Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4237
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Beatles had a one/two punch, Lennon/McCartney. DC5? Clark/Smith, Clark was a fiction - Mike Smith pound for pound could handle them both.

- In 1968 the Beatles considered firing Ringo and hiring Dave.

- In 1967 The Dave Clark Five briefly entertained the idea of forming a record label and naming it after a fruit or vegetable.

Anyone ever pick sides in this battle?
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13489
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Left Seater »

Y’all are old.

Sincerely,


MA
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Dr_Phibes wrote:Beatles had a one/two punch, Lennon/McCartney. DC5? Clark/Smith, Clark was a fiction - Mike Smith pound for pound could handle them both.

- In 1968 the Beatles considered firing Ringo and hiring Dave.

- In 1967 The Dave Clark Five briefly entertained the idea of forming a record label and naming it after a fruit or vegetable.

Anyone ever pick sides in this battle?
The last few years that has been this building movement to pretend that Ringo was something special. Honest to g0d real drummers like Stewart Copeland going on about how he had a unique style which has been attributed to a lefty playing a right hand kit.

I think it is utter bullshit.

Ringo was a very basic drummer. He kept a beat well enough, but not once have I ever watched him do something and just shake my head thinking holy fukk, a human being shouldn't be capable of that. Ringo coming in ahead of people like Joe Morello and Steve Gadd in ridiculous "best drummers ever" articles is a fukking joke.

Ringo comes in number one in one musician category, luckiest fuller ever. He hooked up with 3 dudes who, while not virtuoso musicians either, were absolute fukking creative geniuses.

Any respectable garage band drummer could have sat in and no one would have noticed. I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.

I feel pretty much the same way about Charlie Watt, although I believe Charlie had a fair bit more chops than Ringo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by BSmack »

smackaholic wrote:
Dr_Phibes wrote:Beatles had a one/two punch, Lennon/McCartney. DC5? Clark/Smith, Clark was a fiction - Mike Smith pound for pound could handle them both.

- In 1968 the Beatles considered firing Ringo and hiring Dave.

- In 1967 The Dave Clark Five briefly entertained the idea of forming a record label and naming it after a fruit or vegetable.

Anyone ever pick sides in this battle?
The last few years that has been this building movement to pretend that Ringo was something special. Honest to g0d real drummers like Stewart Copeland going on about how he had a unique style which has been attributed to a lefty playing a right hand kit.

I think it is utter bullshit.

Ringo was a very basic drummer. He kept a beat well enough, but not once have I ever watched him do something and just shake my head thinking holy fukk, a human being shouldn't be capable of that. Ringo coming in ahead of people like Joe Morello and Steve Gadd in ridiculous "best drummers ever" articles is a fukking joke.

Ringo comes in number one in one musician category, luckiest fuller ever. He hooked up with 3 dudes who, while not virtuoso musicians either, were absolute fukking creative geniuses.

Any respectable garage band drummer could have sat in and no one would have noticed. I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.

I feel pretty much the same way about Charlie Watt, although I believe Charlie had a fair bit more chops than Ringo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ginger would have broken the band up in a year.

As for Charlie Watts, I remember reading an article in Rolling Stone prior to the Steel Wheels album that he had just learned how to tune his drum kit. Given how shity Steel Wheels was I assume he then forgot how to tune his kit.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

BSmack wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
Dr_Phibes wrote:Beatles had a one/two punch, Lennon/McCartney. DC5? Clark/Smith, Clark was a fiction - Mike Smith pound for pound could handle them both.

- In 1968 the Beatles considered firing Ringo and hiring Dave.

- In 1967 The Dave Clark Five briefly entertained the idea of forming a record label and naming it after a fruit or vegetable.

Anyone ever pick sides in this battle?
The last few years that has been this building movement to pretend that Ringo was something special. Honest to g0d real drummers like Stewart Copeland going on about how he had a unique style which has been attributed to a lefty playing a right hand kit.

I think it is utter bullshit.

Ringo was a very basic drummer. He kept a beat well enough, but not once have I ever watched him do something and just shake my head thinking holy fukk, a human being shouldn't be capable of that. Ringo coming in ahead of people like Joe Morello and Steve Gadd in ridiculous "best drummers ever" articles is a fukking joke.

Ringo comes in number one in one musician category, luckiest fuller ever. He hooked up with 3 dudes who, while not virtuoso musicians either, were absolute fukking creative geniuses.

Any respectable garage band drummer could have sat in and no one would have noticed. I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.

I feel pretty much the same way about Charlie Watt, although I believe Charlie had a fair bit more chops than Ringo.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ginger would have broken the band up in a year.

