The First Debate: Live Look In

[Moving Sale]

I had a license through the treasury dept (not the WH Donald) to both travel to Cuba and spend a certain amount of money while there. Nice try.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

No, you're completely wrong, you fucking idiot. A court ruled it illegal and it was never appealed. I think both you and Mgo need to re-take 9th grade civics before further participating in this discussion.

What is so fucking hard to understand? The judge's ruling was in regards to REFORMS to the stop and frisk practice. The practice itself was not outlawed or deemed unconstitutional. Stop and frisk is still happening under the current mayor, but at a reduced rate. Maybe it's the nuance you're struggling with. Try actually reading about the case and you might learn something.

[Moving Sale]

Under Terry it is illegal to stop and frisk unless the cops have articulable facts that criminal activity is afoot. So if you can link up a case that says otherwise I would be happy to read it.

[Screw_Michigan]

The judge's ruling was in regards to REFORMS to the stop and frisk practice.

Why would REFORMS to an illegal practice be ruled illegal? Again, take another crack at this...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fac ... itutional/

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

Your own link sums up what I've been effectively saying this whole time:

There is a court-appointed monitor working with NYPD to ensure that the practice is within constitutional limits.

There has been some confusion about this issue in news coverage. Stop and frisk as a tactic is constitutional. But the way the tactic was applied in New York City has been found unconstitutional. This is an important distinction.

I get it, details are hard.