You mean like I COULD see the starr report AND the 18 boxes of supporting evidence? Yes you are correct. Your red leader and his deep state will never let that happen. I'm just wondering what "judgement call" I have made on this report?
Mueller Report--it's that bad
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
How so?88 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 12:52 amScrew_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2019 3:35 pmIf Bill Burr said the sun rose in the west, the kneepadders would parrot that insanity endlessly
He makes a lot of sense to me.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
No way. Tiny smack is as fresh as it was in 1999.
Sin,
Most Tards on T1B.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
I think you need to finish what you started.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2019 8:47 pmThanks Carson. You seem like a nice guy. If we ever meet up, I'd like to treat you to some ice cream man.Carson wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2019 4:15 pmIn your DreamsShlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 3:45 am
I was expecting more people to jump on this topic...
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Wow Carson, you're really on fire lately...
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Dave has something for you.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
US President Donald Trump has invoked executive privilege over the unredacted Mueller report and other subpoenaed
materials, the Justice Department has said.
The decision was announced by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on
Wednesday morning. The committee was poised to vote on a contempt citation against Attorney General William Barr
over failure to present the unredacted Mueller report and other materials...
https://www.rt.com/usa/458734-trump-ass ... ifications
materials, the Justice Department has said.
The decision was announced by Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd in a letter to the House Judiciary Committee on
Wednesday morning. The committee was poised to vote on a contempt citation against Attorney General William Barr
over failure to present the unredacted Mueller report and other materials...
https://www.rt.com/usa/458734-trump-ass ... ifications
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
The kool aid drinkers don’t care. Trump could shoot their mother on 8th ave and they would STILL suck his dick.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Jim Jordan = POS
We allege that the "oranges" of the investigation were corrupt, therefore we all ought to turn a blind eye to Donald's illegal fascism.
Yeppers.
Good work, m0rons.
We allege that the "oranges" of the investigation were corrupt, therefore we all ought to turn a blind eye to Donald's illegal fascism.
Yeppers.
Good work, m0rons.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Which criminals did he identify you greedy lying POS?
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21094
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
.088 wrote:Your clown had $35M and 24 months and the entire government working to find Trump/Russia election rigging and came up with bupkiss.
The entire government?
lol
Go douche yourself, nancy.
Congress hasn't even received the full report, even though it's now been six weeks since Barr has had it.
Don and his dicksuckers are hellbent on defying rightful subpoenas and shutting down fact-finding that is the responsibility of congress.
Mueller clearly documented multiple instances of obstruction, you lying, desperate twat.
And he explained why he left it for congress.
More than 370 former federal prosecutors who worked in Republican and Democratic administrations have signed
on to a statement asserting special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s findings would have produced obstruction charges
against President Trump — if not for the office he held.
The statement — signed by myriad former career government employees as well as high-profile political appointees —
offers a rebuttal to Attorney General William P. Barr’s determination that the evidence Mueller uncovered was
“not sufficient” to establish that Trump committed a crime.
Mueller had declined to say one way or the other whether Trump should have been charged, citing a Justice
Department legal opinion that sitting presidents cannot be indicted, as well as concerns about the fairness of accusing
someone for whom there can be no court proceeding...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/na ... 56511278c5
What the hell is wrong with you?
Your credibility is totally shot.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
I get they you are dumb but the red menace does not have unfettered firing powers. In your world he could conspire with Don Jr. to have Don Jr. kill Don the Con’s mail carrier because he was late with the mail then fire anyone who dared to investigate.
You are a jackboot. You are a POS. You are disgusting and vile. You are a right wing authoritarian. You are racist and a fraud.
You are a jackboot. You are a POS. You are disgusting and vile. You are a right wing authoritarian. You are racist and a fraud.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
I am going to skip over the rest of your completely wacked out rant and look just at this...
A president is granted power to take certain actions, yes.
But in taking those actions, his motivation for taking the action(s) determines whether or not it is obstruction of justice.
And btw, the firing of Comey isn't the only instance of possible obstruction of justice on the part of Donald.
The president was a target of the Mueller investigation.
You are trying to tell us that by virtue of the office he holds, the man who is president cannot have an investigation find him to have committed a crime because he has the power to shut the fact-finding down if he wants to.
You think the president is a king.
Congress is a co-equal branch, twat.
They are fully within their rights to issue subpoenas in order to get to the facts.
Look at you.
You have become a serious mess because you are so desperate to support this lying, criminal buffoon.
Why?
You're not really a lawyer, are you?.088 wrote:A president cannot be guilty of obstructing justice by exercising the powers the Constitution bestows on his office. Even if Trump wanted the Mueller investigation to be over and fired everyone involved in it including Mueller, it would not amount to obstruction of justice. He has that power.
A president is granted power to take certain actions, yes.
But in taking those actions, his motivation for taking the action(s) determines whether or not it is obstruction of justice.
And btw, the firing of Comey isn't the only instance of possible obstruction of justice on the part of Donald.
