The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Hey look everybody...a woman being sawed in half!
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
so take that you roundearther conspiracy whack jobs, me and tart know the real truth!!!!!poptart wrote:
88 missed it by millions and millions of miles.
get out, get out while there's still time
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Parallax: another concept popeturd fails to understand.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
In a related story, our friend Dinsdale met this smokin' hot chick at a bar last night...
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
you mean like thismvscal wrote:Parallax: another concept popeturd fails to understand.
lies made up by brainwashed roundearthers afraid to face the real truth.....that the world is flat and the sun is 3,105 miles away......
get out, get out while there's still time
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
I took astronomy in college and learned about things like dwarf stars, black holes, parallax used for measuring distance (even did some hands on measurements), speed of light in a vaccuum, red shift, quasars, pulsars etc.
but now, I know it was all just a lie.......if they're willing to lie to us about the earth being round then I know they're lying to me about everything else.....
Charlton Heston wrote:you maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!
get out, get out while there's still time
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21091
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Ohhhh Fuck,poptart wrote:
Really!
The floor looks nice but those two seams just to the right of your map should have been staggered more.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
88, it's IMPOSSIBLE for the sun to be 93 million miles from earth and I demonstrated it.
I don't run from my original diagram, comments, or analysis.
-- Now look at the line on the bottom -- from Natal to Liberville, so that we can achieve the necessary 45 degree angle of the sun from Liberville.
Is Liberville, Africa 93 million miles from Natal, Brazil?
bwaaaa hahahaha!!
Is a light bulb coming on? --
Because I clearly subsequently said to AP BEFORE you decided to post your wack diagram...
It matters not at all.
What YOU posted to show the proper earth curve validates my comment and -----> BURIED YOU.
I extended the line on your diagram, as you should have done if you wanted to be intellectually honest.
On the papers and earth scale that I showed you, the lines would have to be extended by well over 2,000 sheets of paper to reach what would be 93 million miles.
And yet it takes just 15 pages for the lines to meet.
Let it soak in.
bwaaaa...
People who WANT to pay attention to what is going on in this thread can see what just happened.
So I'm not surprised that you wanted to divert away from the diagram you posted in defense of your bogus model.
As for your link, right out of the gate, we see an ASSUMPTIONS made.
The "radius of the earth" section.
1. Assumption: Parallel rays from the sun
2. Assumption: Earth is round
3. Assumption: The angle of the shadow on the earth's surface is the same angle to the center of the earth
Based on 3 assumptions, a radius of earth is determined.
What a crock of shit.
Think for yourself.
Give it a shot.
It feels VERY good, I can tell you.
I don't run from my original diagram, comments, or analysis.
-- Now look at the line on the bottom -- from Natal to Liberville, so that we can achieve the necessary 45 degree angle of the sun from Liberville.
Is Liberville, Africa 93 million miles from Natal, Brazil?
bwaaaa hahahaha!!
Is a light bulb coming on? --
Because I clearly subsequently said to AP BEFORE you decided to post your wack diagram...
And that is RIGHT.poptart wrote:I couldn't find a pic with a curved (slightly) line at the bottom of this triangle -- to represent earth curvature from Natal to Libreville.
But go ahead and assume the mild curve we would see in 3,000 miles.
This just in: It matters -----> NOT AT ALL
It matters not at all.
What YOU posted to show the proper earth curve validates my comment and -----> BURIED YOU.
I extended the line on your diagram, as you should have done if you wanted to be intellectually honest.
On the papers and earth scale that I showed you, the lines would have to be extended by well over 2,000 sheets of paper to reach what would be 93 million miles.
And yet it takes just 15 pages for the lines to meet.
Let it soak in.
bwaaaa...
People who WANT to pay attention to what is going on in this thread can see what just happened.
So I'm not surprised that you wanted to divert away from the diagram you posted in defense of your bogus model.
As for your link, right out of the gate, we see an ASSUMPTIONS made.
The "radius of the earth" section.
1. Assumption: Parallel rays from the sun
2. Assumption: Earth is round
3. Assumption: The angle of the shadow on the earth's surface is the same angle to the center of the earth
Based on 3 assumptions, a radius of earth is determined.
What a crock of shit.
