Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environment
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environment
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wind- ... edium=feed
In short, wind turbines cause bird populations to die off or move from their native habitat in addition to directly killing them from blade strikes. Just goes to show that between the solar death ray devices in the desert and the wind turbines to the crony corruption of the numerous Obama funded Solyndras, green energy is bad for the environment, economy, and political system top to bottom.
In short, wind turbines cause bird populations to die off or move from their native habitat in addition to directly killing them from blade strikes. Just goes to show that between the solar death ray devices in the desert and the wind turbines to the crony corruption of the numerous Obama funded Solyndras, green energy is bad for the environment, economy, and political system top to bottom.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Down here at FGCU, they cut down a lot of trees to make way for solar panels. Marvelous. How would you like to live near the giant bird killers---SWOOSH---SWOOSH all night long? Plus they look so nice adding to the natural landscape. Idiots. Don't get me going on heavy metal/acid batteries.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Not to mention the havic they cause while trying to maintain reliable grid operations. On average they run at approximately 35% of capacity with many peaks and valleys over a given time frame. In a nutshell this is the definition of an unreliable power source that makes the job of providing reliable grid operations a PIA and leads to long term maintenance issues across the system.
Go Nuclear, almost zero greenhouse gas emissions.
Go Nuclear, almost zero greenhouse gas emissions.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Solar panels go...SWOOSH---SWOOSH?Wolfman wrote:Down here at FGCU, they cut down a lot of trees to make way for solar panels. Marvelous. How would you like to live near the giant bird killers---SWOOSH---SWOOSH all night long? Plus they look so nice adding to the natural landscape. Idiots. Don't get me going on heavy metal/acid batteries.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
only at night, did you not read his entire post?
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
His entire post? That's crazy talk.atmdad wrote:only at night, did you not read his entire post?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
I have concluded that humans are bad for the environment. You guys want to argue which side of the pendulum......enjoy.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
It's encouraging to see such ignorance running rampant around here.
What would we do without our learning impaired to make fun of?
What would we do without our learning impaired to make fun of?
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
I'll admit the information I spouted is something I read in some Nuclear power related journal, don't recall which one, which undoubtedly had some bias and cherry picked data on capacity factors. Isn't that SOP for this site.
Mikey, does your magic tree SWOOSH at night?
Mikey, does your magic tree SWOOSH at night?
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
You have a good point there.Papa Willie wrote:You know - if you consider the evolution in technology over most things, have you ever wondered how 40 years ago - it took a computer the size of Nevada to do what a current PC can do - yet solar panels now are pretty much the same size as they were back then?
I often wonder the same thing about cars, frying pans, surfboards and half gallon milk cartons.
Maybe they've reached the peak of their technological potential and it's time to go back to whatever they replaced.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Your post was actually pretty close, though obviously biased toward newcular power. But then, you live in California and (probably) aren't suffering from syphilitic dementia.atmdad wrote:I'll admit the information I spouted is something I read in some Nuclear power related journal, don't recall which one, which undoubtedly had some bias and cherry picked data on capacity factors. Isn't that SOP for this site.
Mikey, does your magic tree SWOOSH at night?
Ideally, peak renewable production would occur at the same time as the grid, or system, peak. We obviously can't control the wind or the sun, but PV comes pretty close to being coincident.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f27d1/f27d18e96efce831c5883b68670d17abec1ed1f6" alt="Image"
If you looked at that chart as total kW, instead of capacity factor, the solar peak would be way below the grid usage at the same time. The same would be true with wind power, though it's not a regular, predictable, curve like the solar. If the peak production gets higher than the actual demand, then you need to find someplace to use it.
We will always need "base loaded" generation to fill in any gaps where renewables don't fill. Right now that includes fossil fuel and nuclear plants. We also have, in California, natural gas "peaker" units that only come on during the system peak. There are other renewable technologies, like waste to energy plants that take organic waste and turn it into syngas; geothermal; etc. that can have a flat profile or be controlled to match the demand.
The (hopeful) answer to the intermittency of solar and wind is energy storage, so that the energy can be produced when it's available and used when needed. This can be batteries (ask Elon Musk), hydrogen produced from electricity, compressed air, melted eutectic salts, or other possibilities. Just because we don't have single, all encompassing, storage technology right now isn't a reason to abandon renewables all together. The eventual answer won't be one technology but probably a combination of all of the above.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Wolfman wrote:Down here at FGCU, they cut down a lot of trees to make way for solar panels. Marvelous. How would you like to live near the giant bird killers---SWOOSH---SWOOSH all night long? Plus they look so nice adding to the natural landscape. Idiots. Don't get me going on heavy metal/acid batteries.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75970/759704b745f4486829b60c1bf6687e833109cf4f" alt="Image"
Can you imagine having to live in the middle of all that?
Oh wait...nobody does. Idiot.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
ELIMINATED !atmdad wrote:havic
wolfman wrote:I also remember seeing all the old people dying in the streets because they did not have medicare. Good times.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
fuk i ben rummed.
