Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
So, apparently some guy helped rich people get their spawn into prestigious universities. That this devalues any particular university’s degree is a discussion for another day, but the gist is that parents were paying up to $6.5 million to get B List Actress or Actor’s D earning child into a school. It seems that this is a bribe somehow and is illegal.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/college-entr ... m-cheating
The result is that the Boston FBI Office is charging a bunch of people with the crime of giving away their money to schools to get their dummies into them at prices which far exceed the actual tuition just so they can have the bragging rights of saying, “I graduated from Hah-vahd.”
Big deal.
Anybody see a problem with this?
https://www.foxnews.com/us/college-entr ... m-cheating
The result is that the Boston FBI Office is charging a bunch of people with the crime of giving away their money to schools to get their dummies into them at prices which far exceed the actual tuition just so they can have the bragging rights of saying, “I graduated from Hah-vahd.”
Big deal.
Anybody see a problem with this?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
It unfairly denies access to qualified people without the money to bribe the schools. So yeah it's theft.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
- FiatLux
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 8:51 am
- Location: San Francisco--The edge of the western world
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Why is this a scandal? Elite private schools have been admitting students when daddy donates a new library to the school. Has been happening for 100+ years.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13476
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
It sounds like this “service” had others pose as the students for some exams. That sure rings as all sorts of illegal.
The whole thing is immoral IMO.
The whole thing is immoral IMO.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
I've always been under the impression that if you donated to the university or quarterback club it was understood that you had an inside track to get your kid accepted to these schools. Am I wrong here?
Furthermore, Asians, for instance, regularly score better on entrance exams than other minorities but do not necessarily gain access despite their grades and test scores. Doesn't this equate to the same thing when less qualified students are granted entrance to Yale than the better scoring Asian?
Furthermore, Asians, for instance, regularly score better on entrance exams than other minorities but do not necessarily gain access despite their grades and test scores. Doesn't this equate to the same thing when less qualified students are granted entrance to Yale than the better scoring Asian?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Asians tend to have more options if they can't get into their school of choice. Most of them could set up shop and make watches from used bicycle pumps.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
All that being sadi, most young people would probably be better off in the long run if their parents got them a pick up truck/van and a set of tools and they get into a trade.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.
"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
There are a ton of wannbe fuck ups out there thinking they are in the trades. Can't pass drug tests to make the real money, fired one of them off my job today. Right now the only real good spot to be in the trades is electrician or plumber. Protected trades. There are ways to make a living in the other trades but that is where the money is. Excavation, utilities are pretty good too, a couple of skilled people can make 120K a year each pretty easy with no employees. Electricians and plumbers can make 120 plus a year, but have to put in 4 years of school and apprenticeshipWolfman wrote:All that being sadi, most young people would probably be better off in the long run if their parents got them a pick up truck/van and a set of tools and they get into a trade.
The Messicians have taken over most of the unskilled trades, with the Russians running a real close second. They will work for shit, cheat you blind on the jobs and do slop work. The lazy ass millennial who are the project managers have no balls to manage the project and the scabs run their ass over. Times are good right now, but someday it will suck again and a lot of people will be unemployed.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
You are correct.
Sin,
88brokenracists
Sin,
88brokenracists
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Just kidding.
We all know he never apologizes for anything.
We all know he never apologizes for anything.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Ok, it turns out that these people gave money to a fixer who bribed various college administrators, coaches, and SAT/ACT testers who in turn awarded scholarships to the donors’ kids. Definitely illegal. My impression upon first reading about this was that they had merely purchased a slot for their kid via donations to the school.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Illegal and immoral.
Off with their heads.
Off with their heads.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Rooster is how we got Trump. Criminals are in charge.Rooster wrote:So, apparently some guy helped rich people get their spawn into prestigious universities. That this devalues any particular university’s degree is a discussion for another day, but the gist is that parents were paying up to $6.5 million to get B List Actress or Actor’s D earning child into a school. It seems that this is a bribe somehow and is illegal.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/college-entr ... m-cheating
The result is that the Boston FBI Office is charging a bunch of people with the crime of giving away their money to schools to get their dummies into them at prices which far exceed the actual tuition just so they can have the bragging rights of saying, “I graduated from Hah-vahd.”
