Dinsdale wrote:So, how's all those "Syrian refugees" working out for Canada?
No sooner does your PM say Canada will take all the Islamatards that the US turns away, then they go commit a terrorist act... as ifto prove Trump right.
Not bad, forty thousand in two years and not a peep. Other than them getting shot, you've got things backwards.
My brother in law has a friend who claims they stole his garden vegetables. When the bombs do go off, you're the first person I'll call, from the top of a stool, skirt hiked up.
Biggest bully in the sandbox and you're just a bunch of girls.
Seriously though, I don't know WTF is real or not anymore
Yahoo had this article on the news feed yesterday that the ACLU had obtained a stay against the immigration executive order, yet as of this morning no other news outlet reported it, so it must be bullshit...... right?
88 wrote:
Trump is not trying to ban all Muslims, which is the bullshit strawman position your article argues against. Trump is attempting to prevent people who intend to commit acts of terror on our soil from immigrating here. Whether and how he can effectively do that is subject to debate. But the debate is not one that involves the Constitution.
They're preventing people who have already been vetted, who already have green cards or permanent residence status and have lived here for years, from re-entering the country.
I guess the fact that they are all Muslims is just a coincidence.
Maybe vetted. Like kinda sort of vetted. Like Obama level of vetted. "Are you a terrorist or have you ever been associated with terrorism? No? Well then, come on in! Welcome the US of A, Mr. Allah Ackbar!"
Truly vetted would be the sort of background investigation which anybody getting a security clearance undergoes. Of course you can't do such background checks when the entire neighborhood the hopeful refugee/terrorist comes from is ISIS or Hezbollah controlled, but them are the breaks, right? Which is the point.. None of these people should be allowed into the US. None.
Seriously though, I don't know WTF is real or not anymore
Yahoo had this article on the news feed yesterday that the ACLU had obtained a stay against the immigration executive order, yet as of this morning no other news outlet reported it, so it must be bullshit...... right?
Generally speaking this is a good thing. After decades and decades of liberally biased news-- even when we knew and recognized that problem --we thought we could trust what was coming out from the various news sources because there was supposed to be a level of professional journalistic integrity that was unassailable. That has proven to be a false assumption. In turn, this has raised the level of skepticism to a degree that we question everything we read, see, or hear, particularly if it originates from the MSM. All-in-all, that is a very, very good result.
What's funny is seeing the media all of a sudden regain their journalistic pride after eight years of cravenly regurgitating whatever Obama spoke. Obama having terror ties through William Ayers? No problem. But Trump trying to stop terror by preventing a specific group that displays a propensity for blowing things up and shooting people, well now, we need to thouroughly investigate this travesty!
/spits
Last edited by Rooster on Mon Jan 30, 2017 4:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
88 wrote:
What makes Bannon unqualified to serve as a member of the NSC? If he is capable of holding a top secret security clearance, he would appear to be qualified. It isn't like he doesn't have the President's ear already.
Not addressed to me, but an exercise in common sense?
As an advisory committee, it should contain nothing but specialists in their chosen field. It's a resource for obtaining technical information and basing your decisions on the information you receive.
It strikes me that the value is compromised, when you appoint your political advisor, batman, guru - whatever their relationship to the principals committee. You run the risk of getting advice based on what someone wants you to hear, rather than sober analysis. I think Field Marshal BritBrite or whatever he is might be unqualified? Politicising military, strategic decisions is murky territory.
Kinda like David Axelrod for the Obama administration, huh? Yeah, I know, that guy was totally qualified and unpolitical.
Moving Sale wrote:This hand wringing about Muslims comes from racist fucks like Rooster, but nice try you stupid silly fuck.
Stupid? As in calling me a racist for being justifiably suspicious of a religious group? That kind of stupid? You must have gotten your law education from the University of Jamaica Law and Coconut Gathering, libtard. Being Muslim isn't a race, you idiot. How did you ever pass the bar exam? Oh, that's right, you didn't. You're probably a paralegal who gets sent out for coffee and Kinkos.
