(G) Muslims Slaughter Cartoonists/Cops in Paris (G)

[LTS TRN 2]

Well Reagan would qualify as a diseased pet, if only for being such an obedient servant of the corporate plutocrats and militarists. That he was politically euthanized and stuffed as a prize trophy of the neocon contagion is perhaps distasteful, but such are the mores of that ilk.

Do us all a favor. Provide a link any time you C&P post.

I usually put it in bold type. This one's not c&p'd, it's actually how I speak.

[mvscal]

Sure, Reagan is your hero..



What a dumbfuck.

You are not thinking of defending RRs record are you ofailurecal?

I'm mocking a braindead windup toy who posted a graph on "The Reagan Years" that only covers his first two years. I guess the other six didn't fit the narrative.

[Truman]

Not pictured: 1400 years of Islamic Extremism

I'm confident mvscal will be along soon to correct the dates, but I pretty sure the Crusades died out around 1272. The Inquisition; during Napoleon's reign. And the last witch burned in America was in 1697. Funny how democracy, industrialism, and capitalism has a way of civilizing some people.

BTW, only one person has ever died in an abortion clinic blast. Another six have been murdered outside of their clinics. The thousands of babies that died within those clinics notwithstanding, natch. Do you not recall the outcry of millions of Christians condemning such acts of violence? Funny the silence of the Muzzies with each outrage, ain't it?

As for gay bashing... Better that than gay beheading, eh, Sammy? We all know how the Religion of Peace embraces homosexuality.

If the point of your post is that you happen to agree with the limp-wristed, liberal fucktard that crayoned that op-ed cartoon, then you are just as big a simpering pajama-boy as Lee Judge is.

[LTS TRN 2]

Center ring x post there 88. And since his post was not in bold, that means it was just as he speaks, right?

I said "usually," asshole.

You are not thinking of defending RRs record are you ofailurecal?[/quote]

I'm mocking a braindead windup toy who posted a graph on "The Reagan Years" that only covers his first two years. I guess the other six didn't fit the narrative.[/quote]

It covers eight years...what , you can't read? Plus, the rap sheet posted above fills it out a bit, eh? :wink: And again...are you really trying to defend the record and legacy of the most criminal administration in history? The most disastrous--unless of course you own an oil company..?..

[mvscal]

It covers eight years...what , you can't read?

Yes, I see. The problem for you is that five of them aren't "Reagan Years." You have Ford's final budget and Carter's four. Reagan's first budget took effect 10/1/1981.

You got your head stuck pretty far up your ass, don't cha? Or what?

[mvscal]

I'm confident mvscal will be along soon to correct the dates, but I pretty sure the Crusades died out around 1272.

And, perhaps more to the point, the Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

I'm confident mvscal will be along soon to correct the dates, but I pretty sure the Crusades died out around 1272.

And, perhaps more to the point, the Crusades were a response to Muslim aggression.

Pretty fucking late to the game, too.

I guess they waited for the Byzantines to burn out before strolling in under the guise of "Christian fellowship", only to grab land and loot the place.

Like taking the wristwatch off a cancer patient...

[Left Seater]

Huge racks to 88 for that find.

Most posters would Hungus themselves after such a stunt was revealed. Only a special few have so little self worth as to stay.

[LTS TRN 2]

Here, I wrote this...

Conservatives this week have been on a lying love-fest to commemorate the 100th birthday of Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan. Everyone from Sarah Palin to Newt Gingrich to Republican Senators on the floor of the Senate have praised the addle-brained B-movie actor-turned-governor and then President as the ideal of conservatism. Although Reagan is touted as the ultimate conservative, his record as governor of California and President belies the neo-conservative narrative of low taxes and small government. What Reagan did accomplish was to usher in an era of business first, people second that has continued to 2011, and is singularly responsible for the ongoing destruction of the middle-class and elevation of corporatism and theocracy to the detriment of America.

Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times, nearly tripled the federal budget deficit, gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants and their families, increased the size of the federal government, and presided over an unemployment increase after cutting taxes for the rich but raising them for the middle class and the poor. Republicans and conservative groups are hard-pressed to admit to those aspects of the Reagan presidency, but regardless their efforts to rewrite history, the records are there for all to see.