Big deal.
Anybody see a problem with this?
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Just out of curiosity, what is your opinion regarding affirmative action?BSmack wrote:It unfairly denies access to qualified people without the money to bribe the schools. So yeah it's theft.
IMO, it is just a different form of the same injustice.
I am OK with AA based on one's economic circumstances. Doing it based simply on race is unfair and the very definition of racism.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13476
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Race based admission standards are exactly the same thing. However it is liberal Democrat approved, so you are told to accept and embrace it.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
I still don't get how this bitch could have been elected to anything higher than assistant dog catcher. But then, this is the same bunch that sent Ted Kennedy back to the Senate again and again, no matter who he killed.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13476
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Good ol’ Teddy. All about alternative fuels. Well up until a wind farm was proposed for the cape and he went all not in my back yard.
Never mind he killed someone.
Never mind he killed someone.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9640
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
That's like saying that climate change is a hoax & then turning around to file an application to build a sea wall, saying that it's needed due to climate change.Left Seater wrote:Good ol’ Teddy. All about alternative fuels. Well up until a wind farm was proposed for the cape and he went all not in my back yard.
9/27/22“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
You elected a moron for POTUS. Irony is lost on you idiots.smackaholic wrote:I still don't get how this bitch could have been elected to anything higher than assistant dog catcher. But then, this is the same bunch that sent Ted Kennedy back to the Senate again and again, no matter who he killed.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
He opposed the project, which was approved to go forward, for the same reasons as the guy who owned the approved rights, mainly that it was a dumb idea. Don’t ever let the facts get in way of a good lie eh?Left Seater wrote:Good ol’ Teddy. All about alternative fuels. Well up until a wind farm was proposed for the cape and he went all not in my back yard.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
New England has become the capital of windmills built in dumb places.
The latest fad seems to be building them in cities. It's a "hey, look at us!!!! we're green" thing.
The latest fad seems to be building them in cities. It's a "hey, look at us!!!! we're green" thing.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Tim Applesmackaholic wrote:I still don't get how this bitch could have been elected to anything higher than assistant dog catcher.
Marilyn Lockheed
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
She helped create the CFPB, which of course you hate because you endorse banks screwing over and defrauding customers. She also wants to breakup Google and Facebook and Amazon, which is a great idea.smackaholic wrote:I still don't get how this bitch could have been elected to anything higher than assistant dog catcher. But then, this is the same bunch that sent Ted Kennedy back to the Senate again and again, no matter who he killed.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
I am sure that building offshore windmills is a bad idea in most places, as it is a bad idea in a lot of areas they are built. But I am equally sure that Ted supported the rest of them. He didn't want it because added navigational challenges is a bad thing when you are sailing with a BAC over .3.Kierland wrote:He opposed the project, which was approved to go forward, for the same reasons as the guy who owned the approved rights, mainly that it was a dumb idea. Don’t ever let the facts get in way of a good lie eh?Left Seater wrote:Good ol’ Teddy. All about alternative fuels. Well up until a wind farm was proposed for the cape and he went all not in my back yard.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Link?smackaholic wrote: But I am equally sure that Ted supported the rest of them.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
There is 100% proof we have changed the atmospheric make up of gasses, but you don’t know anything about chemistry so it’s no wonder you don’t believe* that is changing the climate.88 wrote:. The hoax is that we can somehow control climate change by granting to world government the power to control our lives. There is no evidence or even a scientific consensus (which is an oxymoron) that doing anything will have any quantifiable effect to control climate change.
If this Interweb exists in 11.5 years, I anticipate posting video of AOC and countless other morons being proved wrong yet again, and you ignoring that and continuing to worship them and your new god.
