I'm not moving the goalposts. You assumed I meant swarthy to mean his skin color when I was using the pejorative that has nothing to do with skin color. Which I then explained the subsequent posts. It's not my fault you can't read.BSmack wrote: Talk about moving the fucking goalposts.
Open challenge to mvscal
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
What does any of that have to do with Ofailurecal being a self loathing racist? And why are YOU licking his balls?Goober McTuber wrote: BSmack is about 5'7". Those who met him in person back in the day described him as a "fat little fuck". But you can still look up to him.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Here ya go, lil guy. Glad I could help.Moving Sale wrote:You assumed I meant swarthy to mean his skin color when I was using the pejorative that has nothing to do with skin color.
swar·thy adjective \ˈswȯr-thē, -thē\
: having dark skin
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/swarthy
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
yes, but to say Idahoans are alarmingly ignorant is like saying the Titanic had a leak.....the people here aren't alarmingly ignorant, they're willfully ignorant which to my way of thinking is much worse......but we have a relatively small population and the real ignorance is for the most part confined to the smaller population areas.....I live in the largest metro area (Boise area) and most of the people (notice I didn't say legislature) are intellectually competent......mvscal wrote:What the hell are you talking about? Don't you live in Idaho?Felix wrote:I'm not particularly fond of people in the midwestern states.....well intentioned types generally speaking but alarmingly ignorant.....I'm not sure how you can stand being out there.....
get out, get out while there's still time
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
[/quote]
A) Go ahead and post a usable pic or STFU you swarthy racist fuck.
B) There is no AB dictionary online you vapid asshat.
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Because that's what the fucking word means, someone with dark skin.Moving Sale wrote:I'm not moving the goalposts. You assumed I meant swarthy to mean his skin color.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Don't listen to me I couldn't care less. I bet you think mvscal means someone with black skin eh? Good god you are stupid.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Yes, but only because that's what it does primarily mean.Moving Sale wrote:I bet you think mvscal means someone with black skin eh?
So, at least according to this source (and others you may consider more authoritative, I'm sure), mvscal DOES mean someone with black skin. Of course, that's not its ONLY definition:dictionary.com wrote:nig-ger noun
1. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive.
a. a black person.
b. a member of any dark-skinned people.
dictionary.com also wrote:2. Slang: Extremely Disparaging and Offensive. a person of any race or origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc.
3. a victim of prejudice similar to that suffered by blacks; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.
The word can be correctly used to describe a black person, but it's not limited to that definition.
Now let's look at a different word:
dictionary.com wrote: swarth-y adj dark-hued or dark-complexioned
That is the ONLY definition given for the word. There's nothing there that says it also refers to peoples who often have dark skin but are sometimes fair-skinned. If you are dark-complected, you're swarthy. If you're not dark-complected but others of your ethnicity often are, you're still not swarthy. Pretty simple stuff.
There probably isn't one at Barnes & Noble, either. In fact, the only place it likely exists is in your imagination. And forgive me if this comes across as insensitive, but your imagination isn't considered authoritative by anyone other than you.You wrote:There is no AB dictionary online
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Moving Sale wrote:
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
It is also not limited to the definitions you provided. In fact it is many times used to describe people with light colored skin like our President. This is the whole point. It doesn't matter if he is a mvscal or swarthy or Irish or from Omaha. His is an individual and should be treated as such, not mocked for the color of his skin or anything else about him that he can't change.Smackie Chan wrote:
The word can be correctly used to describe a black person, but it's not limited to that definition.
That being said, he clearly doesn't have blond hair or 'white' skin. That makes him dark-hued. If he would like to stop being a pussy and post a decent pic and he has blue eyes like Tom Watson then maybe I will rethink, but for now he is swarthy.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Nice white flag asshat. How do Ofailurecal's balls taste?MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Moving Sale wrote:dig pic
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
It isn't easy being a fearless crusader for social justice and all that is right in the world.Papa Willie wrote:Jesus. This is almost uncomfortable to watch...
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I wouldn't know. I don't associate with violent lowlifes.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Which is fine - there can be many more definitions. But as long as "a black person" or "a person with black skin" are among them, it is appropriate to use it in that way.Moving Sale wrote:It is also not limited to the definitions you provided.I wrote:
The word can be correctly used to describe a black person, but it's not limited to that definition.
The whole point of what? It's been acknowledged that the word has secondary & tertiary definitions.In fact it is many times used to describe people with light colored skin like our President. This is the whole point.
