King v Burwell
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Atomic Punk
- antagonist
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
- Location: El Segundo, CA
Re: King v Burwell
Meanwhile, the electorate is worried if their cell phones are charged enough for the next few hours of texting.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.
Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
Re: King v Burwell
To be honest, when I first saw the title of this (King vs. Burwell) I thought it would be about an MMA fight on TV. Silly me. Now I think we need a T1B virtual version with 88 vs. Jsc810.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
- FLW Buckeye
- 2014 T1B FBBL Champ
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 2:14 am
Re: King v Burwell
Wolfman wrote:Now I think we need a T1B virtual version with 88 vs. Jsc810.
Personally, Moving Saul vs Johnny S. Cochran 810 is a much better draw.
“Hey! You scratched my anchor!”
Re: King v Burwell
FLW Buckeye wrote: Moving Saul
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: King v Burwell
"[t]he State" means the government in my book, so this is an easy one for me.
Re: King v Burwell
Seems like "the State" was intentionally ambiguous, so the law could be redefined down the road.Moving Sale wrote:"[t]he State" means the government in my book, so this is an easy one for me.
But hey, they had to vote for it to see what was in it.
But in a law that directly addressed state exchanges and what individual states could and couldn't do, referring to the National Government as "The State" seems disingenuous.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Re: King v Burwell
Actually the law says "the State." I think if it said "The State" I would have an even better argument.
Re: King v Burwell
That is a simple matter of routine for this "administration."88 wrote:...unless you want to ignore what the law says.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: King v Burwell
The National Government established the Exchange under 1311 when they said all individual States "shall" established an Exchange. Some will need to be run by the National Government as noted in 1321. The tax credit goes to all people that are in Exchanges run by their individual State or run in an individual State by the National Government, the individual State and the National Government are collective, or individually, known as the State, or sometimes the Federal Government. I can do this all day, which is a statement you can apparently not make when you don't even know the difference between the National Government and Federal Government. :grin: :doh: