It's Bin Laden's Birthday..Have You Been A Good Boy?..

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:02 am

Yeah, the official shill for 9/11, the Boogeyman himself would have turned fifty-eight today, but for his clumsy murder. No official charges were ever filed against the former CIA operative, and no inquiry as to his murder has ensued. Unlike John Wilkes Booth, who proudly declared his motive and meaning in whacking the Imperialist "Manifest Destiny" president (Lincoln), Bin Laden denied entirely any part in the (obviously staged) 9/11 controlled demolition extravaganza. No evidence has been presented to link him to the event, and the utterly vile and insane Zionazi criminals who in fact conducted the treasonous act are on the loose and looking to ramp up

Are you ready to kill?

These towel-brained loosened stools of desperate Christer (all the way in Cotton and Ernst's driven dementia) are in office and fully prepared to engage the Lord's Will.

And you're twisting your panties about "muzzies"?

WW

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:48 am

Murder? Really?!? If you had said al-Awlaki, I'd agree with you, since it was murder sanctioned by our scofflaw President, but bin Laden had it coming from start to finish. Even as a Jew hater like yourself would have to agree with that-- well, unless you are the nutty type to believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories and all.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 1:25 pm

No evidence has been presented to link him to the event,

You sad, pathetic moron.

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:27 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:And you're twisting your panties about "muzzies"?

How long ago were you beheaded?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:18 pm

mvscal wrote:
No evidence has been presented to link him to the event,

You sad, pathetic moron.

Okay, dullard, let's see just where he was officially charged or indicted for anything to do with 9/11. What..? You've got absolutely nothing? Well, have a treat--because you're right--he was never charged. As for the fatuous "confession video," this was as cheap and clumsy a fake as we've ever been offered. And you'll notice that as it was quickly revealed to be fake, it has been withdrawn from public view. That is, it hasn't been used in suggesting his guilt since its first roll-out.

So...if in fact you've got nothing, what are you pretending to (triple laughing face) chortle about?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:24 pm

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:33 pm

Exactly...you've got nothing. Just like you can't defend any part of the official 9/11 Commission report. Nothing...And yet still you pretend to laugh? Well, the perverse joke is on you.

Here are the basic facts
http://www.911hardfacts.com/report_19.htm

some more..
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf ... e13664.htm

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:34 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, you'll notice that as it was quickly revealed to be fake, it has been withdrawn from public view.

You mean as in every video and link you've ever provided? Excuse me LTARD, but this is about to break...

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 8:43 pm

Was there ever a post June 2000 arrest warrant issued in the US for OBL?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:05 pm

Of course not...and the FBI admitted as much..
Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, you'll notice that as it was quickly revealed to be fake, it has been withdrawn from public view.
You mean as in every video and link you've ever provided? Excuse me LTARD, but this is about to break...

Like what, you fake ass hat?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:10 pm

That's what I thought. So no evidence has ever been presented linking OBL to 911.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:12 pm

88 wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:As for the fatuous "confession video," this was as cheap and clumsy a fake as we've ever been offered. And you'll notice that as it was quickly revealed to be fake, it has been withdrawn from public view.
Someone better let ABC know that they forgot to withdraw the cheap, clumsy, fatuous, fake "confession video" from public view:

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/video/osama-b ... n-13506877

SS...this is the original one and done presentation of the fake tape. There's been no further use of it --because almost immediately after this display, it was revealed to be totally bullshit. My point, precisely, is that it has not been used since. Try again...you're flailing and desperate.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:26 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Like what, you fake ass hat?

Like every 9/11, UFO or conspiracy video or web link in your entire posting history. Remember the UFO at O'Hare thread? I tore you apart then and exposed your bullshit and you admitted as such.

Let's start there, yes?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:32 pm

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 9:54 pm

Yes, there was the Nuremberg trials, and similar post-war trials for the Japanese--and Tojo was convicted on presented evidence and executed.

Why is there no evidence of Bin Laden's complicity in 9/11? Any ideas? Surely, with all of the massive "National Security" reaction to the event, some clear trail of evidence would be forthcoming? But...what..nothing? Plus, he clearly denied it--when taking credit would be the biggest coup--and recruitment vehicle--in history. But...nothing?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 10:42 pm

88 wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Was there ever a post June 2000 arrest warrant issued in the US for OBL?
I cannot imagine any reason why there would have been a post June 2000 arrest warrant issued in the US for OBL. Was there a post December 1941 arrest warrant issued for Emperor Hirohito or Adolf Hitler?

How is that relevant? Either there was a post 911 warrant or there wasn't.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Wed Mar 11, 2015 11:11 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Like what, you fake ass hat?
Like every 9/11, UFO or conspiracy video or web link in your entire posting history. Remember the UFO at O'Hare thread? I tore you apart then and exposed your bullshit and you admitted as such.

Let's start there, yes?

The O'Hare UFO incident was interesting in the subsequent media muzzling. But as for your refuting it or anything, this is a joke.

Here's a local angle from the day in question..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlhiAFHHTM4&t=220

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 12:37 am

Then I'm sure you can cite the paperwork that gives the military the power to invade Pakistan and kill a dude.
The fact remains that no evidence has even been presented against OBL Linking him to 911, Correct?
I don't know why Bush was never arrested. Vincent Bugliosi laid out how to do it for the Iraq war and no one took him up on it. Obama folded his tent on getting Bush for 911 and again I don't know why. Bunch of pussies.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:00 am

I never said that no evidence being presented against OBL means he didn't do it now did I?

Edit to add:
1541. Purpose and policy
(a) Congressional declaration
It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

None of that was happening in Pakistan in 2011 now was it?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:57 am

I have no idea if Obama was covering anything up, he may have believed that OBL was connected to 911 just like you do.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:12 am

Yeah, SS, why are you squirming like a worm? Just admit that there has been no evidence offered to connect Bin Laden with 9/11. And that he was never charged with anything directly related to 9/11. Okay? It's not a question for you to dodge, it's a simple fact that raises the actual important question, which is how does one justify murdering and dumping him into the sea without any due process or even a hint of evidence of his guilt?

As for Barry refusing to investigate the obvious inside job of 9/11--yes, he is necessarily complicit, no question. The most efficient War President in history is of course a total fraud. And you'd do well to focus on his most burning mission, the "fast-tracking" of the TPP. This charming cherry on the corporate world coup makes NAFTA look like the Peace Corps.

But please, ease off the loopy logic squirming, okay?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:17 am

I'm not too familiar with international war crimes legislation, but if you mean to use the term in a nonlegal sense then, yes.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:37 am

LTS Loser;
Can you hook me up with a link to where arrest warrants were issued for every kraut we killed in WWII?

TIA

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:41 am

How is that relevant?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:52 am

Surely warrants were issued for the enemy combatants in that war, just like you assert for this war.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:06 am

Define- enemy combatant

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:09 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:Surely warrants were issued for the enemy combatants in that war, just like you assert for this war.

So you're now in a squirming contest with SS? C'mon, D, your attempt at confused equivocation is silly at best. Bin Laden was immediately identified by the White house as the main culprit--and yet they have never produced any evidence whatsoever (except for the fatuous "confession tape'--which we see being every bit abandoned by you yahoos as the original ABC News).

Why is there no evidence? Why do you believe he had anything to do with it? Why do you pretend to defend the official 9/11 story? Any part of it you can defend? Nothing?

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 5:33 am

So you're saying that a member of government wasn't able to keep her emails secret, yet the previous administration was able to keep under wraps a humongus conspiracy to bomb the World Trade Center towers as well as the Pentagon.

Would you like to buy a bridge?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:22 am

Your cheesy attempt at equivocation again stalls..

Hillary is keeping all sorts of her e-mails secret.

And yes, the (obvious) controlled demolition of the WTC towers and the absurd official story of the pentagon attack has been effectively plastered over your cowering and clueless lobes. Let's be clear, the immediate muzzling of the mainstream media--the marshaling of it into an obedient chorus of the official story--is perhaps the most troubling and dangerous fact of this most dire event--that which all things are now seen as having come before or after. We're now in Year 14 of Our New Pearl Harbor.

As for your attempt at being dismissive..well, we're still waiting for you to attempt to defend a single part of the official story.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:21 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:The O'Hare UFO incident was interesting in the subsequent media muzzling. But as for your refuting it or anything, this is a joke.

Here's a local angle from the day in question..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlhiAFHHTM4&t=220

Really Nick? This video is what you're using to give credibility to your fantasies that the O'Hare UFO incident was real? Two talking heads speculating with no proof, no photos, no eyewitnesses, nothing.

There's no point rehashing all of this, because I can simply bump that thread up and show just how badly you were exposed. Remember Nicky, you admitted you were bullshitting.

Pack up your conspiracy videos, books and tin foil cap and go home.

