T1B

Different day, same result - Jsc_reprobate having his ass handed him by 88.

Long winded way to go about it but effective nonetheless.

I find a simple, ongoing "Go Fuck Yourself" an adequate response.

Papa Willie wrote:Solution:

Divide the country into two different countries. One for the left, one for the right.

Wait...........why the fuck does jsc get an island in this deal?

poptart wrote:It really is comical to see someone like Bace trumpeting the will of a judge over the will of the people - seemingly without considering the obvious.

Obvious: The same glorious judge(s) might decide to turn around and drop a brick on your head.

what would Jesus do, hypocrite?

We can only guess what Jesus would do, but based on what He did wth the whore at the well who was about to be stoned, he'd tell the homos " Go, and sin no more"

Bizzarofelice wrote:

poptart wrote:It really is comical to see someone like Bace trumpeting the will of a judge over the will of the people - seemingly without considering the obvious.

Obvious: The same glorious judge(s) might decide to turn around and drop a brick on your head.

what would Jesus do, hypocrite?

I've always found the the "What would Jesus do?" thing sadly amusing.

What did Jesus do?
What is Jesus doing?

Make sense.

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

No, He didn't say that.

poptart wrote:

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

No, He didn't say that.

Well, that's what he told me.

Jsc810 wrote:I won't argue with you.

Jsc was run.

as a parting gift, take a heartfelt Go fuck yourself with you.

Thanks for playing.

Goober McTuber wrote:Well, that's what he told me.

Well played, I must admit.

poptart wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:

poptart wrote:It really is comical to see someone like Bace trumpeting the will of a judge over the will of the people - seemingly without considering the obvious.

Obvious: The same glorious judge(s) might decide to turn around and drop a brick on your head.

what would Jesus do, hypocrite?

I've always found the the "What would Jesus do?" thing sadly amusing.

Funny. As a person who spends his life absorbed in his teachings I thought you'd take it serious.

poptart wrote:

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

No, He didn't say that.

And you know this, how?

Answer: You haven't the slightest idea what He did or did not say. Neither does anyone else.

Bizzarofelice wrote: Funny. As a person who spends his life absorbed in his teachings I thought you'd take it serious.

I distinctly remember poptart typing "you're a joke here" when referring to you a few days ago.

why would he take you serious?

like, do people elsewhere take you all serious and stuff?

You call yourself Bizzarofelice and want to be taken seriously?

You're a joke here, dude.

Van wrote:And you know this, how?

Answer: You haven't the slightest idea what He did or did not say. Neither does anyone else.

Hi Van.

Jsc entered... "what Scripture says," into this discussion.

I'm responding to that same Scripture.

The "The Bible isn't accurate" discussion would be an entirely different one.

Jsc wrote:Luke 9:27

As always, you need to look at the context to understand the Scripture, Jsc.
At first glance, yeah, a person could take this --ONE LINE-- of Scripture to mean something that it doesn't mean.

Read on from Luke 9:27, beginning right at 9:28 and continuing to 9:36.

Jesus took (8 days later) Peter, John, and James (those who would not taste death until they saw the Kingdom of God) up to a mountain ---> where the transfiguration incident took place.
There, those three people witnessed the Kingdom of God and they witnessed the stark reality that it must be ---> ONLY Jesus Christ.

Hey, Pop.

Anyway, no, Jsc didn't originally mention the Scriptures. He merely posted...

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

You followed that up with, "No, He didn't say that."

Jsc qualified his comment with the use of "supposedly." You? It was as if you were passing on a firsthand recollection of dude's conversations!

Van wrote:Hey, Pop.

Anyway, no, Jsc didn't originally mention the Scriptures. He merely posted...

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

You followed that up with, "No, He didn't say that."

Jsc qualified his comment with the use of "supposedly." You? It was as if you were passing on a firsthand recollection of dude's conversations!

You didn't know? Pops WAS there. In fact,

He was 'round when Jesus Christ
Had his moment of doubt and pain
Made damn sure that Pilate
Washed his hands and sealed his fate

He stuck around St. Petersburg
When he saw it was a time for a change
Killed the Czar and his ministers
Anastasia screamed in vain

He rode a tank
Held a general's rank
When the Blitzkrieg raged
And the bodies stank

woo who

Top Four Stones song, along with "Angie," "Wild Horses" and "Gimme Shelter."

