Wow
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Wow
The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Re: Wow
Maybe extravagant but not really so much.Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Wow
If they had a reasonable expectation for success, wouldn't it have made sense to put an actual satellite up, rather than another piece of orbital debris?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10941
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10941
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Wow
No rocket was shown going to space.Buttsy wrote:after it got up into space
I am disappoint.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d159/8d159e99d37fad73178def8c799704cfba894a86" alt="Image"
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13489
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Wow
Why would it have mattered? You wouldn’t believe it and would have had 7 excuses.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: Wow
Huh. I did not know that. Thanks for making me just a wee bit smarter this morning, Mikey! Do you suppose for purposes of weight, throw, and mass, that the car was a shell, empty of its’ engine and drivetrain or that this was probably a complete automobile?Mikey wrote:Maybe extravagant but not really so much.Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Wow
And how are they going to charge the batteries in the car?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Wow
Rooster wrote:Huh. I did not know that. Thanks for making me just a wee bit smarter this morning, Mikey! Do you suppose for purposes of weight, throw, and mass, that the car was a shell, empty of its’ engine and drivetrain or that this was probably a complete automobile?Mikey wrote:Maybe extravagant but not really so much.Rooster wrote:The dual landing of the boosters looked like that Nork video footage of Kim Jung Un’s multiple ICBM launches in reverse. And while Elon Musk can spend his money in any manner he wants, it seems rather... extravagent to launch a sports car into space. Pretty cool day for space travel though.
It was a test launch and they would normally put a dummy payload on top of the piccolo pete, like a big rock or something. In this case Elon wanted some PR so he put a $200,000 roadster (used) on top instead. Expensive wheels but in the overall cost of this launch pretty much chump change, and probably worth a lot more in the aforementioned PR.
Hard to say, but the payload for the Falcon Heavy is supposed to be 141,000 lb. I don't know if they tested it with a full payload (presumably could google that) but if that's the case then they probably still needed a few cinder blocks to fill it out.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Wow
I disagree.Mikey wrote:No.smackaholic wrote:If they had a reasonable expectation for success, wouldn't it have made sense to put an actual satellite up, rather than another piece of orbital debris?
Yeah, I understand that satellites are more valuable than used Tesla convertibles, but the simple act of putting anything in orbit is as well. They could have lifted something reasonably cheap like space station vittles which wouldn’t have been a great financial loss if it went boom in the pad.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10941
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Wow
There are people who actually believe this bullshit?
Pardon me for being insensitive, but...
Are you retarded??
There are SO many reasons why this Space Sex dealie is utter nonsense.
It's fantasy for the mind of a child.
2:45, the earth glitches.
And simultaneously the shadow on the driver's neck glitches.
Nothing else glitches.
Why?
Pardon me for being insensitive, but...
Are you retarded??
There are SO many reasons why this Space Sex dealie is utter nonsense.
It's fantasy for the mind of a child.
2:45, the earth glitches.
And simultaneously the shadow on the driver's neck glitches.
Nothing else glitches.
Why?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d159/8d159e99d37fad73178def8c799704cfba894a86" alt="Image"
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10941
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Wow
ha!
Well...
I'm not talking about the shape of the earth (or MS's body).
I am commenting on Space Sex nonsense.
Well...
I'm not talking about the shape of the earth (or MS's body).
I am commenting on Space Sex nonsense.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d159/8d159e99d37fad73178def8c799704cfba894a86" alt="Image"
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Wow
Why are you obsessed with the exosphere? That's just creepy.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Wow
Says the total fraud who has watched the video of WTC 7 dropping in perfect controlled demolition and yet refuses to believe the basic physics right before his eyes? The same toxic punk who pretends to be a "pilot" and insists the pentagon just swallowed a 757? The same tedious impostor who still desperately supports the Trump/Pence malignancy?Left Seater wrote:Why would it have mattered? You wouldn’t believe it and would have had 7 excuses.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c31/64c3119960d80f788222721b630862543af31de0" alt="Embarassed :oops:"
Before God was, I am
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10941
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Wow
I'm sorry, but if you believe this absurdity, there is really something majorly wrong with you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d159/8d159e99d37fad73178def8c799704cfba894a86" alt="Image"
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is