The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:36 pm

poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:Still waiting for you to comment on the tens of thousands of individuals who have circumnavigated the globe in thousands of ships. Their course, heading and speed all meticulously documented.

On a flat earth: completely impossible.
WRONG

WRONG.

Bust out your handy dandy flat earth map and plot a course west from your port of choice and arrive back at that port from the east.

TIA

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:50 pm

Yes sir, backing up the many flights and ship passages that have circumnavigated the globe.

Poopturd has no answer for these recorded and verifiable events.

He continues to be stuck on denial like a scratched and old record.

Skip forward to the inner circle pops, all will be revealed.

Or will it...?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:27 am

LS wrote:Got to love Pop's crazy line of thinking here. He wants to see a NASA live shot of the space station from earth. Yet he doesn't believe anything they do.

So he argues for something that he will dismiss immediately instead of seeing something himself first hand with his own eyes.

You are not smart.

Page 4.

Mr. Pilot had no idea what earth curvature rate supposedly is.
Can't tell the difference between a straight line and a curved one.
Doesn't know how a gyroscope works.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:33 am

Jayne wrote:Yes sir, backing up the many flights and ship passages that have circumnavigated the globe.

Poopturd has no answer for these recorded and verifiable events.

When did I ever say that the earth has not been circumnavigated??

Never!

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:41 am

poptart wrote:
Jayne wrote:Yes sir, backing up the many flights and ship passages that have circumnavigated the globe.

Poopturd has no answer for these recorded and verifiable events.
When did I ever say that the earth has not been circumnavigated??

Never!

circumnavigate

verb
1.
(transitive) to sail or fly completely around

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:50 am

mvscal wrote:Bust out your handy dandy flat earth map and plot a course west from your port of choice and arrive back at that port from the east.

On a flat earth, W is continually moving as a person moves laterally from a N-S line.

It's not a difficult concept.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 12:51 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
poptart wrote:
Jayne wrote:Yes sir, backing up the many flights and ship passages that have circumnavigated the globe.

Poopturd has no answer for these recorded and verifiable events.
When did I ever say that the earth has not been circumnavigated??

Never!
circumnavigate

verb
1.
(transitive) to sail or fly completely around

lol

Yes, dumbshit, we are using a ball earth term so that we can all be on the same page when discussing this particular dynamic.

Basic.

What's wrong with you?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:42 pm

poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:Bust out your handy dandy flat earth map and plot a course west from your port of choice and arrive back at that port from the east.
On a flat earth, W is continually moving as a person moves laterally from a N-S line.

It's not a difficult concept.

I see you have never used a compass either. Simple fact of the matter is that that doesn't not happen on this planet.

West is 270°. North is 0°. East is 90°. South is 180°. That never changes. Those are your "four corners" of the earth. If you shoot an azimuth of 270° on a flat earth and hold that course, you will travel due west until you fall off the edge of the earth. There is no other alternative possibility. It is basic geometry. Flat earth has edges at all 360° of arc. No getting around it.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:45 pm

Don't confuse him with 3D. 2D is his limit of comprehension.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 5:22 pm

Left Seater wrote:Don't confuse him with 3D. 2D is his limit of comprehension.

If only the Bible was a pop-up book.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 5:33 pm

R-Jack wrote:If only the Bible was a pop-up book.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 5:47 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
R-Jack wrote:If only the Bible was a pop-up book.

Not the story of Onan again, Uncle Diego!

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Wed Oct 21, 2015 9:08 pm

Roach wrote:God told Lott is was ok to have a popup or two.

Don't forget he also told him to amputate part of his finger so he could start in the Super Bowl, the ring didn't go on that finger anyway. It was a win win for the Almighty, his money was on the Niners.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:43 am

:xxxl:

mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:Bust out your handy dandy flat earth map and plot a course west from your port of choice and arrive back at that port from the east.
On a flat earth, W is continually moving as a person moves laterally from a N-S line.

It's not a difficult concept.
I see you have never used a compass either. Simple fact of the matter is that that doesn't not happen on this planet.

West is 270°. North is 0°. East is 90°. South is 180°. That never changes. Those are your "four corners" of the earth. If you shoot an azimuth of 270° on a flat earth and hold that course, you will travel due west until you fall off the edge of the earth. There is no other alternative possibility. It is basic geometry. Flat earth has edges at all 360° of arc. No getting around it.