You tried to run smack on Bri for not knowing the definition of a word, when, in fact, he does appear to know its primary definition. Your moral crusade against racism has nothing to do with word meanings. Words still mean the same thing irrespective of your moral stance on an issue.You, to BSmack wrote:I bet you think mvscal means someone with black skin eh? Good god you are stupid.
It doesn't matter if he is a mvscal or swarthy or Irish or from Omaha. His is an individual and should be treated as such, not mocked for the color of his skin or anything else about him that he can't change.
That may be, but it doesn't give you or anyone else license to arbitrarily assign new definitions to existing words.
In your imagination, since you have no evidence to the contrary that meets your standard of proof. Essentially, you've "convicted" him of being guilty of having dark skin when the assumption, legally anyway (which I realize isn't at issue here), is that he must be presumed "innocent" until proven otherwise. You've taken a decidedly un-American approach here, counselor.That being said, he clearly doesn't have blond hair or 'white' skin. That makes him dark-hued. If he would like to stop being a pussy and post a decent pic and he has blue eyes like Tom Watson then maybe I will rethink, but for now he is swarthy.
Why do you hate America?
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I actually know what Moving Sale is saying.
The term "swarthy" is occassionally used as a perjorative directed at people of Mediterranian descent. But it's context that way should be acceted as a racial slur...for example "Italians and Greeks are untrustworthy...those sneaky, swarthy villains".
Here's where Moving Sale tells us "he knows that" and is aware of the reversal of definition...turning "swarthy" into a power word against someone he percieves as being worthy of disdain.
Go on, Moving Sale...that's what you meant, right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
The term "swarthy" is occassionally used as a perjorative directed at people of Mediterranian descent. But it's context that way should be acceted as a racial slur...for example "Italians and Greeks are untrustworthy...those sneaky, swarthy villains".
Here's where Moving Sale tells us "he knows that" and is aware of the reversal of definition...turning "swarthy" into a power word against someone he percieves as being worthy of disdain.
Go on, Moving Sale...that's what you meant, right?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
And when someone uses it, as they often do, to describe a mixed race person like the POTUS? He is not a “member of any dark skinned people” nor is his skin “black.” The POTUS is not a “member” of any race unless you want to argue that he is “member” of more than one race at a time. Is that your argument?Smackie Chan wrote: But as long as "a black person" or "a person with black skin" are among them, it is appropriate to use it in that way.
As does “swarthy.” Unless your argument is that all meanings of words must be in a dictionary. The LAPD gang squad would love it if that were true.The whole point of what? It's been acknowledged that the word has secondary & tertiary definitions.
I never said he didn’t. What I had said earlier in the thread, to you, was:You tried to run smack on Bri for not knowing the definition of a word, when, in fact, he does appear to know its primary definition.
So he was on notice that I was referring to the secondary meaning. Now you can bitch about the existence of a secondary meaning if you want…. Oh wait it's the next part of your post you say?The smarter of the two of us wrote:A) The Aryans he has been sucking up to for so many years care about his Spanish DNA not his skin color.
I’m just reporting the news. You can choose to believe it or not. And just for the record how many police reports, prison rules violation reports and the like do you think I have read in the last decade? How many clients who were ‘at war’ with, in bed with or a member of the AB (and their ‘white’ counterparts) do you think I have interviewed? Do you really think I’m making this up?Your moral crusade against racism has nothing to do with word meanings. Words still mean the same thing irrespective of your moral stance on an issue.
How do you think words get new meanings? Shit how do you think new words come into being? You think they START in a dictionary?That may be, but it doesn't give you or anyone else license to arbitrarily assign new definitions to existing words.
I have a pic of his black hair and not white skin. WTF are you talking about?In your imagination, since you have no evidence to the contrary that meets your standard of proof.
You can check the record, but I don’t think I ever said he was swarthy before he posted his (grainy shitty pussylike) pic.Essentially, you've "convicted" him of being guilty of having dark skin when the assumption, legally anyway (which I realize isn't at issue here), is that he must be presumed "innocent" until proven otherwise.
Racists. Too many fucking Racists.Why do you hate America?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda60/cda605068f7df7767d20836747954deb21b306e9" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
A) Shhhhhhhh. They are on a roll, shut your bacon trap.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:I actually know what Moving Sale is saying.
The term "swarthy" is occassionally used as a perjorative directed at people of Mediterranian descent.