Van wrote:Hey, Pop.

Anyway, no, Jsc didn't originally mention the Scriptures. He merely posted...

Jsc wrote:He supposedly said that he would return within the lifetimes of those living at the time he did.

You followed that up with, "No, He didn't say that."

Jsc qualified his comment with the use of "supposedly." You? It was as if you were passing on a firsthand recollection of dude's conversations!

If Jsc wasn't getting his information from the Bible about what Jesus supposedly said, where on earth are you imagining that he got it from?

The point is that he properly qualified his statement. You just stated yours as if it were fact.

Oh, never mind.

Van wrote:"Angie".

Yes.

Here ya' go, Ana...





...and anyone who doesn't like it can die in an overwrought rectum fire.

No one's going to agree on this, dorko...it's a moot argument.

I just posted "yes", because the Stones had a hit with "Angie" the same year I was born.



I can be as addicting as heroin, I'm told.

Ana Ng wrote:I can be as addicting as heroin, I'm told.

And probably just as dangerous.

Todd, you really need to STFU here.

Mikey wrote:Todd, you really need to STFU here.

Here, there and everywhere.

Toddowen wrote:It doesn't conjure up any images of dying love in my mind.

You may already know this, but Mick Jagger wrote Angie about David Bowie's ex-wife Angela. She and Mick were having an affair and Mick decided it was time to break it off so as not to hurt Bowie, his good friend and rumored lover.

Smackie Chan wrote:You may already know this, but Mick Jagger wrote Angie about David Bowie's ex-wife Angela.

Common misconception. Keith Richards will tell you otherwise.

Ya. That's kinda where I was going with the "heroin" comment, but then Todd laid down some epic "attention" smack, and ran me.

Van wrote:Here ya' go, Ana...

FTFY

Ana Ng wrote:...and ran me.

When you do get run, I want to imagine it happening on a wind swept beach, with your hair flowing freely and your dainty frame gliding across the silhouetted crashing waves.

Is that okay? I hope I haven't gone too far with this...













P.S. ~ trev must never know of this

Ana Ng wrote:Ya. That's kinda where I was going with the "heroin" comment.

If it's any consolation, I totally "got" that.

Van wrote:Top Four Stones song, along with "Angie," "Wild Horses" and "Gimme Shelter."

Those songs fucking sucked goat ass. same for ruby tuesday and many more

Martyred wrote:

Ana Ng wrote:...and ran me.

When you do get run, I want to imagine it happening on a wind swept beach, with your hair flowing freely...

Oh, about that.

I asked for a little off the bottom, and they took a foot and a 1/2. :/

Gimme Shelter is one of the few Stones songs that doesn't make me want to throw on some MGMT and jump around and do the Screwey... a dance that involes caucasian males making a mopping action almost-to-the-beat, then holding their pasty arm over their head for at least several seconds.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

Ana Ng wrote:Ya. That's kinda where I was going with the "heroin" comment.

If it's any consolation, I totally "got" that.

Somehow I knew.

Dinsdale wrote:... a dance that involes caucasian males making a mopping action almost-to-the-beat, then holding their pasty arm over their head for at least several seconds.

It's the dance craze that's sweeping the...well...it's sweeping DC, at least.



Or should I say...mopping.

Dinsdale wrote:Gimme Shelter is one of the few Stones songs that doesn't make me want to throw on some MGMT and jump around and do the Screwey.

Dude? Were you raised by lesbians on the Isle of Lesbos where no men existed?

I don't think that came out the way Dinsdale intended it to.

Or maybe.....

......it did.

What I was sayi', was that the Stones have a slightly higher level of talent than MGMT.

Stones delve about as deeply into music theory as AC/DC, but without all the energy. Same 3 chord stuff.

Dinsdale wrote:What I was sayi', was that the Stones have a slightly higher level of talent than MGMT.

Stones delve about as deeply into music theory as AC/DC, but without all the energy. Same 3 chord stuff.

so fukking what. music doesn't need to be complex to be good, just as complex music sometimes sucks horribly.

too bad everything they've written in the last 30 years is teh suck as well as simple.