You're done.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:52 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:So you're saying that a member of government wasn't able to keep her emails secret, yet the previous administration was able to keep under wraps a humongus conspiracy to bomb the World Trade Center towers as well as the Pentagon.

Would you like to buy a bridge?

None of that is science. Do you have any science that supports your claim?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:51 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:The O'Hare UFO incident was interesting in the subsequent media muzzling. But as for your refuting it or anything, this is a joke.

Here's a local angle from the day in question..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AlhiAFHHTM4&t=220
Really Nick? This video is what you're using to give credibility to your fantasies that the O'Hare UFO incident was real? Two talking heads speculating with no proof, no photos, no eyewitnesses, nothing.

There's no point rehashing all of this, because I can simply bump that thread up and show just how badly you were exposed. Remember Nicky, you admitted you were bullshitting.

Pack up your conspiracy videos, books and tin foil cap and go home.

You're done.

What's this tedious digression? Look, the witnesses were many at O'Hare. The official explanation--sort of a variation on the old "swamp gas" notion--was a joke. What's your point? AS for my supposed admission, this is total bullshit and you know it.

Look, if you're actually interested in that curious event, here's some compiled data.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5Ni6ESWYE4

As for any evidence of Bin laden being connected with 9/11, you're still striking out. Zero. You've provided nothing. And you won't, we all know that.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:43 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:What's this tedious digression? Look, the witnesses were many at O'Hare. The official explanation--sort of a variation on the old "swamp gas" notion--was a joke. What's your point? AS for my supposed admission, this is total bullshit and you know it.

There were thousands of people who saw the Phoenix Lights as well, including me. Thousands of witnesses to military flares.

As to your admission, like I said, just a bump away. You did freely admit you used bogus photos and conspiracy theory desperation and fallacy to make your point. You failed.

Don't make me call on this guy...

Look, if you're actually interested in that curious event, here's some compiled data.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5Ni6ESWYE4

As for any evidence of Bin laden being connected with 9/11, you're still striking out. Zero. You've provided nothing. And you won't, we all know that.

I haven't said a word regarding OSB. I'm just reminding you of what a liar you are.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:26 pm

You're drunk in the daytime. AS for the variety of witnesses at O'Hare, why don't you listen to the tapes from the air controllers? AS for my admitting anything about using fake data, you're full of shit.

Interesting that you shy away from the actual topic--the framing and murder of Bin Laden. No surprise, you total fraud.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 8:58 pm

No, just celebrating Bin Laden's birthday. And reminding you that you're being played like a cheap violin.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 10:14 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:You're drunk in the daytime.

As an ET-jizz bubbling blowhole like you well knows, you're delusional, so I'll let the idiocy pass.

Here's a direct quote from you on the pointy-headed photos you used. "And indeed, the weird skulls were a bluff."

That's just one example soup-brain, so strap down the tin-foil if you want more of your own crap dropped down on you.

AS for the variety of witnesses at O'Hare, why don't you listen to the tapes from the air controllers? AS for my admitting anything about using fake data, you're full of shit.

Clouds, low visibility, weird lighting. The controllers saw something alright, it just wasn't E fucking T.

I've shown you how clouds can look like UFO's.

Interesting that you shy away from the actual topic--the framing and murder of Bin Laden. No surprise, you total fraud.

Not at all retard. It's an incredibly silly topic, I don't care.

Shoo fly, buzz the fuck off.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Thu Mar 12, 2015 11:08 pm

What utter gibberish. Why are you posting pictures of clouds? The air controllers at O'Hare aren't reporting as witnesses--if you actually listened--but rather are relaying the reports of pilots. And moreover, where do you get off trying to float the "military flares" no0nsense concerning the Phoenix lights? What, the military was conducting target practice for jets and missiles right above the city of Phoenix? Really?

But, really, UFO's and so forth are another subject. Why can't you admit that Bin Laden was never charged and no evidence has ever been produced--not even after 14 years. Why? That is, why are you such a squirming weasel?

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 1:52 am

Sure, ya old tracker. I know yer dead on the trail of the actual perps, and all you need is that one more little push of reason, one more example of the bald falsity of the official story. Here ya go..

solid forensic evidence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqG6v7KZ_s8

and speculative assumptions..
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Now get on out there and do yer job!

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 2:01 am

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
Now get on out there and do yer job!

With that said....do you fucking have one?

Yes or no will suffice, since if it's yes, we already know it's either at a communist supporting coffee house or a pot dispensary.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Mar 13, 2015 2:08 am

Are you trying to recruit him into the horse breeding business?