Think for yourself.
Give it a shot.
It feels VERY good, I can tell you.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
So many things are n!gger rigged in S. Korea that I barely pay attention to it any more.atmdad wrote:Ohhhh Fuck,poptart wrote:
Really!
The floor looks nice but those two seams just to the right of your map should have been staggered more.
It's all about getting things done... NOW!
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Raise your hand if you are actually deluded enough to believe this thing went to the moon?
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Do you know the extreme heat this would have had to endure for very long periods of time?
What kind of cooling unit did it have and how was that unit POWERED?
How big and heavy would the battery have needed to be, and how in the world could they even carry it?
Look at that piece of crap there and THINK.
People, it's called FANTASY.
Wake up, seriously.
What kind of cooling unit did it have and how was that unit POWERED?
How big and heavy would the battery have needed to be, and how in the world could they even carry it?
Look at that piece of crap there and THINK.
People, it's called FANTASY.
Wake up, seriously.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Unreal...
:09 to :12 - camera zoom out (LOL)
:26 onward -- camera zoom in (LOL)
Two seconds after liftoff, astroNOT says, "We're on our way, Houston."
LOL
Holy crap.
Really??
Embarrassing.
Truly truly embarrassing.
Get a grip, folks.
:09 to :12 - camera zoom out (LOL)
:26 onward -- camera zoom in (LOL)
Two seconds after liftoff, astroNOT says, "We're on our way, Houston."
LOL
Holy crap.
Really??
Embarrassing.
Truly truly embarrassing.
Get a grip, folks.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
OK, dumbfukk, what is the official NASA T+2 line supposed to be? How about "WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" or maybe " "HOLY FUKK!!!!"
Who was the astronaut? Somebody from Tehas? I guess "YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!!" would be apropriate.
As for the flimsy Lunar Module, maybe you didn't get the memo. Space is pretty much a vacuum. The moon has such a weak sauce grvity system that it can't even keep an atmosphere around. This makes it a kinda shitty place to live, but, it also makes it a tad bit easier to hop back into space from. Seems to me, if they were going to fake it, they'd have made it look like something out of Buck Rogers, just to convince dopes like you.
Who was the astronaut? Somebody from Tehas? I guess "YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!!" would be apropriate.
As for the flimsy Lunar Module, maybe you didn't get the memo. Space is pretty much a vacuum. The moon has such a weak sauce grvity system that it can't even keep an atmosphere around. This makes it a kinda shitty place to live, but, it also makes it a tad bit easier to hop back into space from. Seems to me, if they were going to fake it, they'd have made it look like something out of Buck Rogers, just to convince dopes like you.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Dude, in that liftoff moment, the astronNOT's life was on the line.smackaholic wrote:OK, dumbfukk, what is the official NASA T+2 line supposed to be? How about "WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" or maybe " "HOLY FUKK!!!!"
Who was the astronaut? Somebody from Tehas? I guess "YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!!" would be apropriate.
Hanging in the friggin' balance.
Have you ever been scared shitless?
What did you do in that moment?
Nobody is going to squeal, "We're on out way, Houston" at that moment.
It is absolutely, completely ridiculous.
Pull your head out.
If you think that is real, your mind is going, going, -----> GONE!
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21732
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Remember who we are talking about here. These dudes were the best of the best. Test pilots with ginormous hairy balls. They knew there was a damn good chance this would be a one way trip for them and they did it any way. So, having them say something like that in a relaxed voice is completely understandable.poptart wrote:Dude, in that liftoff moment, the astronNOT's life was on the line.smackaholic wrote:OK, dumbfukk, what is the official NASA T+2 line supposed to be? How about "WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" or maybe " "HOLY FUKK!!!!"
Who was the astronaut? Somebody from Tehas? I guess "YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!!" would be apropriate.
Hanging in the friggin' balance.
Have you ever been scared shitless?
What did you do in that moment?
Nobody is going to squeal, "We're on out way, Houston" at that moment.
It is absolutely, completely ridiculous.
Pull your head out.
If you think that is real, your mind is going, going, -----> GONE!
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
they were trained astronauts having gone through this countless times in simulators.....they weren't scared shitless, they knew it was going to work.....poptart wrote: Have you ever been scared shitless?
