Wow

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Wow

Post by Mikey »

Just fucking wow.



Launch at about 1:45.

Then skip to about 9:15.
Unreal.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Wow

Post by Mikey »

Not sure what happened to the center core though. Supposed to have landed on an off-shore barge or something.
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Wow

Post by Rooster »

The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Wow

Post by Mikey »

Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
Maybe extravagant but not really so much.

It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Wow

Post by smackaholic »

If they had a reasonable expectation for success, wouldn't it have made sense to put an actual satellite up, rather than another piece of orbital debris?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Wow

Post by Mikey »

smackaholic wrote:If they had a reasonable expectation for success, wouldn't it have made sense to put an actual satellite up, rather than another piece of orbital debris?
No.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10941
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Wow

Post by Softball Bat »

Image
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Bucmonkey
2011 CFB Bowl Pic Champ
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: ...

Re: Wow

Post by Bucmonkey »

Musk must be a fan of the movie Heavy Metal.
Go Bucs, Gators
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10941
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Wow

Post by Softball Bat »

Buttsy wrote:after it got up into space
No rocket was shown going to space.






I am disappoint.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13489
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Wow

Post by Left Seater »

Why would it have mattered? You wouldn’t believe it and would have had 7 excuses.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: Wow

Post by Rooster »

Mikey wrote:
Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
Maybe extravagant but not really so much.

It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
Huh. I did not know that. Thanks for making me just a wee bit smarter this morning, Mikey! Do you suppose for purposes of weight, throw, and mass, that the car was a shell, empty of its’ engine and drivetrain or that this was probably a complete automobile?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Wow

Post by Goober McTuber »

And how are they going to charge the batteries in the car?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Wow

Post by Mikey »

Rooster wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
Maybe extravagant but not really so much.

It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
Huh. I did not know that. Thanks for making me just a wee bit smarter this morning, Mikey! Do you suppose for purposes of weight, throw, and mass, that the car was a shell, empty of its’ engine and drivetrain or that this was probably a complete automobile?

Hard to say, but the payload for the Falcon Heavy is supposed to be 141,000 lb. I don't know if they tested it with a full payload (presumably could google that) but if that's the case then they probably still needed a few cinder blocks to fill it out.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31620
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Wow

Post by Mikey »



User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Wow

Post by smackaholic »

Mikey wrote:
smackaholic wrote:If they had a reasonable expectation for success, wouldn't it have made sense to put an actual satellite up, rather than another piece of orbital debris?
No.
I disagree.

Yeah, I understand that satellites are more valuable than used Tesla convertibles, but the simple act of putting anything in orbit is as well. They could have lifted something reasonably cheap like space station vittles which wouldn’t have been a great financial loss if it went boom in the pad.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10941
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Wow

Post by Softball Bat »

There are people who actually believe this bullshit?

Pardon me for being insensitive, but...


Are you retarded??


There are SO many reasons why this Space Sex dealie is utter nonsense.
It's fantasy for the mind of a child.


2:45, the earth glitches.
And simultaneously the shadow on the driver's neck glitches.

Nothing else glitches.

Why?



Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10941
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Wow

Post by Softball Bat »

ha!


Well...

I'm not talking about the shape of the earth (or MS's body).

I am commenting on Space Sex nonsense.
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: Wow

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Why are you obsessed with the exosphere? That's just creepy.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Wow

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Left Seater wrote:Why would it have mattered? You wouldn’t believe it and would have had 7 excuses.
Says the total fraud who has watched the video of WTC 7 dropping in perfect controlled demolition and yet refuses to believe the basic physics right before his eyes? The same toxic punk who pretends to be a "pilot" and insists the pentagon just swallowed a 757? The same tedious impostor who still desperately supports the Trump/Pence malignancy? :oops:
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10941
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Wow

Post by Softball Bat »

I'm sorry, but if you believe this absurdity, there is really something majorly wrong with you.




Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Post Reply