Legal quandry, or maybe not

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

The stand down at Otis. Your turn.
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by R-Jack »

Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.
Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.

Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by R-Jack »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Oh, and I'm pretty sure they used Dots not Twizzlers. Try picking those things out of your teeth. Indestructible.


Image
Stop going hysterical. Dots? Pull your head out of your ass. It's clearly Twizzlers.

The only way they could've brought down WTC7 with Dots support is if the Necro wafer foundation cracked.......which I guess is possible.
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

R-Jack wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:The evidience is that it was not reckless cause it worked on millions of tards like yourself. That's a FACT.
Stop getting hysterical. You're missing the point. You keep focusing on the result. I'm trying to make sense of the moment and the road it took to get there.

Out of the WTC and Petagon inside jobs.....which one was planned and performed better?
Again nice white flag on the WTC7 issue nancy. BushCo knew there were millions of stupid tards on 9-10-2001 you freaking moron. The result is just proof you have millions of stupid companions.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

R-Jack, Mgo, Shlomo (b-juice)...it's okay...your surrender is accepted. Ease up on the pawing child-like attempts at humor and circle-jerk sarcasm.

You know..and that's a real start. :wink:

One day at a time.

C'mon, you're okay
Image


But I'm not ... :twisted:
Image
Before God was, I am
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:The stand down at Otis. Your turn.
Nice white flag.
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

WTF are you talking about? Are you too stupid to even know the facts surrounding the Otis stand down? You are dumber than I thought and I had you pegged at room temp IQ.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Sooooo where is the evidence, flag boy?

I'm waiting...
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

So basic facts of 911 elude you.
Ok I will play. The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo. Now it's your turn... As it has been for the last few posts. What are you? Yellow?
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo.
So a one sentence reply is your "evidence" that an entire administration was behind the 9/11 attacks?

Just how many dicks did you have to suck to pass the Bar?
User avatar
Roger_the_Shrubber
Back-o-Matic
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:29 am

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Roger_the_Shrubber »

Moving Sale as Prez during 9-11:

Air Force: Sir, we have 3, possibly 4 hi-jacked commercial planes with hundreds of people on board.

Prez Herve Villachez: Scramble F-14's and shoot them all down at once.
What were we just talking about?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:The planes at Otis were late due to a stand down that was the responsibility of BushCo.
So a one sentence reply is your "evidence" that an entire administration was behind the 9/11 attacks?

Just how many dicks did you have to suck to pass the Bar?
Funny how you are accusing me of dodging when you have not even attempted to answer my question.

The specific people who should have managed the air defense on 9/11 were absent precisely while the attacks were occuring. Even though they were available in the days before and after the attack, they were missing exactly in the crucial hours of the hijackings. For better understanding, this is what the protocol said before 9/11 in case of a hijacking:
The air traffic controllers realizing the hijacking would inform their superiors, who in turn would alert the Hijack Coordinator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The Hijack Coordinator would call the Pentagon, more precisely the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO) in the National Military Command Center (NMCC). The DDO in coordination with the Secretary of Defense then would give orders to NORAD, which would scramble fighter jets to intercept the hijacked plane. 1
So the top people responsible would be:
 the FAA ́s Hijack Coordinator  the DDO in the NMCC
 the Secretary of Defense
On 9/11 all three were absent from their command posts in the crucial hours between 8:14 a.m. (first hijacking) and 10:03 (last crash).
 Michael Canavan, the Hijack Coordinator of the FAA (and former Special Forces General) was not in the office but had flown to Puerto Rico; 2 Lynne Osmus, his Deputy, arrived in the office only after all the planes had crashed 3
 General Montague Winfield, the NMCC DDO (who in 2012 became Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense), was not at his post between 8:30 and 10:00 a.m.; Captain Charles Joseph Leidig, his Deputy, had just qualified for being DDO one month before; General Winfield had asked him the afternoon before if he would sit in as DDO from 8:30 on; Winfield returned to his post only after all planes had crashed 4
 Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stayed away from the NMCC, too, and arrived there no sooner than 10:30 a.m., after all planes had crashed 5
This seemingly well-timed absence of key people is still unexplained. It obstructed the air defense effectively.


Now you MGOYellowLightSpecial.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Source?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

What's wrong? Too yellow to answer my question?