The president was a target of the Mueller investigation.
You are trying to tell us that by virtue of the office he holds, the man who is president cannot have an investigation find him to have committed a crime because he has the power to shut the fact-finding down if he wants to.
You think the president is a king.
Congress is a co-equal branch, twat.
They are fully within their rights to issue subpoenas in order to get to the facts.
Look at you.
You have become a serious mess because you are so desperate to support this lying, criminal buffoon.
Why?
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
The answer to why is right in his post. The economy is humming. It’s the first thing he says as to why we are all good. He is a greedy fuck. 7deadly sins and all. He was born a poor hillbilly and it scares the fuck out of him to think of ever being like that again. Same basic concept with Brokenpsyche his dad dies and he is worried about what will happen to the family economically and he does everything he can to make sure he is never in that situation, up to and including marrying a frigid snow queen.
Scum of the earth.
Scum of the earth.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21094
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Who is BrokenPsyche?Kierland wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 1:44 pm The answer to why is right in his post. The economy is humming. It’s the first thing he says as to why we are all good. He is a greedy fuck. 7deadly sins and all. He was born a poor hillbilly and it scares the fuck out of him to think of ever being like that again. Same basic concept with Brokenpsyche his dad dies and he is worried about what will happen to the family economically and he does everything he can to make sure he is never in that situation, up to and including marrying a frigid snow queen.
Scum of the earth.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Probably Left (Broken) Seater.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
.088 wrote:Nadler and Schiff and Pelosi and the other dolts in Congress should fire up impeachment proceedings if they think they are warranted.
They want to get the FACTS, 'tard.
It is rightful.
They have subpoenaed documents and people and are being stonewalled.
Why the hell would you support this?
Oh...
You support this kind of authoritarianism because your guy is the president.
If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly.088 wrote:Donald could fire all persons in the Executive Branch and its agencies that investigate the crime and pardon himself and Donald Jr. for any federal crimes they committed. It would not be obstruction of justice.
did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state.
- R. Mueller
He says you are full of shit, as do 370 former federal prosecutors who all signed a statement saying you are full of shit.
Let me guess...
"Mueller is one of the very bad democrats!! They got the ENTIRE government after Donald Trump!! Those 370 former feds are ALL against Donald, tool!! AHHHHHHHHHHHH"
rotf...
You are deluded and quite obviously mentally ill.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Except Don the Con who could kill a mail carrier and only be impeached but not tried and convicted in “federal” court.88 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 3:14 pm
Yes, if Donald Trump conspired with Donald Jr. to have his son murder a postman, Donald could fire all persons in the Executive Branch and its agencies that investigate the crime and pardon himself and Donald Jr. for any federal crimes they committed. It would not be obstruction of justice. It is a power granted to the office of president. Trump would be impeached by the Congress, which is its power. And he would go to prison for life with his son for state charges of murder and conspiracy etc., even if the murder occurred in the District of Columbia. No one is above the law.
Goebbels Says What?
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
That not what US v Nixon says but since you are a kool aid drinking Brownshirt you either don’t care or are willfully ignorant of the law.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
In addition to this long history of Congress extensively using its oversight authority, including to
investigate the Executive Branch, the judiciary has repeatedly affirmed Congress’s broad investigatory
powers. As the Supreme Court has stated: “The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is
inherent in the legislative process,” and “that power is broad.” Indeed, Congress must have this
power because it can “legislate wisely [and] effectively” only with “information respecting the conditions
which the legislation is intended to affect or change." For that reason, “where the legislative body does
not itself possess the requisite information—which not infrequently is true—recourse must be had to
others who do possess it.”
Finally, the Court relied on “Congress’ broad investigative power” in upholding a statute that required
the preservation of presidential materials from the Nixon Administration. Among the “substantial
public interests that led Congress to seek to preserve [these] materials” was “Congress’ need to
understand how [our] political processes had in fact operated” during “the events leading to [Nixon]’s
resignation . . . in order to gauge the necessity for remedial legislation.”
In short, the House and Senate possess broad investigatory powers rooted in the Constitution’s grant of
the legislative power to Congress under Article I. Indeed, even the Executive Branch has agreed. As the
Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel has noted, “It is beyond dispute that Congress may
conduct investigations in order to obtain facts pertinent to possible legislation and in order to evaluate
the effectiveness of current laws.”
https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-co ... -Brief.pdf
.088 is a brownshirt.
No doubt.
Frightening.
investigate the Executive Branch, the judiciary has repeatedly affirmed Congress’s broad investigatory
powers. As the Supreme Court has stated: “The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is
inherent in the legislative process,” and “that power is broad.” Indeed, Congress must have this
power because it can “legislate wisely [and] effectively” only with “information respecting the conditions
which the legislation is intended to affect or change." For that reason, “where the legislative body does
not itself possess the requisite information—which not infrequently is true—recourse must be had to
others who do possess it.”
