Page 4 of 4
Re: All indications are that it's Brian Kelly
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:02 am
by Van
Stanford can foot the kid's bill, any way they wish...or are you somehow under some insane impression that they can't? Do you seriously think Stanford can't choose to take in a kid, mid-year, and cover the cost from Day One?
Re: All indications are that it's Brian Kelly
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:12 am
by M Club
mvscal wrote:Van wrote:If Stanford wishes to bestow upon a kid a scholarship midway through the school year, there's nothing stopping them from doing so.
Other than the fact that there wouldn't be a scholarship to bestow in the middle of the school year. Did you even go to college?
link?
Re: All indications are that it's Brian Kelly
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:03 am
by M Club
oh, so the only funding a university can make available to its students has to come in the form of an officially sanctioned scholarship? link, please.
Re: All indications are that it's Brian Kelly
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:32 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Killian wrote:Kelly left CMU to coach Cincinnati in their bowl game. I don't remember Cincy players bitching then.
Was this an discussion on these boards when DickRod did it? Or any other coach?
Nope. And it's been a fairly common occurrence. Off the top of my head, it happened to North Carolina when Mack left for Texas, and it happened to Cinci once before -- when Dantonio left for the Sparty job. And ND has been in this situation beforehand as well, at least twice -- when O'Leary and Holtz were hired.
Yet another example of the type of hair-pulling that ESPN routinely engages in and which apparently passes for "journalism" there.