And yes I know you do believe, but you are such a greedy corporate shill you won’t admit it.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13476
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
So he opposed a wind farm because it wa a dumb idea. Got it. You just made my point. Dude was a grade A hypocrite.Kierland wrote:Left Seater wrote:mainly that it was a dumb idea.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13476
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Of course they can’t. They can’t even get their models they are using to “predict” the future, to back into actual results. So they can’t replicate the past, but by all means we should put all of our eggs in the basket the models tell us we should.You dodged the question, per usualm. The question is if we implemented any of the proposed "fixes" that have been proposed, can science definitively tell us exactly what would occur and when it would occur? You know, sciency shit. If you can conclusively say that X occurs because of an addition of greehouse gases, then your science is only valid if you can tell us what will happen if we switch to X-Y. And you can't. No one can. That is why it isn't science. It is religion.
Just more liberal emotion driving decisions.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
88 wrote:The hoax is that we can somehow control climate change by granting to world government the power to control our lives.
Was acid rain a thing? Or were melting monuments, structures and statues "a matter of opinion"?
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Why don't you and your dick slurping faggot boyfriend Queerland just admit you both are a couple of cock sucking Communist socialist bastards who want nothing more than the Federal government to take over every aspect of the nations economy, nationalize large business and drive this country into the ditch ??Screwed in the Ass wrote: She also wants to breakup Google and Facebook and Amazon, which is a great idea.
You both are so stupid it is beyond belief. You will be bleating like sacrificial sheep when the secret police force hauls your ass to the basement of the Capital and pops a cap in your pitiful brains.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
And acid rain was proven to be an actually bad thing.
We have altered the atmosphere by pumping a good bit of CO2 into the atmosphere. From this, there is one effect that we can be certain of - shit grows better. We have essentially fertilized the atmosphere.
Any other effect is debatable. It MAY have a small effect on temp. This may/may not be a good thing.
We have altered the atmosphere by pumping a good bit of CO2 into the atmosphere. From this, there is one effect that we can be certain of - shit grows better. We have essentially fertilized the atmosphere.
Any other effect is debatable. It MAY have a small effect on temp. This may/may not be a good thing.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
88dipshits,
Way to move the goal posts. First it was there is no MMCC, now it’s your solution sucks. You think we should just pump as much CO2 into the air as possible and hope for the best. And then you have the nerve to ask for science? You are a fucking POS.
Way to move the goal posts. First it was there is no MMCC, now it’s your solution sucks. You think we should just pump as much CO2 into the air as possible and hope for the best. And then you have the nerve to ask for science? You are a fucking POS.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
You would think that basic reading comprehension would be a requirement for alleged lawyers, even bottom of the barrel public defenders.
What 88 and most everyone who looks at this with any level of honesty has said is, the erf appears to be warming as we come out of the latest ice age. This warming trend has bumps in it.
A few hundred years ago we looked to be headed back into one.
A few thousand years ago, the Romans planted vineyards in Scotland. This is proof of a lasting period of temps above today's.
40 years ago "the experts" said we were plunging back into the ice age, despite being nearly 2 centuries into the industrial revolution.
Then we had a 20 year run of apparent warming, which, looking back on it, is prolly part real warming and part "adjusting" the data.
The last 20 years, the warming appears to have stalled. There is hard evidence out there of the AGW faithful pointing this out and discussing how they can hide it.
Where we have disagreement is on the following topics...
So, it's warming, as it has been doing for roughly 20K years. Is the last 200 years worth of a long term trend due to our pissing into the atmospheric pool? Would it have magically leveled off at some magical preferred temp?
Is warming good? Cold continues to kill far more humans than heat. Vast swaths of the erf that happen to be located above sea level are located in areas that will become more habitable as it warms. Relatively small parts will become less so.
Is a higher level of this poison know as CO2 in the atmosphere a good thing?
Fauna will be unaffected.
Flora will love it.
There has been a measurable greening effect over the last half century. Greenhouses have been pumped full of CO2 for years because their owners didn't sleep through grade school science classes where they learned that plants actually like that shit.
And lastly we come to the AGW faithful's holy grail. That the erf climate system is a positive feedback system. They need it for their alarmism. The fact that a planet that has been continually habitable for many millions of years MUST have a negative feedback mechanism in conveniently ignored. If CO2 caused warming would result in a runaway effect and turn us into Venus, it would have already happened.
What 88 and most everyone who looks at this with any level of honesty has said is, the erf appears to be warming as we come out of the latest ice age. This warming trend has bumps in it.
