Clemson Tigers quarterback Kelly Bryant will transfer after losing the starting job over the weekend, according to Manie Robinson of the Greenville News.
"I feel like it's what's best for me and my future," Bryant told the Greenville News. "I was just going to control what I could control and try to make the most of my opportunity, but at the end of the day, I just don't feel like I've gotten a fair shot."
Bryant took over under center after Deshaun Watson moved on to the NFL following the 2016 season, starting all of his games in the last campaign and each of the first four games this season.
As Swinney alluded to, it was a "tough" decision for all parties involved.
"They asked me how I felt about it," Bryant told The Greenville News. "I was like, 'I'm not discrediting Trevor. He's doing everything asked of him, but on my side of it, I feel like I haven't done anything to not be the starter. I've been here. I've waited my turn. I've done everything y'all have asked me to do, plus more.'
"I've never been a distraction. I've never been in trouble with anything. To me, it was kind of a slap in the face."
Following the demotion, the 22-year-old made sure to look out for himself.
"I've been with this senior class for four years. Seeing how much we built and poured into this program, it's tough to walk away from it," Bryant said, per Robinson. "But at the same time, I've got to do what's best for me. And I feel like this is the best situation for me."
After the news of Bryant's impending departure was made public, Swinney made it clear that his decision to change quarterbacks should not be viewed as a "slap in the face."
"He's entitled to his opinion, but absolutely I think we've given him a fair shot. I always tried to be open, honest and transparent as possible with Kelly," Swinney said, per USA Today Sports's Dan Wolken. "This isn't middle school. There's tough decisions that have to be made at this level and you have to do what's best for the team."
Swinney added, per The Athletic's Matt Fortuna: "Obviously saddened and disappointed that he's chosen to leave the team, but I really have absolutely nothing bad that I could say about Kelly Bryant. He's one of the best young people I've ever been around."
While Bryant may not be happy with the Tigers' decision, Swinney noted Lawrence had earned the nod.
"We've played four games now and it's a difficult thing, man, it's a tough day, but it's just where we are," Swinney said on Tuesday, per ESPN.com's Adam Rittenberg. "I've told y'all that many times that if we saw a change, if there was a change, we'd probably all know it, and that's what happened Saturday. And Kelly didn't do anything wrong. He played well. But Trevor, after four games, productivity and just the sheer data, he deserves to run out there first this game."
According to Rittenberg, Bryant was given Monday off and also missed practice on Tuesday.
Bryant is coming off a season in which he led the Tigers to a 12-2 record and an appearance in the College Football Playoff—a 24-6 loss to Alabama in the semifinals.
This year, Bryant had completed 66.7 percent of his passes for 461 yards, two touchdowns and one interception, adding 130 yards and two scores on the ground. Meanwhile, Lawrence has completed 65 percent of his passes for 600 yards, nine touchdowns and two interceptions.
Clemson is 4-0 on the season.
Clemson QB transferring
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Clemson QB transferring
Business decision.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I’m sure Chip Kelly or Willie Taggert would love to have him on their roster as early as Saturday.
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I only saw one Clemson game this year but it kind of feels like a dick move on Swinney's part. Bryant is a senior in his fourtth year with the program. Lawrence is a freshman. Bryant had his best game against Texas A&M when he led them on 3 of their 4 TD drives. Lawrence didn't do a whole lot in that game.
Lawrence built up his stats against Furman, Georgia Southern and Georgia Tech. I think Swinney could have kept the senior as starter and brought the freshman in off the bench. It's gotten them to 4-0 and a projected place in the playoffs. If Lawrence gets hurt, Clemson is fucked. And that would serve Swinney right.
Lawrence built up his stats against Furman, Georgia Southern and Georgia Tech. I think Swinney could have kept the senior as starter and brought the freshman in off the bench. It's gotten them to 4-0 and a projected place in the playoffs. If Lawrence gets hurt, Clemson is fucked. And that would serve Swinney right.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- MuchoBulls
- Tremendous Slouch
- Posts: 5626
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Re: Clemson QB transferring
A dick move by Dabo would have been to start Bryant this weekend and then Lawrence the rest of the way.