Dr_Phibes wrote:The vetting process for refugee claimants is already more stringent in any western country.
There is no vetting process, you fucking idiot. It's not even possible.
"Hello, please. I am Suk Madiq from Kam al-Terd, Syria in ISIS controlled Buttfuckistan. My village is now a black spot on the road. Let me into your country and spend your money supporting me for the rest of my life."
Where do you start vetting somebody like that? Walk me through the procedure. Why should we even give a fuck? Get lost, you fucking diaperheads.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Moving Sale wrote:This hand wringing about Muslims comes from racist fucks like Rooster, but nice try you stupid silly fuck.
Stupid? As in calling me a racist for being justifiably suspicious of a religious group? That kind of stupid? You must have gotten your law education from the University of Jamaica Law and Coconut Gathering, libtard. Being Muslim isn't a race, you idiot. How did you ever pass the bar exam? Oh, that's right, you didn't. You're probably a paralegal who gets sent out for coffee and Kinkos.
No I called you a racist because you are one. I passed the hardest bar in the nation on my first try because I'm not a dumbass like you.
Dr_Phibes wrote:The vetting process for refugee claimants is already more stringent in any western country.
There is no vetting process, you fucking idiot. It's not even possible.
"Hello, please. I am Suk Madiq from Kam al-Terd, Syria in ISIS controlled Buttfuckistan. My village is now a black spot on the road. Let me into your country and spend your money supporting me for the rest of my life."
Where do you start vetting somebody like that? Walk me through the procedure. Why should we even give a fuck? Get lost, you fucking diaperheads.
This from the POS who belives that when muslims kill people they are scum and when they get killed the people that killed them are not scum the muslim still is. You are almost as stupid as rooster.
Mikey wrote:I also think this may be another of his smokescreens for something far more ominous, which would be his removal of the DNI and the chairman of the JCS from the principals committee of the NSC and replacing them with Reince Priebus and Steve Bannon, who is a white supremacist anarchist, avowed Leninist whose stated goal is to bring down the government of the United States.
Maybe he was cute as the crazy editor of Breitbart but this is starting to get serious.
Good job filling your diaper there, dummy. You've got it all figured out do ya?
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Dr_Phibes wrote:The vetting process for refugee claimants is already more stringent in any western country.
There is no vetting process, you fucking idiot. It's not even possible.
"Hello, please. I am Suk Madiq from Kam al-Terd, Syria in ISIS controlled Buttfuckistan. My village is now a black spot on the road. Let me into your country and spend your money supporting me for the rest of my life."
Where do you start vetting somebody like that? Walk me through the procedure. Why should we even give a fuck? Get lost, you fucking diaperheads.
Right.
So when Hassan blik Blofeld hatches a scheme to tie Miss Ruby to the train tracks.. he applies for refugee status and subjects himself to a two-year vetting process. Rather than a tourist visa.
Mr. Rooster, fetch Mr. FrieghtBit from the NSC, mv has accidentally and horribly cut his head off whilst shaving.
Last edited by Dr_Phibes on Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Just wait until we pull out of the Paris Climate Change boondoggle. Libs' heads are going to be going all Allah ackbar Moving Sale wholesale then...
Hey Sale, go get me a coffee, one sugar, whole milk-- and be snappy about it. And don't forget to pick up those documents we sent you to Kinkos to copy.
88 wrote:
What makes Bannon unqualified to serve as a member of the NSC? If he is capable of holding a top secret security clearance, he would appear to be qualified. It isn't like he doesn't have the President's ear already.
Not addressed to me, but an exercise in common sense?
As an advisory committee, it should contain nothing but specialists in their chosen field. It's a resource for obtaining technical information and basing your decisions on the information you receive.
It strikes me that the value is compromised, when you appoint your political advisor, batman, guru - whatever their relationship to the principals committee. You run the risk of getting advice based on what someone wants you to hear, rather than sober analysis. I think Field Marshal BritBrite or whatever he is might be unqualified? Politicising military, strategic decisions is murky territory.
