T1B

And do people think Vannie gets out much? If I actually gave a fuck and gave an 1/8 of the effort I do for work here, it would make a big difference. I don't give a fuck, though.

Hmmmm. If you were good at your craft, I'd expect it to take little to no effort to compose a decent post. But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer. And what does this have to do with Van?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer.

Not much about punctuation, I'd wager.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Hmmmm. If you were good at your craft, I'd expect it to take little to no effort to compose a decent post. But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer. And what does this have to do with Van?

Punctuation aside, rack this take. We've had two pro writers here, to my knowledge, Van an Euro. With each it is fairly obvious. Not talking about 4th grade grammar rules, either. I am talking about overall content.

These fukkers just know how to put down thoughts. It's like breathing to them.

I don't buy the "this shithole is not worthy of my efforts" line for a second.

Prove me wrong. I dare you.

smackaholic wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Hmmmm. If you were good at your craft, I'd expect it to take little to no effort to compose a decent post. But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer. And what does this have to do with Van?

Punctuation aside, rack this take. We've had two pro writers here, to my knowledge, Van an Euro. With each it is fairly obvious. Not talking about 4th grade grammar rules, either. I am talking about overall content.

These fukkers just know how to put down thoughts. It's like breathing to them.

I don't buy the "this shithole is not worthy of my efforts" line for a second.

Prove me wrong. I dare you.

Smackaholic is posting an impassioned plea for more proofreading and better grammar? And is doing so in a post littered with errors?

BSmack wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Hmmmm. If you were good at your craft, I'd expect it to take little to no effort to compose a decent post. But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer. And what does this have to do with Van?

Punctuation aside, rack this take. We've had two pro writers here, to my knowledge, Van an Euro. With each it is fairly obvious. Not talking about 4th grade grammar rules, either. I am talking about overall content.

These fukkers just know how to put down thoughts. It's like breathing to them.

I don't buy the "this shithole is not worthy of my efforts" line for a second.

Prove me wrong. I dare you.

Smackaholic is posting an impassioned plea for more proofreading and better grammar? And is doing so in a post littered with errors?

so, i had one run on sentence and maybe a misplaced comma.

sue me.

never claimed to be one of those pro writers. nor do I generally nit pic about grammar.

what i am referring to here is overall writing. after reading van or euro for awhile, it is apparent that they are skillful writers, if not professional. i never get that sense after reading screwey. not even close.

i guess it might be possible that screwey writes sports coverage of high school sports for a community free paper. he does not do any sort of creative writing. not very well, anyway.

smackaholic wrote:so, i had one run on sentence and maybe a misplaced comma.

sue me.

never claimed to be one of those pro writers. nor do I generally nit pic about grammar.

what i am referring to here is overall writing. after reading van or euro for awhile, it is apparent that they are skillful writers, if not professional. i never get that sense after reading screwey. not even close.

i guess it might be possible that screwey writes sports coverage of high school sports for a community free paper. he does not do any sort of creative writing. not very well, anyway.

Yea, it was just a misplaced comma and a few run on sentences. And WWII was a few small skirmishes.

BSmack wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Hmmmm. If you were good at your craft, I'd expect it to take little to no effort to compose a decent post. But hey, what do I know. I'm not a professional writer. And what does this have to do with Van?

Punctuation aside, rack this take. We've had two pro writers here, to my knowledge, Van an Euro. With each it is fairly obvious. Not talking about 4th grade grammar rules, either. I am talking about overall content.

These fukkers just know how to put down thoughts. It's like breathing to them.

I don't buy the "this shithole is not worthy of my efforts" line for a second.

Prove me wrong. I dare you.

Smackaholic is posting an impassioned plea for more proofreading and better grammar?

Hardly.

Not talking about 4th grade grammar rules, either. I am talking about overall content.

smackaholic wrote:nor do I generally nit pic about grammar.

I bet you don't complain to your neighbors about their shitty fucking landscaping either. And I could really give two shits about commas and punctuation. However, I do believe you're a total fucking retard if you think the plural of cat is cat's. And if you consistently misspell any three letter word, you're a fucking moron. I mean, really. It's three fucking letters.

Carry on...