A momentary pause as poptart's culturally limited and Stockholm Syndromed puss filled and swampy brain absorbs this and overloads and short circuits.

Pudding mind says "umm...I don't know what shape anything is. I don't know what the fuck I am even babbling about.

YouTube is my God. Conspiracy is my heart. I am living life on the flat edge of a razor blade, so cut me some slack.

As I cut my own throat, wrists and impotent junk whilst I bury myself in bullshit myths, please pile on some more, you idiOts haven't plowed me enough."

Sin,
Poopturd

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:01 am

mvscal wrote:I see you have never used a compass either. Simple fact of the matter is that that doesn't not happen on this planet.

West is 270°. North is 0°. East is 90°. South is 180°. That never changes. Those are your "four corners" of the earth. If you shoot an azimuth of 270° on a flat earth and hold that course, you will travel due west until you fall off the edge of the earth. There is no other alternative possibility. It is basic geometry. Flat earth has edges at all 360° of arc. No getting around it.

You claim science yet spew this rhetoric without even realizing the ASSumptions you place within your "science."

You're a blowhard.
A joke.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:16 am

A compass is not rhetoric. Neither is geometry. A flat earth is finite. Pick a direction...any direction and keep going. You will eventually arrive at the edge of the earth. Yet nobody in the recorded history of mankind has ever done this before.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:07 am

You have a brain.
You should really try to use it once in a while.

- nobody in recorded history has gone to the edge of the earth -

You don't know this.
What you know is that NASA has shown you images and told you stories.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 3:11 am

poptart wrote: lol

Yes, dumbshit, we are using a ball earth term so that we can all be on the same page when discussing this particular dynamic.

Basic.

What's wrong with you?

A global Earth versus a flat Earth is apples and pancakes.

BTW, it is interesting when I suggested you use sticks and shadows to show the Sun's declination would have been proven by now. Where I park on a fixed East-West street the Sun came up 2 months ago slightly south of it, is now several degrees south of that point when I park at the same exact spot.

I know, that is waaay past your comprehension to observe for yourself.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:01 am

What is that supposed to prove?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:07 am

poptart wrote:What is that supposed to prove?

The changing declination of the Sun as the Earth rotates around it on a tilted axis of a little over 23 degrees.

Simple to observe. You didn't do it did you? If not, you are an obscurer of simple observational evidence.

Therefore, you aren't interested in truth. You are nothing but a fool trolling a losing battle.

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:17 am

You are nothing but a fool trolling a losing battle

Page 1 says what?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:20 am

Y2K wrote:
You are nothing but a fool trolling a losing battle
Page 1 through 40 says what?

FTFY :grin:

Y2K · Post by **Y2K** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 4:54 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
Y2K wrote:
You are nothing but a fool trolling a losing battle
Page 1 through 40 says what?
FTFY :grin:

Nope..just page 1.
Poptart proved the theory of "mmmkay?.."
Where's his Nobel Prize?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:06 am

poptart wrote:What is that supposed to prove?

AP wrote:The changing declination of the Sun as the Earth rotates around it on a tilted axis of a little over 23 degrees.

It is your assumption that the sun rays are always approaching the earth at 90 degrees.
Isn't it?

Like what we would see if a light source was lighting an object from far far away.
Like 93 million miles away.

Before you try to draw conclusions based on shadows you see, perhaps you first need to prove that the sun is 93 million miles away.

GO...

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 5:15 am

poptart wrote:
poptart wrote:What is that supposed to prove?

AP wrote:The changing declination of the Sun as the Earth rotates around it on a tilted axis of a little over 23 degrees.
It is your assumption that the sun rays are always approaching the earth at 90 degrees.
Isn't it?

Like what we would see if a light source was lighting an object from far far away.
Like 93 million miles away.

Before you try to draw conclusions based on shadows you see, perhaps you first need to prove that the sun is 93 million miles away.

GO...

Yes, the Sun is always shining on the Earth at 90 degrees. I guess you've never noticed the Sun is lower in Winter and somehow higher in the Summer. Notice is gets hot in the Summer and cold in the Winter? Seems to me that you are the only one here that can't disprove the Sun's declination on a tilted Earth as it rotates and travels around the Sun.

You've never been able to explain solar and lunar eclipses, phases of the Moon, observable constellations, etc. either.

Why do you continue to beg to get your ass handed to you daily?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 7:38 am

AP wrote:Yes, the Sun is always shining on the Earth at 90 degrees. I guess you've never noticed the Sun is lower in Winter and somehow higher in the Summer.