Kinda like David Axelrod for the Obama administration, huh? Yeah, I know, that guy was totally qualified and unpolitical.
He's bang on. But this is an odd one, fantasies about building a wall on a border is like everyone eat mangos on Tuesday. It's like he's got genuine contempt for the people he's leading on both sides. A monkey's paw.
Scott wrote:I watched a 60 minutes report on how they're vetting the Syrian refugees - here's the condenses version: http://www.cbsnews.com/live/video/how-w ... es-vetted/
Keeping it real, I think Gov is probably doing a thorough job vetting them given it's an 18-24 month process- but what they omit is it costs $30,000 per person to do this vetting
My problem is why, when we at a record deficit, looking at a Medicare insolvency and can't take care of our own Vets are we spending this money on non-Citizens
Dr_Phibes wrote:But this is an odd one, fantasies about building a wall on a border is like everyone eat mangos on Tuesday.
Washington (CNN) — It's not just the southern border: Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker says it's "legitimate" to discuss building a wall separating the United States from Canada, as well.
The Republican presidential contender said the idea of a northern border has come up while he has campaigned in New Hampshire.
In an interview for NBC's "Meet the Press" available online, Walker said his tough talk to securing the borders and enforcing U.S. laws extends to the 5,525-mile Canadian border as well.
It's a shift from most campaign-trail rhetoric, which has focused on the United States' border with Mexico, where millions undocumented immigrants have entered the country.
"Some people have asked us about that in New Hampshire," Walker said. "They raised some very legitimate concerns, including some law enforcement folks that brought that up to me at one of our town hall meetings about a week and a half ago. So that is a legitimate issue for us to look at."
Terrorist attacks have been plotted in Canada -- including the so-called "Millennium plot," a foiled 2000 plan in which an Algerian national planned to cross into the United States from Canada and bomb the Los Angeles International Airport.
Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, of Vermont, slammed the comments on Monday, saying that having grown up near the Canadian border, Walker's suggestion is to him "one of the craziest" ideas to come out of the election.
"Gov. Walker simply must be unaware of the economic prosperity that commerce across the northern border brings to the United States," Leahy said in a statement. "Those of us who represent states that share a border with Canada know better. ... It is disappointing but not surprising that yet another Republican presidential candidate is using the border to score cheap political points."
Walker has focused his immigration remarks on enforcing U.S. laws already on the books in recent weeks.
He ran into trouble two weeks ago after GOP front-runner Donald Trump proposed repealing the Fourteenth Amendment's mandate that children born in the United States automatically become citizens, regardless of their parents' legal status.
Walker first said he favored Trump's idea of repealing birthright citizenship. He backed off that stance days later, telling a reporter that he hasn't taken a position. And then last Sunday, he said that he isn't advocating any changes to laws on the books -- including the Fourteenth Amendment.
Despite taking three different positions in the course of a week, Walker insisted Sunday on NBC, his stance has been consistent.
Joe in PB wrote:
Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote:
They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Apparently all the Toronto hospitals are doing voluntary surgeries on all the kids scheduled and booked for treatment in the US, but were turned back. It appears Trudeau's got a bit of his Dad in him after all. He'll run rings around the cunt.
The Mexicans need to worry, if it's worry back to bilateral trade deals, they're afraid that Canada will throw them to the wolves and go it alone and they're probably right.
Dr_Phibes wrote:It appears Trudeau's got a bit of his Dad in him
FROM THE DESK OF "Shlomart Ben Yisrael"
"Hi! We're sorry we're not able to process your Diego set-ups right now, but please be assured that you request has been ticketed and will be served first thing Monday morning.
Thanks and have a great SuperBowl Weekend!"
Asst. Director of Snide Remarks, Shlomart Ben Yisrael
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote:
Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Reich is putting forward on CNN that those progressive anarchists rioting in Berkeley were possibly Breitbart right wingers masquerading as Lefties. Tinfoil hat time.
