T1B

Martyred wrote:

Cuda wrote:
wait... they pay? How much? USD or Canadian?

Mostly with Best Buy gift cards, but you should see this sweet home theatre I set myself up with.

Schindler's List and Munich in 7 channel surround on a 70 inch LED...Oy! You'll absolutely plotz!

Well don't forget Der Untergang, you'll just love it. They loved it with popcorn at the Bush compound--except for the ending...you know, where Germany loses?

Martyred wrote:Best Buy gift cards,

Best Buy? why those cheap motherf... errrr, I mean... I wonder what the blacvk market exchange rate is these days? I might know someone who might know someone who might know some Venezuelans

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

Left Seater wrote:Still waiting for your response to those questions LTS.

Oh and thanks for the link to a site I have been thru in detail. Once you answer those questions we can go thru yours.

You have no questions, only weaselly evasions. What, you're going on about some staged renenactment of some shell of plane run into a wall?

Clearly reading comp is beyond your abilities. I didn't post anything about an F-4 on a rocket sled fired into a wall.

I asked you directly to explain all the eyewitness accounts and how they are all wrong. Then I asked you to show us one photo of a commercial passenger jet going 400 mph that hit a stone or concrete building and the resulting debris field with large viable pieces.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:We're talking about pyroclastic explosions.

Are you sure you're not getting this confused with priapistic explosions?

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:We're talking about pyroclastic explosions.

Are you sure you're not getting this confused with priapistic explosions?

More likely he is confusing it with prolapsed rectimus...what he suffers from on a daily basis after being plungered here about 40 times a day.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:If he flies, fine. Let's give him some time to examine the 45-minute presentation of the evidence. You too--if you can reach your toes.

45 minute presentation of evidence.....??? Really??...Surely it did not take them that long to reach such a scientific conclusion..

What are you pretending to laugh about, D-ron? Here's the piece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdE1Cwny

Watch it and then you'll have something to comment on.

As for the pyroclastic clouds which were obvious as the towers collapsed, these were caused by nanothermite. Or what? Do you suppose a pyroclastic cloud would be produced by the sheer pressure of the buildings crushing all those office supplies? It was as controlled a demolition as any you've ever seen. And the WTC7 was even more egregious and obvious. How can you possibly accept the official story on that?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:What are you pretending to laugh about, D-ron? Here's the piece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdE1Cwny

Watch it and then you'll have something to comment on.

Bwwhaaa..just like your arguments, the link takes you to a " This video does not exist" page.

Fucking moron.

Derron wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:What are you pretending to laugh about, D-ron? Here's the piece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdE1Cwny

Watch it and then you'll have something to comment on.

Bwwhaaa..just like your arguments, the link takes you to a " This video does not exist" page.

Fucking moron.

My bad, here's the one in question. Check it out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdE1Cwny ... creen&NR=1

88 wrote:My only question is when do we get to the pics of dirigible-sportin' pneumatic bimbos proudly hoisting dead pairs of fish or something of similar ilk?

Ask and ye shall be answered.

88 wrote:Page 4. And it looks like we've once again veered from a thread topic that attempted to paint all GOP'ers as deviant homosexual pedophilic fucks based on the questionable sexual mores of Larry Craig and company to LTSTRN2's inability to comprehend basic physics. My only question is when do we get to the pics of dirigible-sportin' pneumatic bimbos proudly hoisting dead pairs of fish or something of similar ilk? Alec, please save us.

Basic physics? Really? I'm glad you're willing to use the word, let alone consider its meaning. Sure, let's consider the basic physics of a massive modern steel skyscraper (you know, like WTC7?) simply collapsing in a perfect controlled demolition manner because of a fire. Sure, let's talk about a pyroclastic cloud emerging from the collapse of a massive office building. Sure, let's talk about a 757 completely disappearing into a small hole--while not even breaking the windows above. Look, physics are exactly what the war-mongering criminals who created the New Pearl Harbor does not want to discuss.

As for the basic topic, it's not such a stretch. I'm not suggesting that the Demo party isn't rife with Zionazi supporters. But the GOP is the bedrock of the entire movement. And it has become essentially perverse and corrupt. Just look at it--at the actual members and their actions.

So..you're cool with the collapse of WTC 7? Can you actually dare to open your eyes?

Fergit yer memories of twat on yer nose...

This is the GOP today...




What...?...did you think you were....oh..

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Sure, let's talk about a pyroclastic cloud emerging from the collapse of a massive office building.

That is your best theory yet. Please tell us how Bush pulled that off? Did he have a volcano relocated below the WTC complex? Or did he have his cronies in the drilling industry drill a vent channel from Hawaii to the WTC complex?

L-seater, try to get this on one bounce....a pyroclastic cloud is ALSO caused by the extreme heat of nanothermite. Okay? Now, how did they plant it? It wasn't so difficult. And the guy who had just purchased the whole WTC complex subsequently went for a double indemnity settlement on the insurance. Talk about chutzpah!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7 ... watch-vrec

Willers, the whole idea is that Barney Frank is out and proud. Get it? There's nothing immoral about his behavior. The closeted GOPers, however, live a lie--and vote against same-sex marriage, etc. And the pic is not random, but from a very weird comedy called "Happiness."

