House votes for Pot

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Moving Sale wrote:Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket. Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it. YOU are missing the distinction between decriminalizing weed and only decriminalizing possession of less than a certain amount of weed, but then you are an idiot so it's understandable.

I think everyone on the planet understands the meaning of decriminilisation in the framework of this discussion, as it refers to amounts that lend to the definition of possession and not to amounts that would be interpreted as "intent to traffic".

Everyone...except you, apparently.

Because you need to fabricate the context of decriminilisation into a sharp, pointy stick...to fend off wolves or something.


Keep tilting at tiny windmills, Mini Quixote.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by BSmack »

Moving Sale wrote:Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket.
Yes, for small amounts.

http://norml.org/aboutmarijuana/item/st ... iminalized
NORML wrote:The following states have passed laws decriminalizing marijuana. Typically, decriminalization means no prison time or criminal record for first-time possession of a small amount for personal consumption. The conduct is treated like a minor traffic violation.
I would expect a lawyer to understand this. Then again, you're hardly a "real" lawyer. You're more like the lawyer a jizz mopper would refer to one of his "clients."
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

BSmack wrote:You're more like the lawyer a jizz mopper would refer to one of his "clients."
Image


Image
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Everyone...except you, apparently.
And every dictionary. So I can listen to a dim sheeple from north Mexico or dictionary writers. Go fuck a moose you stupid bland piece of boring shit.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

BSmack wrote: I would expect a lawyer to understand this.
I understand that you are as dumb as the idiot who wrote that blurb. So I can listen to some NORMAL blurb or dictionary writers. Go suck off a rabid skunk you stupid lemming.
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12899
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by mvscal »

No real surprise to see Shorty riding the plunger pony once again.

Poor lil fella.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7324
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Smackie Chan »

Moving Sale wrote:Use the wrong words enough and they become right. Is that your take you stupid fucking turd?
That was the argument you tried to employ when defending your incorrect use of swarthy.
Decriminalization means you can still get a ticket. Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it. YOU are missing the distinction between decriminalizing weed and only decriminalizing possession of less than a certain amount of weed
So you're saying decriminalized is not the right word to use when describing the legal status of marijuana possession in Oregon and elsewhere. What would you suggest is the right word?
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Except every dictionary definition backs me up. Why do you want to lick their balls so bad?

Edit: this is meant for Ofailure not SC.
Last edited by Moving Sale on Thu Jul 17, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

I think I said swarthy's pejorative meaning was in addition to it's definition. I don't think I said it meant something different like "white skinned" or some such BS like dims and his anal horde are trying to do.

There is no one word that I know of for what Oregon did in 1973. There might be one in German but in English you would have to not be a lazy fuck and, god forbid, use a whole phrase.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

I don't care if you find this funny, but...


Image
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

It's not only not funny it says a lot about what a stupid vapid jock riding fuckstain you are. I'm right and you just CAN'T admit it and that is sad. Sad for you, sad for north Mexico and sad for gray matter everywhere. Get over yourself. Get your shit together and post something less bland than a Matzo ball or at least be factually correct.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by BSmack »

Moving Sale wrote:Image
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Nice white flag asshat.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

You are a fat stupid shit. We get it.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Sudden Sam wrote:MS, have you ever even considered admitting you've made a mistake?

Or that you were wrong?
Just the other day I fucked up a post to dims where I misquoted him somehow. I told him I didn't know how I fucked it thus implying that I did indeed fuck it up. Does that count?

Are you implying decriminalization means something other than what I have said it means?
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by poptart »

FACT is, Oregon did decriminalize weed, just as Dinsdale said.

If Moving Flail wanted to debate him, he needed to ask, "Yes, but are you saying they decriminalized weed in ALL quantities?"
And he could hope that Dinsdale would shoot himself in the foot by saying, "Yes, all quantities."
Less than .01% chance Dins would have said that, however, because he surely knows better.

But Moving Flail he didn't ask him to qualify.
He instead came roaring in like a bull in a china shop, declaring, "Oregon did not decriminalize weed in 1973 or any other year."

He was wrong.
Weed WAS decriminalized in Oregon.

Period.
Full stop.


Two pages of M. Flail twisting and humiliating himself further -----> in futile effort to rationalize his failure.

