Dim politicians in California want to legalize kid fucking

[Screw_Michigan]

And they are trying to pass it as a LGBT issue.

I said it before, that as they added more letters to LGBT they were going to add kid fucking to the list

That east coast faggot, who reps pelosi country at the State level, and is trying to legalize spreading AIDS is at it again. The latest bill he is trying to pass is one that will make it legal for homosexual men to fuck boys and not face any consequences for

The bill is called SB 145 and would make it so kid fuckers wouldn't have to even file as sex offenders.

What are you on?

[Wolfman]

You can see where this is all headed. "Just another life style", nothing to worry about and none of our business. "Who are we to criticize someone else's behavior?" Fortunately I'll be gone before this brave new world dawns.

[Kierland]

Way to glass dick yourself about a subject where you have already posted in the other thread. That takes a special kind of stupid.

[Rooster]

None of us can claim that we didn’t see this coming. With the template that the homosexual community used to foist gay marriage on us, it was a path that was clearly marked for the next step, transgenderism, to take. Zoophilia, pederasty, ephebophilia, polygamy, the list goes on and on now that the dam is broken and the libertine flood waters are rising.

[Mikey]

The bill is called SB 145 and would make it so kid fuckers wouldn't even have to file as sex offenders.

So you can go back to coaching Little League now?

[Kierland]

None of us can claim that we didn’t see this coming.

You saw sensible 290 laws coming? You are a fucking liar.

[Rooster]

None of us can claim that we didn’t see this coming.

You saw sensible 290 laws coming? You are a fucking liar.

Serious question, Kierland, are you OK with this proposed legislation in California? No equivocation, no pointing at shiny objects, no yelling about racism and black cocks, just answer the question.

[Kierland]

Here is my answer from when Melty played all nice also.


"290 registration is a joke. It’s just another one of those laws that people think make them look “tough on crime” when they support them. His legislation doesn’t go far enough.

"I don’t know anything about him other than this. 290 is a joke for many reasons.
1) You can have to register for peeing behind a bar at 2am.
2) It tells all 290 offenders that they will never rehabilitate so why try.
3) It has no good mechanism to handle homeless or transient working registrants.
4) It is violative of peoples' right to live where they want after they are off parole or probation. In some cities you have few if any places you can live due to what are called micro parks. This is a small bit of land designated as a park that 290s can’t live within 2000 feet of. It’s not there for kids to enjoy as they are often too small or in strange places.
5) But the worst reason is most sex offender molest family and friends which is rarely affected by registration."

[Screw_Michigan]

Here is my answer from when Melty played all nice also.


"290 registration is a joke. It’s just another one of those laws that people think make them look “tough on crime” when they support them. His legislation doesn’t go far enough.

"I don’t know anything about him other than this. 290 is a joke for many reasons.
1) You can have to register for peeing behind a bar at 2am.
2) It tells all 290 offenders that they will never rehabilitate so why try.
3) It has no good mechanism to handle homeless or transient working registrants.
4) It is violative of peoples' right to live where they want after they are off parole or probation. In some cities you have few if any places you can live due to what are called micro parks. This is a small bit of land designated as a park that 290s can’t live within 2000 feet of. It’s not there for kids to enjoy as they are often too small or in strange places.
5) But the worst reason is most sex offender molest family and friends which is rarely affected by registration."

Amen, friend. Keep fighting the good fight.

[Derron]

Here is my answer from when Melty played all nice also.


"290 registration is a joke. It’s just another one of those laws that people think make them look “tough on crime” when they support them. His legislation doesn’t go far enough.

"I don’t know anything about him other than this. 290 is a joke for many reasons.
1) You can have to register for peeing behind a bar at 2am.
2) It tells all 290 offenders that they will never rehabilitate so why try.
3) It has no good mechanism to handle homeless or transient working registrants.
4) It is violative of peoples' right to live where they want after they are off parole or probation. In some cities you have few if any places you can live due to what are called micro parks. This is a small bit of land designated as a park that 290s can’t live within 2000 feet of. It’s not there for kids to enjoy as they are often too small or in strange places.
5) But the worst reason is most sex offender molest family and friends which is rarely affected by registration."

Amen, friend. Keep fighting the good fight.

And one of the monkeys jumps down from his tree to fellate his boyfriend once again.

[Screw_Michigan]

[Left Seater]

Here is my answer from when Melty played all nice also.


"290 registration is a joke. It’s just another one of those laws that people think make them look “tough on crime” when they support them. His legislation doesn’t go far enough.