Dreams......Temporary Madness
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
College football continually trying to emulate the NFL is not a good thing, Sam. I don't want Lawrence to get hurt, but I would love to see him start playing like a freshman. Probably won't matter since Clemson has one ranked team left on their schedule, and it's a basketball school.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
He's been successfully playing both of them, and they've both been successful. Bryant won the only tough game they've played. I think Dabo also runs the risk of alienating the upper classmen on the team. I think he made a mistake, and I hope he pays for it. And no, Sam, it doesn't always work that way at any level beyond peewee football. Some coaches value their 4-year players.Sudden Sam wrote:Lawrence may fall flat on his face. But Swinney has to play the guy who he thinks is best for the team. It works that way at any level beyond peewee football or any other sport.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Oh, you can't believe all the whining and crying and shit by talking heads. Except for the one you agree with. As I said, Bryant did a better job against the one quality opponent they played. You're just butthurt that Bryant beat a team from the SEC! SEC! SEC!
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
And Lawrence may be the better pure passer, but Bryant could beat you with his legs as well. I hope he transfers to Allbarn and kicks Bammer's ass next year.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
You're a professional. But I suppose Clemson athletes probably are, too.Sudden Sam wrote:McElroy made sense with his comments. He likes Bryant a lot, but said he got bypassed by Lawrence. It's simply how things work.
If someone comes in and outdoes me at my job, it doesn't matter that I've been here 15 years. They'll go to the new guy.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Clemson QB transferring
On the more realistic side -- he's an experienced QB with a year of eligibility left. While the Clemsons and Alabamas of the world don't want him, the Minnestotas and Rutgers do. He's already graduated, so he gets a chance to do a year of postgrad on someone else's dime.Papa Willie wrote:I could see Bryant transferring if he was a freshman or a sophomore, but doing it as a senior?
So, if as you say, he has no shot at the NFL -- his senior year sounds like a perfect time to transfer. Brilliant move, actually.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
If we all accept that college football is big business masquerading as amateurism, then we can't get upset at players transferring and essentially making personal business decisions. Likewise, I don't blame Dabo for playing the guy he thinks gives him the best chance to win. Seems like both parties here are making wise decisions. We'll see how they play out.
Re: Clemson QB transferring
For what it’s worth, I figured it was perfect timing to take the ‘Cuse and the +22.5 points.
Looking good so far.
Looking good so far.
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Not sure why I didn't go there. I guess it explains my last place standing.L45B wrote:For what it’s worth, I figured it was perfect timing to take the ‘Cuse and the +22.5 points.
Looking good so far.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Clemson was fortunate to escape with a win. Syracuse shot itself in the foot with a lineman downfield on an incredible 4th & 1 pass play that may have led to a winning TD.
Wonder what Dabo & Kelly Bryant were thinking when the freshman QB went down. :doh:
Wonder what Dabo & Kelly Bryant were thinking when the freshman QB went down. :doh:
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Moments after the game...
~ ring ring ~
Kelly Bryant: Hello?
Dabo: Hey bud, how's it goin'?
Kelly Bryant: Fine.
Dabo: Soooooooooo...you got any plans next weekend?
~ ring ring ~
Kelly Bryant: Hello?
Dabo: Hey bud, how's it goin'?
Kelly Bryant: Fine.
Dabo: Soooooooooo...you got any plans next weekend?
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Bingo. And when Lawrence got hurt, Syracuse was already up 16-7. But Clemson's D and their schedule will get them into the playoffs.Goober McTuber wrote:He's been successfully playing both of them, and they've both been successful. Bryant won the only tough game they've played. I think Dabo also runs the risk of alienating the upper classmen on the team. I think he made a mistake, and I hope he pays for it. And no, Sam, it doesn't always work that way at any level beyond peewee football. Some coaches value their 4-year players.Sudden Sam wrote:Lawrence may fall flat on his face. But Swinney has to play the guy who he thinks is best for the team. It works that way at any level beyond peewee football or any other sport.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I guess that we'll just have to agreeSudden Sam wrote:I hope Bryant has a good season in his one remaining year of playing college football. And I hope he has a stellar career in the CFL as well.
He should have worked hard to try to earn his job back. But no...instead he quit on his teammates. Who would want him back on the team? Dabo's nuts to even suggest he'd take him back.
He got beat out and couldn't deal with it. To heck with him.
And I don't believe that Dabo made the move now to give Bryant the opportunity to transfer, as he was shocked that Bryant chose to transfer. Which probably shows that Dabo's not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Todd Blackledge suggested that Bryant was selfish. He got just a bit of blowback.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I doubt his teammates blame him. And if Dabo doesn't want him, what's wrong with going where his services will be utilized and appreciated? It's funny, coaches can lie to recruits and players, tell them whatever they want to hear so they stick around. They can lie to recruits and players about being the head coach long term only to leave them high and dry the moment a better gig pops up. It's all good, no problem. Yet when a player exercises his right to transfer because he feels that's what's best for his future, then he's a quitter who's crossed the line. What a load of sanctimonious horse shit.Sudden Sam wrote:I hope Bryant has a good season in his one remaining year of playing college football. And I hope he has a stellar career in the CFL as well.