But, the real cancer is in the fact of 9/11 being a total inside job.

Just catching up with this thread, and...

Wow


First, as soon as I saw "pyroclastic," I laughed like a mofo.

No, really LTS -- "pyroclastic" deals with volcanoes, and the vast majority of it doesn't go airborn, it flows along the ground.


Second, you've obviously never seen thermite ignited (and yes, I have). It doesn't explode, dumbass. It burns, much along the lines of a very very hot match-head. It isn't capable of sending "pyroclastic" (still laughing) flows into the air. All it does is melt stuff (it can melt concrete, but you'd need a whole fucking shitload of it).


But it's cool that secret agents moved a whole volcano under the WTC without anyone noticing -- about as likely as tearing down a bunch of sheetrock, repairing it, and repainting it without anyone noticing.

And someone bought a billion-dollar property, and they took out insurance on it? WHOA, that's hard to fathom, right there... I'm sold.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:L-seater, try to get this on one bounce....a pyroclastic cloud is ALSO caused by the extreme heat of nanothermite.

Wait the extreme heat of nanothermite caused a pyroclastic cloud.


Deep breath



Keep the laffs coming. Have you ever even taken one physics class? Did you skip all of second grade? Here is a fill in the blank for you.

Warm air _________, cold air sinks.

That's right warm air will rise. So if you are claiming that the extreme heat of nanothermite was used to bring down the WTC buildings, then we should have seen air flowing towards the buildings. As the superheated air would be rapidly climbing into the atmosphere, it would need to be replaced at the site of the heat source. There were zero reports of air moving towards the WTC.

Look at a nuclear explosion. You will see the blast wave radiate out from the center of the blast and then you will see debris being sucked back towards the center of the explosion due to the superheated air climbing into the atmosphere.

Nope, your "pyroclastic" cloud at WTC more resembles super cooled air much like the reaction of dry ice in sublimation.



Hey, but keep bringing the funnay.

What's with all the laughing icons? Are you kidding? Of course a thermite fire creates the pyroclastic flow--as seen and felt as the towers collapsed.
Multiple explosions were reported by all sorts of firefighters, police and pedestrians--occurring on the bottom floors well before the collapse. And ideas?

Here's some basic info on thermite as well as eyewitnesses at 9/11 and so forth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7 ... watch-vrec

And here's a quick refresher since you can't seem to wrap your addled noodle around the basic facts of the whole crime.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q


Any ideas on all those hundreds of cameras at the pentagon being confiscated and sealed?

Umm, to keep US military secrets from getting out?

It is the Pentagon, you know.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:What's with all the laughing icons? Are you kidding? Of course a thermite fire creates the pyroclastic flow--as seen and felt as the towers collapsed:

So you are saying the super heated temps caused by the nano thermite caused volcanic activity where there previously wasn't any.

Got it. This is your craziest theory yet.

No, L-seater, you seem to have a curious problem with this. Look, there was no volcano at the WTC. There was, however, apparently a tremendous amount of thermite ignited--due to the very obvious huge pyroclastic flows from each of the controlled demolitions. Okay? You see, without the huge amounts of thermite burning, there would have been no pyroclastic flow. For that matter, without the precisely placed crippling blasts throughout the structures, they of course would not have collapsed at all. Or what, do you suppose it's in any way natural for a colossal steel-framed building to drop in perfect controlled demolition fashion for any reason? The suggestion that a fire from falling debris caused the WTC 7 building to simply drop like a malleted steer should outrage even the most conservative supporter of the official story. What's your excuse?

LTS TRN 2 wrote: there was no volcano at the WTC. There was...huge pyroclastic flows

LTS TRN 2 wrote: You see, without the huge amounts of thermite burning, there would have been no pyroclastic flows.

You can't go one paragraph without completely contradicting your own arguement.

How bored must one be to continue arguing with absolute lunacy? :?

Bored is the keyword. But you have to do something to pass the time in the hotel room.

mvscal wrote:"Profit!" said I, "thing of evil!--profit still, if white devil!--
Whether Tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate, yet all undaunted, in this Arrowhead venue enchanted--
On this home by Horror haunted--tell me truly, I implore--
Is there--is there balm in Kansas City?--tell me--tell me, for my arse is sore!"
Quothe the coat of puff, "I know you are, foul wretch!! But what....am I?!?"
And nothing more

Left Seater wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: there was no volcano at the WTC. There was...huge pyroclastic flows

LTS TRN 2 wrote: You see, without the huge amounts of thermite burning, there would have been no pyroclastic flows.

You can't go one paragraph without completely contradicting your own arguement.

Are you totally drunk--or just desperately dodging (while pretending to laugh sarcastically)?

There's no contradiction. There was no volcano. There was thermite and the usual ensuing pyroclastic flow. What are you trying to confuse in the first place?

C'mon, you little fraud, come out from under your bed. Answer if can why a 47-storey modern steel-frame skyscraper would collapse in perfect controlled demolition fashion because of "fires from falling debris."

You're only entertaining when you try and roll out "physics" and so forth. And then you can entertain us with your aeronautical expertise and answer the claims of the dozens of professional pilots who call total bullshit on the official 9/11 (coverup) story.