During the Reagan presidency, he was responsible for helping to destroy unions for big business and is directly responsible for mining disasters in West Virginia where he assisted Don Blankenship of Massey Energy to prevent unions from protecting coal miners. Despite historical truth that union membership helped create the middle class in America starting after the Second World War, Republicans are continuing their narrative that unions are responsible for the economic woes the country is facing today.

The conservative notion that cutting taxes creates jobs and increases revenue is ongoing from the Reagan era and during his first year in office when he cut taxes, the government went deeper into debt and despite raising taxes 10 more times he was never able to rein in the federal deficit. His economic policies are still the stuff of legend for conservatives, but instead of helping American families, he was responsible for an income disparity that saw average incomes for the top wage earners triple or quadruple while the median income has risen only 30% (adjusted for inflation).

The rise of the religious right in America is in part due to Reagan’s deal with the devil (moral majority) by giving them a voice and a foothold in politics in exchange for their voting bloc. Reagan’s unholy alliance with the likes of Jerry Falwell has been a thorn in the side of women’s rights and religious freedom that continues to this day with Republicans making every attempt to restrict a woman’s right to choose in the 112th Congress.

What must be a source of embarrassment for Republicans and conservatives is Reagan’s creation of the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Reagan was responsible for funding, training, arming, and equipping the Islamist mujahidin in Afghanistan as a means of combatting the former Soviet Union. Reagan was responsible for channeling billions of dollars and sophisticated weapons through Pakistan’s intelligence agency that is still responsible for helping the Taliban to kill Americans in Afghanistan and the border region with Pakistan.

It is curious why Republicans have elevated Ronald Reagan to god-like status when history shows he presided over what is arguably a period of criminal activity and economic despair for millions of Americans. Reagan’s administration illegally sold arms to Iranian officials in exchange for American hostages despite an arms embargo in place at the time. If it wasn’t bad enough selling arms illegally, Reagan secretly used some of the proceeds to fund anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua that was directly prohibited by Congress.

Ronald Reagan’s tenure as California governor does nothing to add to his mystique as a humanitarian because he committed one of the worst atrocities on mentally ill Californians that the State is still dealing with today. Reagan closed all of California’s State Hospitals that were the primary care mental health facilities, and put the patients on the streets without any care or safety nets. California’s streets are still the home for those mental patients who have not since died from lack of care or are not in prison. Besides putting the mentally ill on the streets, Reagan’s actions put thousands of health professionals out of a job further costing the state tax revenue.

Republicans can profess Ronald Reagan’s greatness as the epitome of conservative idealism but they are in denial of the truth about the man. His lack of political experience allowed his underlings and corporate masters to dictate policy that America is still suffering from in 2011. He was not a fiscal conservative and besides raising taxes, he increased the size of the federal government much like subsequent Republican administrations and it has cost the American people dearly.

Perhaps Republicans are not in denial and are counting on memory loss from those who lived through the Reagan years or the ignorance of young Republicans who worship the image of Reagan instead of his horrendous record. When one considers the damage that Reagan allowed his Cabinet to wreak on America because his brain had turned to mush, the man conservatives idolize is just a puppet for corporations and banks like Republicans today. Reagan’s legacy will forever be cemented in American lore as a bad president and destroyer of the American dream and no amount of revisionist history will change that.

The man is dead, but his record lives on for truth-seekers to refer to when looking for the origin of today’s conservative movement. History is supposed to be the great teacher so intelligent human beings do not repeat past mistakes, but like the addle-brained half-wit Ronald Reagan, Republicans in 2011 are not intelligent and are apt to repeat the same failed policies of their idol and it continues to be a source of shame for decent Americans. Republicans could certainly find a better leader to unite behind than a mentally challenged B-movie actor, but then again, Republicans are all just B-movie actors and bad for America.

It took me all morning, but it was worth the toil and sweat so that you guys could get a nuanced take...you're welcome..

[Moving Sale]

I guess the other six didn't fit the narrative.

Do tell.

[mvscal]

I just thought that some Christians needed to be reminded of their past "indiscretions".

Who gives a fuck about the past in a conversation about the present?

[Smackie Chan]

Who gives a fuck about the past in a conversation about the present?

An odd statement from someone so rooted in history.

[mvscal]

Who gives a fuck about the past in a conversation about the present?

An odd statement from someone so rooted in history.