A few hundred years ago we looked to be headed back into one.
A few thousand years ago, the Romans planted vineyards in Scotland. This is proof of a lasting period of temps above today's.
40 years ago "the experts" said we were plunging back into the ice age, despite being nearly 2 centuries into the industrial revolution.
Then we had a 20 year run of apparent warming, which, looking back on it, is prolly part real warming and part "adjusting" the data.
The last 20 years, the warming appears to have stalled. There is hard evidence out there of the AGW faithful pointing this out and discussing how they can hide it.
Where we have disagreement is on the following topics...
So, it's warming, as it has been doing for roughly 20K years. Is the last 200 years worth of a long term trend due to our pissing into the atmospheric pool? Would it have magically leveled off at some magical preferred temp?
Is warming good? Cold continues to kill far more humans than heat. Vast swaths of the erf that happen to be located above sea level are located in areas that will become more habitable as it warms. Relatively small parts will become less so.
Is a higher level of this poison know as CO2 in the atmosphere a good thing?
Fauna will be unaffected.
Flora will love it.
There has been a measurable greening effect over the last half century. Greenhouses have been pumped full of CO2 for years because their owners didn't sleep through grade school science classes where they learned that plants actually like that shit.
And lastly we come to the AGW faithful's holy grail. That the erf climate system is a positive feedback system. They need it for their alarmism. The fact that a planet that has been continually habitable for many millions of years MUST have a negative feedback mechanism in conveniently ignored. If CO2 caused warming would result in a runaway effect and turn us into Venus, it would have already happened.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
how does 88 cock taste you stupid droning spaz? If flora are effected then fauna are effected. That is how nature works you stupid corporate shill.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Nice melt. You would have made a great advocate for Standard Oil and the railroad monopoly back in the day.Derron wrote: Why don't you and your dick slurping faggot boyfriend Queerland just admit you both are a couple of cock sucking Communist socialist bastards who want nothing more than the Federal government to take over every aspect of the nations economy, nationalize large business and drive this country into the ditch ??
You both are so stupid it is beyond belief. You will be bleating like sacrificial sheep when the secret police force hauls your ass to the basement of the Capital and pops a cap in your pitiful brains.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Priceless.Derron wrote: Why don't you and your dick slurping faggot boyfriend Queerland just admit you both are a couple of cock sucking Communist socialist bastards....
You both are so stupid it is beyond belief.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
Once again, you display your utter lack of reading comprehension.Kierland wrote:how does 88 cock taste you stupid droning spaz? If flora are effected then fauna are effected. That is how nature works you stupid corporate shill.
Flora is affected. It likes it. Fauna won't directly notice the small rise in the CO2 levels, but it will enjoy the increased quantity of flora it has to eat.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
I read just fine. You are an idiot. Bigger flora equals more food for fauna, but yeah no effect. Dipshit.
- smackaholic
- Walrus Team 6
- Posts: 21748
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: upside it
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
My point, you fukking moron, is that fauna won't be directly affected by the CO2 rise. By that I mean the increased level of CO2 they breath won't affect them in the least.
I do appreciate that you do agree that there is a direct, identifiable benefit to all this carbon we've been pumping into the air. You may want to think about that before thinking it's such a great idea to stop doing it.
I do appreciate that you do agree that there is a direct, identifiable benefit to all this carbon we've been pumping into the air. You may want to think about that before thinking it's such a great idea to stop doing it.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Would any of you consider this illegal or immoral?
English, motherfucker. Assimilate or leave.schmick wrote:Stanford is one of the schools involved in this, borat and moochelles adopted daughter, malaria, is a student at Stanford. She has not played any sports at Stanford and didn't play any in High School. My son's girlfriend's younger brother has had to tutor her at Stanford and said she's dumb as rocks. What strings were pulled to get her in to Stanford. Her "dad" went to Occidental and her "mom" went to Princeton so she is not a legacy. Someone was paid off to get that kid in to Stanford.
48 of the 50 sets of parents named in the scandal have all been big dimorat donors, who did the owebama's go through for this service.
My son's girlfriend's younger brother