Legal quandry, or maybe not
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Roger_the_Shrubber
- Back-o-Matic
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am
Legal quandry, or maybe not
Having been in the 'business' for a short time with a badge, but years of running data and stats in criminal law, and all the reading, watching, studying and especially REALLY thinking about criminal law, from both sides, I have some questions for all, but especially lawyers about a few things. Moving Sale, etc. I really want your opinions. OK, in no particular order:
1. Defense attorney supplied for you.
Why are new arrestees told that if they can't afford a defense attorney one will be provided for you, but they forget to say that they will be charged per hour for even a public defender at the charges' disposition? Tacked onto court costs. Why hasn't Miranda been changed to tell people this?
2. Cops can lie.
Why is it legal for a cop, in questioning, to lie to an arrestee about what other people said, evidence found, etc., yet their word is literally 'law'? Anything you he/she says about your arrest, things you might have said, is BANG!...evidence. Your word - hearsay. The 12 year old kid in San Diego accused of killing his sister( they interrogated him for 14 hours i believe, without a lawyer and he signed a confession which was bullshit!), and in Jacksonville, Fla., the 15 year old kid charged with killing two German tourists, beaten into signing a confession after cops said someone identified him(a lie). I hate real bad guys too, but damn! Just cause you arrest someone doesn't make them guilty.
3. Drug fines etc. go to treatment cause one must pay for it himself.
The biggest reason I quit state law enforcement was because of the drug charges, and the fees that people on probation have to pay. They had to pay full amount for a 1 month treatment program. They can't afford THAT! I wrote the head of the DOC in Fla. telling him that all cost of supervision(now @ $50 a month, or more now) should go directly to Drug rehab programs, since they are paying in. Strange...never heard anything back. Why shouldn't these funds go to treating the people that need it?
4. Jury of peers is a joke. 85% morons
There should be a moderately difficult law /civics/non-moron test for potential jurors. Having served on 4 now, and with a lot of law involved jobs and education,.....85% of the people were absolute idiots. I mean, how did these people learn to tie their shoes? A jury of ones peers? You mean the 9 white people and 3 black? for a white defendant? Or 9 black and 3 white for a eskimo?(tried to throw ya there) Never mind about their IQ level or anything???? I had one 66 year old white woman that wanted to add on three....THREE!!! felony charges onto a black dude up for domestic violence. I was Foreman, and showed her the door. Judge replaced her with the alternate. Anyway...
5. Any child crimes is life without parole or death. Period.
I think that one of the worst things that can happen to any person(male or female) in the U.S. is being wrongfully accused of child molestation. I feel liars about such accusations should be penalized exactly the same as would happen to the people that actually committed those crimes. That said:
After attending a week training with the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement in crimes against children training. 500 P&P officers, and they had a big screen setup for slide shows. Oh, and airline barf bags on all the tables. Now, I consider myself a Christian man, and in NO WAY perfect or with out sins(ya think?), but the things masquerading as humans that abuse children......in any form but especially sexual abuse......when you saw the ...things I saw, I want to kill every one of those non-human bastard pieces of filth!
No torture. Head meet bullet. Gonzo.
Just a rant, but intelligent responses accepted. I have no choice about the morons that respond with their usual razor wit.
1. Defense attorney supplied for you.
Why are new arrestees told that if they can't afford a defense attorney one will be provided for you, but they forget to say that they will be charged per hour for even a public defender at the charges' disposition? Tacked onto court costs. Why hasn't Miranda been changed to tell people this?
2. Cops can lie.
Why is it legal for a cop, in questioning, to lie to an arrestee about what other people said, evidence found, etc., yet their word is literally 'law'? Anything you he/she says about your arrest, things you might have said, is BANG!...evidence. Your word - hearsay. The 12 year old kid in San Diego accused of killing his sister( they interrogated him for 14 hours i believe, without a lawyer and he signed a confession which was bullshit!), and in Jacksonville, Fla., the 15 year old kid charged with killing two German tourists, beaten into signing a confession after cops said someone identified him(a lie). I hate real bad guys too, but damn! Just cause you arrest someone doesn't make them guilty.
3. Drug fines etc. go to treatment cause one must pay for it himself.
The biggest reason I quit state law enforcement was because of the drug charges, and the fees that people on probation have to pay. They had to pay full amount for a 1 month treatment program. They can't afford THAT! I wrote the head of the DOC in Fla. telling him that all cost of supervision(now @ $50 a month, or more now) should go directly to Drug rehab programs, since they are paying in. Strange...never heard anything back. Why shouldn't these funds go to treating the people that need it?
