The 70's thread

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: The 70's thread

Post by Dinsdale »

A Mustang II is a Ford Fairmont with a different body. Which, unfortunately, shared very few parts with a Pinto.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: The 70's thread

Post by BSmack »

Pintos weren't so bad once they figured out how to stop the cars from blowing up when hit in the back.
Image
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21748
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: The 70's thread

Post by smackaholic »

Dins, you are confusing the Mustang II with the fox body which followed it. It was based on the fairmont.
1979–1982
The 1979 model year Mustang was based on the Fox platform. This chassis was "Ford's initiative to build a one-size-fits-all car to serve as a two-door sports car and a four-door family car" with its initial use by the larger Ford Fairmont and Mercury Zephyr twins that debuted in the 1978 model year.[4] "Ford built the 1979 Mustang around a platform it would share with more humble cars in the Lincoln-Mercury-Ford corporate family in order to keep development and construction costs down."[5] Body styles for the Mustang included a coupe (notchback) and hatchback. Two trim levels were available: the base model and the more luxurious Ghia model. The wheelbase dimension was 4 inches shorter than the Fairmont/Zephyr series at 100 inches (the same as the outgoing European Ford Capri and 6 inches longer than the Mustang II).
The second-generation Ford Mustang, marketed as the Ford Mustang II, is a pony car that was manufactured by Ford. It was introduced in showrooms during September 1973, in coupe and hatchback versions for the 1974 model year, in time for the 1973 oil crisis.[3] The Mustang II had no common components with the preceding models and shared its platform with the subcompact-sized Ford Pinto.[4][5][6][7]
This is from wiki, which occasionally is right.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Kierland

Re: The 70's thread

Post by Kierland »

It’s pretty easy to find Mrsdale talking shit and being all wrong and stuff.
But, he doe,s know h,ow to use, a com,ma.,
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: The 70's thread

Post by Smackie Chan »

BSmack wrote:Pintos weren't so bad once they figured out how to stop the cars from blowing up when hit in the back.
I went to school with the plaintiff in the case against Ford in which the jury awarded the largest punitive damage amount at the time ($125M, which a judge later reduced to $3.5M). Dude was a dick (and not just because his name was Richard), and the accident fucked him up pretty bad. His face looked like someone took a huge wad of bubble gum and stretched it over his grill, and his nose, ears, and most of his fingers were burned off. I don't wish shit like that on anyone, but if I did, it would be him. Total douche.
Stultorum infinitus est numerus
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: The 70's thread

Post by Dinsdale »

smackaholic wrote:
This is from wiki, which occasionally is right.
Gee, who should I believe?

Wiki, or multiple Ford dealerships which have tried to get me parts?

Hmmmmm, tough call.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Post Reply