The truth is out there!

[LTS TRN 2]

Nice spread of silly Big Foots pics as well as the (unread) mock interviews, but the raise is still on the table. So far, you've insisted that a pic purportedly from the O' Hare incident was taken at the wrong time of day. you insisted that clouds have fooled thousands of people including highly trained pilots and astronauts. I've provided testimony by those same highly trained U.S. Air Force pilots. You are squirming like little kids needing to pee as you fidget and refuse to examine their testimony.

You lose.

[ML@Coyote]

I wish I could say we were making progress, but he keeps saying the "raise is still on the table." I'm just not sure where we go from here. If only David in Tulsa was around to administer a little rectal shock therapy.

[mvscal]

Nice spread of silly Big Foots pics as well as the (unread) mock interviews, but the raise is still on the table.

OK. I call. What's your take? We are being visited by extraterrestrial beings in space ships? Is that what you're saying here?

[LTS TRN 2]

No, I haven't said I believe we've been visited by UFOs. But I've offered clear and abundant testimony from highly trained U.S. Air Force pilots that they've seen a variety of UFOs. This is called a raise. For you to call means you're prepared to examine and consider their testimony. If you're unwilling--and instead become caw-cawing little brats, posting silly pictures aimed at me instead of the actual witnesses, well this is called folding. And you have all folded. And you know what comes next.

On behalf of Nick Frisco and Carol Condit Enterprises, I claim this easily won hand...



Now really, since you're not prepared to actually discuss anything outside your tiny head space of Hannity gibberish and circle jerk sillies, let's put this thread to bed.

[mvscal]

For you to call means you're prepared to examine and consider their testimony.

If your point is to say that credible people have seen things they don't understand and can't explain, my reply is, "So what?"

[LTS TRN 2]

And they took videos, and those things they saw, being utterly unexplainable, should properly give one some sort of concern, if only curiosity. Instead, cowardly twits like you start insulting and smearing them. What the fuck is wrong with you, you disgusting maggot?

[Left Seater]

No, I haven't said I believe we've been visited by UFOs. But I've offered clear and abundant testimony from highly trained U.S. Air Force pilots that they've seen a variety of UFOs. This is called a raise. For you to call means you're prepared to examine and consider their testimony. If you're unwilling--and instead become caw-cawing little brats, posting silly pictures aimed at me instead of the actual witnesses, well this is called folding. And you have all folded. And you know what comes next.

The only folding done here has been by you. First it was you walking away from your claims that a 757 would immediately crash if flying at high speed close to the ground. Then it was the picture you claimed was taken at 4:40am on a Nov morning at O'Hare.

[Jay in Phoenix]

So, you want to continue to play, raise your empty hand foolishly and continue the downward spiral. So be it.

Nice spread of silly Big Foots pics as well as the (unread) mock interviews, but the raise is still on the table. So far, you've insisted that a pic purportedly from the O' Hare incident was taken at the wrong time of day. you insisted that clouds have fooled thousands of people including highly trained pilots and astronauts. I've provided testimony by those same highly trained U.S. Air Force pilots. You are squirming like little kids needing to pee as you fidget and refuse to examine their testimony.

First bluff, and a bad one. You come right out and call the pic YOU posted as evidence is "purported". That means intended or implied. Not real by indisputable proof. Left Seater has very clearly given you the time of day of the photo and location by evidence of the position of the sun and angle of the photograph from the concourse. Both sets of visual testimony completely dismiss the time and angle you claim. The sky is quite overcast, a gray fog of clouds. The fuzzy flying blob at the center of the pic looks like what it is. A plane. You know, those things that fly around in the sky over airports.

As to clouds. Ever looked up into the sky and noticed how sometimes they resemble other things, from cotton balls to furry bunnies. Sometimes they look like rings and saucers. People who are easily deluded, such as yourself, can see pretty much whatever they want to when they want to. Oddly shaped clouds and lights in the sky are easily taken for UFO's. And there hasn't been a picture taken yet that shows unquestionable, verifiable proof of a flying saucer. And certainly not on that day over O'Hare, where hundreds, if not thousands of people over the course of several minutes had plenty of time and opportunity to click a pic of that so-called giant UFO hovering over the airport.

First hand to me, as my three of a kind of hard reality beats your pair of empty claims.

No, I haven't said I believe we've been visited by UFOs. But I've offered clear and abundant testimony from highly trained U.S. Air Force pilots that they've seen a variety of UFOs. This is called araise. For you to call means you're prepared to examine and consider their testimony. If you're unwilling--and instead become caw-cawing little brats, posting silly pictures aimed at me instead of the actual witnesses, well this is called folding. And you have all folded. And you know what comes next.

On behalf of Nick Frisco and Carol Condit Enterprises, I claim this easily won hand...

On behalf of Nick Crisco and Carol Cuntlips, I say, not so fast Fucktard.

The "testimony" of all of your pilots and astronuts is what we call inconclusive hearsay. He said-they said. No matter what their professional opinions may be, they are just that...opinions. Suppositions. Misperceptions. If you can't tell what it is, make something up, as long as it sounds dramatic. That's how myths and legends form. That's how primitive man looked up at a comet and saw a god. That's how you look up your ass and see the world. The truth is indeed "up there", at least for you.

Second hand to me, as my straight truth beats your pair of nothing.

Now really, since you're not prepared to actually discuss anything outside your tiny head space of Hannity gibberish and circle jerk sillies, let's put this thread to bed.

And they took videos, and those things they saw, being utterly unexplainable, should properly give one some sort of concern, if only curiosity. Instead, cowardly twits like you start insulting and smearing them.

And now we go all-in. All of us have discussed, both logically and humorously your twisted, self-flagellating argument. So your stellar witnesses took videos and photographs. You have yet to show them, or at least, anything that is conclusive. Hyperbole and hearsay are not valid in a courtroom, and so far, you sit in judgement as a fool. Any videos or photos that they took, are completely explainable and are of no concern at all. They are curiously silly. We insult and smear what is painfully bogus and hysterically juvenile.

We have asked you to back up your allegations. You have failed to do so. We have asked you for visual proof. You offer inconclusive and insubstantial phantoms, wisps of nothing. We have asked you for at the very least, for a sustainable or logical bit of evidence. You offer innuendo, rumor and fairy tales as you flail your arms hysterically, spraying spittle like a village idiot.

Final hand to me, as my full house of sanity beats your straight jacket of insanity.