 years that he hasn't been paying and see if we can correlate that with beef prices...I'd tell you it's an effort in futility, but I know you're the determined kind....
There aren't any other ranchers in that area. They all complied with this finding and they are all now ex-ranchers.
so you're stating as fact that every ranch operation that was previously located in that area is out of business? you're a fucking moron.....cattle ranchers don't give a fuck what land they're using....cattle ranchers move their operations all the time. incorporating new lands.....cattle ranches are very fluid operations and people that know what they're doing can do very well.....they all pay up.....this fuckwit doesn't think he should pay? why does he merit special consideration.....
Overgrazing is a self-correcting problem that doesn't require micromanagement from bureaucratic pinheads thousands of miles away.
thanks, you've demonstrated that you know absolutely nothing about federal grazing permits nor ranching.....
I'm going to use that "self correcting problem" quote the next time I'm on a working cattle ranch.....I want to see how long it takes them to stop laughing their asses off.....jeezus palamino