And this is an accurate take on the rigid denial of folks who are determined to believe the ludicrous official story.Moving Sale wrote:A very good ploy in the FFO is to get people to believe that the operation would need to be larger than it actually needed to be. This is done by using plants to suggest a much more complicated conspiracy than necessary, thus duping people like 88 to become married to the government narrative. Once married to the government narrative most people will (unlike a real marriage) never let go, even in the face of unexplainable concepts in the government narrative. Once married to the GN, it doesn’t matter how stupid the GN is (folding wings, 100 foot airliner into 16 ft hole, fire melting steal and titanium, magic windows, and the like) the dupe is now a full-fledged (although still outside the loop) member of the GN and will defend it vigorously.88 wrote:
To give your bullshit take any consideration, one would have to believe that:
Someone (and likely many people) had the ability to obtain, arm, and control some sort of a missile and deliver it to the Pentagon disguised as an airliner sufficient to mislead a crew of a C-130 into believing that it was a 757.
Someone (and likely many people) would have had to right the WTC's with explosives or arrange similar missiles to fly into the WTC buildings on 9/11.
Someone (and likely many people) had the ability to commandeer Flight 77, take it somewhere else, and kill every single person on board.
Someone (and likely many people) would have had to do the same thing with three other airliners.
Despite the enormous cast and crew that would have to have been involved in such a conspiracy, none of them has spoken a single word about the conspiracy during the last 13 years.
That anyone could believe that such a conspiracy occurred boggles the mind.
As for the interesting claims of a seeming large number of people involved in such a conspiracy, this is rather misleading. This sort of false flag operation--like the Reichstag Fire--is pyramidal in structure. That is, no one knows what their superior knows--all the way up to the top. And in this case, let's be frank, the top is Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Dov Zakheim, and various PNAC swine like Wolfowitz. The control of the media was already in place, as the flood of false accusations and war hysteria was similarly planned well in advance.
And yes, the passengers on the four planes (each barely a third full) were murdered. Why would this be a surprise given the scope of the false attack?
And yes, the three towers were obviously fitted with demolition devices--not any sort of impossibility given the fact that Larry Silverstein had purchased them only several months prior. And I'm sure you've seen the video where Silverstein admits--astonishingly--that indeed WTC 7 had been "pulled" by necessity. Now this is absurd in the sense that a huge steel-framed building would be in any sort of peril due to a fire, but moreover that the building was already prepared for such an emergency demolition--as though this is somehow standard!!!
Here, let's hear it from Larry..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p34XrI2Fm6I
Now...why would he admit such a thing? because he's frazzled out of his tree at the fact that this thing is actually underway?
AS for the pentagon attack, the photo is real. The front of the building was obviously not struck by a 120-ton airliner...look..
This is the actual damage
\And this is the official cause...
Obviously no 757 slammed into the pentagon.
As to SS's claim of voluminous evidence, where is it? Any photos, videos? Any of the flight recorder data released? No? Nothing?