Anyway, here you go MGOYELLOWLIGHTSPECIAL ...
9/11 Commission Report, pp. 17-18 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
9/11 Commission, Transcript 2nd Public Hearing, 23.05.03, p. 77 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/arch ... -05-23.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Lynne Osmus, 03.10.03 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00910.pdf
9/11 Commission, Memorandum for the Record, Interview Captain Charles Joseph Leidig, 29.04.04 http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00684.pdf
Consensus 9/11, Point MC-8: The activities of Brigade General Montague Winfield between 8:30 and 10:30 AM http://www.consensus911.org/point-mc-8/
9/11 Commission Report, p. 44 http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

I've had time to digest all of this and I'm completely with you. We need to take this evidence to the proper authorities IMMEDIATELY. Shoot me your contact info and we'll get started. Do you know any good lawyers?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

Nice Yellow Flag.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Bro, I'm in your corner. Enough with the petty internet squabbles. Time is of the essence...

We need to hop on a conference call now. I'm sending you and LTS a GoToMeeting link...
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

Why would I want to talk to you? You're an idiot.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Ditto, mgo. It's enough to implant the clear awakening in your dome. You know it's true. And this is how the truth will come out. Sure, you're just a speck, a meaningless grain of sand on a distant beach. But that beach is connected to the water, and the water reaches another land. And in that land, believe it or not, there are actually people of mind and conscience, people of moral imperative and positioned principles. Yours may well be a forgotten, never known existence of base futility, but the fact of your knowing is what counts. I salute you in your bland and tedious existence.

Sure, we did it...and we'd do it again..
Image
Before God was, I am
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:Why would I want to talk to you? You're an idiot.
You still mad? You seem mad.

This isn't a time for anger. So take a deep breath, go outside, get some fresh air, get laid, do whatever you gotta do to rid your mind of this teenager angst because...















































































































































































































...WE'RE SITTING ON A MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE!


This is a slam dunk case you FOOL.

LTS is on board, we went over some basic strategy last night. Did you get the conference call number?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

not wanting to talk to you doesn't make someone mad it makes them smart.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:not wanting to talk to you doesn't make someone mad it makes them smart.
Are you pulling the white flag on this endeavor?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

Are you retarded? You said you were convinced. My job is done. Now run along.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

On second thought, having a known pedophile on the team would destroy our reputability. Your services are no longer desired. In fact, we should end all communication immediately.
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

Nice I Know You Should But What Should I
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Goober McTuber »

I kind of understand Moving Sale's pedophilia. A lot of guys aren't comfortable dating females that are taller than them. Hey, Moving Sale, just so you know, this lady is now available:

Image
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs

Congrats on finally making a list. :meds:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:Nice I Know You Should But What Should I
Don't talk to me.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Goober McTuber »

Moving Sale wrote:So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs

Congrats on finally making a list. :meds:
IKYABWAI. Brilliant. Some of your best work.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Nice I Know You Should But What Should I
Don't talk to me.
We have already been thru this. You're and idiot. Why would I want to talk to you?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:So to recap the list of known pedophiles on T1B is:
R-Jack
Marty
AP
MGO and
goobs

Congrats on finally making a list. :meds:
IKYABWAI. Brilliant. Some of your best work.
You're just pissed you got outed you fat, publicly naked, boy chaser.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Goober McTuber »

Nice white flag, Tiny.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Moving Sale wrote:...fat...
Careful throwing that around, you fire-hydrant-shaped dullard.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Moving Sale wrote:You're and idiot.
Archive.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

If all you've got is a typo, you must be really squirming....oh yeah, you are. :oops:
Before God was, I am
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Why are you siding with the pedo? I thought we were a team? :x
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

No, I replied "ditto" in proceeding to flay your sorry existence. But I saluted your futility. Remember? :wink:
Before God was, I am
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Okay, okay, I gotta come clean with you guys about something.......................I was just doing a bit. You know, for the sake of my own entertainment. I know, I know, we're not supposed to joke around here because this place is SUPER SERIOUS.



So let's get back to where we were, shall we? I believe Moving Sale failed to provide substantial evidence of his outrageous allegations. Let's just pick things up from there. Any questions for me?
Moving Sale

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by Moving Sale »

That's because you were too busy diddling kids to read it.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Legal quandry, or maybe not

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Wow, awfully quick on the draw there, eh sporto? Do you have that new Chihuahua Ankle-Lock app that alerts you every time I post?
Post Reply