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

smackaholic wrote:nor do I generally nit pic about grammar.

I bet you don't complain to your neighbors about their shitty fucking landscaping either. And I could really give two shits about commas and punctuation. However, I do believe you're a total fucking retard if you think the plural of cat is cat's. And if you consistently misspell any three letter word, you're a fucking moron. I mean, really. It's three fucking letters.

Carry on...

And a question mark is a single character.

So fukking what?

Link me to where I made an arguement for 's denoting plurality.

smackaholic wrote:Link me to where I made an arguement for 's denoting plurality.

Sure thing, champ, I'll get right on that... right after you provide me with a link where I specifically accused you. The word "if" is your friend. Read it again.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:The word "if" is your friend.

Well, at least he can spell it.

Sin,
Argument

smackaholic wrote: Link me to where I made an arguement for 's denoting plurality.

And just so's (see what I did there?) you know -- if you're (see what I did there?) pluralizing something represented by initials or an acronym, then you actually do use an apostrophe... since this will probably come up at some point.

Dinsdale wrote:since this will probably come up at some point.

And the person who correctly points that out will inevitably have some other obvious error contained within the same post. Don't ask why, it's just the way it is.

Sin,
The Grammar/Spelling Smack Gods

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Link me to where I made an arguement for 's denoting plurality.

Sure thing, champ, I'll get right on that... right after you provide me with a link where I specifically accused you. The word "if" is your friend. Read it again.

Specifically accuse?

Perhaps not, but this kind of implies it, IMO.

I bet you don't complain to your neighbors about their shitty fucking landscaping either. And I could really give two shits about commas and punctuation. However, I do believe you're a total fucking retard if you think the plural of cat is cat's. And if you consistently misspell any three letter word, you're a fucking moron. I mean, really. It's three fucking letters.

So how is it that you could give two shits about punctuation, but a fairly common misspelling of the plural form of it (because it makes sense), apparently is worth giving a shit or three about?

Just a little consistency is all I'm looking for.

smackaholic wrote:So how is it that you could give two shits about punctuation, but a fairly common misspelling of the plural form of it (because it makes sense), apparently is worth giving a shit or three about?

People commonly misspell the plural of it? Because it makes sense? Wow. What is the plural form of it?

You know, it might just be time for you to seek refuge in the Federal Witless Protection Program.

It's... its


Same spelling.

Different punctuation.


Might wanna quit while you're behind.

Dinsdale wrote:It's... its


Same spelling.

Different punctuation.

Yes, and neither is a plural form.

Goober McTuber wrote:

smackaholic wrote:So how is it that you could give two shits about punctuation, but a fairly common misspelling of the plural form of it (because it makes sense), apparently is worth giving a shit or three about?

People commonly misspell the plural of it? Because it makes sense? Wow. What is the plural form of it?

You know, it might just be time for you to seek refuge in the Federal Witless Protection Program.

:doh:

I meant possessive.

that dreaded little word is gonna torment me for ever.

smackaholic wrote:for ever

That's actually one dreaded little word.

Dinsdale wrote:

smackaholic wrote:for ever

That's actually one dreaded little word.

technically, it could be written as two.

Dinsdale wrote:And just so's (see what I did there?) you know -- if you're (see what I did there?) pluralizing something represented by initials or an acronym, then you actually do use an apostrophe... since this will probably come up at some point.

smackaholic's parents must have possessed very low IQs. If it's in CAPS, you don't necessarily need the apostrophe. Riveting, I know.

I recall posting something about private messages once and people wondering what was up with a certain poster's PMS (no, not me .)

smackaholic wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:

smackaholic wrote:for ever

That's actually one dreaded little word.

technically, it could be written as two.

Not if you want it to make any sense... wait, I forgot who I' wa's deal'ing with.

Come on guy's knock it, off.

can a nigga get a civic's quiz up in here.

need something to get my self of steam back.























and yes, I did put that apostrophe there on purpose.

I was really hoping one of them titties was gonna escape her outfit.

smackaholic wrote:I was really hoping one of them titties was gonna escape her outfit.

2nd.

Jerkovich wrote:

I'm surprised Motel 6 allows dogs.