Nat Geo Explorer...

[Softball Bat]

You're really struggling with the whole gravity concept, ain'cha, pop. A ball large enough to not only create its own gravitational field, but cancell out our globes field would be kinda big.

Stop making up stupid shit and post the experiment showing water clinging to the outside of a flying and spinning ball.

You pop your head in this thread and post NOTHING of value.


Read only.

[Dinsdale]

You are mentally ill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreligiosity

Intense religious beliefs that interfere with normal functioning -- Check

Delusions -- Check

Extravagant expression of religiosity -- Check

Get some help, dude.

[Dinsdale]

You're really struggling with the whole gravity concept, ain'cha, pop. A ball large enough to not only create its own gravitational field, but cancell out our globes field would be kinda big.

Stop making up stupid shit and post the experiment showing water clinging to the outside of a flying and spinning ball.

You pop your head in this thread and post NOTHING of value.


Read only.

More KYOA. This is getting ugly.

[Softball Bat]

Now since none of you delusional half-wits can produce the experiment which shows your fantasy as a reality, why not admit what is blatantly obvious?

That what you believe is simply a THEORY.


And an obviously VERY stupid one at that.

[Softball Bat]

More KYOA. This is getting ugly.

Eject, 'tard.

Unreal.

[smackaholic]

Screwey better watch out. Our boy from soko is making his move on the outside. The BBoY contest ain't over just yet.

[Softball Bat]

You are mentally ill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreligiosity

Intense religious beliefs that interfere with normal functioning -- Check

Delusions -- Check

Extravagant expression of religiosity -- Check

Get some help, dude.

Duncedale scouring Wikipedia.

Who would ever guess?

[Softball Bat]

Screwey better watch out. Our boy from soko is making his move on the outside. The BBoY contest ain't over just yet.

Where is your experiment, 'tard.




#absent

#deluded

[smackaholic]

Gravity is more than a theory. How's about you go find a tall building near you and prove it.

[smackaholic]

Screwey better watch out. Our boy from soko is making his move on the outside. The BBoY contest ain't over just yet.

Where is your experiment, 'tard.




#absent

#deluded

That's it. I tap out. There is just no point in trying to discuss anything with a 12th degree black belt in tae tar do.

[Softball Bat]

That's it. I tap out.

Bye bye, dummy.

[Softball Bat]

Gravity is more than a theory.

Where is the center of the earth, and how do you know?

How do you know that there is a center of the earth?

For the sake of argument, let's say gravity is a fact.
How does that prove that the earth is the globe you say it is?


Educate yourself.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

That what you believe is simply a THEORY.


And an obviously VERY stupid one at that.

Uhh, you do realize that "theory" as it pertains to science means something much different than the way it's used in every day conversation? Something that reaches the status of scientific theory has gone through repeated experiment or observation backed up by many independent lines of evidence and is essentially considered fact. Have you ever taken even a basic college level biology course before?

[Softball Bat]

And what is a fact?



In science, a theory is superseded or becomes obsolete when a scientific consensus once widely accepted it, but current science considers it an inadequate, incomplete, or simply false description of reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersede ... in_science


A pretty long list, Charlie.

Take a look at it.

[Derron]

You are mentally ill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreligiosity

Intense religious beliefs that interfere with normal functioning -- Check

Delusions -- Check

Extravagant expression of religiosity -- Check

Get some help, dude.

Duncedale scouring Wikipedia.

Who would ever guess?

Actually dude, he hit it out of the fucking park really. The diagnosis of Hyperreligiosity seems pretty accurate which you then completely support with more manic rambling. I have to agree with suckaholic here, your BBTY chances are gaining huggge ground every post. Queerland's ankle biting is annoying, but yours is drop kick worthy.

[Softball Bat]

Duhrron, did you ever get around to looking at the laser test data?

7 tests in 7 locations in 7 different weather conditions.




Flat water in all instances.
Science.

DId you ever produce an experiment showing water clinging to the outside of a flying and spinning ball?



Shutting your very dumb hole is your best option.
Trust me.

I'm here for you.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

And what is a fact?



In science, a theory is superseded or becomes obsolete when a scientific consensus once widely accepted it, but current science considers it an inadequate, incomplete, or simply false description of reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersede ... in_science


A pretty long list, Charlie.

Take a look at it.

I don't care to define a fact for you. I'm just trying to help you understand the difference between what a theory is in layman's terms and what a scientific theory is, because you seemed to dismiss gravity as being the former, as if it's nothing more than a hunch or a guess. Believe in gravity, or don't. I don't really care. I just don't know why gravity is so mind-bendingly difficult for you to accept, but when you're presented with a story about an old dude who herded two of every animal species on his boat to evade a global flood, your conclusion is, "Yep, that totally checks out!"

[Derron]

did you ever get around to looking at the laser test data?

Why no. That would be you assuming I give a fuck about your rants, or your theory's.

[Left Seater]

So Tart is back to moving the goal posts and then getting good and work up about it.

It makes perfect sense -- every other body we can see in space (including that one at night we can see with the naked eye)is spherical, and the earth is the lone exception. Perfectly logical.