Finally, the Court relied on “Congress’ broad investigative power” in upholding a statute that required
the preservation of presidential materials from the Nixon Administration. Among the “substantial
public interests that led Congress to seek to preserve [these] materials” was “Congress’ need to
understand how [our] political processes had in fact operated” during “the events leading to [Nixon]’s
resignation . . . in order to gauge the necessity for remedial legislation.”
In short, the House and Senate possess broad investigatory powers rooted in the Constitution’s grant of
the legislative power to Congress under Article I. Indeed, even the Executive Branch has agreed. As the
Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel has noted, “It is beyond dispute that Congress may
conduct investigations in order to obtain facts pertinent to possible legislation and in order to evaluate
the effectiveness of current laws.”
https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-co ... -Brief.pdf
.088 is a brownshirt.
No doubt.
Frightening.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Your rote regurgitation of Trump's drivel about "Mueller and his band of Democrats" is prima facie evidence that your takes aren't worth considering seriously, much less taking the time to refute.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
And impossible for you to prove.88 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2019 6:52 pmIt isn't drivel, and it is impossible for you to refute. 13 of the 15 prosecutors hired by Muller are registered Democrats and/or contributed to Democrat political candidates in recent election cycles. Mueller and Rosenstein are registered Republicans.
Yes, 13 of 18 on the team were registered Democrats. Angry? More like in possession of considerable expertise.
Additionally,
Would you have been happier if Mueller went against Department policy and hired all Trump cock sucking sycophants, like yourself?Justice Department officials, however, are not supposed to ask about employees' political affiliations. Department policy prohibits "using political affiliation and may also prohibit using certain ideological affiliations in hiring and taking other personnel actions with regard to career attorneys," according to the department’s inspector general.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... ts-n976226
Seriously, just STFU. You're looking more and more like the deranged brownshirt that Pops keeps accusing you of being.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Donald spent an adult lifetime contributing to Democrat political candidates... and he bragged about it..088 wrote:contributed to Democrat political candidates in recent election cycles
Remember?
Way to kick the hell out of your own @ss.
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Joe in PB
- 2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 4522
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Pacific Beach
- Contact:
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
This thread has turned into an alternate for pops flat earth debate.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
You have never once won a legal argument against me you fucking hack so take your tent peg and shove it up your plungered ass.
Nixon says that the privilege is qualified and creates a presumption of vailidity once invoked. A sufficient showing must then be made that the material is essential to the inquiry. But then you knew (or should have know) that you fucking water carrying stooge.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
And 100% of the tards trying to suppress it are right wing tards like you. So the report is more bi partisan than the people defending its suppression.
Do you have any other stupid arguments as to why I can’t read it and see the boxes of supporting evidence?
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Way to move the goalposts. I did not say he had to produce it. I said it’s not an absolute privledge and that you are wrong that all Congress can do is impeach or pound sand. In fact you labeled them 1) and 2). It’s not the red mence’s decision and it’s not your decision either “it is the province and duty of [the] Court "to say what the law is" with respect to the claim of privilege presented...” US v Nixon
- Left Seater
- 36,000 ft above the chaos
- Posts: 13441
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
- Location: The Great State of Texas
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Good to see I am living rent free in more than one location these days.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Because anybody who posts anything about another poster has that poster “living in their dome.” You really are a talking point spouting mess you fat greedy fuck.
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
It has unfortunately turned into another dumping ground for your inane takes.
Wack, partisan hack video is 5, 4, 3...
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Softball Bat
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 10903
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Did Q tell you that?.088 wrote:Get ready for the IG’s report, Barr’s grand jury indictments and Comey’s, Clapper’s, and Brennan’s frog marching.
bwaaa...
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri May 10, 2019 1:32 amDid Q tell you that?.088 wrote:Get ready for the IG’s report, Barr’s grand jury indictments and Comey’s, Clapper’s, and Brennan’s frog marching.
bwaaa...
I would say Greaty-Great has been going yard with his prognostications far more than you, in the last 6 or so months....
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Ah yes it has nothing to do with Don the Con because you say so, when the case clearly states that they have more than just those two options.
“Because I say so” is a shit argument you fucking red kool aid drinking hack.
And I could not care less who Barr pulls into his red web. YOU on the other hand sure as shit seem to care what happens to your dear leader. I am looking at the law, you are looking in your wallet. Fucking POS.
“Because I say so” is a shit argument you fucking red kool aid drinking hack.
And I could not care less who Barr pulls into his red web. YOU on the other hand sure as shit seem to care what happens to your dear leader. I am looking at the law, you are looking in your wallet. Fucking POS.
- Shlomart Ben Yisrael
- Insha'Allah
- Posts: 19031
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: filling molotovs
Re: Mueller Report--it's that bad
Your straw-manning of Greaty-Great with the MAGA yoke is as lame as 'Spray painting every Blue-Stater centrist as a tranny worshipping, fecophiliac Maoist.
How do you not bore yourself into a coma?
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.