He should have worked hard to try to earn his job back. But no...instead he quit on his teammates. Who would want him back on the team? Dabo's nuts to even suggest he'd take him back.
He got beat out and couldn't deal with it. To heck with him.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
So is it safe to assume you rooted against Jacob Coker, since he "quit" on his teammates at FSU? Seemed like it worked out pretty well for him. Didn't he win an NC at Bama?
And Baker Mayfield, what a thin-skinned pussy that guy was for transferring out of Texas Tech. He should have stayed there and gone 7-5 every year instead of winning a Heisman and competing for NCs at a football powerhouse.
And Baker Mayfield, what a thin-skinned pussy that guy was for transferring out of Texas Tech. He should have stayed there and gone 7-5 every year instead of winning a Heisman and competing for NCs at a football powerhouse.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
How convenient that you have no problem with transferring when it benefits your team, or goes against your argument. :grin:
Coker still could have come back for his final year but he didn't want to compete against Rapeis Winston so he bolted.
Mayfield got hurt then bolted because they weren't playing him after he came back healthy.
In both instances that's "quitting" according to your logic.
Plus, I think transferring as a senior makes more sense than transferring as a freshman or sophomore. The clock is ticking very fast on Bryant's eligibility and he doesn't want to spend what's left of it on the bench. He wants to showcase his wares as much as possible at this point. As a frosh or sophomore you have plenty of time to improve and beat out the competition.
Coker still could have come back for his final year but he didn't want to compete against Rapeis Winston so he bolted.
Mayfield got hurt then bolted because they weren't playing him after he came back healthy.
In both instances that's "quitting" according to your logic.
Plus, I think transferring as a senior makes more sense than transferring as a freshman or sophomore. The clock is ticking very fast on Bryant's eligibility and he doesn't want to spend what's left of it on the bench. He wants to showcase his wares as much as possible at this point. As a frosh or sophomore you have plenty of time to improve and beat out the competition.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I see both sides here. Pluses and minuses both ways.
However I would like to see some changes to the scholarship system. First off all athletic scholarships should be a minimum of 4 years, instead of the 1 year renewables they are now. If the athlete redshirts as a freshman then the scholarship should automatically reset to 4 years guaranteed. If a player redshirts after their frosh season and they graduate on time then the scholarship should cover their “5th year” or 4th season of full time play. Further graduates should also have the ability to transfer as they do now for grad school and not have to sit out a season.
Also, if a program is hit with serious scantions then players should be free to transfer at will as long as they are on track to graduate.
However I would like to see some changes to the scholarship system. First off all athletic scholarships should be a minimum of 4 years, instead of the 1 year renewables they are now. If the athlete redshirts as a freshman then the scholarship should automatically reset to 4 years guaranteed. If a player redshirts after their frosh season and they graduate on time then the scholarship should cover their “5th year” or 4th season of full time play. Further graduates should also have the ability to transfer as they do now for grad school and not have to sit out a season.
Also, if a program is hit with serious scantions then players should be free to transfer at will as long as they are on track to graduate.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Bryant is a senior, dumbass. He doesn't have the luxury of waiting til after the season, or his eligibility will run out. He is taking advantage of the rule where you can appear in four games or fewer and still redshirt.Sudden Sam wrote:I have no problem with Bryant wanting to get more PT.
He shouldn't have quit on his teammates DURING THE SEASON.
If Hurts had left Alabama before the season, I would have completely understood. If he had left DURING THE SEASON, he'd have been a POS for quitting on his teammates. He'll probably leave after this season. I wish him nothing but the best if he does.
This is really simple stuff. You don't quit on your buddies. I guess you young folks were raised in the 'me, me, me' line of thought.
Coaches
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Clemson QB transferring
Disagree with most of that. Name 3 offensive linemen at Oklahoma State? Can’t unless you are a Pokes Fan. But you can name their coach and their rich benefactor. Name the Head Coach at New Mexico? Can’t name any starters though can you? The point is the Head Coaches in college are the name brands. The money is coming in regardless of what the players do on the field for the most part. Boosters give to their schools because it is their school. Disagree? Look at Texas. They often lead the nation in income yet have done fuck all on the field for close to a decade.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
Coachesseek other opportunitiesquit all the time. I don't see why it should be a problem when players do the same. They're the ones generating all the revenue for the sport. Everyone, in every facet of life, should have mobility in academic, athletic, or professional endeavors. That's the reality of the world, deal with it.