How do you know they are spherical?

How do you know they are spherical?

Ask a 3rd grader.

No 3rd grader would ever believe water clings to the outside of a flying, spinning ball -- unless they were indoctrinated into that completely irrational fairy tale.

You believe something utterly ridiculous.
And compounding your stupidity is the fact that you have no science experiment to show that will confirm the laffable nonsense you believe.

Even further, you have now been alerted to the folly you believe in, and yet you continue to vigorously defend it.


Summary: You are mentally ill

This is exactly why it is my belief that you are trolling or have a learning disability. Anytime you are put on the spot you move the goalposts or attack a straw man. You rant and rave like above but completely ignore the post/question/fact. In this case observations a 3rd grader can make. See also eclipses, Southern Hemisphere non stop flights, a working map, etc.

You think you are claiming some moral high road by asking people to think yet you refuse to do the same. When pressed repeatedly you will drop a quick I don’t know, but I know what it isn’t. Yet on the flip side if someone doesn’t have an immediate answer you start to yell and scream scoreboard. You really need some self reflection, or just keep trolling on.

[Softball Bat]

In this case observations a 3rd grader can make.

How do you know that the bodies we see in space are spherical?

[Softball Bat]

I don't care to define a fact for you. I'm just trying to help you understand the difference between what a theory is in layman's terms and what a scientific theory is, because you seemed to dismiss gravity as being the former, as if it's nothing more than a hunch or a guess. Believe in gravity, or don't. I don't really care. I just don't know why gravity is so mind-bendingly difficult for you to accept, but when you're presented with a story about an old dude who herded two of every animal species on his boat to evade a global flood, your conclusion is, "Yep, that totally checks out!"

I'm really not interested in talking about Noah's Ark in here...

But it is pretty easy.

Jesus Christ rose from the dead, totally and phenomenally fulfilled the Old Testament, and proved beyond the shadow of a doubt (imo) that He is indeed the promised Messiah.

That Messiah (God Himself) spoke about Noah, and the flood, as being real.

So...

I assume Noah's Ark to have been real.

You can believe as you wish.

[Left Seater]

In this case observations a 3rd grader can make.

How do you know that the bodies we see in space are spherical?

Simple. Take the moon. Look at the differentiation between where sunlight and no sunlight fall on the moon. The shape of this boundary is always an arc. Only a sphere can cast this sort of shadow in any orientation when viewed from earth.

Then there is the oft mentioned eclipse. The entry and exit shadows are always arched. Never once has a non arched shadow been recorded.

Or take a look at Mars with a telescope. If it were flat why do we see different “views” of it over time? If it were truely flat we would see the same surface area each time we looked at it. We don’t of course and we can accurately know when certain surface features are visible which is evidence of a sphere.

[Softball Bat]

Take the moon. Look at the differentiation between where sunlight and no sunlight fall on the moon. The shape of this boundary is always an arc. Only a sphere can cast this sort of shadow in any orientation when viewed from earth.

What if the moon is its own light?

Or take a look at Mars with a telescope. If it were flat why do we see different “views” of it over time? If it were truely flat we would see the same surface area each time we looked at it.

Objection, your honor.
Speculation.

[Mikey]

What if the moon is its own light?

What if pigs live in trees?
If Indians can be in two places at once?

What if dogs flew spaceships and the Aztecs invented wire recorder?

That’s right - your brain is not the boss. Everything you know is wrong!

[Softball Bat]

your brain is not the boss

I think you should use your brain.

The sun and the moon are nearly identical in size in our sky.


It just so happens...

that the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon, and at the same time 400 times further away from us than the moon.
These two things magically coincided to make them appear to be the same size in our sky.

Presto!

What are the odds?


No.
Maybe it is simply as it seems.
They are the same size and they are relatively close to us.

[Left Seater]

Take the moon. Look at the differentiation between where sunlight and no sunlight fall on the moon. The shape of this boundary is always an arc. Only a sphere can cast this sort of shadow in any orientation when viewed from earth.

What if the moon is its own light?

Or take a look at Mars with a telescope. If it were flat why do we see different “views” of it over time? If it were truely flat we would see the same surface area each time we looked at it.

Objection, your honor.
Speculation.

These have to be some of your dumbest takes yet. Seriously, just think for about two seconds before you bang on your keyboard.

If the moon produces its own light, then why does any part of it ever appear in shadow?


As far as your Mars take, denying easily visible observations as speculation is a special kind of dumb. Here we go again with you demanding answers to your questions but dismissing outright anything that doesn’t fit easily into your non sphere view.

[Dinsdale]

You think you are claiming some moral high road by asking people to think yet you refuse to do the same. When pressed repeatedly you will drop a quick I don’t know, but I know what it isn’t. Yet on the flip side if someone doesn’t have an immediate answer you start to yell and scream scoreboard. You really need some self reflection, or just keep trolling on.

I've asked him several times what he thinks that joke of a laser experiment proves, and why, and he's ignored it every time, yet still cites it as some sort of "proof" of something (then again, he even calls that laughable shit "science," so there's that).

[Mikey]

that the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon, and at the same time 400 times further away from us than the moon.
These two things magically coincided to make them appear to be the same size in our sky.

Presto!

What are the odds?


No.
Maybe it is simply as it seems.
They are the same size and they are relatively close to us.

The moon is a lot bigger than your thumb, or at least it's supposed to be. Yet if you hold your arm out straight and line your thumb up with the moon it's just about the same size as your thumb down to the first knuckle.

These things magically coincided to make them appear the same size?

Presto!

What are the odds?


No.
Maybe it is simply as it seems.
They are the same size and and the moon is only an arm's length away.

And made of delicious green cheese.

[Mikey]

Another interesting and highly plausible theory:

[Softball Bat]

You think you are claiming some moral high road by asking people to think yet you refuse to do the same. When pressed repeatedly you will drop a quick I don’t know, but I know what it isn’t. Yet on the flip side if someone doesn’t have an immediate answer you start to yell and scream scoreboard. You really need some self reflection, or just keep trolling on.

I've asked him several times what he thinks that joke of a laser experiment proves, and why, and he's ignored it every time, yet still cites it as some sort of "proof" of something (then again, he even calls that laughable shit "science," so there's that).

You lie habitually.

Page 3...

What is it you think these pseudo-experiments prove (beyond your laughable ignorance)?

Page 11...


Significance of the study: This documentation can be used as a spring board for further studies for those who are interested in the research of water surface model measurements.


I would agree with that.


Also, go to page 105.
Read 105, 106, 107, and 108.


It is pretty damning for the very stupid globe.

[Softball Bat]

If the moon produces its own light, then why does any part of it ever appear in shadow?

There are numerous theories on this -- which you can quite easily research.
I have not found one yet that satisfies my curiosity.
So... I don't know.

As far as your Mars take, denying easily visible observations as speculation is a special kind of dumb.

No.
You just happen to be gullible -- and easily influenced to believe things without examining them further.

Mars is allegedly 34 million miles away.
No man has ever set foot there.

Yet based on pics from a telescope which show change you have concluded that it must mean that Mars is a sphere.


Excuse me...

[Left Seater]

As far as your Mars take, denying easily visible observations as speculation is a special kind of dumb.

No.
You just happen to be gullible -- and easily influenced to believe things without examining them further.

Mars is allegedly 34 million miles away.
No man has ever set foot there.

Yet based on pics from a telescope which show change you have concluded that it must mean that Mars is a sphere.

I am talking about my own observations of looking at mars thru a telescope. You should try it yourself. Surface features are easily visible. Yet they change and aren’t always visible. Why?

[Dinsdale]

You think you are claiming some moral high road by asking people to think yet you refuse to do the same. When pressed repeatedly you will drop a quick I don’t know, but I know what it isn’t. Yet on the flip side if someone doesn’t have an immediate answer you start to yell and scream scoreboard. You really need some self reflection, or just keep trolling on.

I've asked him several times what he thinks that joke of a laser experiment proves, and why, and he's ignored it every time, yet still cites it as some sort of "proof" of something (then again, he even calls that laughable shit "science," so there's that).

You lie habitually.

Page 3...

What is it you think these pseudo-experiments prove (beyond your laughable ignorance)?

Page 11...


Significance of the study: This documentation can be used as a spring board for further studies for those who are interested in the research of water surface model measurements.


I would agree with that.


Also, go to page 105.
Read 105, 106, 107, and 108.


It is pretty damning for the very stupid globe.

YHKYOA

[Left Seater]

If the moon produces its own light, then why does any part of it ever appear in shadow?

There are numerous theories on this -- which you can quite easily research.
I have not found one yet that satisfies my curiosity.
So... I don't know.

Theories? Thanks for again proving my point. You yell and demand the exact science that proves anything associated with a globe. Yet theories and I don’t know are acceptable answers for you, yet you know definitely what the shape isn’t. :doh:

[Dinsdale]

Light Without Heat... it's not just a record label anymore.

[Mikey]

Light Without Heat... it's not just a record label anymore.

Lingulodinium polyedrum comes pretty close.

[Dinsdale]

Light Without Heat... it's not just a record label anymore.

Lingulodinium polyedrum comes pretty close.

Another new one for me. Although when I've fished off the jetties, there's these tiny jellyfish-like things that glow green when the wave splashes against the rocks.

[Mikey]

I've seen those around here too.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

So... I don't know.

And why should you know? You flat earth tards have only had since the dawn of human thought process to come up with a viable set of explanations for your position. How many more millenniums do you need before you can answer the tough questions? As you have said yourself, flat earth is the prevailing belief when you take all of human history into account, and yet it's still rather ambiguous and incomplete.

On the other hand, round earthers (aka sane people with access to technology) have explanations for everything related to a globe earth. You may not like the explanations, but we have them.

There is certain observable phenomena that occurs on our planet that would seem impossible in a flat earth scenario. You can't answer why. Nobody before you could answer why. And nobody after you will answer why. Why? Because your entire belief system is fucking whack. Care to consider that?

[Kierland]

Then you have an explanation for why I can see headlights 20 miles down a salt flat?