Liberals, your take?

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Kierland

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Kierland »

What about his daughter?
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Rooster wrote: Sun Jun 23, 2019 11:28 pm Osama had it coming to him. But Al-Waliki and his son, both US citizens? No. At the very least a public trial in absentia should have been held and if found guilty and then given a death sentence, then drone him. As it was, even if Al-Waliki was deserving of death, his son was innocent.
I agree
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4227
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Dr_Phibes »

Left Seater wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:28 pm

It can be taken away as part of a signed agreement. Paying them pallet loads of cash to agree to restrict their program would make more sense than paying them and removing restrictions.
But you're forgetting, the US has no credibility on that point. That was done to the DPRK under Clinton and you simply reneged. The deal was worked, signed and the cash wasn't delivered. The light water reactors were never built, so the heavy water reactors were switched back on. Iran still exists in the abstract 'Axis of Evil' alongside the DPRK, they're not stupid.

Interesting to see the 'sanctions' flag being tarried, despite being morally reprehensible to any thinking person. Using food as a weapon is the height of perversity. And practically, they don't work and have never worked - it's futile.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13472
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Left Seater »

I think you are missing the point. I was saying giving them cash would be an incentive for them to agree to restrict their nuclear program. This leaves them with coin with which they can feed their people.

But attacking US assets and those of close allies is pretty fucking stupid despite your claim of their intellect.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Dr_Phibes
P.H.D - M.B.E. - O.B.E.
Posts: 4227
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:11 am

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Dr_Phibes »

But any offer of cash is an offer that isn't guaranteed. I'm saying that in past dealings, the US has reneged on payment when it 'strikes a deal'.
You have no credibility, just a history of not honouring the payments in situations like this.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 10928
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Softball Bat »

I'm not looking for war, and if there is, it'll be obliteration like you’ve never seen before

- Donald



Image
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13472
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Left Seater »

Dr_Phibes wrote: Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:54 am But any offer of cash is an offer that isn't guaranteed. I'm saying that in past dealings, the US has reneged on payment when it 'strikes a deal'.
You have no credibility, just a history of not honouring the payments in situations like this.
So the pallet loads of cash didn't happen?
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Kierland

Re: Liberals, your take?

Post by Kierland »

Not the way you say they did. Bush on the other hand....
Post Reply