4. Jury of peers is a joke. 85% morons
There should be a moderately difficult law /civics/non-moron test for potential jurors. Having served on 4 now, and with a lot of law involved jobs and education,.....85% of the people were absolute idiots. I mean, how did these people learn to tie their shoes? A jury of ones peers? You mean the 9 white people and 3 black? for a white defendant? Or 9 black and 3 white for a eskimo?(tried to throw ya there) Never mind about their IQ level or anything???? I had one 66 year old white woman that wanted to add on three....THREE!!! felony charges onto a black dude up for domestic violence. I was Foreman, and showed her the door. Judge replaced her with the alternate. Anyway...
5. Any child crimes is life without parole or death. Period.
I think that one of the worst things that can happen to any person(male or female) in the U.S. is being wrongfully accused of child molestation. I feel liars about such accusations should be penalized exactly the same as would happen to the people that actually committed those crimes. That said:
After attending a week training with the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement in crimes against children training. 500 P&P officers, and they had a big screen setup for slide shows. Oh, and airline barf bags on all the tables. Now, I consider myself a Christian man, and in NO WAY perfect or with out sins(ya think?), but the things masquerading as humans that abuse children......in any form but especially sexual abuse......when you saw the ...things I saw, I want to kill every one of those non-human bastard pieces of filth!
No torture. Head meet bullet. Gonzo.
Just a rant, but intelligent responses accepted. I have no choice about the morons that respond with their usual razor wit.
What were we just talking about?
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Yes, abuse of prescription drugs is a crime. Were you surprised?Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:The biggest reason I quit state law enforcement was because of the drug charges.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Go back to sleep, stupid.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Roger_the_Shrubber
- Back-o-Matic
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
The usual suspects.I have no choice about the morons that respond with their usual razor wit.
What were we just talking about?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Prayers going out.quandry
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
If deception leads to a confession... so be it. example: "Now your buddies have already told us what happened... do you want to give us your side of it now?" "Or do we let them describe your role in this without hearing your version?" hmmm? "And to be honest, they didn't give two shits about you and were only looking to save their own asses.... so here is your chance to tell us what really went down... unless you like being thrown under the bus" Now harping on a person for hours to wear them down to give a false confession is another story. There is a difference. Nobody is getting water-boarded here.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Yes, Shrub, the cops lie--on every level..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a22f/7a22f51fece01677a1a14a63221a1d65206213b7" alt="Image"
Experts agree...what's your excuse?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22663/226637408bc77a8ea1e8b648980ff3519c625062" alt="Image"
Notice how the official death photo (on the right) is an obvious fake, cheap slick mash-upRoger_the_Shrubber wrote: 2. Cops can lie.
Why is it legal for a cop, in questioning, to lie to an arrestee about what other people said, evidence found, etc., yet their word is literally 'law'? Anything you he/she says about your arrest, things you might have said, is BANG!...evidence. Your word - hearsay. The 12 year old kid in San Diego accused of killing his sister( they interrogated him for 14 hours i believe, without a lawyer and he signed a confession which was bullshit!), and in Jacksonville, Fla., the 15 year old kid charged with killing two German tourists, beaten into signing a confession after cops said someone identified him(a lie). I hate real bad guys too, but damn! Just cause you arrest (MURDER) someone doesn't make them guilty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a22f/7a22f51fece01677a1a14a63221a1d65206213b7" alt="Image"
Experts agree...what's your excuse?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22663/226637408bc77a8ea1e8b648980ff3519c625062" alt="Image"
Before God was, I am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
There never was any "official death photo," you cum-speckled fuck puppet.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
"official" as far as what was released to the public. Just as with the video of the collapse of WTC7 (completely ignored in the 9/11 Commission report).
We notice you don't address the fact that the photo on the right was released--and is obviously a fake. We notice you don't actually attempt to explain any of the blatant holes in the "official" story, or for that matter to defend it. Your mewling comment in your "debate' was simply that you "hadn't heard anything" that would contradict, etc. Such squirming and evasive tripe is utterly shameless and hollow. Typical of you, in other words.
We notice you don't address the fact that the photo on the right was released--and is obviously a fake. We notice you don't actually attempt to explain any of the blatant holes in the "official" story, or for that matter to defend it. Your mewling comment in your "debate' was simply that you "hadn't heard anything" that would contradict, etc. Such squirming and evasive tripe is utterly shameless and hollow. Typical of you, in other words.
Before God was, I am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
By whom? Certainly not the administration.LTS TRN 2 wrote:"official" as far as what was released to the public.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
The Official Death Photo Committee.mvscal wrote:By whom? Certainly not the administration.LTS TRN 2 wrote:"official" as far as what was released to the public.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
Wakey Wakey Motherfucker.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
The "official" photo as distributed by the muzzled and thoroughly controlled mainstream media. You know, the same mainstream institutions who have dutifully and unquestioningly accepted and forwarded the "official" story of 9/11 in the first place. The same ones who promoted the Popular Mechanics piece--but did not offer any of the massive and immediate refutation of that palsied fake propaganda vehicle.mvscal wrote:By whom? Certainly not the administration.LTS TRN 2 wrote:"official" as far as what was released to the public.
Before God was, I am
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
It was all a massive hologram, Nikolai.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Jay in Phoenix
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3701
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Riiight.LTS TRN 2 wrote:The "official" photo as distributed by the muzzled and thoroughly controlled mainstream media. You know, the same mainstream institutions who have dutifully and unquestioningly accepted and forwarded the "official" story of 9/11 in the first place. The same ones who promoted the Popular Mechanics piece--but did not offer any of the massive and immediate refutation of that palsied fake propaganda vehicle.mvscal wrote:By whom? Certainly not the administration.LTS TRN 2 wrote:"official" as far as what was released to the public.
While the "mainstream media" is by no means above reproach, you Nick are still babbling the same old tin-foil tinted rhetoric and "psycho"babble you always do without a single reputable source of information to back up your inanity.
The Popular Mechanics piece still stands. You've shown nothing to discredit it.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Oh, the mainstream media released the death photo....
Pretty sure it would be a piece of cake for Frisco to link that up for us.
Pretty sure it would be a piece of cake for Frisco to link that up for us.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
You guys were mean to hijack Roger's thread. Did we ever determine the legal quandriness of these various issues?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
No problemR-Jack wrote:Oh, the mainstream media released the death photo....
Pretty sure it would be a piece of cake for Frisco to link that up for us.
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/world ... type=Image
As for the Popular Mechanics piece, there was immediately a broad curb stomping of this shameless propaganda bullshit from a variety of researchers..
here's a few..the researchers are a variety of engineers and similarly trained experts. Attempt to refute their observations if you think you can. Simply attempting to dismiss them out of hand of course is simply surrendering.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=16171
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OumO4_e6KM8
Before God was, I am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Hmmmm. No corpse photo there. Wanna try another one?LTS TRN 2 wrote:No problemR-Jack wrote:Oh, the mainstream media released the death photo....
Pretty sure it would be a piece of cake for Frisco to link that up for us.
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/world ... type=Image
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
The biggest quandry I'm seeing right now, is the legal complexities involved in doing bodily harm to many of the players in this thread.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You guys were mean to hijack Roger's thread. Did we ever determine the legal quandriness of these various issues?
BTW -- I just noticed that we have an RTS and a LTS. Coincidence? I say y'all's should form your own opinions... not that you've exhibited any adeptness at it to date.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
- Roger_the_Shrubber
- Back-o-Matic
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
I just noticed that we have Dinsdale and people with an IQ below 80 in here. Coincidence?
And BTW, "y'all" is already plural shit head. A contraction of 'you' and 'all'. No 's' needed. But of course, you knew that. And the extra apostrophe at the end makes you just...precious.
Now, feel free to follow me around (like usual) when I have no interest in you at all. Kinda like the way your friends and family feel about ya. Or so I can guess, seeing how that they can't be more unintelligent as you. I could be wrong. You can't have any friends.
PS - Love ya buddy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2796/e2796bd6e5720c3d1ae9ef278e21817eeaac57b8" alt="hfal :hfal:"
And BTW, "y'all" is already plural shit head. A contraction of 'you' and 'all'. No 's' needed. But of course, you knew that. And the extra apostrophe at the end makes you just...precious.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
Now, feel free to follow me around (like usual) when I have no interest in you at all. Kinda like the way your friends and family feel about ya. Or so I can guess, seeing how that they can't be more unintelligent as you. I could be wrong. You can't have any friends.
PS - Love ya buddy!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2796/e2796bd6e5720c3d1ae9ef278e21817eeaac57b8" alt="hfal :hfal:"
What were we just talking about?
