Legal quandry, or maybe not
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.
Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Stop going hysterical. Dots? Pull your head out of your ass. It's clearly Twizzlers.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Oh, and I'm pretty sure they used Dots not Twizzlers. Try picking those things out of your teeth. Indestructible.
The only way they could've brought down WTC7 with Dots support is if the Necro wafer foundation cracked.......which I guess is possible.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Again nice white flag on the WTC7 issue nancy. BushCo knew there were millions of stupid tards on 9-10-2001 you freaking moron. The result is just proof you have millions of stupid companions.R-Jack wrote:Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.
Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
R-Jack, Mgo, Shlomo (b-juice)...it's okay...your surrender is accepted. Ease up on the pawing child-like attempts at humor and circle-jerk sarcasm.
You know..and that's a real start. :wink:
One day at a time.
C'mon, you're okay
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/692b1/692b11e9e68e84751b9a7596d1f69861bade43a5" alt="Image"
But I'm not ... :twisted:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a49/94a499e5724c9a07ae15f8b74ee0222a4fb2f693" alt="Image"
You know..and that's a real start. :wink:
One day at a time.
C'mon, you're okay
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/692b1/692b11e9e68e84751b9a7596d1f69861bade43a5" alt="Image"
But I'm not ... :twisted:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94a49/94a499e5724c9a07ae15f8b74ee0222a4fb2f693" alt="Image"
Before God was, I am
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Nice white flag.Moving Sale wrote:The stand down at Otis. Your turn.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
WTF are you talking about? Are you too stupid to even know the facts surrounding the Otis stand down? You are dumber than I thought and I had you pegged at room temp IQ.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Sooooo where is the evidence, flag boy?
I'm waiting...
I'm waiting...
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
So basic facts of 911 elude you.
Ok I will play. The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo. Now it's your turn... As it has been for the last few posts. What are you? Yellow?
Ok I will play. The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo. Now it's your turn... As it has been for the last few posts. What are you? Yellow?
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
So a one sentence reply is your "evidence" that an entire administration was behind the 9/11 attacks?Moving Sale wrote:The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo.
Just how many dicks did you have to suck to pass the Bar?
- Roger_the_Shrubber
- Back-o-Matic
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Moving Sale as Prez during 9-11:
Air Force: Sir, we have 3, possibly 4 hi-jacked commercial planes with hundreds of people on board.
Prez Herve Villachez: Scramble F-14's and shoot them all down at once.
Air Force: Sir, we have 3, possibly 4 hi-jacked commercial planes with hundreds of people on board.
Prez Herve Villachez: Scramble F-14's and shoot them all down at once.
What were we just talking about?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Funny how you are accusing me of dodging when you have not even attempted to answer my question.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:So a one sentence reply is your "evidence" that an entire administration was behind the 9/11 attacks?Moving Sale wrote:The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo.
Just how many dicks did you have to suck to pass the Bar?
The specific people who should have managed the air defense on 9/11 were absent precisely while the attacks were occuring. Even though they were available in the days before and after the attack, they were missing exactly in the crucial hours of the hijackings. For better understanding, this is what the protocol said before 9/11 in case of a hijacking:
The air traffic controllers realizing the hijacking would inform their superiors, who in turn would alert the Hijack Coordinator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Hijack Coordinator would call the Pentagon, more precisely the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO) in the National Military Command Center (NMCC). The DDO in coordination with the Secretary of Defense then would give orders to NORAD, which would scramble fighter jets to intercept the hijacked plane. 1
So the top people responsible would be:
the FAA ́s Hijack Coordinator the DDO in the NMCC
the Secretary of Defense
On 9/11 all three were absent from their command posts in the crucial hours between 8:14 a.m. (first hijacking) and 10:03 (last crash).
Michael Canavan, the Hijack Coordinator of the FAA (and former Special Forces General) was not in the office but had flown to Puerto Rico; 2 Lynne Osmus, his Deputy, arrived in the office only after all the planes had crashed 3
General Montague Winfield, the NMCC DDO (who in 2012 became Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense), was not at his post between 8:30 and 10:00 a.m.; Captain Charles Joseph Leidig, his Deputy, had just qualified for being DDO one month before; General Winfield had asked him the afternoon before if he would sit in as DDO from 8:30 on; Winfield returned to his post only after all planes had crashed 4
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stayed away from the NMCC, too, and arrived there no sooner than 10:30 a.m., after all planes had crashed 5
This seemingly well-timed absence of key people is still unexplained. It obstructed the air defense effectively.
Now you MGOYellowLightSpecial.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Source?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
What's wrong? Too yellow to answer my question?
Anyway, here you go MGOYELLOWLIGHTSPECIAL ...
9/11 Commission Report, pp. 17-18 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
9/11 Commission, Transcript 2nd Public Hearing, 23.05.03, p. 77 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/arch ... -05-23.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Lynne Osmus, 03.10.03 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00910.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Captain Charles Joseph Leidig, 29.04.04 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00684.pdf
Consensus 9/11, Point MC-8: The activities of Brigade General Montague Winfield between 8:30 and 10:30 AM http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-8/
9/11 Commission Report, p. 44 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
Anyway, here you go MGOYELLOWLIGHTSPECIAL ...
