Page 4 of 4

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:40 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Dinsdale wrote:you guys are really reaping a good, fair reward for voting for a traitor.
Don't blame me. I'm one of the 5% or so of this board who didn't vote for him.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:40 pm
by Tom In VA
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:you guys are really reaping a good, fair reward for voting for a traitor.
Don't blame me. I'm one of the 5% or so of this board who didn't vote for him.

Dude the Dems are just as bad when it comes to the border so don't front.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:42 pm
by Tom In VA
Dinsdale wrote: Yet you tards won't demand better, and make excuses for acts of treachery...ponderous.
No see, that sounds to me like somebody needs to impeach him on those grounds. They're wasting their time with obsessing on Iraq.


If we can prove that Bush's policies or lack thereof in regards to the border, put our national security at risk ....

Then he's not doing his job.


I like that angle Dins.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:27 am
by RadioFan
mvscal wrote:No problem at all.
In the past two years, FAIR has issued fiscal cost studies for California, Arizona, Texas and Florida looking at the same cost factors studied by the Urban Institute 10 years earlier, i.e., education, emergency medical care and incarceration. Our findings of the annual net fiscal costs were:

California
$8.8 billion ($1,183 per native household)

Arizona
$1.03 billion ($717 per native household)

Texas
$3.73 billion ($725 per native household)

Florida
$.91 billion ($315 per native household)

These studies were done in 2004 and 2005, and the rapid continuing increase in the illegal immigrant population in each of these states would result in higher estimates of the fiscal cost today.
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?p ... localcosts
A nonpartisan group's stats are fine by me. Point taken.



Btw, how is it that California has about 36 million people and Texas has 23 million, yet Califorina has 2 1/2 times the cost? hmmmmm?

And don't even get me started about Kalifornia's "legal" system.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:11 am
by Mister Bushice
Simple answer. Who the fuck wants to end up in Texas?

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 6:49 am
by RadioFan
Mister Bushice wrote:Simple answer. Who the fuck wants to end up in Texas?
You're kidding, right?

Along the lines of pop's original post ...

1. Change the Capitol from Washington to Austin. Hell, it was early Texans who decided not to make the capitol there taller than the U.S. Capitol, out of "respect."

Sheeeeeet.