What did you do in that moment?
Nobody is going to squeal, "We're on out way, Houston" at that moment.
It is absolutely, completely ridiculous.
look I'm down with you on the whole flat earth thing, but dude seriously arguing that man didn't go to the moon? that's the studiest thing I've ever heard....
you do realize that while they were there the left a 2-foot wide panel studded with 100 mirrors pointing at Earth? anyone on earth with the proper equipment can use this lunar laser ranging retroreflector array to determine the distance of the earth from the moon.....I've gone to the astrophysics lab at Boise State and used it myself....when the measurement came back it showed the earth was 238,855.87 miles from the moon.....how do you think they got that laser array up there?
get out, get out while there's still time
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
88,
Your link forgot to prove how Kepler came up with M.
Cassini's measurements are useless unless M is right in the first place.
So less like astronomy for dummies and more like astronomy by dummies.
And why can Kepler figure M but he cant use the same formula to figure E?
Your link forgot to prove how Kepler came up with M.
Cassini's measurements are useless unless M is right in the first place.
So less like astronomy for dummies and more like astronomy by dummies.
And why can Kepler figure M but he cant use the same formula to figure E?
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Quite obviously it was visitors from one of the other flat planets and we were just lucky to run across it. Those aliens are tricky little bastards, they were using it to look through peoples windows down on earth like high rise perverts with telescopes. They have to be pissed that we are shooting lasers at it and messing with their jerk sessions. They're going to come kick somebodys ass at Boise St....Bank on it!how do you think they got that laser array up there?
- Felix
- 2012 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: probably on a golf course
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
bwahahahaY2K wrote:They have to be pissed that we are shooting lasers at it and messing with their jerk sessions. They're going to come kick somebodys ass at Boise St....Bank on it!how do you think they got that laser array up there?
nice......
get out, get out while there's still time
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
I'm going to come correct on something now.
My diagram, and much of what I said in response to 88's diagram with the two arrows going up was ----> wrong and STUPID.
Amazingly stupid.
I was working quickly, and what I posted was ASININE.
lol
I deserve one of these...
The upward lines on 88's diagram will NEVER meet, and a 4th grader would know that.
Yes, I surely K'dMOA there.
That said, none of my crapping the bed over the last page changes my overall view in the least.
It was just my error, of which of course I make many, and certainly in no way validates the false model I've detailed over the past 40+ pages.
My diagram, and much of what I said in response to 88's diagram with the two arrows going up was ----> wrong and STUPID.
Amazingly stupid.
I was working quickly, and what I posted was ASININE.
lol
I deserve one of these...
The upward lines on 88's diagram will NEVER meet, and a 4th grader would know that.
Yes, I surely K'dMOA there.
That said, none of my crapping the bed over the last page changes my overall view in the least.
It was just my error, of which of course I make many, and certainly in no way validates the false model I've detailed over the past 40+ pages.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
You are deluded.smackaholic wrote:Remember who we are talking about here. These dudes were the best of the best. Test pilots with ginormous hairy balls. They knew there was a damn good chance this would be a one way trip for them and they did it any way. So, having them say something like that in a relaxed voice is completely understandable.poptart wrote:Dude, in that liftoff moment, the astronNOT's life was on the line.smackaholic wrote:OK, dumbfukk, what is the official NASA T+2 line supposed to be? How about "WEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" or maybe " "HOLY FUKK!!!!"
Who was the astronaut? Somebody from Tehas? I guess "YEEEEEEEHAAAAAAA!!!!!!" would be apropriate.
Hanging in the friggin' balance.
Have you ever been scared shitless?
What did you do in that moment?
Nobody is going to squeal, "We're on out way, Houston" at that moment.
It is absolutely, completely ridiculous.
Pull your head out.
If you think that is real, your mind is going, going, -----> GONE!
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
You think the earth is flat?Felix wrote:look I'm down with you on the whole flat earth thing, but dude seriously arguing that man didn't go to the moon? that's the studiest thing I've ever heard....
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
It's going well beyond 50, 'spray.
There is much more meat to be posted -- and people will not be able to lay off what I will post.
I'm sure of it.
The best is yet to come.
No more cr@pping the bed like I did the last page+.