What's odd about it? The actions of Christians 800 years ago have no relevance whatsoever to contemporary Muslim behavior.

I study history. I don't live there.

[The Seer]

It's the ignorance expressed by these people that bugs me. The comments like "No religion should harm those who believe differently" and "You don't kill in the name of your god" can't go unchallenged.

To be clear...I want these Isamafanatics eliminated (which will never happen). All extremists of their ilk have got to go.

So basically, the Christians have evolved and the muzzies have Devolved (or remained stagnant).

[Smackie Chan]

The actions of Christians 800 years ago have no relevance whatsoever to contemporary Muslim behavior.

I study history. I don't live there.

Dig, but asking the rhetorical question, "Who gives a fuck about the past in a conversation about the present?" seems to indicate you feel there is no connection or relevance history has to the present in general, which is something I don't think you believe. I agree that anyone trying to argue that sins committed by Christians centuries ago justifies or explains current Muslim behavior is engaging in fallacious reasoning. I just wouldn't have worded the argument against it as you did unless your point is that history, in this case, is being used as a red herring.

[mvscal]

Dig, but asking the rhetorical question, "Who gives a fuck about the past in a conversation about the present?" seems to indicate you feel there is no connection or relevance history has to the present in general, which is something I don't think you believe.

There isn't any meaningful connection or historical relevance when comparing two different subsets of people at two different points in time.

Every idiot that yaks about the Crusades doesn't even bother to mention the Muslim jihad which conquered the Holy Land in the first place or the Muslim attacks on Christian pilgrims which triggered the subsequent western Christian crusades.

[War Wagon]

If the point of your post is that you happen to agree with the limp-wristed, liberal fucktard that crayoned that op-ed cartoon, then you are just as big a simpering pajama-boy as Lee Judge is.

Not only that, but he's a terrible cartoonist as well. I can't even look at one his pap-smears w/o my blood pressure going up 10 points.

And then he tries to opine about baseball. :brad:

I'd like to see him in an orange ISIS jumpsuit video and then have Glen McCoy replace him at The KC Star.

[Jay in Phoenix]

Here, I wrote this...

Conservatives this week have been on a lying love-fest to commemorate the 100th birthday of Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan. Everyone from Sarah Palin to Newt Gingrich to Republican Senators on the floor of the Senate have praised the addle-brained B-movie actor-turned-governor and then President as the ideal of conservatism. Although Reagan is touted as the ultimate conservative, his record as governor of California and President belies the neo-conservative narrative of low taxes and small government. What Reagan did accomplish was to usher in an era of business first, people second that has continued to 2011, and is singularly responsible for the ongoing destruction of the middle-class and elevation of corporatism and theocracy to the detriment of America.

-----

The man is dead, but his record lives on for truth-seekers to refer to when looking for the origin of today’s conservative movement. History is supposed to be the great teacher so intelligent human beings do not repeat past mistakes, but like the addle-brained half-wit Ronald Reagan, Republicans in 2011 are not intelligent and are apt to repeat the same failed policies of their idol and it continues to be a source of shame for decent Americans. Republicans could certainly find a better leader to unite behind than a mentally challenged B-movie actor, but then again, Republicans are all just B-movie actors and bad for America.

It took me all morning, but it was worth the toil and sweat so that you guys could get a nuanced take...you're welcome..

So, it took you all morning, eh? Was that this morning LTS?

Or was it back in 2011 when you were ripping off posting under the identity of Rmuse?

http://agentlemansview.com/2011/02/05/r ... ican-hero/

Whichever it is, you're busted lying...again!

[Moving Sale]

contemporary Muslim behavior.

WTF does that even mean?

[mvscal]

Is there some reason you believe that your stupidity is my problem? Perhaps I might be able to help if you would tell me which of those three simple words you don't understand.

[Moving Sale]

The phrase you black cock sucking ass wipe. What does the phrase mean?

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

LTS = M2.

It's now fairly obvious.

No.

I suspect LTS is a "One Cock" kind of guy.

Milton's ass on a Saturday night probably looks like that bucket in the Korean stick game that poptart plays...

[R-Jack]

LTS = M2.

It's now fairly obvious.

Felcho's Jewish???

[LTS TRN 2]

Here, I wrote this...