As for Charlie Watts, I remember reading an article in Rolling Stone prior to the Steel Wheels album that he had just learned how to tune his drum kit. Given how shity Steel Wheels was I assume he then forgot how to tune his kit.
You may be right about Ginger, although my guess is he would have just left.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by BSmack »

My guess is he would have heard one demo from them and would have said they were a bunch of talentless cunts and he didn't want to be bothered.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

smackaholic, cementing his status as The Dumbest Motherfucker on the Internet wrote:Ringo comes in number one in one musician category, luckiest fuller ever. He hooked up with 3 dudes who, while not virtuoso musicians either, were absolute fukking creative geniuses.
Image
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:Goobs - Harrison was never a virtuoso guitarist. 'Holic laid out what may have been the best description of the Beatles I've ever seen. None of them were masters of their instruments, but as far as being creative with their talents - holeeeeee fuck. They wrote the book on maximizing what to do with what you've got...
I know you actually play but Harrison was an outstanding guitarist, and widely recognized as such by his peers. Educate yourself. :mrgreen:

If you watch A Hard Day's Night or Help! you'll understand one of the reasons Ringo was in the band - his goofball personality.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic, cementing his status as The Dumbest Motherfucker on the Internet wrote:Ringo comes in number one in one musician category, luckiest fuller ever. He hooked up with 3 dudes who, while not virtuoso musicians either, were absolute fukking creative geniuses.
Image
I love George's playing and he was a damn good writer/singer, but I don't put him in a class folks like be Jeff Beck.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

Not saying that anyone's top 100 list is definitive, but Rolling Stone's has Beck at 14, Harrison at 21.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Imus
Elwood
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:27 am

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Imus »

I'm so fukkin' Glad all over the Dr posted this. We've been together for a long long time, and even though Goober may not dress in the best of taste, some of us like it like that.

To those on the sub-average IQ boards like .net and apparently the late CF, I say catch us if you can, and go chase clack bock.

The name of the place is t1b so come on, and (you don't try too hard) come on let me show you where it's at. Because all of the time, this is where I spend bits and pieces of my life.

Please tell me why not to get a move on and where is AP?


fuk man this is a stressful afternoon at the studio, my hair stylist is on coke again. Cocktail time.
wolfman wrote:I also remember seeing all the old people dying in the streets because they did not have medicare. Good times.
User avatar
Jay in Phoenix
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3701
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 10:46 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Jay in Phoenix »

Sorry 'holic and Spray, but I'm with Goober on this one. Harrison was a talented guitarist and multi-instrumentalist. He may not have been a Clapton or Beck, but he is easily in the top 50 if not top 25 for his all around skills. As to Ringo, he was a solid drummer, not a superstar at the position, but one of the steadiest drummers around.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg_6CWcJqNM&t=8s (It's not working when I stick the YT link in.)
Let me help. There has been no musician in this thread that remotely even touches these 3. I doubt y'all will watch much of it, but trust me on this.
Nice white flag. :mrgreen:

Solid take, Jay.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Paul was the most musically talented guy in that band. You'd be surprised at how many of the guitar solos are his.
My least favourite Beatle...but it needed to be said.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

I'd also note, that of the Yardbirds guitarists, technically Jeff Beck was the best...
Page is a better song thief writer and Clapton...well Clapton is a tone GOD...but Beck is the original shred monster.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

The Aristocrats are fukking aliens. Have to be. No human has those skills. All 3 are about as good as it gets at their respective instruments.
Last edited by smackaholic on Wed Oct 25, 2017 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Papa Willie wrote:Don't think there's anything that guy can't play.
He can't play being a non-egomaniacal, non-douchebag.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:Don't think there's anything that guy can't play.
He can't play being a non-egomaniacal, non-douchebag.
Supposedly he is a very humble, down to earth dude. You are confusing him with Yngwie.

edit: I see that you were refering to sir paul, not GG. I take back the above statement.
Last edited by smackaholic on Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Joe in PB »

The Beatles are best known for their commercial jingles.

Sincerely,

Screwy

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4237
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Imus wrote:I'm so fukkin' Glad all over the Dr posted this. We've been together for a long long time, and even though Goober may not dress in the best of taste, some of us like it like that.

To those on the sub-average IQ boards like .net and apparently the late CF, I say catch us if you can, and go chase clack bock.

The name of the place is t1b so come on, and (you don't try too hard) come on let me show you where it's at. Because all of the time, this is where I spend bits and pieces of my life.

Please tell me why not to get a move on and where is AP?


fuk man this is a stressful afternoon at the studio, my hair stylist is on coke again. Cocktail time.

You dropped a few seriously obscure references in there comrade. :shock: Whoever you are, there aren't many of us, so we gotta stick together.
Every game, Crystal Palace FC marches out to Glad All Over:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4Esk00JCj4

Let's see the Beatles manage that 8)
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

heavens to murgatroyd!

Drummer?

Image
Image


...more like "skin flute virtuoso".
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Q: Why did Dave Clark want Freddie Mercury at his recording sessions?

A: He needed someone to push his stool in.





