T1B

BSmack wrote:There shouldn't even BE a preseason #1. The only thing preseason polls are good for is allowing teams to get by a loss or two based on their preseason polling spot.

Dinsdale wrote:[
Now your just plain reaching, .....

rozy wrote:

Felix wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:
BSU was getting beaten senseless. OU ponied up turnovers, which gave BSU the game. But to say OU wasn't beating the ever loving fuck out of them would be inaccurate.

I have to ask....did you watch the game.....because BSU wasn't getting beaten.....

they created those two turnovers you reference, the fumble was stripped from Thompson's hand and the interception for a touchdown was on a pass tipped at the line.....

Now on the other hand, at 28-10, OU got the most fortunate break of the game when the punt bounced off the BSU players foot....no fault of his, but that's just one of the breaks...but OU didn't create that turnover, it was handed to them.....

If BSU fields that punt cleanly, we're not having a discussion about the game being one of the best ever.....BSU runs another 5 to 6 minutes off the clock....even if they don't score, they pin OU deep in their own territory forcing them to drive the length of the field....they would have never been able to stage that remarkable comeback because they wouldn't have had time.....

Best post in the whole thread.


So, m2, Cal gets wasted by Phil Fulmer , who gets wasted by Penn State, who got wasted by Notre Dame, who got wasted by USC, who got wasted by Oregon State, who got absolutely obliterated by.......help me out here..........BOISE STATE. Using your demented logic of course. You may now exit stage left.

The argument AGAINST Boise is much, much simpler. They had to get up for ONE game. And had several weeks to do so. Florida on the other hand had to play an SEC Schedule which meant they got their asses pounded on HARD every freaking week by top level quality talent and freaking won. How would Boise have fared in the SEC? I hate making an argument in favor of big conferences because I hate the arrogance of the big conferences. But there can be no argument against what I just typed. None. So, moronSQUARED, if you want to shoot down the Boise honks, bring a measure of common sense to your freaking argument.

rozy wrote:Actually, Dumbass, I can't substantiate it here, but every football friend I have at work would tell you I also picked Boise St. to win that game. That of course having absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand as well as being completely irrelevant.

Now, as Nj pointed out, and as anyone else with the ability to rub more than 3 brain cells together simultaneously saw as obvious, I was clearly referring to the '04 Utah and Auburn teams. Teams exponentially superior to this Boise team. Glad I could clear that up for you since I know context seems to kick your ass with almost as much fervor as you spend kicking it yourself.

Your attempted deflection is now made moot. Care to address the content of the other post or is concession to be inferred?

Your premise was that since Cal beat aTm...handily, and since aTm is considered a top 4 team in the Big 12...by you... that, by some osmosis of the hempfried San Francisco brain means that BSU beating Oklatucky by 1 would OBVIOUSLY...to you... mean that Cal would beat Boise by...as much as they feel like. How then do you explain Cal losing to Tenn who lost to PSU who lost to ND who lost to USC who lost to Oregon St. who got gangbanged by who were we talking about again? Oh yeah, Boise State. So, by using YOUR logic, bounced first off of 3 windchimes, 4 boxes of Rice a Roni, 3 pole smokers climbing Golden Gate bridge, and 7 long haired friends of Jesus in that old chartreuse microbus, OBVIOUSLY Boise would beat Cal somewhere in the neighborhood of 77-3. Using your logic...of course.