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
You're really working this "intellectual superiority" angle hard, aren't you?
Since you want to go down that path, professor, the correct spelling is "quandary," dumbass. But I'm sure you knew that.Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:And BTW, "y'all" is already plural shit head. A contraction of 'you' and 'all'. No 's' needed. But of course, you knew that. And the extra apostrophe at the end makes you just...precious.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:But I'm sure you knew that.
Percocet_The_Shrubber was just testing you, bro.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
LTS TRN 2 wrote:No problemR-Jack wrote:Oh, the mainstream media released the death photo....
Pretty sure it would be a piece of cake for Frisco to link that up for us.
http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/world ... type=Image
As for the Popular Mechanics piece, there was immediately a broad curb stomping of this shameless propaganda bullshit from a variety of researchers..
here's a few..the researchers are a variety of engineers and similarly trained experts. Attempt to refute their observations if you think you can. Simply attempting to dismiss them out of hand of course is simply surrendering.
http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=16171
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OumO4_e6KM8
Ever notice how all of the websites Nicky links to look like they were put together by some ADHD meth freak?
FLAKEY FLAKEY
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
I figured shrubber was more of a klonopin-addled fucktard.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:But I'm sure you knew that.
Percocet_The_Shrubber was just testing you, bro.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Absolute bullshit.Goober McTuber wrote:
Ever notice how all of the websites Nicky links to look like they were put together by some ADHD meth freak?
FLAKEY FLAKEY
Check this out..
http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/676-deb ... anics.html
It's as professionally designed as any other site. And more to the point its sources are actual experts. And you can't refute any of it. What, are you ten years-old?
Before God was, I am
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Style over substance.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
No, it's the substance that's right there--and which you can't begin to refute.
Same as here
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
Where do you get off dismissing an engineer who has carefully made his case? Who the fuck are you?
Same as here
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/indexg.html
Where do you get off dismissing an engineer who has carefully made his case? Who the fuck are you?
Before God was, I am
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Goober McTuber wrote: FLAKEY FLAKEY
nice
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/306ff/306ff4a8dd5fc54e4a719508769e787f3e8058e6" alt="Cool 8)"
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Jay in Phoenix
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3701
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Hey Slappy, your boy Jim Hoffman is a "website engineer".
You do understand the difference, don't you?
Of course you don't.
You do understand the difference, don't you?
Of course you don't.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
You tedious ankle biters are pathetic. The Architects and Engineers For truth site is comprised of experts in the respective fields. And you can't refute any of their findings. The PM debunking site (provided by Jim Hoffman) cites many similar experts. Hoffman is simply compiling them. Who do you suppose the "experts" were that PM relied on? A few paid shills--very similar to the whored-out "expert" Climate Change deniers.
Before God was, I am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
And you, you door-stop, what's "flakey" about architects and engineers calling bullshit on an obvious false "official" government narrative? Is this what you call "ribbed" humor? Are you really so dull?Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:Goober McTuber wrote: FLAKEY FLAKEY
nice
Before God was, I am
- Jay in Phoenix
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 3701
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:46 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
So the answer to the question was indeed, no. You don't understand.
Sleepy sleep.
Sleepy sleep.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Most of Nicky's links are loaded with spyware and viruses. You're one or two clicks away from being redirected to some donkey porn website. I wouldn't touch them unless your machine is operating under a full fortress of protection.Goober McTuber wrote:Ever notice how all of the websites Nicky links to look like they were put together by some ADHD meth freak?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Absolute bullshit. There's nothing whatever like malware on any of the sites. Why are you so scared to acknowledge that your beloved government lied to you? Why are you scared to face the truth?
Before God was, I am
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
So..."donkey porn" then?
ewwww
ewwww
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You're one or two clicks away from being redirected to some donkey porn website.
Also, the copy of Donk Blaster that came installed on my laptop ran out because it was only the "trial version".
Would you say that the $19.95 yearly subscription to Donk Blaster Pro is worth it? It doesn't come bundled with other crap-ware that I don't want, does it?
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
...and does Donk Blaster Pro have a Mac version? Wolfman wants to know. TIA.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Donk Blaster Pro 5.0 is definitely worth it. But make sure you get the "9/11 Truther"extension for an extra $4.95.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Could you hook up a bruthah with a cracked version? A torrent link maybe?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e380/6e380a1decebc8d4bdcc8892a909e32e1ce991aa" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e380/6e380a1decebc8d4bdcc8892a909e32e1ce991aa" alt="Image"
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.