I'm embarrassed by that.
I have no idea what the hell I was thinking about when I started off on that tangent, and how I got even more confused as I went along.
Wish I could blame that on a bong overdose, but no can do.
There is much more meat to be posted -- and people will not be able to lay off what I will post.
I'm sure of it.
The best is yet to come.
No more cr@pping the bed like I did the last page+.
I'm embarrassed by that.
I have no idea what the hell I was thinking about when I started off on that tangent, and how I got even more confused as I went along.
Wish I could blame that on a bong overdose, but no can do.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Gay in Phoenix gets a sig file reprieve.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
poptart is so totally texas.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Here's hoping it is finally the Southern Hemisphere flights.poptart wrote:
There is much more meat to be posted -- and people will not be able to lay off what I will post.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Yeah, I will bring my ruler and put it against the window.Papa Willie wrote:The next time you fly @ 40,000+, you'll now understand that you aren't really seeing the curvature of the earth.Left Seater wrote:Here's hoping it is finally the Southern Hemisphere flights.poptart wrote:
There is much more meat to be posted -- and people will not be able to lay off what I will post.
You're just high.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
We always see a flat earth and no matter how high we go, the horizon is always at eye level.
Think about that.
Such would not be the case if we lived on a ball.
Think about that.
Such would not be the case if we lived on a ball.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
A reset...
and...
9/11 + Twin Towers
poptart wrote:Revelation 9:11
And they (demonic beings) had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose
name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.
Revelation 9/11
Apollyon = Apollo
The Destroyer, king of the demons, who is released to wreak havoc on earth.
The worship of Apollo.
The greatness of Apollo.
Apollo 11, the climax.
Some numbers are used repeatedly in the Bible to represent something.
11 represent confusion, chaos, disorder.
and...
9/11 + Twin Towers
- Atomic Punk
- antagonist
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
- Location: El Segundo, CA
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
poptart wrote:A reset...
9/11 + Twin Towers
Well, you and shit troll Felcho certainly have a lot of catching up to do.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.
Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
- Atomic Punk
- antagonist
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
- Location: El Segundo, CA
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
You mean that from the reference point of the Earth being a very small ball/globe. You're not very good at proportions are you?poptart wrote:We always see a flat earth and no matter how high we go, the horizon is always at eye level.
Think about that.
Such would not be the case if we lived on a ball.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.
Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
You're good at making dumb excuses for your *FAILED* earth model.
It has been pointed out to you in page-after-page that there is a SERIOUS problem with your model.
CN Tower has people viewing out to 100 miles.
lol
IMPOSSIBLE if your model is correct.
This just in: It isn't
Beyond that "water is wet" point which anyone should understand, if you're viewing out to 100 miles in your model, you've got over 1 miles in earth curvature.
Everything is moving downhill from you as you look out 100 miles.
You should be able to see that things way in the distance, 70-100 miles for example, are leaning away from you.
Yet of course we don't see that.
We see a flat earth.
It has been pointed out to you in page-after-page that there is a SERIOUS problem with your model.
CN Tower has people viewing out to 100 miles.
lol
IMPOSSIBLE if your model is correct.
This just in: It isn't
Beyond that "water is wet" point which anyone should understand, if you're viewing out to 100 miles in your model, you've got over 1 miles in earth curvature.
Everything is moving downhill from you as you look out 100 miles.
You should be able to see that things way in the distance, 70-100 miles for example, are leaning away from you.
Yet of course we don't see that.
We see a flat earth.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Or maybe your math is totally fucked and you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.poptart wrote:You're good at making dumb excuses for your *FAILED* earth model.
It has been pointed out to you in page-after-page that there is a SERIOUS problem with your model.
CN Tower has people viewing out to 100 miles.
lol
IMPOSSIBLE if your model is correct.
This just in: It isn't
Beyond that "water is wet" point which anyone should understand, if you're viewing out to 100 miles in your model, you've got over 1 miles in earth curvature.
Everything is moving downhill from you as you look out 100 miles.
You should be able to see that things way in the distance, 70-100 miles for example, are leaning away from you.
Yet of course we don't see that.
We see a flat earth.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
With the globe model we've been sold on, a person has to be well over a mile high (6,600 ft, to be precise) in order to be able to see something on the ground 100 miles away.