:lol:
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31648
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Mikey »

Moving Sale wrote:

If pot has been decriminalized in Oregon how did a client of mine do time for having 20lbs?
Criminal stupidity.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Mikey wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:

If pot has been decriminalized in Oregon how did a client of mine do time for having 20lbs?
Criminal stupidity.
Do explain.

Puptent,
I specifically prefaced my point by saying that dims dropping spelling and comma smack and then being fast and loose with the facts was BS. That was the point two pages ago and it's still the point. The Fact that Oregon did not decriminalize pot in 1973 is merely a side note.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by poptart »

You're lying.

If Oregon did not decriminalize marijuana, how is it that people are caught with weed ----> and yet face no criminal prosecution?
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

poptart wrote:You're lying.

If Oregon did not decriminalize marijuana, how is it that people are caught with weed ----> and yet face no criminal prosecution?
Some do some don't. If it was decriminalized nobody would face more than a ticket. Lights yet?
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by poptart »

Moving Bowel wrote:If it was decriminalized nobody would face more than a ticket. Lights yet?
Uhh... no.
You're lying.
You're wrong, and you know it.

People who TRAFFIC marijuana, or have intent to TRAFFIC marijuana, face criminal charges.
People who just possess it, for personal use, do not.

What that means is that it has been decriminalized in Oregon, by the definition which EVERYONE long ago understood.


You should have never entered this thread.


Go into Read Only mode for a long while, failure.

Your act is worn the hell out.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized. My "act" is being right. You are an idiot if you think being right is worn out.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized.
You honestly do not know the difference between decriminalization vs legalization as it pertains specifically to marijuana...and people actually pay you real money to represent them? :shock:
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

SS,
I have answered the question more than once but I will do it again, I talked to his Oregon atty and she seemed to have her shit together.
Last edited by Moving Sale on Fri Jul 18, 2014 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Bullshit. People who have more than an oz face criminal charges. That's not decriminalized.
You honestly do not know the difference between decriminalization vs legalization as it pertains specifically to marijuana...and people actually pay you real money to represent them? :shock:
Actually I do. Decriminalized means you can still get a ticket for it and legalized mean you can't. The possession of more than an oz of pot is still illegal in Oregon and you can go to jail for having 29grams. That's not decriminalized you stupid asshat, but thanks for the water.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Yes it is, in accordance with how the term is used by lawmakers. Your personal definition/interpretation of it is irrelevant.
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Yes it is, in accordance with how the term is used by lawmakers. Your personal definition/interpretation of it is irrelevant.
Here is the text.

“Notwithstanding subsection (2) of this section, unlawful possession of marijuana is a violation if the amount possessed is less than one avoirdupois ounce of the dried leaves, stems and flowers of the plant Cannabis family Moraceae. A violation under this subsection is punishable by a fine of not less than $ 500 and not more than $1,000. Fines collected under this subsection shall be forwarded to the Department of Revenue for deposit in the Criminal Fine and Assessment Account established under ORS 137.300.”

It does not contain the word "decriminalization" anywhere. The bill that made pot illegal in Oregon was called the Uniform State Narcotic Drug Act. Does that make pot a Narcotic?
And it's not MY definition. It's the dictionary definition. YOU are the one misusing the word and your only defense is "they did it first."

You are a stupid fucking lemming.
User avatar
Felix
2012 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 9271
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: probably on a golf course

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Felix »

Moving Sale wrote:Legalization means you can't even get a ticket for it.
really? tell your client (assuming your defense didn't result in a life sentence for him) to get pulled over in Tacoma carrying 20 lbs and see what happens......
get out, get out while there's still time
Moving Sale

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Moving Sale »

Yes really.

Main Entry: le·gal·ize
Pronunciation: \ˈlē-gə-ˌlīz\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): le·gal·ized; le·gal·iz·ing
Date: circa 1716
transitive verb
: to make legal ; especially : to give legal validity or sanction to
— le·gal·i·za·tion \ˌlē-gə-lə-ˈzā-shən\ noun
— le·gal·iz·er \ˈlē-gə-ˌlī-zər\ noun


As for my client, I walked him in his Cali case so he is out and about. Why don't you just tell me what would happen if he had 20 lbs in Tacoma instead of playing whatever game it is you are playing?
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: House votes for Pot

Post by Dinsdale »

Moving Sale wrote:Why don't you just tell me what would happen if he had 20 lbs in Tacoma
You'd get your ass kicked by a bunch of gangbangers and your weed would be stolen.

What do I win?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Post Reply