"I don’t know anything about him other than this. 290 is a joke for many reasons.
1) You can have to register for peeing behind a bar at 2am.
2) It tells all 290 offenders that they will never rehabilitate so why try.
3) It has no good mechanism to handle homeless or transient working registrants.
4) It is violative of peoples' right to live where they want after they are off parole or probation. In some cities you have few if any places you can live due to what are called micro parks. This is a small bit of land designated as a park that 290s can’t live within 2000 feet of. It’s not there for kids to enjoy as they are often too small or in strange places.
5) But the worst reason is most sex offender molest family and friends which is rarely affected by registration."

So wouldn’t a law that exempted those that pee behind a bar or the homeless be more appropriate than one that would give a pass to a 19 year old having relations with a 9 year old?

[Kierland]

If I only had one point and not 5 then yes.
Why can’t there be both?

[Left Seater]

If I only had one point and not 5 then yes.
Why can’t there be both?

Well, because most rational folks would want a 19 year old who had sex with a 9 year old to register as a sex offender. This is regardless of political ideology or race or socio-economic standing.

[Kierland]

I know that most people would. Most rational people is another question. Did you read my reasoning?

[Left Seater]

I did. I think your reasoning is sound on some of it.

As for rehabilitation of a person who would prey upon 9 year olds that is debatable as to if it is even possible. Yes they may have completed their “time” but that doesn’t mean parents shouldn’t know when they want to move into the neighborhood. Same goes for family members.

But I don’t think those who choose to pee behind a bar on on a golf course should have to register.

[Kierland]

And that is probably why the legislation has a check in it. They still have to register until they get relief, if they ever do.

[Goober McTuber]

And that is probably why the legislation has a check in it. They still have to register until they get relief, if they ever do.

If they peed behind a bar on a golf course, sounds like they already relieved themselves.

[Goober McTuber]

Dim politicians in California want to legalize kid fucking

And why would this bother you, you fucking scum-bucket, considering your reaction to Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims.

[Goober McTuber]

Hey, Skidmark, did you miss me?

[Goober McTuber]

Had a fantastic trip. 12 full days on the island.

[Goober McTuber]

Had a fantastic trip. 12 full days on the island.

That's cool. St. Maartin (or however you spell it)?

St. Martin for the French side
Sint Maarten for the Dutch

[Rooster]

I did. I think your reasoning is sound on some of it.

As for rehabilitation of a person who would prey upon 9 year olds that is debatable as to if it is even possible. Yes they may have completed their “time” but that doesn’t mean parents shouldn’t know when they want to move into the neighborhood. Same goes for family members.

But I don’t think those who choose to pee behind a bar on on a golf course should have to register.

I’m guessing that the underlying rationale for the peeing thing is the issue of publicly exposing oneself, the thinking being we wouldn’t want the quintessential trench coat wearing creep whipping out his dick by a school and then claiming he was merely urinating. The devil in the details was likely delineating how close to a school should be illegal and then to cover all contingencies legislators just made it a universal rule for simplicity’s sake.

[Kierland]

No they do it to fuck with people because they are not in office to help they are in office to be authoritarian fucks.

[Goober McTuber]

People have died doing that shit. I'll pass.

[Left Seater]

Did you do the “bathe in the jet wash” procedure on the beach behind the runway? For some odd reason, I’d like to try that.

Done it. Unless you are drunk 80 pound female it isn’t an issue. Well unless you stand in the sand and get sand blasted. The cooler part for me was standing under the landing KLM 747 which it seems like is inches over your head. Lots of people ducked.

[Goober McTuber]

We used to always go to that beach bar by the airport for cocktails the day we were heading back, right before turning in the rental car. Have also seen the KLM jets up close, both landing and taking off.

[Goober McTuber]

And on the way back on our flight to Newark, we had Seater doppelgangers, both Mr. and Mrs. They were three rows ahead of us. The missus was every bit as far out of the mister's league as the Seaters, too. Weird shit.

[Left Seater]

So are you saying you didn’t outkick your coverage?

[Goober McTuber]

Not really. We are a very good match. I did a boatload of stringer-sorting in my 20s and early 30s.

Do not underestimate my coverage.

[Left Seater]

To each their own, but out kicking the coverage seems like winning in my book.

[Goober McTuber]

To each their own, but out kicking the coverage seems like winning in my book.

For you, yes. For her.....

[Left Seater]

So you are saying you are shallow and only look at the surface of people?

[Goober McTuber]

So you are saying you are shallow and only look at the surface of people?

You're close. I'm saying you are shallow so I only have to look at the surface, because that's all there is. In your case, a LOT of surface.

[Left Seater]

You have shown us more surface than any of us care to have seen.

[Goober McTuber]

Speak for yourself. Melty sent me grateful PMs.