Trump Asks Russia To Hack Shrillary's Emails

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:18 pm

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07 ... paign.html

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 11:34 pm

Mikey wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:That is, when Hillary's camp screams treason, they're tacitly admitting that indeed the (leaked) e-mails did contain sensitive information.
Actually, they're not.

Let's turd, for once is on to something. How the Shillary campaign can be stupid enough to try to make something out of Trump's making a joke is ridiculous. It's as if the Russkies are just sitting on their hands waiting for an invite to cause mischief. But then most of their talking points are braindead to someone with half a brain. I am reffing to the BLM asskissing. Question for the libs here, do you think they have a legit arguement? Do you believe cops hunt them for fun? Do you think any one of your sorry white asses wouldn't receive the same or worse from a cop if you acted as they do?

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:44 am

For the Killary camp to claim treason on anything other than her actions in multiple situation is rich.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 3:34 pm

Left Seater wrote:For the Killary camp to claim treason on anything other than her actions in multiple situation is rich.

To claim that Hillary's storage of emails on a private server is treasonous while not doing the same about Bush Administration members who also stored emails on a private server is rich.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 4:02 pm

^^^^^^
Gets it. Of course the DNC knows this too, but they need to rile up their sheep.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:38 pm

He'll probably (wisely) back out, but I can't wait for the debates.

He'll get his ass handed to him.

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:49 pm

All Trump has to do during the debate(s) is to read transcripts of Killary's own words. Start with her speech about Bengazhi, then move on to the email server, and then finish with the FBI report on the email server.

Hell he could ignore every question and just read her crap every time it is his turn.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:47 pm

You're out of your mind with Hillary derangement syndrome.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sun Jul 31, 2016 11:53 pm

Hillary derangement syndrome

The new Normal----get used to it.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 12:46 am

What 88 said. Remember when that fat bitch and Barry DPed Mittens right on the stage? Mittens laid there and didn't even ask for a reach around. Trump will be different.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:02 am

smackaholic wrote:What 88 said. Remember when that fat bitch and Barry DPed Mittens right on the stage? Mittens laid there and didn't even ask for a reach around. Trump will be different.

Saying you have yuge, tremendous, outstanding plans will only go so far.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:03 am

Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:24 am

88 wrote: The moderator always lobs softball questions at the lib and gores the repute.

Yeah always.
It's like you are a Trump clone. You just spew shit and don't even care if has any truth associated with it at all. And then you move on to the next lie.

And just in case you forgot the last one was you calling RBG a judge.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:41 am

88 wrote:
Clinton Playbook wrote:You just spew shit and don't even care if has any truth associated with it at all. And then you move on to the next lie.
Nice white flag 88trumps

Moving Fail wrote:And just in case you forgot the last one was you calling RBG a judge.
You should spend your days trying to get RBG to get on board with your insanity. She is blowing holes in it with her own quotes:

Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote:On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them. Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office.

And they should. WTF does that have to do with the link you tried to use to prove your stupid point? Look fuckhead, judges judge. Justices decide Constitutionality. Why do you think your own link calls The Chief Justice a Justice and all district judges judges. You are stupid beyond belief, no wonder you are sucking trumpcock.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 2:49 am

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:54 am

Yep just like trump. Round and round you go like the past never happened and words have no meaning.
The USC has no canons so it does not restrict what she can say. The canons you linked to specifically do not name her as a judge so they don't apply to her. That's the point when you bailed last time.

Now link me up to moderators always lobbing softballs to Ds and goring Rs.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 7:43 pm

smackaholic wrote:What 88 said. Remember when that fat bitch and Barry DPed Mittens right on the stage? Mittens laid there and didn't even ask for a reach around. Trump will be different.

He'll ask for a reach-around?

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:01 pm

BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.

I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Mon Aug 01, 2016 9:31 pm

Papa Willie wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:00 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:
BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.
I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.

Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother. He's a sociopathic loon. And Hillary will put him on display. She just needs to let Trump be Trump. The rest will take care of itself.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 1:15 am

Moving Sale wrote:The canons you linked to specifically do not name her as a judge so they don't apply to her.

Yet she claimed she was a judge... so the nasty old Constitution-hating biddy doesn't even know what her job is?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:23 am

Moving Sale wrote:

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:22 pm

BSmack wrote: Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother.

Stop lying, you brainless cum puddle.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:40 pm

BSmack wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:
BSmack wrote:Hillary will rope a dope the orange mummy. He doesn't stand a chance.
I'm not sure I would go that far. It's going to be difficult for her to get past her issues when Trump will press the moderator to do so.
Trump is currently attacking a gold star mother. He's a sociopathic loon. And Hillary will put him on display. She just needs to let Trump be Trump. The rest will take care of itself.

You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.

The media isn't going to call out the Democrats at all for anything really, but I found it pretty disingenuous that they willingly paraded illegal immigrants at their convention like it wasn't an issue.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:42 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.

Ooooo. "Vicious" "attack."

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:50 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:The canons you linked to specifically do not name her as a judge so they don't apply to her.
Yet she claimed she was a judge... so the nasty old Constitution-hating biddy doesn't even know what her job is?

Did I stutter?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:17 pm

MuchoBulls wrote: You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood?

Because some brain dead Trumpista claimed he was without any actual proof?
Come on you can do better than this.

Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.

You really don't follow along very well, do you?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:20 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.

Except she has spoken before. And even a little bit of research should have uncovered that fact. All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy. Trump does that an Khan goes awah. But no, Trump can't do that. And now he's losing votes from his own party.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:36 pm

BSmack wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:You mean the gold star mother whose husband has apparent ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? Trump asked why she wasn't allowed to speak, which raises a good question.
Except she has spoken before. And even a little bit of research should have uncovered that fact. All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy. Trump does that an Khan goes awah. But no, Trump can't do that. And now he's losing votes from his own party.

Did she speak at the convention? His comment was pertaining to that.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:40 pm

BSmack wrote: All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy.

That's exactly what he said, fuckwad.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:43 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote: All Trump had to do was say that he respects his son's sacrifice but that he disagrees with him on the policy.
That's exactly what he said, fuckwad.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our "leaders" to eradicate it!

After being called out on his initial comeback. You don't follow along much better than MuchoBullshit.

Or maybe you're just a lying sack of shit.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:06 pm

Quote it or go fuck yourself.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:17 pm

So Trump asking why Mrs. Khan was not able to speak at the convention, is me not following along?

Trump has many faults, but what he brought up regarding Mrs. Khan was a good point. I cannot say that I am surprised at how easily offended the media and liberals in general get. It's the same liberals who were totally ok with Chris Matthews' blatant and erroneous attack on Pat Smith at the RNC.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 6:15 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:So Trump asking why Mrs. Khan was not able to speak at the convention, is me not following along?

Trump has many faults, but what he brought up regarding Mrs. Khan was a good point. I cannot say that I am surprised at how easily offended the media and liberals in general get. It's the same liberals who were totally ok with Chris Matthews' blatant and erroneous attack on Pat Smith at the RNC.

Or Shillary calling her a liar. Now that is an actual "attack" and one made all the more disgusting since it was her own negligence and incompetence which was directly responsible Sean Smith's death.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 6:49 pm

Rats deserting a sinking ship.

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado (AP) — Less than four years ago, the Republican Party tapped a few respected party officials to help the GOP find its way forward. This week, one of them says she's leaving the party — driven out by Donald Trump.

While not a household name, Sally Bradshaw's decision to leave the GOP rocked those who make politics their profession. The longtime aide to former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was one of the five senior Republican strategists tasked with identifying the party's shortcomings and recommending ways it could win the White House after its losing 2012 presidential campaign.

Now, she says, she'll vote for Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton if the race in her home state of Florida appears close come Election Day.

"Sally is representative of an important segment of our party, and that is college-educated women, where Donald Trump is losing by disastrous margins," said Ari Fleischer, who worked with Bradshaw on the GOP project and was a senior adviser to President George W. Bush. "Trump has moved in exactly the opposite direction from our recommendations on how to make the party more inclusive."

Fleischer still supports Trump over Clinton. But Bradshaw is among a group of top Republican operatives, messengers, national committee members and donors who continue to decry Trump's tactics, highlighting almost daily — with three months until Election Day — the rifts created by the billionaire and his takeover of the party.