9/11 Commission Report, pp. 17-18 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
9/11 Commission, Transcript 2nd Public Hearing, 23.05.03, p. 77 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/arch ... -05-23.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Lynne Osmus, 03.10.03 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00910.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Captain Charles Joseph Leidig, 29.04.04 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00684.pdf
Consensus 9/11, Point MC-8: The activities of Brigade General Montague Winfield between 8:30 and 10:30 AM http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-8/
9/11 Commission Report, p. 44 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
I've had time to digest all of this and I'm completely with you. We need to take this evidence to the proper authorities IMMEDIATELY. Shoot me your contact info and we'll get started. Do you know any good lawyers?
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Bro, I'm in your corner. Enough with the petty internet squabbles. Time is of the essence...
We need to hop on a conference call now. I'm sending you and LTS a GoToMeeting link...
We need to hop on a conference call now. I'm sending you and LTS a GoToMeeting link...
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Ditto, mgo. It's enough to implant the clear awakening in your dome. You know it's true. And this is how the truth will come out. Sure, you're just a speck, a meaningless grain of sand on a distant beach. But that beach is connected to the water, and the water reaches another land. And in that land, believe it or not, there are actually people of mind and conscience, people of moral imperative and positioned principles. Yours may well be a forgotten, never known existence of base futility, but the fact of your knowing is what counts. I salute you in your bland and tedious existence.
Sure, we did it...and we'd do it again..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/839cc/839cc3a846525c6bfa1ee9105e3070a9d0af59a4" alt="Image"
Sure, we did it...and we'd do it again..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/839cc/839cc3a846525c6bfa1ee9105e3070a9d0af59a4" alt="Image"
Before God was, I am
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
You still mad? You seem mad.Moving Sale wrote:Why would I want to talk to you? You're an idiot.
This isn't a time for anger. So take a deep breath, go outside, get some fresh air, get laid, do whatever you gotta do to rid your mind of this teenager angst because...
...WE'RE SITTING ON A MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE!
This is a slam dunk case you FOOL.
LTS is on board, we went over some basic strategy last night. Did you get the conference call number?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
not wanting to talk to you doesn't make someone mad it makes them smart.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Are you pulling the white flag on this endeavor?Moving Sale wrote:not wanting to talk to you doesn't make someone mad it makes them smart.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Are you retarded? You said you were convinced. My job is done. Now run along.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
On second thought, having a known pedophile on the team would destroy our reputability. Your services are no longer desired. In fact, we should end all communication immediately.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
I kind of understand Moving Sale's pedophilia. A lot of guys aren't comfortable dating females that are taller than them. Hey, Moving Sale, just so you know, this lady is now available:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ec3/b3ec3875d3cec81b393abd8d307b1f32450a573b" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ec3/b3ec3875d3cec81b393abd8d307b1f32450a573b" alt="Image"
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs
Congrats on finally making a list.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs
Congrats on finally making a list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a636/1a63642b228b5f224293c7a14a623c933f9ae81b" alt="Rolling Eyes :meds:"
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Don't talk to me.Moving Sale wrote:Nice I Know You Should But What Should I
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
IKYABWAI. Brilliant. Some of your best work.Moving Sale wrote:So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs
Congrats on finally making a list.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
We have already been thru this. You're and idiot. Why would I want to talk to you?MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Don't talk to me.Moving Sale wrote:Nice I Know You Should But What Should I
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
You're just pissed you got outed you fat, publicly naked, boy chaser.Goober McTuber wrote:IKYABWAI. Brilliant. Some of your best work.Moving Sale wrote:So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs
Congrats on finally making a list.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Nice white flag, Tiny.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Careful throwing that around, you fire-hydrant-shaped dullard.Moving Sale wrote:...fat...
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Archive.Moving Sale wrote:You're and idiot.
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
If all you've got is a typo, you must be really squirming....oh yeah, you are. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c31/64c3119960d80f788222721b630862543af31de0" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c31/64c3119960d80f788222721b630862543af31de0" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
Before God was, I am
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Why are you siding with the pedo? I thought we were a team? :x
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
No, I replied "ditto" in proceeding to flay your sorry existence. But I saluted your futility. Remember? :wink:
Before God was, I am
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Okay, okay, I gotta come clean with you guys about something.......................I was just doing a bit. You know, for the sake of my own entertainment. I know, I know, we're not supposed to joke around here because this place is SUPER SERIOUS.
So let's get back to where we were, shall we? I believe Moving Sale failed to provide substantial evidence of his outrageous allegations. Let's just pick things up from there. Any questions for me?
So let's get back to where we were, shall we? I believe Moving Sale failed to provide substantial evidence of his outrageous allegations. Let's just pick things up from there. Any questions for me?
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
That's because you were too busy diddling kids to read it.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not
Wow, awfully quick on the draw there, eh sporto? Do you have that new Chihuahua Ankle-Lock app that alerts you every time I post?