How is the topography on you Fallbrook parcel. Put in a second pool and develop a small scale pumped storage hydro project.
How is the topography on you Fallbrook parcel. Put in a second pool and develop a small scale pumped storage hydro project.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
So at night the solar panels turn into windmills?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Smackie Chan
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 7324
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
- Location: Inside Your Speakers
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
From sundown til midnight, when they turn into pumpkins.Goober McTuber wrote:So at night the solar panels turn into windmills?
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Smackie Chan wrote:From sundown til midnight, when they turn into pumpkins.Goober McTuber wrote:So at night the solar panels turn into windmills?
Drive a stake through their heart. It's foolproof I tells ya'.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
feel free to chime in when we are discussing ice or snow otherwise STFU.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
The OP and the first responder are the ones closest to tits up in this shithole...surprising.
Go Bucs, Gators
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
There was this guy named Langley who discovered the idea of the Solar Constant. You should look into it, then come back and apologize for being fucking dumb.Papa Willie wrote:solar panels now are pretty much the same size as they were back then?
I read somewhere a while back that West Texas produced more wind power than everywhere else combined. Seemed like a Texas-sized claim. Then, I drove through there (last weekend). At least Texas is good for something -- they have the bird-killers by the tens of thousands. Probably produce enough electricity to run about 3 AC units.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Pretty sure Langley didn't "discover" the idea of a Solar Constant. It was named after him and defined as 1 thermochemical calorie per square cm. You got the point though - there's pretty much an absolute limit to how much solar energy can be harvested from any given area based, surprisingly, on how much sunlight hits there.Dinsdale wrote:There was this guy named Langley who discovered the idea of the Solar Constant. You should look into it, then come back and apologize for being fucking dumb.Papa Willie wrote:solar panels now are pretty much the same size as they were back then?
Buttsy prolly never took HS physics, so what to you expect?
Langley has a lot of other stuff named after him also, BTW.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21755
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
I thought that the long accepted way to store electrons was pumping water uphill.
Oh, wait, I forgot, you don't have any water in cali. Guess it could be done with salt water. Might even be a bit more efficient as salt water has a higher specific specific gravity. Might be hell on the pumps though.
Oh, wait, I forgot, you don't have any water in cali. Guess it could be done with salt water. Might even be a bit more efficient as salt water has a higher specific specific gravity. Might be hell on the pumps though.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
It seems to me that for many here, it is just taken for granted that because something "green" it is an improvement over what was used before. Coal is dumped as a cheap and easily extracted energy source despite the improvements to whatever emissions it gave off. However, like this government study shows, the improvement actually destroys the very thing it's supposed to save. The orthodoxy of "if it's green it must be good" despite much evidence to the contrary puts the lie to much of what is touted as truth. Meanwhile, the sources of energy which we have in abundance and can extract easily, is restricted or dispensed with for spurious and inconstant energy.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
How many liters is that?Mikey wrote:half gallon
Marty wants to know.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
We are the "Arabs" of coal. And yet the idiots running things in government want to shut it all down. There was a proposal to build a coal burning power plant in Clewiston, the middle of south Florida, that could produce cheap electricity for the whole of south Florida. People think coal and they think all the soot and dirt from the early 1900', so they voted it down. What fools these mortals be. I give up.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21755
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Just shut up and build more windmills. Every few years when a hurricane runs through, you will have enough power to run things for 6-8 hours.Wolfman wrote:We are the "Arabs" of coal. And yet the idiots running things in government want to shut it all down. There was a proposal to build a coal burning power plant in Clewiston, the middle of south Florida, that could produce cheap electricity for the whole of south Florida. People think coal and they think all the soot and dirt from the early 1900', so they voted it down. What fools these mortals be. I give up.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Atomic Punk
- antagonist
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
- Location: El Segundo, CA
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
They could be dual purposed. Solar panels attached to wind turbine blades. Think about the efficiency... or not.Goober McTuber wrote:Solar panels go...SWOOSH---SWOOSH?Wolfman wrote:Down here at FGCU, they cut down a lot of trees to make way for solar panels. Marvelous. How would you like to live near the giant bird killers---SWOOSH---SWOOSH all night long? Plus they look so nice adding to the natural landscape. Idiots. Don't get me going on heavy metal/acid batteries.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.
Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Turn those granny panties inside out and your gold, or brown, but WTF I think you are onto something.Atomic Punk wrote: They could be dual purposed. Think about the efficiency... or not.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
This should be at the top of every one of your posts. Just sayin'.Papa Willie wrote:I seriously don't know jack shit on the subject.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Counter-intuitive: Green energy is bad for the environm
Papa Willie wrote:I can admit when I'm not an expert on things, as opposed to being an old fuck who doesn't know jack shit about anything other than old weenies.Goober McTuber wrote:This should be at the top of every one of your posts. Just sayin'.Papa Willie wrote:I seriously don't know jack shit on the subject.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim