Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:44 am
by Roofer
T REX wrote:Roofer wrote:T REX wrote:
Bad game.
THREE SHOTS by one of the greatest scorers of all-time, a guy with a huge competitive streak??????
You just can't handle the fact that he tanked it on purpose which shows poor character.....selfishness.......pathetic.
So let me get this straight. You, along with the other band of clusterfuck Laker Haters in here crack on Kobe when he scores 81, saying he shoots too much, and then you crack on him when he only takes 3 shots in a half. It's painfully obvious to see that you're just bitter. You're graspin for anything you can get your feeble mind around just so you don't have to defend your own rooting interest.
Rock on with your bad self.
Huh? That's two extremes. Why so passive? Its not liek teh offense was going through him. He was basically planted outside the 3 line for most of teh second half. He wasn't driving and dishing or creating for others. He just sat there and watched. It's pretty bad.
Actually, there are lakerfans that saw the same thing. Some aren't as myopic as you.
Yeah Rex, it's not like I haven't said numerous times the enitre team played like shit. Hey with any bit of luck, I might fess up to that at some point.
Again....fucking tool much?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:48 am
by Sky
Roofer wrote:Nope. Steve Nash is. BTW, he doesn't happen to play for the Kings.
Lakers took their series to a Game 7. Kings bowed out in 6. I'd say if you really had to make a comparison between the two, the Lakers fared a bit better in the postseason. But I'm fully convinced you'll take this "midseason turn around" and spin into an example of how the Kings had the better season.
And I am sure you will take this choke job as most LA fans will, lets find what else we can talk about.
And yeah, you are probably right, the Suns are better, that is why they were seeded no 2 while SA was no 1. Good call there Capt Logic.
Does this thread say anything about the Kings in the title, anyone, anyone??
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:50 am
by M2
Roofer wrote:
Lakers took their series to a Game 7. Kings bowed out in 6. I'd say if you really had to make a comparison between the two, the Lakers fared a bit better in the postseason. .
Huh???
The Kings lost to the World Champions!!!
You lost to the Suns.
You think the "Lakers" did better because they won one more game?
Oh, Ok.
Roofer, what planet do you call home?
m2
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:00 am
by The Seer
Sky wrote: the quite obvious fact that your criminal star
I forgot. What exactly was he
convicted of?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:03 am
by M2
The Seer wrote:Sky wrote: the quite obvious fact that your criminal star
I forgot. What exactly was he
convicted of?
Quiting.
In the court of Public Opinion.
By the way... how much did Kobe pay the rape victim?
7 million or was it 8 Million?
m2
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:04 am
by T REX
You glossed over my main point......
Why did Kobe become so passive with the game and series on the line.
Please do not use the "game was already over" response or the "no-win situation" response or the "he was trying to get others involved" response.
It was obvious from the get go that he was content letting his teammates chuck it up. Why?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:06 am
by The Seer
m2 wrote:The Seer wrote:Sky wrote: the quite obvious fact that your criminal star
I forgot. What exactly was he
convicted of?
Quiting.
In the court of Public Opinion.
By the way... how much did Kobe pay the
extortion winner?
7 million or was it 8 Million?
m2
FTFY-NC
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:07 am
by Sky
Right, cause we wouldn't pay anyone that wasn't guilty. I mean hell, the case was dropped in criminal court so he must have been innocent.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:09 am
by M2
The Seer wrote:m2 wrote:The Seer wrote:
I forgot. What exactly was he convicted of?
Quiting.
In the court of Public Opinion.
By the way... how much did Kobe pay the
extortion winner?
7 million or was it 8 Million?
m2
FTFY-NC
Hey, maybe the Lakers can sign her next season?
At least, she's a
Winner.
Without Shaq, Kobe is the "Iceman" without a good
finger roll
m2
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:11 am
by The Seer
Don't make me go Moving Sale on you and cite law vs. logic.....
She saw a gold mine and went for it. Once someone labels a celebrity of something it costs jack just to clear your name. He WAS guilty of cheating on his wife....she was guilty of bragging about her conquest and then milking it for what it was worth....think if she had to do it over again she wouldn't be passing her tail around again????????
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 9:39 am
by Diogenes
The Seer wrote:Sky wrote: the quite obvious fact that your criminal star
I forgot. What exactly was he
convicted of?
Sin,
Orenthal.
FTFY.
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:58 pm
by The Seer
Diogenes wrote:The Seer wrote:Sky wrote: the quite obvious fact that your criminal star
I forgot. What exactly was he
convicted of?
Sin,
Orenthal.
FTFY.
Ron & Nicole got slightly less than 8 million, yes?
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 5:59 pm
by T REX