:shock:
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4237
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Image

*cough*

At least Freddie wasn't one of them :oops:
Last edited by Dr_Phibes on Thu Oct 26, 2017 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Derron »

smackaholic wrote: I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.
As others duly noted, Ginger was a mediocre drummer as well. He would have brought nothing more than Ringo did. Fairly methodical but certainly nothing special. He kept a beat for Eric and Jack who were / are among the best at their instruments. If anything, Ginger would have had all the Beatles shooting heroin backstage and then left them high and dry.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by BSmack »

smackaholic wrote:
Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Papa Willie wrote:Don't think there's anything that guy can't play.
He can't play being a non-egomaniacal, non-douchebag.
Supposedly he is a very humble, down to earth dude. You are confusing him with Yngwie.
Yngwie is playing in Rochester this weekend. He's playing in a halfway decent venue but I just can't see giving him any of my hard-earned cash to him unless he personally guarantees to unleash the focking fury ahead of time.

https://youtu.be/KcXCqQ_-gMI
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

:lol: :lol: :lol:

B, As I was reading through your post, I was thinking, "wassamatter, faggot, can't handle the motherfukking fuuuuuuuuury?"

I would pay to watch Yngwie IF it came with a moneyback guarantee that someone would have the fury unleashed on them during the show.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Derron wrote:
smackaholic wrote: I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.
As others duly noted, Ginger was a mediocre drummer as well. He would have brought nothing more than Ringo did. Fairly methodical but certainly nothing special. He kept a beat for Eric and Jack who were / are among the best at their instruments. If anything, Ginger would have had all the Beatles shooting heroin backstage and then left them high and dry.
You and I have different definitions for 'mediocre'.

Ginger was a fantastic drummer. Worldclass POS as a human, but you can't take away his drumming chops.

He had to be a good drummer for anyone to hire him, given what came along with the drumming.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Derron »

smackaholic wrote:
Derron wrote:
smackaholic wrote: I have wondered how much more the Beatles might have been had they hired Ginger Baker.
As others duly noted, Ginger was a mediocre drummer as well. He would have brought nothing more than Ringo did. Fairly methodical but certainly nothing special. He kept a beat for Eric and Jack who were / are among the best at their instruments. If anything, Ginger would have had all the Beatles shooting heroin backstage and then left them high and dry.
You and I have different definitions for 'mediocre'.

Ginger was a fantastic drummer. Worldclass POS as a human, but you can't take away his drumming chops.

He had to be a good drummer for anyone to hire him, given what came along with the drumming.
Ginger was a a mediocre drummer.

He was not even close to being in a class with Neil Peart or any other number of drummers. Can you imagine Neil drumming for Cream ??

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWRMOJQDiLU
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Goober McTuber wrote:Not saying that anyone's top 100 list is definitive, but Rolling Stone's has Beck at 14, Harrison at 21.
RS lists are horrible.

As I said earlier, they have Ringo ahead of Joe Morello and Steve Gadd. That pretty well says it all.

It is as much a popularity contest as anything else. Also, I believe they are factoring in creativity. If that's your measure, George is right there at the top. He was the lead guitarist for a group which in a few years, completely changed rock. No one since can come anywhere close to the run they had.

But, that is not what I was talking about.

I was talking about George's technical ability to play a guitar. He was certainly good. The best in the band, but nowhere close to Beck, Hendrix, Page, SRV, etc.

If your measuring stick is ability to create popular guitar pieces, I put him right at the top with Page.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10944
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Softball Bat »

I'll take the Clark Five.

5 > 4



Power play.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

Softball Bat wrote:I'll take the Clark Five.

5 > 4



Power play.
So, using your logic, Any shit garage 4 piece > Rush.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

smackaholic wrote:I was talking about George's technical ability to play a guitar. He was certainly good. The best in the band, but nowhere close to Beck, Hendrix, Page, SRV, etc.
I'll just remind myself of what a complete fucking retard you are and leave it at that.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by smackaholic »

g0d, you are one tedious old fukk.

"you're an idiot" pretty much sums up 97% of your posts here, and you can't even manage a shred of creativity when saying it.

George was a pretty decent guitar player and part of a trio of immensely talented writer/composers. He wrote WMGGWs, but notice he got a buddy to actually play the guitar part. Well, the buddy part might have changed when Eric started boning his OL, but my point.......AGAIN..... is that George was not at that level of guitar playing and unlike you, he knew it. I kinda doubt he did it because he felt bad for Eric and felt he needed the work.

His position on one of RS's shit rank'ems does not change this.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Dave Clark Five vs Beatles

Post by Goober McTuber »

smackaholic wrote: "you're an idiot" pretty much sums up 97% of your posts here, and you can't even manage a shred of creativity when saying it.
I beg to differ.
Goober McTuber wrote:God, you are so fucking stupid you make suckaholic look like Stephen Hawking.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Post Reply