B) [dins]Spelling much?[/dins]
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
No. My argument is that when it's used to describe a black person, it's being used according to its primary definition. But, as I already stated, it can also be used to describe "a person of any race or origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, etc."Moving Sale wrote:And when someone uses it, as they often do, to describe a mixed race person like the POTUS? He is not a “member of any dark skinned people” nor is his skin “black.” The POTUS is not a “member” of any race unless you want to argue that he is “member” of more than one race at a time. Is that your argument?Smackie Chan wrote: But as long as "a black person" or "a person with black skin" are among them, it is appropriate to use it in that way.
Can you produce a reference that would be moderately to widely accepted providing a definition of swarthy that is anything other than dark-skinned? It may be true that over time, certain words can take on meanings they previously didn't have. Typically, when this happens, dictionaries will catch up with modern usage and start including the new definitions, since that's the function of dictionaries as reference documents - to provide word definitions. I'm not aware of this happening with swarthy, which doesn't mean it hasn't, but you're the only person I know using it to mean something else. This typically is not indicative of the word taking on a new accepted meaning. It usually means the person using it is misinformed and is using it incorrectly, which is my contention here. If your contention is that anyone can start using words in ways other than they are commonly used, language ceases to have meaning because any word can have any meaning the user wants it to have.You wrote:As does “swarthy.” Unless your argument is that all meanings of words must be in a dictionary.I wrote:The whole point of what? It's been acknowledged that the word has secondary & tertiary definitions.
The secondary meaning that only you seem to be aware of. Because you're so much smarter than everyone else here, I know.The shorter of the two of us wrote:A) The Aryans he has been sucking up to for so many years care about his Spanish DNA not his skin color.
So he was on notice that I was referring to the secondary meaning.
What news have you reported? That swarthy has a new definition that you've made up?I’m just reporting the news. You can choose to believe it or not.
And this is relevant...how? If you're trying to say that you've heard people use a word in a way that is not considered proper usage, that doesn't mean the word has taken on a new meaning. It means there are a lot of people using it incorrectly.And just for the record how many police reports, prison rules violation reports and the like do you think I have read in the last decade? How many clients who were ‘at war’ with, in bed with or a member of the AB (and their ‘white’ counterparts) do you think I have interviewed?
Yep.Do you really think I’m making this up?
There are several ways.You wrote:How do you think words get new meanings?I wrote:That may be, but it doesn't give you or anyone else license to arbitrarily assign new definitions to existing words.
That's for a different discussion since we're not talking about new words here. But, in a word, it's coining.Shit how do you think new words come into being?
Swarthy has nothing to do with hair color, and "not white" skin does not translate to dark skin. Plenty of fair-skinned folks have dark hair.I have a pic of his black hair and not white skin. WTF are you talking about?
But you said you were using the word because of his DNA, not his color, and that its use was proper for that reason. You can't have it both ways.I don’t think I ever said he was swarthy before he posted his (grainy shitty pussylike) pic.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I'm apparently not getting through to you. Let's try a different tack.Smackie Chan wrote: The secondary meaning that only you seem to be aware of. Because you're so much smarter than everyone else here, I know.
dwarf
noun, often attributive \ˈdwȯrf\
plural dwarfs also dwarves
Definition of DWARF
1a : a person of unusually small stature; especially : one whose bodily proportions are abnormal
How many times have you had a long drawn out conversation about the merits of this word being used to describe any poster on this board?
I can answer that question for you it's none. "Swarthy" accurately describes Ofailurecal when used on this board. Does that help? If not reread Marty’s last post.
Are you color blind? He clearly doesn't have white skin. He is a swarthy mongrel who most white racists would laugh at if he ever had the balls to pull this shtick in public. Why are you so adamant about licking his balls?"not white" skin does not translate to dark skin.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I haven't seen the pic, and don't really care if I do. Not sure why you have such a hard-on for dude to post a pic of himself.Moving Sale wrote:Are you color blind? He clearly doesn't have white skin."not white" skin does not translate to dark skin.
If you say so.He is a swarthy mongrel who most white racists would laugh at if he ever had the balls to pull this shtick in public.
I don't recall mentioning him by name, citing anything he's posted, or defending anything he's said during our exchanges in this thread or in any others. Must be I just don't know what licking his balls means. What's the definition? If you're not sure, just make one up. You seem pretty adept at that.Why are you so adamant about licking his balls?
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
So white flag on the swarthy issue. Good show.
You can say I'm making up the definition or you can read Marty's post. I don't care which.
You can say I'm making up the definition or you can read Marty's post. I don't care which.