This past weekend, the billionaire industrialist Charles Koch (coke) told hundreds of donors that make up his political network that Trump does not embrace, nor will he fight for, free market principles.

That's one reason Koch's network, which has the deepest pockets in conservative politics, is ignoring the presidential contest this year and focusing its fundraising wealth on races for Congress. Donors and elected officials gathering at a Koch event in Colorado said they accepted the Koch brothers' decision, even if it hurts the GOP's White House chances.

Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin, among the high-profile Republicans on hand, refused to endorse Trump and referenced now defunct political parties, such as the Whigs, when asked about the health of the modern-day GOP.

"The party is not really what matters. It's the principles," Bevin told The Associated Press.

Another of those in attendance, House Speaker Paul Ryan, didn't even mention his party's presidential nominee during his speech to the group. Yet he referenced an election he called "personality contest" devoid of specific goals or principles.

Liberals and those on the political left are hardly fully united around Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, whose convention was interrupted on occasion by supporters of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.

But after beating Sanders in the primaries, Clinton took steps to win over Sanders and his supporters — including agreeing to changes to the party's platform. Trump has shown little such inclination, pushing ahead instead with the approach and policy proposals that proved successful in the GOP primary.

Among the key recommendations of the post-2014 report that Bradshaw helped write was for the party to be more inclusive to racial and ethnic minorities, specifically Latino voters. One of Trump's defining policies is his call to build a wall on the U.S. border with Mexico, and forcibly deport the millions of people — many of whom are Hispanic — living in the country illegally.

Bradshaw told The Associated Press her decision to change her voter registration in her home state of Florida was "a personal decision," with the tipping point being Trump's criticism of the Muslim mother of a U.S. soldier killed in Iraq in 2004. In an email to CNN, Bradshaw wrote that the GOP was "at a crossroads and have nominated a total narcissist — a misogynist — a bigot."

Her decision to leave the party isn't "a good sign, given the role she's played at the national level with the RNC and the high esteem in which she's held," said Virginia Republican Chris Jankowski, among the nation's leading GOP legislative campaign strategists.

Another member of the panel that examined Mitt Romney's 2012 loss is Henry Barbour, a Republican National Committee member from Mississippi.

In a message to the AP, he joined the many Republicans who called on Trump to apologize to the family of the late Capt. Humayun Khan, a suggestion the billionaire has rejected to date.

Like Fleischer, he does not plan to follow Bradshaw out of the party, but insisted that Trump must work harder to unify it.

"If we are to gain anything by this, Donald Trump must show he wants to unite Americans so he can win in November and the best way to do this would be to apologize," Barbour said. "There's no excuse, particularly for his comments about Mrs. Khan."

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:16 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:While not a household name,

...and scrolling right along. Nobody gives a fuck about a butt hurt Bushie.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:36 pm

mvscal wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:So Trump asking why Mrs. Khan was not able to speak at the convention, is me not following along?

Trump has many faults, but what he brought up regarding Mrs. Khan was a good point. I cannot say that I am surprised at how easily offended the media and liberals in general get. It's the same liberals who were totally ok with Chris Matthews' blatant and erroneous attack on Pat Smith at the RNC.
Or Shillary calling her a liar. Now that is an actual "attack" and one made all the more disgusting since it was her own negligence and incompetence which was directly responsible Sean Smith's death.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:37 pm

This morning onstage, after a supporter gave him his Purple Heart, said "I've always wanted a Purple Heart."

This assclown just can't help himself. He's stuck on stupid.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 7:50 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:While not a household name,
...and scrolling right along. Nobody gives a fuck about a butt hurt Bushie.

Right. "She was one of the five senior Republican strategists tasked with identifying the party's shortcomings and recommending ways it could win the White House after its losing 2012 presidential campaign."

You're hilarious, BTW.

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Tue Aug 02, 2016 8:05 pm

Nearly all of US Trump supporters hate Republican RINO NEOCONS so why all the hate for us Trump Supporters?

Chooo Choooo! Join us on the Trump Train! Choooo Choooooooooo!