Players are getting a free education out of this deal. As I said yesterday, players should get 4 year scholarships. You want to transfer before the 4/5 years are up, then graduate and go wherever you can find a home. Further the reality of the world is many of those thing you list have contracts attached. Scholarships are a contract. Many faculty positions are on a contract basis and require the prof to publish or sign over research discoveries to the Univ. Damn near 100% of professional sports use contracts between the athlete and team/league. Professional opportunities are no different. Most of my work is on a contract basis. The guys working for me also work on a contract and can’t just pick up and leave until the contact is over.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
No players, no sport. No sport, no booster money and no head coaches. Pretty simple. Of course coaches have more star power when the players are turning over every 3-4 years and the coaches remain.
Who cares if YOU want scholarships to be 4-year contracts? They're not, and Bryant is merely taking advantage of the system in place. Maybe it will work out for him and maybe it won't. Like literally every business venture, it's a gamble. But if Bryant feels this is the best move for his future, who are you or anybody else to say he's wrong?
Who cares if YOU want scholarships to be 4-year contracts? They're not, and Bryant is merely taking advantage of the system in place. Maybe it will work out for him and maybe it won't. Like literally every business venture, it's a gamble. But if Bryant feels this is the best move for his future, who are you or anybody else to say he's wrong?
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I never said he was wrong. He is taking advantage of the system as it is currently. Further it sounds like you misunderstand why I want the scholarships to be 4 years. I want them to be 4 years so that even if a player is injured or turns out not to be the star the coaches though he would be, the school can’t non renew the scholarship. It ensures the athlete would get a chance to graduate regardless of what happens.
And sure no one cares what I as one individual thinks. But when more than a hundred of us formar athletes are trying to get the schools and NCAA to do the correct thing for the athlete that carries more weight.
Finally, you are incorrect that if there weren’t players there would be no donations. In that case the alumni would donate to their college or degree program within the University.
You don’t like the NCAA system, cool, no one forces you to accept the scholarship and the rules attached to it.
And sure no one cares what I as one individual thinks. But when more than a hundred of us formar athletes are trying to get the schools and NCAA to do the correct thing for the athlete that carries more weight.
Finally, you are incorrect that if there weren’t players there would be no donations. In that case the alumni would donate to their college or degree program within the University.
You don’t like the NCAA system, cool, no one forces you to accept the scholarship and the rules attached to it.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
This situation is quite entertaining.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
My initial post was simply the story of Bryant leaving Clemson. Glad you found it so funny.Papa Willie wrote:No - what is really funny is your initial post in this thread.Goober McTuber wrote:This situation is quite entertaining.
God damn. What a dumb motherfucker YOU are - but we knew that.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
I'm fairly certain they would have won either way, dumbfuck.Papa Willie wrote:No way. They would have done a lot better with Bryant. Aks Goobs.Sudden Sam wrote:I guess we can all agree that Dabo knew what the hell he was doing.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Clemson QB transferring
That’s horseshit and you know it. Nice back pedal. Like saying they would’ve won it with Hornibrook back there.Goober McTuber wrote:I'm fairly certain they would have won either way, dumbfuck.
Lawrence made throws that Bryant (and most other FBS QBs) can’t make. He stretched that defense all night long.
24-6 from last year is all you need to know.
“My dentist, that’s another beauty, my dentist, you kiddin’ me. It cost me five thousand dollars to have all new teeth put in. Now he tells me I need braces!” —Rodney Dangerfield
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
It's not horseshit. They were a better team than Alabama. And you can't compare last year's teams to this year's, and you certainly can't compare Bryant to Hornibrook.L45B wrote:That’s horseshit and you know it. Nice back pedal. Like saying they would’ve won it with Hornibrook back there.Goober McTuber wrote:I'm fairly certain they would have won either way, dumbfuck.
Lawrence made throws that Bryant (and most other FBS QBs) can’t make. He stretched that defense all night long.
24-6 from last year is all you need to know.
I was not suggesting that Bryant should have been starting the entire season. Lawrence would have gotten more and more playing time. He would have been the starter by season's end. In the end he turned out to be the better quarterback, but I'm still not convinced that he was demonstrably better 4 games into the season. He was pulled in the A&M game. And in the end, it was probably to Bryant's benefit that the change was made when it was, as he'll get a full senior season somewhere else. The most important thing is that Alabama lost.
Yes, Dabo made the right call. There's probably a reason why I no longer coach BTPCF.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Clemson QB transferring
We actually have a freshman coming in who was highly recruited by top programs. On paper he's the best QB ever recruited to Wisconsin. He'd probably beat out Hornibrook (senior) if Hornibrook decides to play football again.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim