Black Student Group Demands - University of Missouri

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 2:43 pm

Left Seater wrote:This action should scare the hell out of every college and Univ admin out there.

Fuck em. They asked for it. They got it. This is the inevitable and long foretold end game of the PC culture these useless skidmarks promoted.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 3:30 pm

I'm wondering how they would have felt about this one...

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 6:38 pm

mvscal wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:There are some costumes that can't be allowed on campus.
Oh? Why is that?

Because you can't come to class naked or walk the campus naked and say you are Adam. Try pulling off your white sheet and reading the thread before you post next time you Black Cock fucking fraud.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 6:54 pm

Moving Sale wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:There are some costumes that can't be allowed on campus.
Oh? Why is that?
Because you can't come to class naked or walk the campus naked and say you are Adam.

I suppose that would depend on the local ordinances regarding public nudity. Regardless, it's a bullshit stuffed strawman.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:38 pm

No asshat. It's a costume nobody can wear. You and 88 are dumber than Ben Carson and Donald Trump.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:40 pm

A. It's not a costume.
B. Nobody was walking around naked.
C. You're a colossal dumbfuck.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 7:44 pm

It's clearly a costume if I say it is because that's what a costume is.
Plenty of people walk around naked in places where it's legal.
You are an issue dodging POS, oh and a black cock fucking racist.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:01 pm

Bro is typical of the liberal leadership. Listen only to my words, my past and history are of no concern.

Dude will make a great Democratic Party candidate in the next decade or so for Congress.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:04 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Plenty of people walk around naked in places where it's legal.

And, in such places, you could "dress up" as Adam for Halloween, you brainless cock monkey.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:06 pm

And at Mizzu you can't, so there is a "list" of costumes you can't wear.

have you EVER been right about ANYTHING?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:33 pm

have you EVER been right about ANYTHING?

You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Moving Sale wrote:And at Mizzu you can't, so there is a "list" of costumes you can't wear.

Now prove me wrong with a link.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:47 pm

Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:52 pm

Saw this just now. Calling "Mizzoo" The University of the Damned. I like that.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:58 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.

Mizzou is in Connecticut? Where is list of banned costumes at Mizzou, btw?

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 9:35 pm

If you are going to dress up as Adam.....wouldnt your privates be covered up by a $300 hooker?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:17 pm

mvscal wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.
Mizzou is in Connecticut? Where is list of banned costumes at Mizzou, btw?

I fixed it a couple of mins before you posted.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:19 pm

88 wrote:http://totalfratmove.com/photo-arizona- ... ona-state/

Looks like a bar. Next.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:23 pm

KC Scott wrote:

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 10:33 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Looks like a bar.

Whatever bar it is, I'm sure you could get under it.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:41 pm

Moving Sale wrote: I fixed it a couple of mins before you posted.

You "fixed it" to citations of even more Connecticut statutes?

The internet is an inanimate entity, yet still gets its foot low enough to kick your ass on a routine basis.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:42 pm

R-Jack wrote:If you are going to dress up as Adam.....wouldnt your privates be covered up by a $300 hooker?

$$$$$$$

We should never forget our lore.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 11, 2015 11:46 pm

And as far as the tangent -- in Oregon, you can be naked pretty much anywhere you want. There are some local ordinances, but no one has ever been prosecuted under them, since it's known they fall apart under state law/OSC precedent.

You can't wave your junk at other people (something about "sexually provocative manner"), and if you're sporting wood, you cross the line.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:09 am

http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/11/here- ... -incident/

No evidence the poop swastika was drawn by a red-necked white, Christian male who is a card carrying member of the KKK. Just as likely it was done by a black member of that Ferguson group, BlackHomosMatter.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:32 am

It's just art!
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... rt-triumph

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:36 am

Rooster wrote:It's just art!
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... rt-triumph

Only if it's red,

Sin,
A certain female poster

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:01 am

Moving Sale wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.
Mizzou is in Connecticut? Where is list of banned costumes at Mizzou, btw?
I fixed it a couple of mins before you posted.

To what?

7:00pm CST says:

Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 5:01 am

Left Seater wrote:This action should scare the hell out of every college and Univ admin out there.

I wouldn't panic too much, it's an acedemic trend and they get replaced. If history is anything to go by we've got:

- an intellectual fashion for 'scientism' in the west in the 50s and 60s, which gave birth to structuralism

- replaced by poststructuralism

- replaced by cultural studies and cognitivism

At least they killed off the brain-dead impressionism which before ruled the humanities. Now we're left with identity politics which will be about for a bit, but nothing more.

Roger_the_Shrubber · Post by **Roger_the_Shrubber** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:00 am

88,

I would not have Index back for any reason. He and Innocent Bystander made the old board unreadable and completely stupid. They would argue and dissect a statement like, "Water is wet" ad infinitum.( that means forever, guys from Michigan)

Curse you if either two show up. :x

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:50 am

Roger_the_Shrubber wrote:88,

I would not have Index back for any reason. He and Innocent Bystander made the old board unreadable and completely stupid. They would argue and dissect a statement like, "Water is wet" ad infinitum.( that means forever, guys from Michigan)

Curse you if either two show up. :x

Why would we worry about them when we have Prophetart?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:43 am

Dr_Phibes wrote:
Left Seater wrote:This action should scare the hell out of every college and Univ admin out there.
I wouldn't panic too much, it's an acedemic trend and they get replaced. If history is anything to go by we've got:

- an intellectual fashion for 'scientism' in the west in the 50s and 60s, which gave birth to structuralism

- replaced by poststructuralism

- replaced by cultural studies and cognitivism

At least they killed off the brain-dead impressionism which before ruled the humanities. Now we're left with identity politics which will be about for a bit, but nothing more.

I blame Khrushchev.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:35 am

88 wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Next.
INDEX LIVES!!!! I was just thinking at lunch today about Index, and what fun it would have been to have his takes in this thread.

Nice white flag

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:37 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Moving Sale wrote: I fixed it a couple of mins before you posted.
You "fixed it" to citations of even more Connecticut statutes?

The internet is an inanimate entity, yet still gets its foot low enough to kick your ass on a routine basis.

What the fuck are you babbling about?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:46 am

Moving Sale wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Moving Sale wrote: I fixed it a couple of mins before you posted.
You "fixed it" to citations of even more Connecticut statutes?

The internet is an inanimate entity, yet still gets its foot low enough to kick your ass on a routine basis.
What the fuck are you babbling about?

Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

2005 Connecticut Code - Sec. 53a-186. Public indecency: Class B misdemeanor.

What in the living fuck made your midget brain assume that the University of Missouri was in Connecticut?

A KYOA of epic proportion.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:35 am

Dinsdale wrote: What in the living fuck made your midget brain assume that the University of Missouri was in Connecticut?

A KYOA of epic proportion.

Yuck it up asshat. You are too stupid to see the mistake three posts in. At least it only took me a few mins to catch it.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 1:54 am

And you "fixed" it -- to more Connecticut statutes... classic.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:20 am

Which is where Yale is dumbfuck.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 7:50 am

Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?

How fucking ironic...that emanating from YOUR keyboard.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:48 am

The Seer wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:Again, have you ever been right about anything? Ever?
How fucking ironic...that emanating from YOUR keyboard.

Name one thing I have ever got wrong that I didnt immediately own up to.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 12:20 pm

Top Mizzou prospect tells Mizzou to GFY.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/11 ... f-control/

Hopefully the first of many, not that there were many blue chip recruits considering that shit program.

To the gutless head coach at mizzou, I hope you are happy now. You let your shit team get out of control. Now you are feeling the consequences. You are fukking done!!! Maybe you can get an asst coach position in a D-3 program somewhere.

This is the first taste of Karma for that shit school. I doubt it will be the last.

I hope the rest of the coaches and administrators in other schools now realize that cowtowing to snot nosed punks over imaginary problems is a bad idea.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Nov 13, 2015 2:37 pm

Moving Sale wrote:Which is where Yale is dumbfuck.

mvscal wrote:
have you EVER been right about ANYTHING?
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

Moving Sale wrote:And at Mizzu you can't, so there is a "list" of costumes you can't wear.
Now prove me wrong with a link.

Still waiting on this list of inappropriate costumes from either Mizzou or Yale. One including public nudity would help your case.