Where do humans rank...

[Softball Bat]

on the food chain?




Well, leave it to the French...


French researchers found that on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the score of a primary producer (a plant)
and 5 being a pure apex predator (a animal that only eats meat and has few or no predators of its own, like
a tiger, crocodile or boa constrictor), they found that based on diet, humans score a 2.21—roughly equal
to an anchovy or pig.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- ... 180948053/








But some say otherwise.
We are TOPS, because of our awesome throwing prowess...


How throwing let man climb to the top of the food chain: Arm
and shoulder development two million years ago helped humans
to hunt more efficiently

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z5CwLRBKq7




A Zulu warrior throws a spear: Our throwing prowess helped our ancestors catch food to grow grow
larger brains and bodies, boosting our intelligence and allowing us to rise to the top of the food chain








:?










What do you think?

[Mikey]

I always thought it was opposable thumbs.

[Wolfman]

Even Lemurs have flexible opposing thumbs, but they can't throw a 100 mph fastball. Walking upright allowed early humanoids to do things better.

[Smackie Chan]

I always thought it was opposable thumbs.

I always thought it was bullets.

[Softball Bat]

I always thought it was bullets.

ha!


RACK!

[smackaholic]

Full semi-automatic bullets.

[Wolfman]

It all began with assault bones.

[Bucmonkey]

Full semi-automatic bullets.

:?

[BSmack]

We didn't really hit our stride until we learned how to breakdance fight.