Conservatives this week have been on a lying love-fest to commemorate the 100th birthday of Republicans’ man-turned-god, Ronald Reagan. Everyone from Sarah Palin to Newt Gingrich to Republican Senators on the floor of the Senate have praised the addle-brained B-movie actor-turned-governor and then President as the ideal of conservatism. Although Reagan is touted as the ultimate conservative, his record as governor of California and President belies the neo-conservative narrative of low taxes and small government. What Reagan did accomplish was to usher in an era of business first, people second that has continued to 2011, and is singularly responsible for the ongoing destruction of the middle-class and elevation of corporatism and theocracy to the detriment of America.

-----

The man is dead, but his record lives on for truth-seekers to refer to when looking for the origin of today’s conservative movement. History is supposed to be the great teacher so intelligent human beings do not repeat past mistakes, but like the addle-brained half-wit Ronald Reagan, Republicans in 2011 are not intelligent and are apt to repeat the same failed policies of their idol and it continues to be a source of shame for decent Americans. Republicans could certainly find a better leader to unite behind than a mentally challenged B-movie actor, but then again, Republicans are all just B-movie actors and bad for America.

It took me all morning, but it was worth the toil and sweat so that you guys could get a nuanced take...you're welcome..

So, it took you all morning, eh? Was that this morning LTS?

Or was it back in 2011 when you were ripping off posting under the identity of Rmuse?

http://agentlemansview.com/2011/02/05/r ... ican-hero/

Whichever it is, you're busted lying...again!

What part of Ignorant Dunce aren't you seeing when you look in the mirror? Because it's right there in front of you.

AS for the comment on the instigation of Islamic fundamentalism by virtue of decades of brutal assault upon the Muslim world by U.S./British/Israel (the real axis of Evil)...well it was a well stated one, to which I added a rejoining clause. And if you can appreciate it and actually think--as opposed to this general embarrassment of Savage Nation parroting that goes on here, it was worth it.

As for the basic accurate assessment of Reagan and his criminal ilk, this is perhaps even more deserving of your attention and awareness.

[Jay in Phoenix]

What part of plagiaristic, lying douch nozzle aren't you accepting when time and time again you are proven to be a fraud.

Nice deflection ass munch, now address the issue of your intellectual theft.

You can tap dance all you want around the original topic, but stick to point here.

You're a known liar, fraud, plagiarist, alien dork snorkeling whipping post, and you're quite finished.

[LTS TRN 2]

And who exactly the fuck are you?

WW

[Jay in Phoenix]

And who exactly the fuck are you?

WW

Just one of many that have kicked your sorry ass up and down this board.

Misdirection and cowardice do suit you Nicky.

You've been caught and called out. Run away bitch boy.

[LTS TRN 2]

Huh? "Caught"? What comedy club did you just wander out of? I don't give a fuck where I get ideas, or steal them, borrow and alter, invert, add pictures with caption...anything...who gives a fuck? All that counts is if it's a real take and an interesting one. Which is where I based my question...who the fuck are you? Some tedious little prick who's calling out to the teacher ..."Nick's cheating!..waaa...waaaa.."..

Yer pathetic, so shut up unless you've actually got an opinion on something.

[poptart]

Kind of like m2 and photos

And our fliend Paula -- busted by orc for plagiarizing in the NFL forum much the same way 88 busted LT TARD here.

RACK 88!

[R-Jack]

shut up unless you've actually got an opinion on something.

[R-Jack]

Kind of like m2 and photos

And our fliend Paula -- busted by orc for plagiarizing in the NFL forum much the same way 88 busted LT TARD here.

RACK 88!

And I caught toodles ripping takes in BTPCF as well.

Lest we forget the CNTL-CUDA affair way back in smackchat.

So the other people who shared LTS's opinion that it doesn't matter whose take it is happen to be some of the biggest drooling mongloids this side of the YouTube comments section.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

shut up unless you've actually got an opinion on something.

Jesus Christ, just stay down Nicky. This is pathetic.

[Jay in Phoenix]

shut up unless you've actually got an opinion on something.

Yep, got to is before I did. Isn't it also interesting how Nicky has gotten so pissed off in this thread.

Dudette was busted more than once pinching other people's statements, and gets all pissy for being called on it.

Let us know when you have your own original thoughts or ideas, LTShithead.

Oh wait, that's right. You can't. 'Tard.