The sun is lower in winter and higher in summer.
This is your proof that the sun is 93 million miles away -- and it's rays are always coming on us at a 90 degree angle?

Excuse me...

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 7:43 am

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 7:46 am

Are you really sure the sun rays are always coming on us at a 90 degree angle?

Is my ass really being handed to me?

Smackie Chan · Post by **Smackie Chan** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 9:12 am

mvscal wrote:What's next? "Water: Is it really wet?"

Yeah, pretty much...

poptart wrote:Is my ass really being handed to me?

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 9:56 am

40 seems like the appropriate number of pages to lock this POS down at, given the biblical significance of the number 40. Time for Noahtart to run his padded ark aground.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 11:48 am

AP wrote:lunar eclipses

Watch the video -- watch the brainwashed ball-earth 'tard flail and propose *magic* to explain what he sees.
It's hilarious.

He speaks truth at 2:00, but then...
Sun light coming under the earth is causing the shadow on the top of the moon there, dumbfounded 'tard actually says.

Optical illusion, he mutters while wetting himself.

Yes, as has already been made abundantly clear, ball earth requires -----> MAGIC.

Watch...

To have a shadow, there must be an object causing it, yes?
"Yes, poptart."

AP (and/or others), what object is causing the shadow on the top of the moon at 1:46?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:54 pm

poptart wrote:Is my ass really being handed to me?

What's left of it, yes.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 12:58 pm

It's a thrashing of biblical proportion.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:33 pm

Just because one idiot on the internet can't explain an eclipse doesn't prove the earth isn't round.

In your warped world an eclipse would never be possible. Yet they happen.

Here is another question you can add to your list of unanswered questions, why do solar and lunar eclipses always cast a shadow in an arc instead of a straight line or some other shape?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 6:38 pm

Papa Willie wrote:I'm gonna go out on limb

Oh-oh.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Oct 22, 2015 9:13 pm

Papa Willie wrote:I'm gonna go out on limb here and say that 'tart bet somebody he could get 50 pages out of a troll job.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu Oct 22, 2015 10:13 pm

Poptart, you rely very heavily on bad Youtube videos, conspiracy websites and other incredibly flawed means of "evidence" to establish your amazingly skewed and bizarre perspective. Good for you for your stubborn and unswerving views. With that said, there is a disturbing and common thread that weaves itself through every post you place.

The sad reality is your obliviousness to its nature.

"Evil is unspectacular and always human and shapes our bed and eats at our own table."

Are you really sure you want to journey further down this slope?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 1:39 am

LS wrote:Just because one idiot on the internet can't explain an eclipse doesn't prove the earth isn't round.

In your warped world an eclipse would never be possible. Yet they happen.

Here is another question you can add to your list of unanswered questions, why do solar and lunar eclipses always cast a shadow in an arc instead of a straight line or some other shape?

1. Your statement about eclipses never being possible on a flat earth is based completely on ASSumptions by you.
You don't know this.

2. Yes, that guy is very confused.

3. The sun came up at 6:50 in Cahokia Mounds that day. Sun above horizon -- moon also clearly above horizon. Yet something is standing between the light of the sun and the moon -- to cause the shadow on the moon. Do you want to explain it better than that guy?

:)

4. From a flat earth perspective, I don't yet have a sure answer I am confident in as far as eclipses. Does not mean at all that there IS no answer. There are theories. I just don't feel confident in one... yet.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:01 am

poptart wrote: 4. From a flat earth perspective, I don't yet have a sure answer I am confident in as far as eclipses.

I'll help you out, bro...

the reason you're not confident in them, is because they're beyond moronic.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:03 am

AP (and y'all) think the sun is 93 million miles away.
So watch two very short sun time-lapse clips and then THINK for yourself about something.

Clip one at :26, notice the size of the sun.
Very small above the horizon.

It then gets bigger, bigger, bigger as it moves across the sky -- and then shrinks again as it lowers, to 1:01 when it is low and very small once again.

Clip two shows the same dynamic -- and he points out the size difference.

If this is an object that is 93 million miles away, it moving a mere few thousand miles away from us would not change it's size.
Or if it did, it would be nearly imperceptible.

But if an object is just a handful of thousand miles from us, yes, it moving thousands of miles away from us WOULD result in it getting smaller as it moved away.

This is basic common sense, right?

Is anyone alive here?

What we are seeing in these clips is this...