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Moving Dwarf should be commended on overcoming his obvious learning disabilities and becoming a lawyer. OK, so he's the worst lawyer in CA, but he is a lawyer.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I read his post, but I don't consider Canadian definitions to have any validity here in the nation you hate, especially as it relates to swarthiness. They're so pasty they make Swedes look swarthy.Moving Sale wrote:So white flag on the swarthy issue. Good show.
You can say I'm making up the definition or you can read Marty's post. I don't care which.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Perhaps it was...Papa Willie wrote:Perhaps it was a black flag?Moving Sale wrote:So white flag on the swarthy issue. Good show.
You can say I'm making up the definition or you can read Marty's post. I don't care which.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
And yet I beat your sorry ass to a pulp.BSmack wrote:Moving Dwarf should be commended on overcoming his obvious learning disabilities and becoming a lawyer. OK, so he's the worst lawyer in CA, but he is a lawyer.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
So any evidence that you are wrong you dismiss. Way to have an open mind. You can now go back to licking Ofailurecal's balls.Smackie Chan wrote: I read his post, but I don't consider Canadian definitions to have any validity here in the nation you hate, especially as it relates to swarthiness. They're so pasty they make Swedes look swarthy.
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Not any evidence. Just Canadian evidence.Moving Sale wrote:So any evidence that you are wrong you dismiss.
And Mexican, too, of course. Can't trust them swarthy spics.
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Sure you did Tiny. Sure you did.Moving Sale wrote:And yet I beat your sorry ass to a pulp.BSmack wrote:Moving Dwarf should be commended on overcoming his obvious learning disabilities and becoming a lawyer. OK, so he's the worst lawyer in CA, but he is a lawyer.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
You have no idea how stupid that post is in this context do you?BSmack wrote:
Sure you did Tiny. Sure you did.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Marty's post is your ace in the hole? The one where he called you a fucking idiot?Moving Sale wrote:So white flag on the swarthy issue. Good show.
You can say I'm making up the definition or you can read Marty's post. I don't care which.
And what's this "white flag" nonsense you keep throwing around? What I see in this thread is people who have addressed your ridiculous arguments eloquently and effectively. Because people don't want to chase your tail around all day doesn't mean anything's been conceded. If you had your way, you'd move the goal posts all day long about the color of the sky, if that's what you needed to do to be "right" on the internet. You're tedious because you're obsessed...or obsessed because you're tedious. Not sure which.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Nice Dodge Mr. Bundy.Smackie Chan wrote:Not any evidence. Just Canadian evidence.Moving Sale wrote:So any evidence that you are wrong you dismiss.
And Mexican, too, of course. Can't trust them swarthy spics.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
I never said that. I said SC is lying if he says there is no other evidence that swarthy is used the way I said.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: Marty's post is your ace in the hole?
I get you are kinda stupid but when someone does not address the substance of a post but merely writes something like "bode" or "your an idiot" then that is dodging the issue. This is known as a white flag you dense fuck.And what's this "white flag" nonsense you keep throwing around?
You are too dumb to read. I get that.What I see in this thread is people who have addressed your ridiculous arguments eloquently and effectively.
Then they shouldn’t post if they don’t want to, but once they do, if it doesn’t address the substance of the issue at hand then it’s a white flag.Because people don't want to chase your tail around all day doesn't mean anything's been conceded.
Go any evidence to back up this wild accusation?If you had your way, you'd move the goal posts all day long about the color of the sky, if that were what you needed to do to be "right" on the internet.
And you are an idiot because you lack the mental capacity to think of anything more complicated than a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.You're tedious because you're obsessed...or obsessed because you're tedious.
Of course you are not sure. You are a nothing but a puddle of flop sweat with a bad haircut.Not sure which.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
No, you don't.Moving Sale wrote:I have a pic of his black hair and not white skin.
My hair is red, my eyes are blue and my skin is quite pale. Those are the facts. Sorry they don't fit your "self-loathing" angle. Of course that bit never made any sense either since I don't hate brown people except for Arabs.
Continue melting here:
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
mvscal wrote:My hair is red, my eyes are blue and my skin is quite pale.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b601f/b601ff1906265499dc1baa945bf1b7c62cf48db4" alt="Image"
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
Oh, so you're just "trolling" now. Gotcha.Moving Sale wrote:You are 5'9" and not a midget or a dwarf. We get it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d1f/99d1ffcd436e8dfc800a9b8c92c0d1bf3f377acb" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Open challenge to mvscal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/774c5/774c51df98b1fb5305b2edf5e767389b7049e0df" alt="Image"
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.