Even at a mile high (5,280 ft), you could only see something 100 miles away if that thing was at least 80 ft tall.
CN Tower (1,465 ft) has people viewing out to 100 miles.
lol
-- To compute the greatest distance at which an observer can see the top of an object above the horizon, compute the distance to the horizon for a hypothetical observer on top of that object, and add it to the real observer's distance to the horizon. For example, for an observer with a height of 1.70 m standing on the ground, the horizon is 4.65 km away. For a tower with a height of 100 m, the horizon distance is 35.7 km. Thus an observer on a beach can see the top of the tower as long as it is not more than 40.35 km away. Conversely, if an observer on a boat (h = 1.7 m) can just see the tops of trees on a nearby shore (h = 10 m), the trees are probably about 16 km away. --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/
Do you not agree with the math?
Even at a mile high (5,280 ft), you could only see something 100 miles away if that thing was at least 80 ft tall.
CN Tower (1,465 ft) has people viewing out to 100 miles.
lol
-- To compute the greatest distance at which an observer can see the top of an object above the horizon, compute the distance to the horizon for a hypothetical observer on top of that object, and add it to the real observer's distance to the horizon. For example, for an observer with a height of 1.70 m standing on the ground, the horizon is 4.65 km away. For a tower with a height of 100 m, the horizon distance is 35.7 km. Thus an observer on a beach can see the top of the tower as long as it is not more than 40.35 km away. Conversely, if an observer on a boat (h = 1.7 m) can just see the tops of trees on a nearby shore (h = 10 m), the trees are probably about 16 km away. --
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizon
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/
Do you not agree with the math?
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
We are in an age of amazing technology, right trolls?
HD everything.
Phenomenal camera tech.
But... can you link me up to a single video, from earth, of a rocket going up into space?
We see video of people supposedly really UP in space, yet we have no video of them actually getting there.
Shit, Ginger and Mary Ann must have really been on an island, right?
We saw them there every week.
Example of bullshit...
Watch 6:00 to 6:20 as the trumped-up GPS satellite rocket is actually coming down.
Then they cut away to a fake "See, we're up here, folks" video which only m0rons accept as true.
Show me the video of a rocket going to space.
We don't GO to space, people.
If we do, then show me.
It should be easy.
This one is curving, and it will go down, also.
lol
Satellites out the @ss up in space, all around the earth, we're told.
Yet not a SINGLE pic of one.
Not one.
Only cartoons.
They show us cartoon pics of satellites.
Eat your Lucky Charms and enjoy the Saturday morning show, kiddies.
Or... grow up and wake up.
Your call.
HD everything.
Phenomenal camera tech.
But... can you link me up to a single video, from earth, of a rocket going up into space?
We see video of people supposedly really UP in space, yet we have no video of them actually getting there.
Shit, Ginger and Mary Ann must have really been on an island, right?
We saw them there every week.
Example of bullshit...
Watch 6:00 to 6:20 as the trumped-up GPS satellite rocket is actually coming down.
Then they cut away to a fake "See, we're up here, folks" video which only m0rons accept as true.
Show me the video of a rocket going to space.
We don't GO to space, people.
If we do, then show me.
It should be easy.
This one is curving, and it will go down, also.
lol
Satellites out the @ss up in space, all around the earth, we're told.
Yet not a SINGLE pic of one.
Not one.
Only cartoons.
They show us cartoon pics of satellites.
Eat your Lucky Charms and enjoy the Saturday morning show, kiddies.
Or... grow up and wake up.
Your call.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
What a complete fucking moron.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
We've seen such an embarrassing failure of a retort many times.
MANY.
"You're a moron!!"
No substance.
Zero.
Just a nice white flag.
MANY.
"You're a moron!!"
No substance.
Zero.
Just a nice white flag.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
Just a statement of fact.
How does DirecTV work, BTW?
How does DirecTV work, BTW?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: The Rod of God -- (!) Pages 33 and 34 (!)
And yet not one single snap taken on the edge of the earth.poptart wrote:We are in an age of amazing technology, right trolls?
HD everything.
Phenomenal camera tech.
Interesting, wouldn't you say?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.